Corticotropin releasing factor-1 receptor antagonist, CP-154,526, blocks the expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization in DBA/2J mice.

RATIONALE: Manipulation of glucocorticoid receptor signaling has been shown to alter the acquisition and expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in mice. It is unknown if other components of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis modulate locomotor sensitization resulting from repeated ethanol administration. In the present investigation, we determined if pretreatment with an i.p. injection of CP-154,526, a selective corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) type-1 receptor antagonist, would block the acquisition and/or expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in male DBA/2J mice. METHODS: To assess the role of the CRF1 receptor in the acquisition of behavioral sensitization, mice were pretreated with an i.p. injection of CP-154,526 30 min before each of 10 sensitizing i.p. injections of ethanol. To determine the role of the CRF1 receptor in modulating the expression of ethanol-induced sensitization, mice that had previously been sensitized to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol were pretreated with CP-154,526 30 min before an i.p. injection of ethanol on the test day. In a third study, ethanol-naïve mice were pretreated with CP-154,526 30 min before an initial i.p. injection of ethanol to determine the combined effects of the CRF1 receptor antagonist and ethanol on locomotor activity. Blood ethanol concentrations were assessed at the termination of sensitization studies. RESULTS: Pretreatment with CP-154,526 blocked the expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in DBA/2J mice but did not prevent the acquisition of sensitization. The ability of CP-154,526 to block the expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization was not attributable to alterations in blood ethanol levels or possible sedative effects produced by the combined administration of CP-154,526 and ethanol. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide novel evidence that CRF1 receptor signaling modulates the expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization, and add to a growing literature suggesting a role for neurochemicals and hormones associated with the HPA-axis in behavioral sensitization resulting from repeated exposure to drugs of abuse.

Involvement of protein kinase A in ethanol-induced locomotor activity and sensitization.

RATIONALE: Mutant mice lacking the RIIbeta subunit of protein kinase A (regulatory subunit II beta(-/-)) show increased ethanol preference. Recent evidence suggests a relationship between heightened ethanol preference and susceptibility to ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization. It is currently unknown if protein kinase A signaling modulates the stimulant effects and/or behavioral sensitization caused by ethanol administration. To address this question, we examined the effects of repeated ethanol administration on locomotor activity RIIbeta(-/-) and littermate wild-type (RIIbeta(+/+)) mice on multiple genetic backgrounds. METHODS: Over three consecutive days, mice were given single i.p. saline injections and immediately placed in a locomotor activity apparatus to establish a composite baseline for locomotor activity. Next, mice maintained on a hybrid 129/SvEvxC57BL/6J or pure C57BL/6J genetic background were given 10 i.p. ethanol injections before being placed in the activity apparatus. Each ethanol injection was separated by 3-4 days. To determine if changes in behavior were specific to ethanol injection, naïve mice were tested following repeated daily saline injections. The effects of ethanol injection on locomotor behavior were also assessed using an alternate paradigm in which mice were given repeated ethanol injections in their home cage environment. RESULTS: Relative to RIIbeta(+/+) mice, RIIbeta(-/-) mice, regardless of genetic background, consistently showed significantly greater ethanol-induced locomotor activation. RIIbeta(-/-) mice also showed increased sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization resulting from repeated administration, an effect that was dependent on genetic background and testing paradigm. Increased locomotor activity by RIIbeta(-/-) mice was specific to ethanol injections, and was not related to altered blood ethanol levels. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide novel evidence implicating an influence of protein kinase A signaling on ethanol-induced locomotor activity and behavioral sensitization. The observation that RIIbeta(-/-) mice are more sensitive to the effects of repeated ethanol administration suggests that normal protein kinase A signaling limits, or is protective against, the stimulant effects of ethanol and the plastic alterations that underlie behavioral sensitization.

Sex differences in (-)-pentazocine antinociception: comparison to morphine and spiradoline in four rat strains using a thermal nociceptive assay.

The present study examined the influence of sex on the antinociceptive effects of (-)-pentazocine, morphine and spiradoline in four rat strains, using a warm-water (50, 52 and 55 degrees C) tail-withdrawal procedure. In F344, Lewis, Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Wistar rats, baseline latencies decreased with increases in water temperature, and at each water temperature latencies were longer in males than in their female counterparts. Morphine and spiradoline produced maximal or near maximal antinociceptive effects in males and females of each strain. Whereas morphine was generally more potent in males, sex differences were not consistently observed with spiradoline. In contrast, there were marked sex differences with (-)-pentazocine, and in each strain (-)-pentazocine was more potent and produced a greater maximal effect in males. The magnitude of the sex differences varied markedly across strains, with (-)-pentazocine being 2.5-fold more potent in males of the F344 strain, but 11-fold more potent in males of the Wistar strain. When collapsed across nociceptive stimulus intensities, sex differences were largest in the Wistar and Lewis strains and smallest in the SD and F344 strains. The present findings indicate that there are marked sex differences in (-)-pentazocine antinociception, and that the magnitude of this effect is genotype dependent.

Importance of sex and relative efficacy at the mu opioid receptor in the development of tolerance and cross-tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of opioids.

RATIONALE: Recent studies indicate that mu opioids are generally more potent and effective as antinociceptive agents in male than female rodents. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of sex on the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine and cross-tolerance to the lower efficacy mu opioids buprenorphine and dezocine in F344 and Lewis rats. METHODS: Using a warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure, the antinociceptive effects of morphine, buprenorphine and dezocine were determined before and during chronic morphine (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg, b.i.d., for 7 and 14 days) administration. RESULTS: Under acute conditions, morphine was more potent in males and during chronic morphine administration tolerance development was generally greater in males. As males were more sensitive to the acute effects of morphine, the functional chronic morphine dose (i.e., chronic morphine dose/acute morphine ED50) administered to males was larger than in females. Analyses of the relationship between the functional chronic morphine dose and tolerance indicated that morphine tolerance development was comparable in males and females. Under acute conditions, buprenorphine and dezocine were more potent and effective in males. During chronic morphine administration, cross-tolerance was conferred to these opioids as evidenced by rightward, and in some cases downward, shifts in their dose-effect curves. Decreases in the maximal effects produced by buprenorphine and dezocine were more frequently observed in females. CONCLUSIONS: That comparable levels of morphine tolerance were obtained in males and females when the functional chronic morphine dose was taken into consideration suggests that the mechanism underlying tolerance is not sex-dependent. Sex differences in the effectiveness of buprenorphine and dezocine when administered acutely and during chronic morphine administration further suggest that these opioids have lower efficacy at the mu opioid receptor in females.

Cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects and [3H]dopamine uptake inhibition produced by selected partial opioid agonists.

Partial opioid agonists can produce their actions at opioid as well as some non-opioid sites. Although the receptor systems underlying these non-opioid effects are not completely clear, recent studies indicate the possible involvement of activity at the dopamine uptake site. One purpose of the present investigation was to examine the ability of selected partial opioid agonists (dezocine, meperidine and [+]-propoxyphene) with non-opioid actions to produce cocaine-like stimulus effects. Because non-opioid effects can be apparent under conditions in which opioid-mediated effects are blocked or at doses that markedly decrease responding, these opioids were also examined in combination with the opioid antagonist naltrexone. A second purpose was to determine the ability of these opioids to inhibit [3H]dopamine uptake in rat caudate putamen. Cocaine and the direct-acting dopamine agonist (-)-quinpirole, but not (+)-propoxyphene, butorphanol, morphine, U50,488 and pentobarbital, substituted completely for the cocaine stimulus. Dezocine substituted for the cocaine stimulus in the majority of the rats tested only when administered in combination with naltrexone. Meperidine also substituted for the cocaine stimulus in the majority of the rats tested, although this pattern of substitution was not consistently altered by naltrexone. Dezocine and meperidine inhibited [3H]dopamine uptake in a manner consistent with that produced by cocaine. The results suggest that dezocine and meperidine can produce cocaine-like stimulus effects and that these effects are likely mediated by activity at the dopamine uptake site.

Three-choice discrimination in pigeons is based on relative efficacy differences among opioids.

RATIONALE: Drug discrimination assays can provide important information on receptor selectivity and relative efficacy to guide the classification and characterization of opioid agonists. OBJECTIVES: A three-choice discrimination was established among high efficacy opioid agonist morphine, low efficacy opioid agonist nalbuphine, and saline to examine the conditions under which differences in relative efficacy might serve as a basis for stimulus control. METHODS: Seven White Carneau pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5.6 mg/kg nalbuphine, 3.2 mg/kg morphine, and saline under fixed ratio 30 (FR30) schedules of food reinforcement. Substitution and antagonism experiments were then conducted with mu, kappa, and delta opioids and naltrexone, respectively and the percent responding appropriate to the training stimuli was determined. RESULTS: Low, intermediate, and high doses of morphine produced > or = 80% saline-, > or = 60% nalbuphine-, and > or = 96% morphine-appropriate responding, respectively. Low and high doses of nalbuphine produced > or = 80% saline- and nalbuphine-appropriate responding, respectively. In substitution tests, low doses of fentanyl and etorphine produced partial nalbuphine-appropriate responding (20-60%) and high doses produced > or = 60-80% morphine-appropriate responding. Intermediate doses of buprenorphine and dezocine produced > or = 60-80% nalbuphine-appropriate responding and high doses produced > or = 80% morphine-appropriate responding. The lower efficacy agonists butorphanol, nalorphine, and levallorphan produced > or = 40-80% nalbuphine-appropriate responding. The kappa agonists spiradoline and U50,488 produced approximately > or = 50% nalbuphine-appropriate responding whereas d-amphetamine, saline, and delta agonists BW373U86 and SNC 80 produced > or = 80% saline-appropriate responding. Naltrexone produced > or = 80% saline-appropriate responding and reversed the stimulus effects of morphine and nalbuphine. CONCLUSIONS: The discrimination between morphine and nalbuphine in pigeons is predominantly based on the relative efficacy differences between morphine, a higher-efficacy mu agonist and nalbuphine, a lower-efficacy mu agonist.

Modulatory effects of dopamine D3/2 agonists on kappa opioid-induced antinociception and diuresis in the rat.

RATIONALE: The dopamine (DA) D3/2 agonist 7-OH-DPAT has been shown to attenuate the behavioral effects of the mu agonist morphine as well as the development of morphine tolerance. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of DA D3/2 agonists [7-OH-DPAT, (+)-PD128,907, quinelorane, (-)-quinpirole], a D1 agonist (SKF38393), a D1 antagonist [(+)-SCH23390], a DA antagonist (spiperone), and an indirect DA agonist (cocaine) on the antinociceptive effects of kappa agonists (spiradoline, U69,593, bremazocine) as well as the effects of D3/2 agonists on the diuretic effects of spiradoline. METHODS: Antinociception was determined using a warm water (50-55 degrees C) tail-withdrawal procedure and urine output was collected over a 2-h interval. RESULTS: The antinociceptive effects produced by the kappa agonists varied with the intensity of the nociceptive stimulus (water), as maximal or near maximal effects were obtained with spiradoline at 55 degrees C, U69,593 at 52 degrees C, and bremazocine at 50 degrees C water. 7-OH-DPAT produced a dose-dependent attenuation of the antinociceptive effects of spiradoline, U69,593, and bremazocine. Spiperone completely reversed the effects of 7-OH-DPAT on spiradoline antinociception. (+)-PD128,907 and quinelorane, but not (-)-quinpirole or the other DAergic agents examined, attenuated the antinociceptive effects of spiradoline in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The diuretic effects of spiradoline were attenuated by 7-OH-DPAT, (+)-PD128,907, quinelorane, and (-)-quinpirole, and this attenuation was reversed by spiperone. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that some D3/2 agonists can modulate both the antinociceptive and diuretic effects of kappa agonists. These modulatory actions are similar to those obtained against the effects of mu agonists.

The dopamine D3/2 agonist 7-OH-DPAT attenuates the development of morphine tolerance but not physical dependence in rats.

RATIONALE: The dopamine (DA) D3/2 agonist 7-OH-DPAT attenuates the acute antinociceptive, discriminative stimulus, locomotor activating, and reinforcing effects of mu agonists (for example, morphine). OBJECTIVES: To examine the ability of 7-OH-DPAT to modulate the development of morphine tolerance and physical dependence in the rat. METHODS: Morphine antinociception was assessed using a warm water tail-withdrawal procedure before and following chronic treatment with morphine (15 mg/kg)/7-OH-DPAT (0.3-3.0 mg/kg). Physical dependence was assessed following naloxone-precipitated (1.0 mg/kg) withdrawal in rats treated chronically with morphine (15 and 7.5 mg/kg)/7-OH-DPAT (1.0-10 mg/kg). RESULTS: 7-OH-DPAT attenuated the antinociceptive effects of morphine in both morphine naive and tolerant rats. Additionally, morphine tolerance was attenuated by the coadministration of 7-OH-DPAT in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The magnitude of the attenuation obtained when morphine and 7-OH-DPAT were administered at the same time was similar to that obtained when administration of these drugs was separated by 6 h, indicating that 7-OH-DPAT did not alter morphine pharmacokinetics. In rats rendered tolerant to morphine, the subsequent coadministration of morphine/7-OH-DPAT failed to reverse morphine tolerance, but did attenuate its further development. The level of physical dependence (number and frequency of withdrawal signs) was greater in rats treated with 15 than 7.5 mg/kg morphine. Under both treatment conditions, physical dependence was not altered by 7-OH-DPAT. In morphine-dependent (15 mg/kg) rats, 7-OH-DPAT (3.0 and 10 mg/kg) failed to precipitate withdrawal. CONCLUSION: The D3/2 agonist 7-OH-DPAT can attenuate the antinociceptive effects of morphine in both acute and chronic preparations as well as the development of morphine tolerance. 7-OH-DPAT does not, however, alter morphine physical dependence.

Sex-related differences in the antinociceptive effects of opioids: importance of rat genotype, nociceptive stimulus intensity, and efficacy at the mu opioid receptor.

RATIONALE: Recent studies indicate that morphine is more potent as an antinociceptive agent in male than female rodents and monkeys. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of sex, nociceptive stimulus intensity and an opioid's relative efficacy on opioid-induced antinociception in rat strains (F344 and Lewis) that display differential sensitivity to morphine antinociception. METHODS: Antinociceptive testing was conducted using a rat warm-water (50-56 degrees C) tail-withdrawal procedure. Dose-response and time-course determinations were performed with various opioids. RESULTS: Across the nociceptive stimulus intensities tested, the high-efficacy mu opioids morphine, etorphine, and levorphanol were equally effective in males and females, but on average 2.5-fold more potent in males. At moderate stimulus intensities, the low-efficacy mu opioid buprenorphine was approximately 0.4-fold more potent in males, and at higher stimulus intensities more potent and effective (greater maximal effect) in males. At low stimulus intensities, the low-efficacy mu opioid dezocine and the mu/kappa opioid butorphanol were greater than 8.9-fold more potent in males, and at moderate stimulus intensities were more potent and effective in males. At a low stimulus intensity, the mu/kappa opioid nalbuphine was more potent and effective in males. At stimulus intensities in which buprenorphine, dezocine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine produced maximal effects in males but not females, these opioids antagonized the effects of morphine in females. Genotype-related differences were noted as opioids were generally more potent in F344 than Lewis males, whereas no consistent differences were observed between F344 and Lewis females. CONCLUSIONS: That sex differences in the potency and effectiveness of opioids increased with decreases in the opioid's relative efficacy and with increases in the nociceptive stimulus intensity suggests that the relative efficacy of mu opioids as antinociceptive agents is greater in male than female rats.

Discriminative stimulus effects of nalbuphine in nontreated and morphine-treated pigeons.

In the present study, the stimulus effects of the low efficacy agonist nalbuphine were examined under two conditions: nontreated and morphine treated. In the first experiment, five pigeons were trained to discriminate among 3.2 mg/kg morphine, 5.6 mg/kg nalbuphine, and saline. Nalbuphine produced nalbuphine-like responding. Low doses of morphine produced nalbuphine-like responding, whereas high doses produced morphine-like responding. Naltrexone produced saline-like responding and reversed the stimulus effects produced by the training doses of morphine and nalbuphine. Five different pigeons were treated daily with 10 mg/kg morphine (i.m.) and trained 6 h later to discriminate among 10 mg/kg morphine, 1.0 mg/kg nalbuphine and saline. In these pigeons, morphine produced morphine-like responding and nalbuphine produced nalbuphine-like responding. Morphine abstinence produced nalbuphine-like responding that was reversed by morphine. Additionally, naltrexone produced nalbuphine-like responding. These data suggest that the discrimination between morphine and nalbuphine in the nontreated and morphine-treated pigeons may be based on the relative efficacy differences between morphine, a higher efficacy mu-agonist, and nalbuphine a lower efficacy mu-agonist.

Effects of neuropeptide Y on the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive properties of morphine.

Previous research indicates that opioid receptor blockade diminishes the effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on feeding and memory. Conversely, NPY attenuates naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal. The present study evaluated the effects of NPY on the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive effects produced by the prototypical mu opioid, morphine. Rats were trained to discriminate 5.6 mg/kg morphine (IP) from saline using a standard two-lever, food-reinforced, drug discrimination procedure. Across a range of doses (3.0, 5.0, and 10 microg), intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of NPY failed to substitute for, antagonize, or potentiate the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. A warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure was used to examine the antinociceptive effects of morphine and NPY, alone and in combination. NPY (3.0 and 10 microg, ICV) failed to alter tail-withdrawal latencies from 52 degrees and 56 degrees C water, whereas morphine (1.0-30 mg/kg, IP) produced a dose-related increase in latencies at both water temperatures. A 10-microg dose of NPY also failed to alter the antinociceptive effects of morphine. This study does not support the idea that the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive effects of morphine are dependent on an NPYergic pathway.

Selective attenuation of the antinociceptive effects of mu opioids by the putative dopamine D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT.

RATIONALE: The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the effects of the D3 agonist (+/-)-7-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT), various dopamine (DA) agonists and DA antagonists on the antinociceptive effects of mu opioids. METHODS: Antinociception was assessed using a warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure in rats. RESULTS: The mu opioids morphine (0.3-10 mg/kg) and dezocine (0.03-3.0 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent increases in antinociception with maximal effects obtained at the higher doses tested. Pretreatment with the putative D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT (1.0-10 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent attenuation of the antinociceptive effects of morphine and dezocine. At the highest dose of 7-OH-DPAT tested, the morphine dose-effect curve was shifted rightward by approximately 1.5 log units and the dezocine curve by greater than 2.3 log units. The (+)-isomer of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg) also shifted the morphine dose-effect curve to the right in a dose-dependent manner. The DA D3/D2 agonist (-)-quinpirole (0.1-10mg/kg) attenuated the effects of morphine, but these effects were small in magnitude, not dose-dependent and observed only under a limited set of conditions. The DA D2/D3 antagonist spiperone failed to alter the morphine dose-effect curve, but reversed the effects of 7-OH-DPAT on morphine antinociception. Pretreatment with the DA D1 agonist (+/-)-SKF38393 (1.0 and 10 mg/kg) and the D1 antagonist (+)-SCH23390 (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg) failed to alter the morphine dose-effect curve. CONCLUSION: The finding that 7-OH-DPAT markedly attenuated the effects of morphine and that these effects were reversed with spiperone suggests that activity at the D3, and possibly the D2, receptor can modulate mu agonist-induced antinociception.

Antinociceptive effects of opioids following acute and chronic administration of butorphanol: influence of stimulus intensity and relative efficacy at the mu receptor.

RATIONALE: A common treatment strategy for the management of severe pain involves the co-administration of multiple opioid analgesics. Due to the increasing popularity of this practice, it is becoming increasingly important to understand the interactions between clinically employed opioids under a wide range of conditions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the effects of opioid combinations following acute and chronic administration of the low-efficacy mu-opioid butorphanol, and to determine if the effects of these combinations are modulated by the intensity of the nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: In a warm-water, tail-withdrawal procedure, rats were restrained and the latencies to remove their tails from 50 degrees C (low temperature) and 55 degrees C (high temperature) water were measured following both acute and chronic administration of butorphanol. Opioids possessing both high (etorphine, levorphanol, morphine) and low [dezocine, (-)-pentazocine, nalbuphine] relative efficacy at the mu receptor were examined. RESULTS: Under acute conditions, etorphine, levorphanol, morphine and dezocine increased tail-withdrawal latencies at both low and high temperatures, whereas (-)-pentazocine, nalbuphine and butorphanol increased latencies only at the low temperature. A dose of 30 mg/kg butorphanol increased the effects produced by these opioids at the low temperature, but antagonized the effects of etorphine, levorphanol, morphine and dezocine at the high temperature. During chronic treatment with 30 mg/kg per day butorphanol, tolerance was conferred to the antinociceptive effects of all the opioids examined, with greater degrees of tolerance conferred to those opioids possessing low efficacy at the mu receptor. During butorphanol treatment, etorphine, levorphanol and morphine increased tail-withdrawal latencies at both water temperatures, dezocine increased latencies at only the low temperature, and (-)-pentazocine, nalbuphine and butorphanol failed to increase latencies at either temperature. A dose of 30 mg/kg butorphanol antagonized the antinociceptive effects of etorphine, levorphanol, morphine and dezocine during chronic treatment, and these effects were observed at both water temperatures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the interactions between butorphanol and other mu opioids vary quantitatively between low and high stimulus intensities, and between acute and chronic conditions. In most instances, however, these interactions can be predicted from the effects of the drugs when administered alone.

Naltrexone and beta-funaltrexamine antagonism of the antinociceptive and response rate-decreasing effects of morphine, dezocine, and d-propoxyphene.

RATIONALE: Patterns of competitive and insurmountable antagonism provide important data to guide the classification and characterization of different types of opioid agonists as well as infer the mechanism of action for agonists. OBJECTIVE: Experiments with the competitive antagonist, naltrexone, and the insurmountable antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA), were conducted to determine whether the antinociceptive and rate-decreasing effects of the opioid agonists dezocine and d-propoxyphene are 1) mediated through muu opioid receptors in rats, and 2) differ from morphine with respect to relative efficacy. METHODS: The rat tail-withdrawal assay was used to measure antinociception and a fixed ratio 20 (FR20) schedule of food delivery was used to measure rate suppression. RESULTS: Naltrexone (0.01-1.0 mg/kg) was approximately equipotent as an antagonist of the antinociceptive and rate-decreasing effects of both morphine and dezocine and as an antagonist of the antinociceptive effects of d-propoxyphene. Naltrexone failed to block the rate-decreasing effects of d-propoxyphene. beta-FNA (5 and 10 mg/kg) also antagonized the antinociceptive and rate-decreasing effects of morphine and dezocine as well as the antinociceptive effects of d-propoxyphene. beta-FNA failed to produce a dose-dependent antagonism of the rate-decreasing effects of d-propoxyphene. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the antinociceptive effects of morphine, dezocine, and d-propoxyphene and the rate-decreasing effects of morphine and dezocine are mediated through mu opioid receptors. Overall, high doses of beta-FNA produced a greater degree of antagonism of the behavioral effects of dezocine than morphine or d-propoxyphene, confirming other reports that dezocine is a lower efficacy agonist than morphine. Additionally, the degree of antagonism produced by beta-FNA was greater for the antinociceptive effects of all three compounds than for the rate-decreasing effects.

Sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive effects of mu opioids: role of strain of rat, stimulus intensity, and intrinsic efficacy at the mu opioid receptor.

Effects of low (butorphanol, nalbuphine)-, intermediate (buprenorphine)-, and high (morphine, levorphanol)-efficacy mu opioids were examined in F344, Sprague-Dawley (SD), Long-Evans (LE), and Lewis rats using a tail withdrawal and a drug discrimination procedure. In the tail withdrawal procedure using low (50 degrees C), intermediate (52 degrees C), and high (56 degrees C) water temperatures, morphine and levorphanol produced maximal effects in each of the strains and were most potent in F344 and least potent in Lewis. Similar differences across strains were obtained with buprenorphine, and at the high intensity, maximal effects were not obtained in Lewis. At the low intensity, butorphanol produced maximal effects in F344 and SD at relatively low doses, half-maximal effects in LE at very high doses, and no effect in Lewis. Nalbuphine produced near maximal effects in F344 and SD when tested with the low intensity and no effect in the LE and Lewis. Similar results were obtained at the intermediate intensity for these opioids, although the absolute level of antinociception was lower. These results indicate that there are profound differences to the antinociceptive effects of mu opioids across rat strains. The magnitude of these differences increased with higher stimulus intensities and when tested with lower efficacy opioids. In rats trained to discriminate morphine (3.0 or 5.6 mg/kg) from water, there were no consistent differences across rat strains to the effects of these mu opioids. Possible reasons for differences between the results obtained in the tail withdrawal and drug discrimination procedures are discussed.

An examination of the interactions between the antinociceptive effects of morphine and various mu-opioids: the role of intrinsic efficacy and stimulus intensity.

UNLABELLED: We examined the effects of several opioids that vary in intrinsic efficacy at the mu-opioid receptor alone and in combination with morphine in a rat warm water tail withdrawal procedure using 50 degrees C and 52 degrees C water (i.e., low- and high-stimulus intensities). Morphine, levorphanol, dezocine, and buprenorphine produced dose-dependent increases in antinociception using both stimulus intensities. Butorphanol produced maximal levels of antinociception at the low, but not at the high, stimulus intensity, whereas nalbuphine failed to produce antinociception at either stimulus intensity. For cases in which butorphanol and nalbuphine failed to produce antinociception alone, these opioids dose-dependently antagonized the effects of morphine. When levorphanol, dezocine, and buprenorphine were combined with morphine, there was a dose-dependent enhancement of morphine's effects. Similar effects were obtained at the low-stimulus intensity when butorphanol was administered with morphine. In most cases, the effects of these combinations could be predicted by summating the effects of the drugs when administered alone. These results indicate that the level of antinociception produced by an opioid is dependent on the intrinsic efficacy of the drug and the stimulus intensity. Furthermore, the level of antinociception produced by the opioid, not necessarily the opioids' intrinsic efficacy, determines the type of interaction among opioids. IMPLICATIONS: Compared with high-efficacy opioids, lower efficacy opioids produce lower levels of pain relief, especially in situations of moderate to severe pain. When opioids are given in combination, the effects can only be predicted on the basis of the antinociception obtained when the drugs are administered alone.

The mu opioid irreversible antagonist beta-funaltrexamine differentiates the discriminative stimulus effects of opioids with high and low efficacy at the mu opioid receptor.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the relative intrinsic efficacy of various opioids using the irreversible mu opioid antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (betaFNA). To this end, pigeons were trained to discriminate 3.0 (n=6) or 1.8 (n=1) mg/kg morphine from distilled water in a two-key, food-reinforced, drug discrimination procedure. The mu opioids fentanyl, l-methadone, buprenorphine, butorphanol, nalorphine, nalbuphine and levallorphan, as well as the delta opioid BW373U86, substituted completely for the morphine stimulus. The stimulus effects of morphine were antagonized (i.e., produced a significant increase in the ED50 value) by a 10 mg/kg but not a 5 mg/kg dose of betaFNA. Antagonist effects of betaFNA were observed following a 2-h pretreatment, but not following 26-, 50-, 74-, 98- or 146-h pretreatments. The stimulus effects produced by fentanyl, l-methadone and buprenorphine were not antagonized by doses of betaFNA as high as 20, 10 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. The lowest dose of betaFNA required to antagonize the stimulus effects of butorphanol was 10 mg/kg, whereas the effects of nalorphine, nalbuphine and levallorphan were antagonized by a dose of betaFNA as low as 5 mg/kg. The delta BW373U86 substituted for the morphine stimulus, and this effect was not antagonized by 10 mg/kg betaFNA. The pkB values for naloxone (1.0 mg/kg) against the stimulus effects of fentanyl (6.70) and morphine (6.52) were considerably higher than that for BW373U86 (4.60), indicating further that the morphine-like stimulus effects produced by BW373U86 were not mediated by activity at the mu opioid receptor. These findings indicate that the strategy of irreversible antagonism can be used effectively to differentiate opioids with varying degrees of intrinsic efficacy at the mu opioid receptor in a pigeon drug discrimination procedure. In particular, the ranking of these drugs by relative intrinsic efficacy at the mu opioid receptor is: l-methadone=fentanyl> or =buprenorphine> or =morphine> or =butorphanol>nalorphine=nalbuphine=levallorphan. Additionally, the short-acting effect of betaFNA in the pigeon suggests that the recovery of mu opioid receptor function varies across species.

Tolerance and cross-tolerance to the rate-suppressing effects of opioids in butorphanol-treated rats: influence of maintenance dose and relative efficacy at the mu receptor.

The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the development of tolerance to the rate-suppressing effects of mu and kappa opioids in rats administered either 3.0 (low) or 30 (high) mg/kg per day of butorphanol, an opioid with low relative efficacy at the mu receptor. The mu opioids butorphanol, buprenorphine, morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil, and the kappa opioid U50,488 dose-dependently suppressed responding under all conditions examined. In rats administered the low maintenance dose of butorphanol, tolerance developed to the effects of butorphanol, buprenorphine and morphine, but not to fentanyl and sufentanil. In rats administered the high maintenance dose, tolerance developed to all of the mu opioids examined. In both treatment groups, the degree to which tolerance developed was greater for butorphanol and buprenorphine than for morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil; and the degree to which tolerance developed to these mu opioids was greater in rats administered the high maintenance dose of butorphanol. The tolerance that developed to morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil was not altered when tested at both 23 and 47 h following the previous maintenance dose of butorphanol, suggesting that these changes were not due to any acute pharmacological interactions between butorphanol and the test compound (i.e., antagonism). Tolerance was also conferred to the kappa opioid U50,488 in both groups of rats, and in rats administered the high maintenance dose, this effect was obtained when tested 23 and 47 h following the previous maintenance dose of butorphanol. Physical dependence developed in rats administered the high maintenance dose of butorphanol, as evidenced by the development of enhanced sensitivity to the rate-suppressing effects of naloxone, and the finding that 30 mg/kg naloxone decreased body weight in a time-dependent manner. No physical dependence was apparent in rats administered the low maintenance dose of butorphanol. These data suggest that during chronic treatment with butorphanol, (1) greater degrees of tolerance are conferred to drugs possessing low efficacy at the mu opioid receptor, (2) tolerance is enhanced as the maintenance dose of the toleragen is increased, and (3) mu-opioid tolerance may be observed under conditions that do not produce mu-opioid dependence.

Drug discrimination history: pigeons trained to discriminate opioids with activity at different receptor types.

In pigeons (Columba livia; N = 5) trained to discriminate the mu (mu) opioid butorphanol from saline, various mu (morphine, fentanyl) but not kappa (kappa; bremazocine, U50,488, U69,593) opioids produced at least 80% drug-appropriate responding. Subsequently, pigeons were retrained to discriminate the kappa opioid bremazocine from saline; in this condition, both mu and kappa opioids produced at least 80% drug-appropriate responding, naloxone was more potent as an antagonist of the butorphanol stimulus, and chronic bremazocine treatment selectively produced tolerance to the bremazocine stimulus. Although butorphanol can function as a kappa antagonist, the effects produced by combinations of butorphanol and bremazocine during training with bremazocine were generally effect-additive. The findings indicate that the mechanisms underlying the stimulus effects of mu opioids are not altered by subsequent training with a kappa opioid. Conversely, a history of discrimination training with a mu opioid does not alter the discriminative control produced by kappa opioids during subsequent training with a kappa opioid.

Dopaminergic activity and the discriminative stimulus effects of mu opioids in pigeons: importance of training dose and attenuation by the D3 agonist (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT.

The present investigation examined the effects of several dopaminergic compounds in pigeons trained to discriminate either a 0.1 (low) or 5.6 (high) mg/kg dose of the mu opioid butorphanol from saline. Various dopamine (DA) re-uptake inhibitors, releasers, a D1 agonist, a D2 agonist and a D3 agonist engendered partial substitution (50-79% butorphanol responding) for the butorphanol stimulus in the low-dose group. In the high-dose group, with a few exceptions, these compounds produced predominately saline responding. In the low-dose group, the opioid antagonist naloxone antagonized the stimulus effects produced by butorphanol, but failed to attenuate the butorphanol-like discriminative stimulus effects produced by the DA re-uptake inhibitors mazindol and cocaine. The D1 antagonist (+)-SCH 23390 and the D2 antagonist raclopride failed to attenuate the stimulus effects produced by either the low or high training dose of butorphanol. Doses of mazindol and cocaine that engendered between 16% and 70% butorphanol responding failed to alter the butorphanol dose-effect curve in either the low- or high-dose group, indicating a less than additive interaction. In the high-dose group, the D3 agonist (+/-)-7-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin [(+/-)-7-OH-DPAT] attenuated butorphanol's stimulus effects in a dose-dependent manner along with the butorphanol-like stimulus effects produced by nalbuphine and morphine. The present findings indicate that direct and indirect DA agonists share similar stimulus effects with a low but not high training dose of butorphanol, and in the high-training dose group, activation of the D3 receptor by (+/-)-7-OHDPAT results in the attenuation of the discriminative stimulus effects of mu opioids.