Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 154(2): 184-9, 2000 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10665607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Controlling vaccine-preventable diseases by achieving high childhood vaccination coverage levels is a national priority. However, there are few, if any, comprehensive evaluations of state immunization programs in the United States, and little attention has been given to the importance of vaccination clinic management style and staff motivation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors associated with the increase in childhood vaccination coverage levels from 53% in 1988 to 89% in 1994 in Georgia's public health clinics. DESIGN: A 1994 mail survey obtaining information on clinic vaccination policies and practices and management practices. SETTING: All 227 public health clinics in Georgia. PARTICIPANTS: Clinic nurses responsible for vaccination services. OUTCOME MEASURE: The 1994 clinic-specific coverage level for 21- to 23-month-old children for 4 doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, 3 doses of polio vaccine, and 1 dose of a measles-containing vaccine as determined by an independent state assessment of clinic coverage levels. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that higher coverage levels were significantly (P<.05) associated with smaller clinic size, higher proportions of clientele enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), being a nonurban clinic, and numerous vaccination practices and policies. Multivariable analysis showed that only 8 of greater than 150 factors remained associated with higher coverage levels, including having no waiting time to be seen, having telephone reminder systems, conducting home visits for defaulters, and restricting WIC vouchers when a child was undervaccinated. Motivational factors related to higher coverage included clinic lead nurses receiving an incentive to raise coverage and lead nurses participating in assessments of clinic coverage levels by state immunization staff. CONCLUSIONS: No single factor is responsible for raising vaccination coverage levels. Efforts to improve coverage should include local assessment to provide feedback on performance and identify appropriate local solutions. Coordinating with WIC, conducting recall and reminder activities, motivating clinic staff, and having staff participate in decisions are important in raising vaccination levels.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Variância , Pré-Escolar , Coleta de Dados , Georgia , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Esquemas de Imunização , Análise Multivariada , Cultura Organizacional , Política Organizacional , Saúde Pública , Recursos Humanos
2.
Cancer Gene Ther ; 7(12): 1511-8, 2000 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11228529

RESUMO

One of the primary limitations of adenoviral (Ad) -mediated gene therapy is the generation of anti-Ad inflammatory responses that can induce clinical toxicity and impair gene transfer efficacy. The effects of immunosuppression on these inflammatory responses, transgene expression, and toxicity have not yet been systematically examined in humans undergoing Ad-based gene therapy trials. We therefore conducted a pilot study investigating the use of systemic corticosteroids to mitigate antivector immune responses. In a previous phase I clinical trial, we demonstrated that Ad-mediated intrapleural delivery of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene (HSVtk) to patients with mesothelioma resulted in significant, but relatively superficial, HSVtk gene transfer and marked anti-Ad humoral and cellular immune responses. When a similar group of patients was treated with Ad.HSVtk and a brief course of corticosteroids, decreased clinical inflammatory responses were seen, but there was no demonstrable inhibition of anti -Ad antibody production or Ad-induced peripheral blood mononuclear cell activation. Corticosteroid administration also had no apparent effect on the presence of intratumoral gene transfer. Although limited by the small numbers of patients studied, our data suggest that systemic administration of steroids in the context of Ad-based gene delivery may limit acute clinical toxicity, but may not inhibit cellular and humoral responses to Ad vectors.


Assuntos
Adenoviridae/genética , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Terapia Genética/métodos , Mesotelioma/terapia , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pleurais/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Formação de Anticorpos , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Técnicas de Transferência de Genes , Vetores Genéticos , Humanos , Imunidade Celular , Masculino , Mesotelioma/genética , Mesotelioma/imunologia , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Projetos Piloto , Neoplasias Pleurais/genética , Neoplasias Pleurais/imunologia , Simplexvirus/enzimologia , Simplexvirus/genética , Timidina Quinase/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA