Reducing the demand for magnetic resonance imaging scans and prostate biopsies during the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: Applying the Barcelona risk-stratified pathway in Catalonia.

PURPOSE: To analyze the reduction in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) demand and prostate biopsies after the hypothetical implementation of the Barcelona risk-stratified pathway (BCN-RSP) in a population of the clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP) early detection program in Catalonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparation between the hypothetical application of the BCN-RSP and the current pathway, which relied on pre-biopsy mpMRI and targeted and/or systematic biopsies, was conducted. The BCN-RSP stratify men with suspected CaP based on a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level >10 ng/ml and a suspicious rectal examination (DRE), and the Barcelona-risk calculator 1 (BCN-RC1) to avoid mpMRI scans. Subsequently, candidates for prostate biopsy following mpMRI are selected based on the BCN-RC2. This comparison involved 3,557 men with serum PSA levels > 3.0 ng/ml and/or suspicious DRE. The population was recruited prospectively in 10 centers from January 2021 and December 2022. CsCaP was defined when grade group ≥ 2. RESULTS: CsCaP was detected in 1,249 men (35.1%) and insignificant CaP was overdeteced in 498 (14%). The BCN-RSP would have avoid 705 mpMRI scans (19.8%), and 697 prostate biopsies (19.6%), while 61 csCaP (4.9%) would have been undetected. The overdetection of insignificant CaP would have decrease in 130 cases (26.1%), and the performance of prostate biopsy for csCaP detection would have increase to 41.5%. CONCLUSION: The application of the BCN-RSP would reduce the demand for mpMRI scans and prostate biopsies by one fifth while less than 5% of csCaP would remain undetected. The overdetection of insignificant CaP would decrease by more than one quarter and the performance of prostate biopsy for csCaP detection would increase to higher than 40%.

Effect of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Cancer Detection.

Concerns exist regarding the effects of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) on multipa-rametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection. Our objective is to analyze the effect of 5-ARI on the prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) distribution and csPCa and insignificant PCa (iPCa) detection. Among 2212 men with serum prostate-specific antigen levels of >3.0 ng/mL and/or suspicious digital rectal examinations who underwent mpMRI and targeted and/or systematic biopsies, 120 individuals exposed to 5-ARI treatment for over a year were identified. CsPCa was defined when the grade group (GG) was >2. The overall csPCa and iPCa detection rates were 44.6% and 18.8%, respectively. Since logistic regression revealed independent predictors of PCa, a randomized matched group of 236 individuals was selected for analysis. The PI-RADS distribution was comparable with 5-ARI exposure (p 0.685). The CsPCa detection rates in 5-ARI-naïve men and 5-ARI-exposed men were 52.6% and 47.4%, respectively (p 0.596). IPCa was detected in 37.6 and 62.5%, respectively (p 0.089). The tumor GG distribution based on 5-ARI exposure was similar (p 0.149) to the rates of csPCa and iPCa across the PI-RADS categories. We conclude that exposure to 5-ARI in suspected PCa men did not change the PI-RADS distribution and the csPCa and iPCa detection rates.

The Role of Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Its Correlation with the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Volume.

PURPOSE: To relate the prostate volume category (PVC) assessed with digital rectal examination (DRE)-small, median, and large-and the prostate volumes (PVs) assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). To compare the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) discrimination ability of two predictive models based on DRE-PVC and MRI-PV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective trial of 2,090 men with prostate-specific antigen >3 ng/mL and/or PCa suspicious DRE were prospectively recruited in 10 centers from Catalonia (Spain), between 2021 and 2022, in whom DRE-PVC was assessed. Pre-biopsy MRI, and 12-core TRUS-random biopsy was always performed after 2- to 6-core TRUS-fusion targeted biopsy of prostate imaging-report and data system >3 lesions. In 370 men (17.7%) the DRE-PVC was unconclusive. Among the 1,720 men finally analyzed the csPCa (grade group >2) detection was 42.4%. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) of TRUS and MRI-PVs of small prostates were 33 mL (19-37 mL) and 35 mL (23-30 mL), p=0.410; in median prostates they were 51 mL (38-58 mL) and 55 mL (48-63 mL) respectively, p<0.001; in large prostates 80 mL (60-100 mL) and 95 mL (75-118 mL) respectively, p<0.001. The predictive models sharing the MRI-PV and DRE-PVC showed areas under the curves of 0.832 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.813-0.851) and 0.828 (95% CI, 0.809-0.848) respectively, p=0.632, as well as similar net benefit and clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: PVC was unconclusive in 17% of DREs. MRI-PV overestimated the TRUS-PV in median and large prostates. The predictive models based on MRI-PV and DRE-PVC showed similar efficacy to predict csPCa. PVC assessed with DRE is helpful to predict the csPCa risk before MRI.

Apalutamide for prostate cancer: Multicentre and multidisciplinary real-world study of 227 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apalutamide prostate cancer compared to the pivotal trials patients and to identify the first subsequent therapy in a real-world setting. METHODS: The study is prospective and observational based on real-world evidence, performed by different medical disciplines and eight academics centres around Barcelona, Spain. It included all patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with apalutamide from June 2018 to December 2022. RESULTS: Of 227 patients treated with apalutamide, 10% had ECOG-PS 2, and 41% were diagnosed with new-generation imaging. In the mHSPC group (209 patients), 75 years was the median age, 53% had synchronous metastases, and 22% were M1a. In the nmCRPC (18 patients), 82 years was the median age, and 81% ≤6 months had PSA doubling time. Patients achieved PSA90 in 92% of mHSPC and 50% of nmCRPC and PSA ≤0.2 in 71% of mHSPC and 39% of nmCRPC. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 40.1% of mHSPC and 44.4% of nmCRPC. After discontinuation of apalutamide due to disease progression, 54.5% in mHSPC and 75% in nmCRPC started chemotherapy, while after discontinuation because of adverse events, 73.3% in mHSPC and 100% in nmCRPC continued with other hormonal-therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of apalutamide were similar to that described in the pivotal trials, despite including an older and more comorbid population. Usually, subsequent therapies after apalutamide differed depending on the reason for discontinuation: by disease progression started chemotherapy and by adverse events hormonal sequencing.

A Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, including a Model for the Partial Omission of Systematic Biopsies.

The primary objective of this study was to analyse the current accuracy of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies in detecting csPCa. A secondary objective was to determine whether there are factors predicting the finding of csPCa in targeted biopsies and, if so, to explore the utility of a predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies. We analysed 2122 men with suspected PCa, serum PSA > 3 ng/mL, and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies between 2021 and 2022. CsPCa (grade group 2 or higher) was detected in 1026 men (48.4%). Discrepancies in csPCa detection in targeted and systematic biopsies were observed in 49.6%, with 13.9% of csPCa cases being detected only in systematic biopsies and 35.7% only in targeted biopsies. A predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies was developed from the independent predictors age (years), prostate volume (mL), PI-RADS score (3 to 5), mpMRI Tesla (1.5 vs. 3.0), TRUS-MRI fusion image technique (cognitive vs. software), and prostate biopsy route (transrectal vs. transperineal). The csPCa discrimination ability of targeted biopsies showed an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI 0.721-0.762). The avoidance rate of systematic prostate biopsies went from 0.5% without missing csPCa to 18.3% missing 4.6% of csPCa cases. We conclude that the csPCa diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsies is higher than that of systematic biopsies. However, a significant rate of csPCa remains detected only in systematic biopsies. A predictive model for the partial omission of systematic biopsies was developed.

Are magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsies needed in men with serum prostate-specific antigen over 10 ng/ml and an abnormal digital rectal examination?

The European Association of Urology currently recommends the use of risk-organized models to decrease the demand of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with suspected prostate cancer (CaP). Low evidence suggests that men with prostate-specific antigen >10 ng/ml and an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) do not benefit from prebiopsy MRI and targeted biopsies. We aim to validate this low evidence in a sizable cohort and knowing how many clinically significant CaP (csCaP) would go undetected if only random biopsies were performed in these cases. We analyze a subset of 545 men with PSA >10 ng/ml and an abnormal DRE who met the previous criteria among 5,329 participants in a prospective trial in whom random biopsy was always performed and targeted biopsies of PI-RADS ≥3 lesions (10.2%). CsCaP (grade group ≥2) was detected in 370 men (67.9%), with 11 of 49 with negative MRI (22.5%) and 359 of 496 (72.4%) having PI-RADS ≥3. CsCaP was identified in random and targeted biopsies in 317 (88.7%) men, in targeted biopsies only in 23 (6.4%), and in random biopsies only in 19 (5.3%). If only random biopsies were performed in these men, 23 of overall 1,914 csCaP (1.2%) would go undetected in this population. Prebiopsy MRI can be saved in men with serum PSA >10 ng/ml and an abnormal DRE and only random biopsy performed. However, a close follow-up of men with negative random biopsy seems appropriate due to the high-risk of csCaP in these men.

[Targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonograpgy fusion compared with sistematic biopsies prostate cancer detection. Initial experience.] / Comparación entre la biopsia prostática con fusión de imagen ecografía/resonáncia magnética y la biopsia sistemática para la detección de cáncer de próstata. Experiencia inicial.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the initial experiencein our center on targeted prostate biopsies (TB) using Magnetic Resonance imaging/ultrasonography (MRI/US) fusion and to compare PCa detection with systematic biopsies (SB). PATIENTS AND ME THODS: A retrospective, descriptive and comparative study was conducted on the first 94 men who underwent TB using MRU/US fusion in our center since February 2017 to March 2018. All patients underwent a protocol of 6-12 cores of systematic biopsies (SB) (except 9) and 2-6 targeted coreson the MRI index lesion. The Hitachi/HiVision Preirus equipment was used with RVS software (Real-time virtual sonography) and a biplane transducer for the fusion imaging procedure. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as: at least one core with a Gleason score of 3+4. RESULTS: The proportion of patients diagnosed with PCa was higher in TB compared with SB (p=0.035) and the mean of core performed for diagnosis was lower in TB compared with SB (p<0.001). A trend towards an improved detection of csPCa in TB compared to SB was observed (p=0.063). CONCLUSIONS: The MRI/US fusion targeted biopsies (TB) showed a higher detection rate of PCa, with less cores taken for diagnosis and a tendency to better identification of csCaP compared to SB.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es describir la experiencia inicial en nuestro centro de las primeras 94 Biopsias de Próstata dirigidas (BD) con fusión de imagen ecografía/Resonancia magnética (US/RMmp) y comparar la tasa de detección de CaP con las biopsias sistemáticas.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y comparativo de los primeros 94 pacientes sometidos a BD por fusión de imagen US/RMmp en nuestro centro desde febrero de 2017 hasta marzo de 2018. Todos los pacientes fueron sometidos a un protocolo de 6-12 cilindros de biopsias sistemáticas (BS) (menos 9) y de 2-6 cilindros dirigidos a las lesiones diana visualizadas en la RMmp. Se utilizó el equipo Hitachi/HiVision Preirus con software RVS (Real-time virtual sonography) y un transductor biplanar para la fusión de imagen. Se definió como CaP clínicamente significativo un GS ≥ 3+4 en, al menos, 1 de los cilindros realizados. RESULTADOS: La proporción de detección de CaP fue mayor en las BD que en las BS (p=0,035) y el número de cilindros realizados para su diagnóstico fue menor en las BD comparado con las BS (p<0,001). Se observó  una clara tendencia a una mayor identificación de CaP clínicamente significativo (CaPcs) en las BD comparado con las BS (p=0,063). CONCLUSIONES: Comparado con las BS, las BD por fusión de imagen US/RMmp presentaron una mayor tasa de detección de CaP y una tendencia a una mayor identificación de CaPcS con una necesidad menor de cilindros realizados.

Comparación entre la biopsia prostática con fusión de imagen ecografía/resonáncia magnética y la biopsia sistemática para la detección de cáncer de próstata. Experiencia inicial / Targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonograpgy fusion compared with sistematic biopsies prostate cancer detection. Initial experience

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es describir la experiencia inicial en nuestro centro de las primeras 94 Biopsias de Próstata dirigidas (BD) con fusión de imagen ecografía/Resonancia magnética (US/RMmp) y comparar la tasa de detección de CaP con las biopsias sistemáticas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y comparativo de los primeros 94 pacientes sometidos a BD por fusión de imagen US/RMmp en nuestro centro desde febrero de 2017 hasta marzo de 2018. Todos los pacientes fueron sometidos a un protocolo de 6-12 cilindros de biopsias sistemáticas (BS) (menos 9) y de 2-6 cilindros dirigidos a las lesiones diana visualizadas en la RMmp. Se utilizó el equipo Hitachi/HiVision Preirus con software RVS (Real-time virtual sonography) y un transductor biplanar para la fusión de imagen. Se definió como CaP clínicamente significativo un GS ≥ 3 + 4 en, al menos, 1 de los cilindros realizados. RESULTADOS: La proporción de detección de CaP fue mayor en las BD que en las BS (p = 0,035) y el número de cilindros realizados para su diagnóstico fue menor en las BD comparado con las BS (p < 0,001). Se observó una clara tendencia a una mayor identificación de CaP clínicamente significativo (CaPcs) en las BD comparado con las BS (p = 0,063). CONCLUSIONES: Comparado con las BS, las BD por fusión de imagen US/RMmp presentaron una mayor tasa de detección de CaP y una tendencia a una mayor identificación de CaPcS con una necesidad menor de cilindros realizados

OBJECTIVE: To describe the initial experience in our center on targeted prostate biopsies (TB) using Magnetic Resonance imaging/ultrasonography (MRI/US) fusion and to compare PCa detection with systematic biopsies (SB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive and comparative study was conducted on the first 94 men who underwent TB using MRU/US fusion in our center since February 2017 to March 2018. All patients underwent a protocol of 6-12 cores of systematic biopsies (SB) (except 9) and 2-6 targeted cores on the MRI index lesion. The Hitachi/HiVision Preirus equipment was used with RVS software (Real-time virtual sonography) and a biplane transducer for the fusión imaging procedure. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as: at least one core with a Gleason score of 3+4. RESULTS: The proportion of patients diagnosed with PCa was higher in TB compared with SB (p = 0.035) and the mean of core performed for diagnosis was lower in TB compared with SB (p < 0.001). A trend towards an improved detection of csPCa in TB compared to SB was observed (p = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS: The MRI/US fusion targeted biopsies (TB) showed a higher detection rate of PCa, with les cores taken for diagnosis and a tendency to better identification of csCaP compared to SB

Comparison of standard vs. palliative management for bladder cancer in patients older than 85 years: multicenter study of 317 de novo tumors.

BACKGROUND: The peak incidence of bladder cancer (BCa) occurs at 85 years but data on treatment and outcome are sparse in this age group. We aimed to compare the outcomes of high-grade nonmuscle invasive BCa (HG NMIBC) and muscle invasive BCa (MIBC) treated with standard therapies vs. palliative management in patients >85 years. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study of 317 patients >85 years who underwent transurethral resection (TURB) for de novo BCa between 2014 and 2016. Standard management consisted in following EAU-guidelines and palliative in monitoring patients without applying oncological treatments after TURB. Low-grade tumors were not compared because all of them were considered to have followed a standard management. RESULTS: Median age was 87 years (85-97). ASA-score was as follows: II, 34.7%; III, 52.1%; IV, 13.2%. Pathological examination showed: 86 Low-grade NMIBC (27.1%), 156 HG NMIBC (49.2%), and 75 MIBC (23.7%). Median follow-up of the series was 21 months (3-61) and median overall survival (OS) 29 (24-33). Among HG NMIBC, 77 patients (49.4%) received standard treatments (BCG, restaging TURB) and 79 (50.6%) palliative management. Among MIBC, 24 (32%) received standard management (cystectomy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) and 51 (68%) palliative. Applying standard management in HG NMIBC was an independent prognostic factor of OS (44 months vs. 24, HR 1.95; P = 0.013) and decreased the emergency visit rate (33% vs. 43%). In MIBC, the type of management was not a related to OS (P = 0.439) and did not decrease the emergency visit rate (33% vs. 33%). ASA and Charlson-score were not predictors of OS in HG NMIBC (P = 0.368, P = 0.386) and MIBC (P = 0.511, P = 0.665). CONCLUSIONS: Chronological age should not be a contraindication for applying standard therapies in NMIBC. In MIBC the survival is low regardless of the type of management. The lack of correlation between OS and ASA or Charlson-score raises the necessity of a geriatric assessment for selecting the best treatment strategy.