Effect of sensor number and location on accelerometry-based vertical ground reaction force estimation during walking.

Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of global disability and is a major cost for the healthcare system. Lower extremity loading is a determinant of knee osteoarthritis onset and progression; however, technology that assists rehabilitative clinicians in optimizing key metrics of lower extremity loading is significantly limited. The peak vertical component of the ground reaction force (vGRF) in the first 50% of stance is highly associated with biological and patient-reported outcomes linked to knee osteoarthritis symptoms. Monitoring and maintaining typical vGRF profiles may support healthy gait biomechanics and joint tissue loading to prevent the onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Yet, the optimal number of sensors and sensor placements for predicting accurate vGRF from accelerometry remains unknown. Our goals were to: 1) determine how many sensors and what sensor locations yielded the most accurate vGRF loading peak estimates during walking; and 2) characterize how prescribing different loading conditions affected vGRF loading peak estimates. We asked 20 young adult participants to wear 5 accelerometers on their waist, shanks, and feet and walk on a force-instrumented treadmill during control and targeted biofeedback conditions prompting 5% underloading and overloading vGRFs. We trained and tested machine learning models to estimate vGRF from the various sensor accelerometer inputs and identified which combinations were most accurate. We found that a neural network using one accelerometer at the waist yielded the most accurate loading peak vGRF estimates during walking, with average errors of 4.4% body weight. The waist-only configuration was able to distinguish between control and overloading conditions prescribed using biofeedback, matching measured vGRF outcomes. Including foot or shank acceleration signals in the model reduced accuracy, particularly for the overloading condition. Our results suggest that a system designed to monitor changes in walking vGRF or to deploy targeted biofeedback may only need a single accelerometer located at the waist for healthy participants.

Effects of Hormonal Contraception and the Menstrual Cycle on Fatigability and Recovery From an Anaerobic Exercise Test.

ABSTRACT: Cabre, HE, Ladan, AN, Moore, SR, Joniak, KE, Blue, MNM, Pietrosimone, BG, Hackney, AC, and Smith-Ryan, AE. Effects of hormonal contraception and the menstrual cycle on fatigability and recovery from an anaerobic exercise test. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study sought to evaluate the effects of oral contraceptive (OC) and hormonal intrauterine device (H-IUD) use, compared with a eumenorrheic (EUM) cycle, on fatigability and recovery between hormone the phases. Peak power (PP), average power (AP), fatigue index (FI), blood lactate, vessel diameter, and blood flow (BF) were measured from a repeated sprint cycle test (10 × 6 seconds) in 60, healthy, active women (mean ± SD; age: 26.5 ± 7.0 years, BMI: 22.5 ± 3.7 kg·m-2) who used monophasic OC (≥6 months; n = 21), had a H-IUD (≥6 months; n = 20), or had regular naturally occurring menstrual cycle (≥3 months) or had a nonhormonal IUD (EUM; n = 19). Subjects were randomly assigned to begin in either the low-hormone phase (LHP) or high-hormone phase (HHP) and were tested once in each phase. Separate univariate analyses of covariances assessed the change from HHP to LHP between the groups, covaried for progesterone, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. All groups demonstrated similar changes in PP, AP, FI, blood lactate, vessel diameter, and BF between the phases (p > 0.05). Although not significant, AP was higher in LHP for OC (Δ -248.2 ± 1,301.4 W) and EUM (Δ -19.5 ± 977.7 W) and higher in HHP for H-IUD (Δ 369.3 ± 1,123.0 W). Oral contraceptive group exhibited a higher FI (Δ 2.0%) and reduced blood lactate clearance (Δ 2.5%) in HHP. In recreationally active women, hormonal contraception and hormone phases may minimally impact fatigue and recovery. Individual elite female athletes may benefit from understanding hormonal contraception type as performance and recovery may slightly vary across the cycle.

Quadriceps composition and function influence downhill gait biomechanics >1 year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Quadriceps dysfunction is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and contributes to aberrant gait biomechanics. Changes in quadriceps composition also occur in these patients including greater concentrations of non-contractile tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between quadriceps composition, function, and gait biomechanics in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Forty-eight volunteers with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction completed gait biomechanics and quadriceps function and composition assessments. Gait biomechanics were sampled during downhill walking (-10° slope) on an instrumented treadmill. Quadriceps function (peak torque and rate of torque development) was assessed via maximal isometric contractions, while composition was evaluated via ultrasound echo intensity. FINDINGS: Greater quadriceps peak torque was associated with a greater peak knee extension moment (r = 0.365, p = 0.015). Greater vastus lateralis echo intensity (i.e. poorer muscle quality) was associated with less knee flexion displacement (r = -0.316, p = 0.032). Greater echo intensity of the vastus lateralis (r = -0.298, p = 0.044) and rectus femoris (r = -0.322, p = 0.029) was associated with a more abducted knee angle at heel strike. Quadriceps peak torque explained 11-16% of the variance in echo intensity. INTERPRETATION: Both quadriceps function and composition influence aberrant gait biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Quadriceps composition appears to provide insight into quadriceps dysfunction independent of muscle strength, as they associated with different gait biomechanics outcomes and shared minimal variance. Future research is necessary to determine the influence of changes in quadriceps composition on joint health outcomes.

Effect of sensor location for modifying center of pressure during gait using haptic feedback in people with chronic ankle instability.

BACKGROUND: Gait retraining using haptic biofeedback medially shifts the center of pressure (COP) while walking in orthopedic populations. However, the ideal sensor location needed to effectively shift COP medially has not been identified in people with chronic ankle instability (CAI). RESEARCH QUESTIONS: Can a heel sensor location feasibly be employed in people with CAI without negatively altering kinematics? Does a heel sensor placement relative to the 5th metatarsal head (5MH) impact COP location while walking in people with CAI? METHODS: In this exploratory crossover study, 10 participants with CAI walked on a treadmill with vibration feedback for 10 minutes with a plantar pressure sensor under the heel and 5MH. Separate 2×2 repeated measures analyses of covariances (rmANCOVAs) were used to compare the averaged COP location and 3-D lower extremity kinematics from the first 10% of stance before and after training and between sensor locations. Baseline measures served as covariates to adjust for baseline differences. RESULTS: Feedback triggered by a heel sensor resulted in 40% of participants avoiding a heel strike. There were no significant main effects or interactions between time and sensor location on COP location when controlling for baseline COP (p>0.05). However, with the 5MH placement, participants displayed less ankle internal rotation(IR) (5MH/Heel: -4.12±0.00º/ -6.43±0.62º), less forefoot abduction (-4.29±0.00º/ -5.14±1.01º), more knee flexion (3.40±0.32º/ 0.14±0.57º), less knee external rotation (-10.95±0.00º/-11.24±1.48º), less hip extension (-0.20±0.00º/-1.42±1.05º), and less hip external rotation (3.12±0.00º/3.75±1.98º). SIGNIFICANCE: A 5MH location may be more feasible based on difficulties maintaining heel strike when the sensor was under the heel. While no sensor location was statistically better at changing the COP, the 5MH location decreased proximal transverse plane motions making participants' gait more like controls. Individual response variations support comprehensive lower extremity assessments and the need to identify responder profiles using sensory feedback in people with CAI.

Biomechanical Threshold Values for Identifying Clinically Significant Knee-Related Symptoms Six Months Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Slower habitual walking speed and aberrant gait biomechanics are linked to clinically significant knee-related symptoms and articular cartilage composition changes linked to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). OBJECTIVE: To determine specific gait biomechanical variables that can accurately identify individuals with clinically significant knee-related symptoms post-ACLR, and the corresponding threshold values, sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios for each biomechanical variable. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-one individuals (n=38 female; age=21±4 years; height=1.76±0.11 m; mass=75.38±13.79 kg) who were 6 months post-primary unilateral ACLR (6.2±0.4 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 3D motion capture of 5 overground walking trials was used to calculate discrete gait biomechanical variables of interest during stance phase (1st and 2nd peak vertical ground reaction force [vGRF]; midstance minimum vGRF; peak internal knee abduction and extension moments; and peak knee flexion angle), along with habitual walking speed. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) was used to dichotomize patients as symptomatic (n=51) or asymptomatic (n=20) using the Englund et al. 2003 KOOS guidelines for defining clinically significant knee-related symptoms. Separate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and respective areas under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the capability of each biomechanical variable of interest for identifying individuals with clinically significant knee-related symptoms. RESULTS: Habitual walking speed (AUC=0.66), vGRF at midstance (AUC=0.69), and 2nd peak vGRF (AUC=0.76), demonstrated low-to-moderate accuracy for identifying individuals with clinically significant knee-related symptoms. Individuals who exhibited habitual walking speeds ≤1.27 m/s, midstance vGRF ≥0.82 BW, and 2nd peak vGRF ≤1.11 BW, demonstrated 3.13, 6.36, and 9.57 times higher odds of experiencing clinically significant knee-related symptoms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Critical thresholds for gait variables may be utilized to identify individuals with increased odds of clinically significant knee-related symptoms and potential targets for future interventions.

Toward designing human intervention studies to prevent osteoarthritis after knee injury: A report from an interdisciplinary OARSI 2023 workshop.

Objective: The global impact of osteoarthritis is growing. Currently no disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs/therapies exist, increasing the need for preventative strategies. Knee injuries have a high prevalence, distinct onset, and strong independent association with post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Numerous groups are embarking upon research that will culminate in clinical trials to assess the effect of interventions to prevent knee PTOA despite challenges and lack of consensus about trial design in this population. Our objectives were to improve awareness of knee PTOA prevention trial design and discuss state-of-the art methods to address the unique opportunities and challenges of these studies. Design: An international interdisciplinary group developed a workshop, hosted at the 2023 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Congress. Here we summarize the workshop content and outputs, with the goal of moving the field of PTOA prevention trial design forward. Results: Workshop highlights included discussions about target population (considering risk, homogeneity, and possibility of modifying osteoarthritis outcome); target treatment (considering delivery, timing, feasibility and effectiveness); comparators (usual care, placebo), and primary symptomatic outcomes considering surrogates and the importance of knee function and symptoms other than pain to this population. Conclusions: Opportunities to test multimodal PTOA prevention interventions across preclinical models and clinical trials exist. As improving symptomatic outcomes aligns with patient and regulator priorities, co-primary symptomatic (single or aggregate/multidimensional outcome considering function and symptoms beyond pain) and structural/physiological outcomes may be appropriate for these trials. To ensure PTOA prevention trials are relevant and acceptable to all stakeholders, future research should address critical knowledge gaps and challenges.

Modifying loading during gait leads to biochemical changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein concentrations in a subgroup of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Strong observational evidence has linked changes in limb loading during walking following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). It remains unknown if manipulating peak loading influences joint tissue biochemistry. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine whether manipulating peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during gait influences changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP) concentrations in ACLR participants. METHODS: Forty ACLR individuals participated in this randomized crossover study (48% female, age = 21.0 ± 4.4 years, BMI = 24.6 ± 3.1). Participants attended four sessions, wherein they completed one of four biofeedback conditions (habitual loading (no biofeedback), high loading (5% increase in vGRF), low loading (5% decrease in vGRF), and symmetrical loading (between-limb symmetry in vGRF)) while walking on a treadmill for 3000 steps. Serum was collected before (baseline), immediately (acute post), 1 h (1 h post), and 3.5 h (3.5 h post) following each condition. A comprehensive general linear mixed model was constructed to address the differences in sCOMP across all conditions and timepoints in all participants and a subgroup of sCOMP Increasers. RESULTS: No sCOMP differences were found across the entire cohort. In the sCOMP Increasers, a significant time × condition interaction was found (F9,206 = 2.6, p = 0.009). sCOMP was lower during high loading than low loading (p = 0.009) acutely (acute post). At 3.5 h post, sCOMP was higher during habitual loading than symmetrical loading (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that manipulating lower limb loading in ACLR patients who habitually exhibit an acute increase in sCOMP following walking results in improved biochemical changes linked to cartilage health. Key Points • This study assesses the mechanistic link between lower limb load modification and joint tissue biochemistry at acute and delayed timepoints. • Real-time biofeedback provides a paradigm to experimentally assess the mechanistic link between loading and serum biomarkers. • Manipulating peak loading during gait resulted in a metabolic effect of lower sCOMP concentrations in a subgroup of ACLR individuals. • Peak loading modifications may provide an intervention strategy to mitigate the development of PTOA following ACLR.

Muscle contributions to reduced ankle joint contact force during drop vertical jumps in patients with chronic ankle instability.

Chronic ankle instability is a condition linked to progressive early ankle joint degeneration. Patients with chronic ankle instability exhibit altered biomechanics during gait and jump landings and these alterations are believed to contribute to aberrant joint loading and subsequent joint degeneration. Musculoskeletal modeling has the capacity to estimate joint loads from individual muscle forces. However, the influence of chronic ankle instability on joint contact forces remains largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare tri-axial (i.e., compressive, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral) ankle joint contact forces between those with and without chronic ankle instability during the ground contact phase of a drop vertical jump. Fifteen individuals with and 15 individuals without chronic ankle instability completed drop vertical jump maneuvers in a research laboratory. We used those data to drive three-dimensional musculoskeletal simulations and estimate muscle forces and tri-axial joint contact force variables (i.e., peak and impulse). Compared to those without chronic ankle instability, the ankles of patients with chronic ankle instability underwent lower compressive ankle joint contact forces as well as lower anterior-posterior and medial-lateral shearing forces during the weight acceptance phase of landing (p <.05). These findings suggest that patients with chronic ankle instability exhibit lower ankle joint loading patterns than uninjured individuals during a drop vertical jump, which may be considered in rehabilitation to potentially reduce the risk of early onset of ankle joint degeneration.

Early Gait Biomechanics Linked to Daily Steps Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Gait biomechanics and daily steps are important aspects of knee joint loading that change following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Understanding their relationship during the first 6 months post-ACLR could help develop comprehensive rehabilitation interventions that promote optimal joint loading following injury, thereby improving long-term knee joint health. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to compare biomechanical gait waveforms throughout stance at early timepoints post-ACLR in individuals with different daily step behaviors at 6 months post-ACLR. The secondary aim was to examine how these gait waveforms compare to those of uninjured controls. DESIGN: Case-Control Study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with primary ACLR assigned to a low (LSG) (n=13) or high step group (HSG) (n=19) based on their average daily steps at 6 months post- ACLR, and uninjured matched controls (n=32). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gait biomechanics were collected at 2, 4, and 6 months post-ACLR in ACLR individuals and at a single session for controls. Knee adduction moment (KAM), knee extension moment (KEM), and knee flexion angle (KFA) waveforms were calculated during gait stance and then compared via functional waveform analyses. Mean differences and corresponding 95% confident intervals between groups were reported. RESULTS: Primary results demonstrated lesser KFA (1-45%, 79-92% of stance) and greater KEM (65-93% of stance) at 2 months and greater KAM (14-20%, 68-92% of stance) at 4 months post-ACLR for the HSG compared to the LSG. KEM, KAM, and KFA waveforms differed across various proportions of stance at all timepoints between step groups and controls. CONCLUSION: Differences in gait biomechanics are present at 2 and 4 months post-ACLR between step groups, with the LSG demonstrating an overall more flexed knee and more profound stepwise underloading throughout stance than the HSG. The results indicate a relation between early gait biomechanics and later daily steps behaviors following ACLR.

Acutely Normalizing Walking Speed Does Not Normalize Gait Biomechanics Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of acutely increasing walking speed on gait biomechanics in ACLR individuals compared with their habitual speed and uninjured matched-controls. METHODS: Gait biomechanics were collected on 30 ACLR individuals (20 females; age, 22.0 ± 4.2 yr; body mass index, 24.0 ± 3.0 kg·m -2 ) at their habitual speed and at 1.3 m·s -1 , a speed similar to controls, and 30 uninjured matched-controls (age: 21.9 ± 3.8, body mass index: 23.6 ± 2.5) at their habitual speed. Functional waveform analyses compared biomechanics between: i) walking at habitual speed vs 1.3 m·s -1 in ACLR individuals; and ii) ACLR individuals at 1.3 m·s -1 vs controls. RESULTS: In the ACLR group, there were no statistically significant biomechanical differences between walking at habitual speed (1.18 ± 0.12 m·s -1 ) and 1.3 m·s -1 (1.29 ± 0.05 m·s -1 ). Compared with controls (habitual speed: 1.34 ± 0.12 m·s -1 ), the ACLR group while walking at 1.3 m·s -1 exhibited smaller vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during early and late stance (13-28, 78-90% stance phase), greater midstance vGRF (47-61%), smaller early-to-midstance knee flexion angle (KFA; 1-44%), greater mid-to-late stance KFA (68-73, 96-101%), greater internal knee abduction moment (69-101%), and smaller internal knee extension moment (4-51, 88-96%). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing walking speed to a speed similar to uninjured controls did not elicit significant changes to gait biomechanics, and ACLR individuals continued to demonstrate biomechanical profiles that are associated with PTOA development and differ from controls.

Sustained Limb-Level Loading: A Ground Reaction Force Phenotype Common to Individuals at High Risk for and Those With Knee Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the vertical (vGRF), anterior-posterior (apGRF), and medial-lateral (mlGRF) ground reaction force (GRF) profiles throughout the stance phase of gait (1) between individuals 6 to 12 months post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured matched controls and (2) between ACLR and individuals with differing radiographic severities of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), defined as Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grades KL2, KL3, and KL4. METHODS: A total of 196 participants were included in this retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Gait biomechanics were collected from individuals 6 to 12 months post-ACLR (n = 36), uninjured controls matched to the ACLR group (n = 36), and individuals with KL2 (n = 31), KL3 (n = 67), and KL4 osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 26). Between-group differences in vGRF, apGRF, and mlGRF were assessed in reference to the ACLR group throughout each percentage of stance phase using a functional linear model. RESULTS: The ACLR group demonstrated lower vGRF and apGRF in early and late stance compared to the uninjured controls, with large effects (Cohen's d range: 1.35-1.66). Conversely, the ACLR group exhibited greater vGRF (87%-90%; 4.88% body weight [BW]; d = 0.75) and apGRF (84%-94%; 2.41% BW; d = 0.79) than the KL2 group in a small portion of late stance. No differences in mlGRF profiles were observed between the ACLR and either the uninjured controls or the KL2 group. The magnitude of difference in GRF profiles between the ACLR and OA groups increased with OA disease severity. CONCLUSION: Individuals 6 to 12 months post-ACLR exhibit strikingly similar GRF profiles as individuals with KL2 KOA, suggesting both patient groups may benefit from targeted interventions to address aberrant GRF profiles.

Femoral cartilage ultrasound echo-intensity is a valid measure of cartilage composition.

This study aimed to create a conversion equation that accurately predicts cartilage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 relaxation times using ultrasound echo-intensity and common participant demographics. We recruited 15 participants with a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the ages of 18 and 35 years at 1-5 years after surgery. A single investigator completed a transverse suprapatellar scan with the ACLR limb in max knee flexion to image the femoral trochlea cartilage. A single reader manually segmented the femoral cartilage cross-sectional area to assess the echo-intensity (i.e., mean gray-scale pixel value). At a separate visit, a T2 mapping sequence with the MRI beam set to an oblique angle was used to image the femoral trochlea cartilage. A single reader manually segmented the cartilage cross-sectional area on a single MRI slice to assess the T2 relaxation time. A stepwise, multiple linear regression was used to predict T2 relaxation time from cartilage echo-intensity and common demographic variables. We created a conversion equation using the regression betas and then used an ICC and Bland-Altman plot to assess agreement between the estimated and true T2 relaxation time. Cartilage ultrasound echo-intensity and age significantly predicted T2 relaxation time (F = 7.33, p = 0.008, R2 = 0.55). When using the new conversion equation to estimate T2 relaxation time from cartilage echo-intensity and age, there was strong agreement between the estimated and true T2 relaxation time (ICC2,k = 0.84). This study provides promising preliminary data that cartilage echo-intensity combined with age can be used as a clinically accessible tool for evaluating cartilage composition.

Physical Activity Associates with T1rho MRI of Femoral Cartilage After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Less physical activity has been associated with systemic biomarkers of cartilage breakdown after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, previous research lacks analysis of deleterious cartilage compositional changes and objective physical activity after ACLR. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between physical activity quantified via accelerometer-based measures of daily steps and time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and T1rho magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the femoral articular cartilage, a marker of proteoglycan density in individuals with ACLR. METHODS: Daily steps and MVPA were assessed over 7 d using an accelerometer worn on the hip in 26 individuals between 6 and 12 months after primary unilateral ACLR. Resting T1rho MRI was collected bilaterally, and T1rho MRI interlimb ratios (ILR: ACLR limb/contralateral limb) were calculated for lateral and medial femoral condyle regions of interest. We conducted univariate linear regression analyses to determine associations between T1rho MRI ILRs and daily steps and MVPA with and without controlling for sex. RESULTS: Greater T1rho MRI ILR of the central lateral femoral condyle, indicative of less proteoglycan density in the ACLR limb, was associated with greater time in MVPA ( R2 = 0.178, P = 0.032). Sex-adjusted models showed significant interaction terms between daily steps and sex in the anterior ( P = 0.025), central ( P = 0.002), and posterior ( P = 0.002) medial femoral condyle. CONCLUSIONS: Lesser physical activity may be a risk factor for maintaining cartilage health after ACLR; additionally, the relationship between physical activity and cartilage health may be different between males and females.

Longitudinal Changes in Quadriceps Morphology over the First 3 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Neuromuscular deficits and atrophy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may be accompanied by changes in muscle composition and poor quadriceps muscle quality (QMQ). Quadriceps atrophy occurs after ACLR but improves within the first three postoperative months, yet this hypertrophy could be attributable to increases in noncontractile tissue (i.e., poor QMQ). The purposes of this study were to evaluate changes in QMQ after ACLR and to determine if changes in QMQ and cross-sectional area (CSA) occur in parallel or independently. METHODS: A longitudinal prospective cohort design was implemented to evaluate QMQ and CSA in 20 individuals with ACLR and 12 healthy controls. Participants completed three testing sessions (baseline/presurgery, 1 month, and 3 months) during which ultrasound images were obtained from the vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF). QMQ was calculated as the echo intensity (EI) of each image, with high EI representing poorer QMQ. Anatomical CSA was also obtained from each image. RESULTS: RF and VL EI were greater at 1 and 3 months in the ACLR limb compared with baseline and the contralateral limb and did not change between 1 and 3 months. VL and RF CSA in the ACLR limb were smaller at 1 and 3 months compared with the contralateral limb and controls (VL only) but increased from 1 to 3 months. Changes in QMQ and CSA were not correlated. CONCLUSIONS: QMQ declines within the first month after ACLR and does not improve by 3 months although hypertrophy occurs, suggesting that these morphological characteristics change independently after ACLR. Poorer QMQ represents greater concentration of noncontractile tissues within the muscle and potentially contributes to chronic quadriceps dysfunction observed after ACLR.

The osteoarthritis prevention study (TOPS) - A randomized controlled trial of diet and exercise to prevent Knee Osteoarthritis: Design and rationale.

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA), the leading cause of disability among adults, has no cure and is associated with significant comorbidities. The premise of this randomized clinical trial is that, in a population at risk, a 48-month program of dietary weight loss and exercise will result in less incident structural knee OA compared to control. Methods/design: The Osteoarthritis Prevention Study (TOPS) is a Phase III, assessor-blinded, 48-month, parallel 2 arm, multicenter randomized clinical trial designed to reduce the incidence of structural knee OA. The study objective is to assess the effects of a dietary weight loss, exercise, and weight-loss maintenance program in preventing the development of structural knee OA in females at risk for the disease. TOPS will recruit 1230 ambulatory, community dwelling females with obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) â€‹≥ â€‹30 â€‹kg/m2) and aged ≥50 years with no radiographic (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≤1) and no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of OA in the eligible knee, with no or infrequent knee pain. Incident structural knee OA (defined as tibiofemoral and/or patellofemoral OA on MRI) assessed at 48-months from intervention initiation using the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include knee pain, 6-min walk distance, health-related quality of life, knee joint loading during gait, inflammatory biomarkers, and self-efficacy. Cost effectiveness and budgetary impact analyses will determine the value and affordability of this intervention. Discussion: This study will assess the efficacy and cost effectiveness of a dietary weight loss, exercise, and weight-loss maintenance program designed to reduce incident knee OA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05946044.

Delayed cartilage oligomeric matrix protein response to loading is associated with femoral cartilage composition post-ACLR.

PURPOSE: To determine associations between immediate and delayed response of serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP) to loading (i.e., 3000 walking steps) and femoral cartilage interlimb T1ρ relaxation times in individual's post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 20 individuals 6-12 months following primary ACLR (65% female, 20.5 ± 4.0 years old, 24.9 ± 3.0 kg/m2, 7.3 ± 1.5 months post-ACLR). Serum samples were collected prior to, immediately following, and 3.5 h following walking 3000 steps on a treadmill at habitual walking speed. sCOMP concentrations were processed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Immediate and delayed absolute sCOMP responses to loading were evaluated immediately and 3.5 h post-walking, respectively. Participants underwent bilateral magnetic resonance imaging with T1ρ sequences to calculate resting femoral cartilage interlimb T1ρ relaxation time ratios between limbs (i.e., ACLR/Uninjured limb). Linear regression models were fitted to determine associations between sCOMP response to loading and femoral cartilage T1ρ outcomes controlling for pre-loading sCOMP concentrations. RESULTS: Greater increases in delayed sCOMP response to loading were associated with greater lateral (∆R2 = 0.29, p = 0.02) but not medial (∆R2 < 0.01, p = 0.99) femoral cartilage interlimb T1ρ ratios. Associations between immediate sCOMP response to loading with femoral cartilage interlimb T1ρ ratios were weak and non-significant (∆R2 range = 0.02-0.09, p range = 0.21-0.58). CONCLUSION: Greater delayed sCOMP response to loading, a biomarker of cartilage breakdown, is associated with worse lateral femoral cartilage composition in the ACLR limb compared to the uninjured limb. Delayed sCOMP response to loading may be a more indicative metabolic indicator linked to deleterious changes in composition than immediate sCOMP response.

Knee kinetics and the medial femoral cartilage cross-sectional area response to loading in indviduals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is capable of detecting morphological changes in femoral articular cartilage cross-sectional area in response to an acute bout of walking; yet, the response of femoral cartilage cross-sectional area varies between individuals. It is hypothesized that differences in joint kinetics may influence the response of cartilage to a standardized walking protocol. Therefore, the study purpose was to compare internal knee abduction and extension moments between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction who demonstrate an acute increase, decrease, or unchanged medial femoral cross-sectional area response following 3000 steps. METHODS: The medial femoral cartilage in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed limb was assessed with ultrasonography before and immediately following 3000 steps of treadmill walking. Knee joint moments were calculated in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed limb and compared between groups throughout the stance phase of gait using linear regression and functional, mixed effects waveform analyses. FINDINGS: No associations between peak knee joint moments and the cross-sectional area response were observed. The group that demonstrated an acute cross-sectional area increase exhibited 1) lower knee abduction moments in early stance in comparison to the group that exhibited a decreased cross-sectional area response; and 2) greater knee extension moments in early stance in comparison to the group with an unchanged cross-sectional area response. INTERPRETATION: The propensity of femoral cartilage to acutely increase cross-sectional area in response to walking is consistent with less-dynamic knee abduction and knee extension moment profiles.

Preventing Osteoarthritis After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: An Osteoarthritis Action Alliance Consensus Statement.

After an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, people need secondary prevention strategies to identify osteoarthritis at its earliest stages so that interventions can be implemented to halt or slow the progression toward its long-term burden. The Osteoarthritis Action Alliance formed an interdisciplinary Secondary Prevention Task Group to develop a consensus on recommendations to provide clinicians with secondary prevention strategies that are intended to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a person has an ACL injury. The group achieved consensus on 15 out of 16 recommendations that address patient education, exercise and rehabilitation, psychological skills training, graded-exposure therapy, cognitive-behavioral counseling (lacked consensus), outcomes to monitor, secondary injury prevention, system-level social support, leveraging technology, and coordinated care models. We hope this statement raises awareness among clinicians and researchers on the importance of taking steps to mitigate the risk of osteoarthritis after an ACL injury.

Evidence Review for Preventing Osteoarthritis After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: An Osteoarthritis Action Alliance Consensus Statement.

CONTEXT: The Osteoarthritis Action Alliance formed a secondary prevention task group to develop a consensus on secondary prevention recommendations to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a knee injury. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to provide clinicians with secondary prevention recommendations that are intended to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a person has sustained an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Specifically, this manuscript describes our methods, literature reviews, and dissenting opinions to elaborate on the rationale for our recommendations and to identify critical gaps. DESIGN: Consensus process. SETTING: Virtual video conference calls and online voting. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: The Secondary Prevention Task Group consisted of 29 members from various clinical backgrounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The group initially convened online in August 2020 to discuss the target population, goals, and key topics. After a second call, the task group divided into 9 subgroups to draft the recommendations and supportive text for crucial content areas. Twenty-one members completed 2 rounds of voting and revising the recommendations and supportive text between February and April 2021. A virtual meeting was held to review the wording of the recommendations and obtain final votes. We defined consensus as >80% of voting members supporting a proposed recommendation. RESULTS: The group achieved consensus on 15 of 16 recommendations. The recommendations address patient education, exercise and rehabilitation, psychological skills training, graded-exposure therapy, cognitive-behavioral counseling (lacked consensus), outcomes to monitor, secondary injury prevention, system-level social support, leveraging technology, and coordinated care models. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus statement reflects information synthesized from an interdisciplinary group of experts based on the best available evidence from the literature or personal experience. We hope this document raises awareness among clinicians and researchers to take steps to mitigate the risk of osteoarthritis after an anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Strength, and Functional Performance in Primary Versus Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are not well understood. HYPOTHESIS: Patients undergoing revision ACLR would demonstrate worse patient-reported outcomes and worse limb symmetry compared with a cohort undergoing primary ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: 672 participants (373 with primary ACLR, 111 with revision ACLR, and 188 uninjured) completed functional testing at a single academic medical center. Descriptive information, operative variables, and patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Tegner Activity Scale score) were assessed for each patient. Quadriceps and hamstring strength tests were conducted using a Biodex System 3 Dynamometer. Single-leg hop for distance, triple hop test, and the 6-m timed hop test were also assessed. Limb symmetry index (LSI) between the ACLR limb and contralateral limb was calculated for strength and hop testing. Normalized peak torque (N·m/kg) was calculated for strength testing. RESULTS: No differences were found in group characteristics, excluding body mass (P < .001), or in patient-reported outcomes. There were no interactions between revision status, graft type, and sex. Knee extension LSI was inferior (P < .001) in participants who had undergone primary (73.0% ± 15.0%) and revision (77.2% ± 19.1%) ACLR compared with healthy, uninjured participants (98.8% ± 10.4%). Knee flexion LSI was inferior (P = .04) in the primary group (97.4% ± 18.4%) compared with the revision group (101.9% ± 18.5%). Difference in knee flexion LSI between the uninjured and primary groups, as well as between the uninjured and revision groups, did not reach statistical significance. Hop LSI outcomes were significantly different across all groups (P < .001). Between-group differences in extension in the involved limb (P < .001) were noted, as the uninjured group exhibited stronger knee extension (2.16 ± 0.46 N·m/kg) than the primary group (1.67 ± 0.47 N·m/kg) and the revision group (1.78 ± 0.48 N·m/kg). As well, differences in flexion in the involved limb (P = .01) were found, as the revision group exhibited stronger knee flexion (1.06 ± 0.25 N·m/kg) than the primary group (0.97 ± 0.29 N·m/kg) and the uninjured group (0.98 ± 0.24 N·m/kg). CONCLUSION: At 7 months postoperatively, patients who had undergone revision ACLR did not demonstrate inferior patient-reported outcomes, limb symmetry, strength, or functional performance compared with patients who had undergone primary ACLR. Patients who had undergone revision ACLR exhibited greater strength and LSI than their counterparts with primary ACLR, but these parameters were still inferior to those of uninjured controls.