Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 29(4): 351-7, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16650261

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In patients with common atrial flutter (CAF), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) causes discomfort. Patients undergoing RFA often feel pain which is difficult to control as the mechanisms are unclear. HYPOTHESIS: Inhaled nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent sedative-analgesic-anxiolytic agent that may relieve anxiety and discomfort during CAF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective randomized study, the effect of Inhaled N2O was compared with that of intravenous sedation with Nalbuphine during CAF ablation in 76 patients (64 +/- 13 years, 56 men). We used a 24 pole mapping catheter around the tricuspid annulus and a 8-mm tip ablation catheter for each patient. Forty-two patients (group 1) underwent radiofrequency (RF) application to the cavotricuspid isthmus 5 minutes after the beginning of inhalation of a (50% N2O/50% O2) mixture. Thirty-four patients (group 2), underwent the first RF application 15 minutes after the end of an infusion of Nalbuphine (20 mg delivered over 15 minutes). Ablation-related anxiety and discomfort were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm, with 0 correlating to the statement "no pain at all" and 100 with "the worst possible pain." The VAS score was determined at the end of each application. The number of RF applications (group 1; 10 +/- 8 vs group 2; 11 +/- 6, P = NS) and procedure duration (group 1; 75 +/- 53 minutes vs group 2; 72 +/- 45 minutes, P = NS), were similar for the two groups. N(2)O sedation compared with nalbuphine infusion reduced VAS for anxiety (10 mm +/- 8 vs 58 mm +/- 22, P < 0.05) and for discomfort (18 mm +/- 9 vs 45 mm +/- 34, P < 0.01), respectively. Although there was more frequent vomiting in group 1; 7 of 42 (17%) than in group 2; 3 of 34 (9%), P < 0.05, patients were less likely to have hypotension during the procedure 1 of 42 (2.5%) versus 4 of 34 (12%), P < 0.05, respectively. CONCLUSION: Inhalation of a (50% N2O/50% O2) mixture during RF ablation for atrial flutter is a safe and efficient way to reduce anxiety and discomfort caused by RF applications.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Flutter Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Nalbufina/administração & dosagem , Óxido Nitroso/administração & dosagem , Dor/prevenção & controle , Administração por Inalação , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Ansiedade/etiologia , Flutter Atrial/complicações , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Europace ; 8(1): 7-15, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16627402

RESUMO

AIMS: Cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a curative therapy for common atrial flutter (AFl), but is associated with a recurrence rate of 5-26%. Although complete bidirectional conduction block is usually achieved, the recurrence of AF is due to recovered conducting isthmus tissue through which activation wavefronts pass. We evaluated a simple and efficient electrophysiological strategy, which pinpoints the ablation target. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (19 men), mean age 61 +/- 6, with recurrent AFl required a repeat ablation, 250 +/- 160 days after a successful RF CTI procedure. Transverse CTI conduction was monitored during AFl or coronary sinus (CS) pacing by a 24-pole mapping catheter positioned in the right atrium (RA), with the distal poles in the CS, proximal poles on the lateral RA, and intermediate poles on the CTI. A slow conduction area traversing the CTI (velocity, 37 +/- 22 vs. 98 +/- 26 cm/s on either side, P < 0.05) and a lower potential amplitude than at both sides (0.2 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.5 +/- 0.5 mV, P < 0.05), defined by a bayonet-shaped depolarization sequence, were considered to represent the incomplete line of block (InLOB). An ablation catheter was progressively dragged up to this InLOB, from the tricuspid annulus to the inferior vena cava, analysing the widely separated double potentials (DPs) until these coalesced. In nine patients (35%), the target conduction gap was a coalesced fractionated atrial potential within the InLOB (duration, 77 +/- 12 ms), and in 16 patients (65%), a narrow DP toward the healthy margins of this InLOB (duration, 28 +/- 15 ms). Adopting this strategy yields 100% successful re-ablation of recurring AFl leading to bidirectional block, with a mean 2.7 +/- 1.4 RF applications. CONCLUSION: Transverse CTI mapping precisely locates the InLOB and helps find conduction gaps along the CTI in re-ablation procedures for common AFl.


Assuntos
Flutter Atrial/fisiopatologia , Flutter Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/fisiopatologia , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/cirurgia , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Reoperação , Resultado do Tratamento , Valva Tricúspide/fisiopatologia , Valva Tricúspide/cirurgia , Veia Cava Inferior/fisiopatologia , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...