Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacotherapy ; 20(7): 771-5, 2000 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10907967

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of bleeding complications from enoxaparin in patients with normal renal function versus patients with renal insufficiency. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: University-based tertiary care center. PATIENTS: One hundred six patients who received two or more doses of enoxaparin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total bleeding complications occurred in 22% of patients with normal renal function and 51% with renal insufficiency (p<0.01). Major bleeds were also significantly different, 2% and 30%, respectively (p<0.001). No patients with normal renal function were given fresh-frozen plasma or packed red blood cells, whereas in those with renal insufficiency, 13% and 32%, respectively, received these products (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Enoxaparin may have resulted in increased bleeding complications and use of blood products in patients with renal insufficiency. Prospective studies need to be conducted to define the drug's role and dosage adjustments in these patients.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Enoxaparina/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Renal/complicações , Idoso , Feminino , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal/sangue , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Pharmacotherapy ; 20(5): 540-8, 2000 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10809340

RESUMO

Contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity (CMN) is a common form of iatrogenic acute renal failure. Typically, patients experience changes in serum creatinine or creatinine clearance between 1 and 5 days after exposure to a contrast medium, but they rarely require dialysis. The mechanism for CMN is not understood, but renal insufficiency, dehydration, and congestive heart failure are risk factors. The frequency of CMN with high-osmolality versus low-osmolality media is controversial. Prophylaxis can reduce CMN. Of many different strategies, hydration with normal saline before and after exposure offers the best protection with the fewest adverse effects.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Cardiotônicos/uso terapêutico , Desidratação/tratamento farmacológico , Diuréticos Osmóticos/uso terapêutico , Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Manitol/uso terapêutico , Concentração Osmolar , Insuficiência Renal/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Cloreto de Sódio/uso terapêutico
3.
Arch Intern Med ; 154(17): 1905-14, 1994 Sep 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8074594

RESUMO

The use of diuretics for the treatment of sodium retention in congestive heart failure was evaluated. Particular focus was given to the altered renal response to diuretics in patients with heart failure and adverse responses to diuretic therapy. Highlighted information included historical aspects of the development of diuretics, mechanisms of sodium retention, the physiologic and clinical response to diuretics, and the altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diuretics in congestive heart failure. Despite more than 60 years of empiric diuretic use in heart failure, the actual database regarding the long-term efficacy, adverse effects, and altered mortality outcome in heart failure is relatively small. Existent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are typically not collected within the context of heart failure efficacy trials. In addition to altered electrolyte transport and total-body electrolyte depletion, diuretics may be associated with adverse neurohormonal activation. Thus, guidelines for acute and long-term therapy with diuretics in heart failure remain somewhat empiric. Diuretics will remain a mainstay for the treatment of edema in congestive heart failure but must be accompanied by moderate sodium restriction. However, large clinical trials of diuretics would be necessary to demonstrate that improved clinical efficacy with edema reduction is not offset by adverse effects, which include electrolyte depletion, ventricular arrhythmias, and subsequent increased mortality.


Assuntos
Dieta Hipossódica , Diuréticos/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Sódio/metabolismo , Administração Oral , Benzotiadiazinas , Diuréticos/efeitos adversos , Diuréticos/farmacocinética , Diuréticos/farmacologia , Resistência a Medicamentos , Edema/metabolismo , Edema/fisiopatologia , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Insuficiência Cardíaca/metabolismo , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Circulação Renal , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio/farmacocinética , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio/farmacologia , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio/uso terapêutico
4.
Cardiol Clin ; 12(1): 37-50, 1994 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8181024

RESUMO

This review has summarized the current role of diuretic therapy in heart failure, emphasizing those aspects most relevant to this patient population. Recommended diuretic usage is as follows: Asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction--establish moderate sodium intake, Mild sodium retention--thiazide-type diuretic or low-dose loop diuretic; continue moderate sodium intake; combine with an ACE inhibitor, Moderate sodium retention--loop diuretic, adjusting for renal function, if necessary; continue moderate sodium intake; combine with an ACE inhibitor, Severe sodium retention--large-dose loop diuretic combined with a thiazide-type diuretic; continue moderate sodium intake; ACE inhibitor, unless contraindicated; consider addition of a potassium-sparing diuretic Treatment measures for refractory sodium retention--intermittent intravenous loop diuretic; short-term infusion of a loop diuretic; intensified combination oral diuretic therapy; intravenous positive inotropic therapy; ultrafiltration or dialysis. In addition, the well-known adverse effect of electrolyte depletion and guidelines for electrolyte replacement have been discussed. It is evident that the diuretic class of pharmacologic therapy has not been as well assessed as both the positive inotrope and vasodilator classes. Limitations in this regard have been summarized recently. Even relatively simple parameters or instruments, such as the sodium retention score, when applied to clinical trials will yield a greater understanding of the utility and limitations of diuretic therapy for heart failure.


Assuntos
Diuréticos/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/induzido quimicamente , Animais , Diuréticos/farmacocinética , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/fisiopatologia
5.
Crit Care Med ; 21(12): 1856-62, 1993 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8252890

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in nosocomial pneumonia frequency rate in mechanically ventilated trauma patients treated with sucralfate vs. ranitidine for stress ulcer prophylaxis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: A 640-bed urban teaching hospital and trauma center. PATIENTS: Ninety-two mechanically ventilated trauma patients. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-nine patients received sucralfate and 44 patients received intravenous ranitidine for stress ulcer prophylaxis; nine patients were excluded from the study for protocol breaks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study population was severely injured and critically ill. The Trauma Score averaged 11.3, the Injury Severity Score averaged 27.7, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score averaged 18.1. There were no significant differences in demographics, mechanisms of injury, Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, APACHE score, length of hospital stay, length of surgical intensive care unit stay, or duration of endotracheal intubation between the sucralfate and ranitidine groups. Eleven (13.2%) patients developed nosocomial pneumonia: six (15.4%) of 39 patients in the sucralfate group and five (11.4%) of 44 patients in the ranitidine group; these numbers were not significantly different (chi 2 = 0.0226, p = .8805). There were no episodes of significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Six patients died during hospitalization, all secondary to severe head injury and none with pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in pneumonia rate in mechanically ventilated trauma patients receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate vs. ranitidine.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/complicações , Úlcera Péptica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/etiologia , Ranitidina/efeitos adversos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Estresse Fisiológico/tratamento farmacológico , Sucralfato/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Traumatismo Múltiplo/classificação , Traumatismo Múltiplo/mortalidade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/terapia , Úlcera Péptica/etiologia , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estresse Fisiológico/etiologia , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma
6.
Clin Pharm ; 11(7): 618-24, 1992 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1617912

RESUMO

The proposed benefit of long-term dobutamine therapy is explained, relevant clinical trials are described, and recommendations for this treatment are discussed. Dobutamine increases cardiac contractility and causes vasodilation with little change in heart rate. It is routinely administered for short periods to relieve exacerbations of congestive heart failure (CHF) in hospitalized patients. Sustained effects have been seen with dobutamine infusions, although the known properties of the drug do not explain these effects. Long-term dobutamine therapy can lessen the symptoms of CHF and improve exercise tolerance and cardiac function. Nine published reports showed consistent improvement in 77 patients treated with multiple infusions of dobutamine. At Ohio State University, long-term dobutamine therapy (typically 5.0-7.5 micrograms/kg/min infused continuously) is used in patients with refractory CHF and those awaiting heart transplantation. Because the therapy does not prolong survival in most patients, specific endpoints of therapy should be determined for each patient. Because it may cause sudden death, patients receiving this therapy must be carefully monitored. Long-term use of dobutamine infusion lessens the symptoms of CHF but does not prolong survival.


Assuntos
Dobutamina/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Dobutamina/farmacocinética , Dobutamina/farmacologia , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA