Comparison of tomographic reports by radiologists and non-radiologists in trauma and interferences in management in a trauma reference center.

OBJECTIVE: diagnostic errors during the interpretation of an imaging test by the physician can lead to increased mortality and length of hospital stay for patients. The rate of divergence in the report given by a radiologist and an Emergency Physicians (EP) can reach over 20%. The objective of this study was to compare the unofficial tomographic reports issued by EP with the official reports issued by radiologists. METHODS: a cross-sectional study, in which interpretations of the exams (documented in the medical records by the EP) of all patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen or pelvis performed in the emergency room, at an interval of 8 months, were evaluated. These data were compared with the official reports of the radiologist (gold standard). RESULTS: 508 patients were included. The divergence between EP and the radiologist occurred in 27% of the cases. The most common type of divergence was the one not described by the EP, but described by the radiologist. The chance of having divergence in a case of multiple trauma is 4.93 times greater in relation to the case of only blunt trauma in one segment. A statistically relevant difference was also found in the length of stay of patients who had different interpretations of the CT scans. CONCLUSION: the study found a relatively high divergence rate between the EP report and the official radiologist report. However, less than 4% of these were considered to be clinically relevant, indicating the ability of the EP to interpret it satisfactorily.

Comparison of tomographic reports by radiologists and non-radiologists in trauma and interferences in management in a trauma reference center / Comparação de laudos tomográficos por médicos radiologistas x não radiologistas no trauma e interferências na conduta em um centro de referência de trauma

ABSTRACT Objective: diagnostic errors during the interpretation of an imaging test by the physician can lead to increased mortality and length of hospital stay for patients. The rate of divergence in the report given by a radiologist and an Emergency Physicians (EP) can reach over 20%. The objective of this study was to compare the unofficial tomographic reports issued by EP with the official reports issued by radiologists. Methods: a cross-sectional study, in which interpretations of the exams (documented in the medical records by the EP) of all patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen or pelvis performed in the emergency room, at an interval of 8 months, were evaluated. These data were compared with the official reports of the radiologist (gold standard). Results: 508 patients were included. The divergence between EP and the radiologist occurred in 27% of the cases. The most common type of divergence was the one not described by the EP, but described by the radiologist. The chance of having divergence in a case of multiple trauma is 4.93 times greater in relation to the case of only blunt trauma in one segment. A statistically relevant difference was also found in the length of stay of patients who had different interpretations of the CT scans. Conclusion: the study found a relatively high divergence rate between the EP report and the official radiologist report. However, less than 4% of these were considered to be clinically relevant, indicating the ability of the EP to interpret it satisfactorily.

RESUMO Objetivo: os erros diagnósticos durante a interpretação de um exame de imagem pelo médico podem acarretar aumento da mortalidade e do tempo de internação dos pacientes. A taxa de divergência entre o laudo dado por um médico radiologista e a avaliação preliminar de um Médico Emergencista (ME) pode chegar a mais de 20%. O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar as avaliações dos exames de imagem realizadas pelo ME com os laudos oficiais emitidos pelos radiologistas. Métodos: estudo seccional e transversal, no qual foram avaliadas interpretações dos exames (documentadas no prontuário pelos ME) de todos os pacientes submetidos à tomografia computadorizada (TC) de tórax, abdome ou pelve realizada na emergência, em um intervalo de 8 meses. Esses dados foram comparados com os laudos oficiais do médico radiologista (padrão ouro). Resultados: foram incluídos 508 pacientes no estudo. A divergência entre ME e radiologista ocorreu em 27% dos casos. O tipo de divergência mais incidente foi a não descrita pelo ME, mas descrita pelo radiologista. A chance de haver divergência em um caso de politrauma é 4,93 vezes maior em relação ao caso de somente trauma contuso em um segmento. Foi encontrada também uma diferença estatisticamente relevante no tempo de internamento dos pacientes que tiveram interpretações divergentes das tomografias. Conclusão: o estudo encontrou uma taxa de divergência relativamente alta entre o laudo do ME e o laudo oficial do radiologista. Contudo, menos de 4% dessas foram consideradas como clinicamente relevantes, indicando a capacidade dos ME em interpretar os exames de imagem de forma satisfatória.

CT scan in the evaluation of pediatric abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVE: to assess the need of computed tomography (CT) for the definition of management in pediatric abdominal trauma. METHODS: observational retrospective study with patients under 18 years old victims of blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma that underwent CT of the abdomen and pelvis at admission. We evaluated CT scan findings, indications and management. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of clinical variables and energy of trauma for findings on CT. RESULTS: among the 236 patients included in our study, 72% (n=170) did not present abnormal findings on CT. It was performed surgical treatment in 15% (n=10), conservative treatment in 54,5% (n=36) and 27% (n=18) did not receive treatment for abdominal injuries. In the assessment of CT indications, 28,8% (n=68) presented no justifications. In this group, 91% (n=62) did not show any abnormal findings. Among the six patients with positive findings, half were selected for conservative treatment, while the rest did not need any treatment for abdominal injuries. The presence of abdominal pain, hemodynamic alterations and high energy blunt trauma had low positive predictive values when isolated, whereas the negative predictive values were higher. CONCLUSION: although CT is necessary in some instances, there is a possible high number of exams that did not make any difference in the management of the pediatric population.

RISK FACTORS FOR SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION AFTER ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY.

BACKGROUND: One of the ways to avoid infection after surgical procedures is through antibiotic prophylaxis. This occurs in cholecystectomies with certain risk factors for infection. However, some guidelines suggest the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for all cholecystectomies, although current evidence does not indicate any advantage of this practice in the absence of risk factors. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the incidence of wound infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in these procedures. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 439 patients with chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis, accounting for different risk factors for wound infection. RESULTS: There were seven cases of wound infection (1.59%). No antibiotic prophylaxis regimen significantly altered infection rates. There was a statistically significant correlation between wound infection and male patients (p=0.013). No other analyzed risk factor showed a statistical correlation with wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: The nonuse of antibiotic prophylaxis and other analyzed factors did not present a significant correlation for the increase in the occurrence of wound infection. Studies with a larger sample and a control group without antibiotic prophylaxis are necessary.

RISK FACTORS FOR SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION AFTER ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY.

AIM: One of the ways to avoid infection after surgical procedures is through antibiotic prophylaxis. This occurs in cholecystectomies with certain risk factors for infection. However, some guidelines suggest the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for all cholecystectomies, although current evidence does not indicate any advantage of this practice in the absence of risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of wound infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in these procedures. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 439 patients with chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis, accounting for different risk factors for wound infection. RESULTS: There were 7 (1.59%) cases of wound infection. No antibiotic prophylaxis regimen significantly altered infection rates. There was a statistically significant correlation between wound infection and male patients (p=0.013). No other analyzed risk factor showed a statistical correlation with wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: The non-use of antibiotic prophylaxis and other analyzed factors did not present a significant correlation for the increase in the occurrence of wound infection. Studies with a larger sample and a control group without antibiotic prophylaxis are necessary.

Risk factors for surgical wound infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy / Fatores de risco para infecção de ferida operatória após colecistectomia laparoscópica eletiva

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: One of the ways to avoid infection after surgical procedures is through antibiotic prophylaxis. This occurs in cholecystectomies with certain risk factors for infection. However, some guidelines suggest the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for all cholecystectomies, although current evidence does not indicate any advantage of this practice in the absence of risk factors. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of wound infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in these procedures. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 439 patients with chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis, accounting for different risk factors for wound infection. RESULTS: There were 7 (1.59%) cases of wound infection. No antibiotic prophylaxis regimen significantly altered infection rates. There was a statistically significant correlation between wound infection and male patients (p=0.013). No other analyzed risk factor showed a statistical correlation with wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: The non-use of antibiotic prophylaxis and other analyzed factors did not present a significant correlation for the increase in the occurrence of wound infection. Studies with a larger sample and a control group without antibiotic prophylaxis are necessary.

RESUMO - RACIONAL: Uma das formas de evitar infecção após procedimentos cirúrgicos é por meio de profilaxia antibiótica. Isso ocorre em colecistectomias com certos fatores de risco para infecção. No entanto, algumas diretrizes sugerem o uso de profilaxia antibiótica para todas as colecistectomias, embora evidências atuais não indiquem qualquer benefício dessa prática na ausência de fatores de risco. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a incidência de infecção em ferida operatória após colecistectomias laparoscópicas eletivas e o uso de antibioticoprofilaxia nesses procedimentos. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de 439 pacientes com colecistite crônica e colelitíase, contabilizados os diferentes fatores de risco para infecção de feridas. RESULTADOS: Ocorreram sete casos de infecção de ferida operatória (1.59%). Nenhum esquema de antibioticoprofilaxia alterou significativamente as taxas de infecção. Foi registrada correlação estatisticamente significativa entre infecção de ferida operatória e pacientes do sexo masculino (p=0.013). Nenhum outro fator de risco analisado demonstrou correlação estatística com infecção de ferida operatória. CONCLUSÕES: O não emprego de antibioticoprofilaxia e outros fatores analisados não apresentaram correlação significativa para aumento da frequência de infecção de ferida operatória. Estudos com maior amostra e grupo controle sem antibioticoprofilaxia são necessários.

CT scan in the evaluation of pediatric abdominal trauma / Tomografia computadorizada na avaliação do trauma abdominal pediátrico

ABSTRACT Objective: to assess the need of computed tomography (CT) for the definition of management in pediatric abdominal trauma. Methods: observational retrospective study with patients under 18 years old victims of blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma that underwent CT of the abdomen and pelvis at admission. We evaluated CT scan findings, indications and management. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of clinical variables and energy of trauma for findings on CT. Results: among the 236 patients included in our study, 72% (n=170) did not present abnormal findings on CT. It was performed surgical treatment in 15% (n=10), conservative treatment in 54,5% (n=36) and 27% (n=18) did not receive treatment for abdominal injuries. In the assessment of CT indications, 28,8% (n=68) presented no justifications. In this group, 91% (n=62) did not show any abnormal findings. Among the six patients with positive findings, half were selected for conservative treatment, while the rest did not need any treatment for abdominal injuries. The presence of abdominal pain, hemodynamic alterations and high energy blunt trauma had low positive predictive values when isolated, whereas the negative predictive values were higher. Conclusion: although CT is necessary in some instances, there is a possible high number of exams that did not make any difference in the management of the pediatric population.

RESUMO Introdução: avaliar a necessidade da tomografia computadorizada (TC) para definição de condutas em trauma abdominal pediátrico. Métodos: estudo observacional retrospectivo com pacientes menores de 18 anos vítimas de trauma abdominal contuso ou penetrante e que realizaram TC de abdome e pelve na admissão. Avaliou-se achados das tomografias, condutas e justificativas para indicação da TC. Foram calculados sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo e valor preditivo negativo de fatores clínicos e energia do trauma para alterações na TC. Resultados: dentre os 236 pacientes incluídos, 72% (n=170) não apresentaram alterações na TC. Foi realizado tratamento cirúrgico em 15% (n=10), tratamento conservador em 54,5% (n=36) e 27% (n=18) não receberam tratamento por lesões abdominais. Na avaliação das indicações de TC, 28,8% (n=68) não apresentavam nenhuma justificativa, sendo que nesse grupo 91% (n=62) resultaram em ausência de achados. Dentre os seis pacientes com achados positivos, metade recebeu tratamento conservador, enquanto o restante não necessitou de tratamento por lesões abdominais. A presença de dor abdominal, alteração hemodinâmica e trauma contuso de alta energia apresentaram baixos valores preditivos positivos de forma isolada, enquanto os valores preditivos negativos foram mais altos. Conclusão: apesar de a TC ser necessária e justificável em alguns casos, há um possível excesso de tomografias dispensáveis para definição de condutas em população pediátrica.

Lumbar and para-iliac hernias: an alternative technique.

Lumbar and para-iliac hernias are rare and occur after removal of an iliac bone graft, nephrectomies, retroperitoneal aortic surgery, or after blunt trauma to the abdomen. The incidence of hernia after the removal of these grafts ranges from 0.5 to 10%. These hernias are a problem that surgeons will face, since bone grafts from the iliac crest are being used more routinely. The goal of this article was to report the technique to correct these complex hernias, using the technique of fixing the propylene mesh to the iliac bone and the result of this approach. In the period of 5 years, 165 patients were treated at the complex hernia service, 10 (6%) with hernia in the supra-iliac and lumbar region, managed with the technique of fixing the mesh to the iliac bone with correction of the failure. During the mean follow-up of 33 months (minimum of 2 and maximum of 48 months), there was no recurrence of the hernias.

Early medical school graduation during the COVID-19 pandemic: preliminary assessment / Graduação antecipada do curso de medicina durante a pandemia de COVID-19: avaliação preliminar

Abstract: Introduction: The current outbreak of the new coronavirus or SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, was first reported to the World Health Organization on December 31, 2019, being declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020. As for the clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is a broad one, ranging from asymptomatic, mild upper respiratory tract disease to severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure and death. With a chance of severe clinical presentation close to 25%, SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to health service overload and increase the demand for material and human resources. Aiming to increase the availability of health professionals directly involved in care during the pandemic, the Ministry of Education authorized the early graduation for students pursuing careers in health, including medicine. Objective: The aim of this article is to obtain preliminary results of the impact of early graduation for medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: Observational and cross-sectional study, carried out by applying a questionnaire with 13 questions, five of which used a Likert scale of assessment, six in multiple choice format and two descriptive, via Google Forms, applied to medical students from the universities of Curitiba-PR that graduated earlier in mid-year 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: 113 recently graduated students answered the questionnaire.101 participants reported that they are working as physicians and, among them, 63.36% stated that they are working directly in the treatment of COVID-19 cases. Regarding the importance of an early graduation, most participants fully agree or agree, while only three participants totally disagree. More than half of the interviewees do not feel harmed by the early graduation. However, 43.3% believe they have failed to acquire important information for their training. Finally, regarding their performance in the pandemic, 79.6% consider important their role in the fight against COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: The study shows that, at first, the efforts to give the Class of 2020 an early graduation were successful, since these new physicians are contributing to alleviate workforce shortages and provide better care for patients during the pandemic.

Resumo: Introdução: O atual surto do novo coronavírus ou Sars-CoV-2, causador da Covid-19, foi relatado pela primeira vez à Organização Mundial da Saúde, pela China, em 31 de dezembro de 2019, sendo declarada pandemia em 11 de março de 2020. Quanto ao espectro clínico da infecção pelo Sars-CoV-2, ele é amplo, variando de quadro assintomático, doença leve do trato respiratório superior, a pneumonia viral grave com insuficiência respiratória e morte. Com uma chance de apresentação clínica grave próxima a 25%, a infecção pelo Sars-CoV-2 pode levar à sobrecarga dos serviços de saúde e aumentar a demanda tanto por recursos materiais como humanos. Para aumentar a disponibilidade de profissionais da área da saúde envolvidos diretamente no atendimento durante a pandemia, o Ministério da Educação autorizou a antecipação da formatura para estudantes de várias áreas da saúde, incluindo Medicina. Objetivo: O objetivo do presente artigo é realizar uma avaliação preliminar do impacto da antecipação da graduação para os formandos de Medicina durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Método: Trata-se de estudo observacional e transversal realizado por meio da aplicação de questionário com 13 perguntas: em cinco, utilizou-se escala Likert de avaliação; em seis, adotou-se o formato de múltipla escolha; e duas foram descritivas. O questionário foi enviado, via Formulário Google, a alunos de Medicina das universidades de Curitiba, no Paraná, formados no primeiro semestre de 2020, que anteciparam a outorga de grau em razão da pandemia de Covid-19. Resultados: Responderam ao questionário 113 formandos, dos quais 101 relataram que já atuam como médicos. Destes, 63,36% afirmaram que estão trabalhando diretamente no atendimento de casos de Covid-19. Sobre a importância da antecipação da outorga de grau, a maioria dos participantes concorda totalmente ou concorda, e apenas três participantes discordam totalmente. Mais da metade dos entrevistados não se sentem prejudicados com a antecipação da outorga de grau. Contudo, 43,3% acreditam que deixaram de adquirir informações importantes em sua formação. Por fim, quanto ao fato de trabalharem na pandemia, 79,6% consideram importante a atuação de médicos recém-formados no combate à Covid-19. Conclusão: Este estudo mostra que, a princípio, os esforços para a antecipação de formatura foram bem-sucedidos, já que os novos médicos estão contribuindo para aliviar a pressão imposta pela falta de profissionais e promover um melhor cuidado aos pacientes durante a pandemia.

Lumbar and para-iliac hernias: an alternative technique / Hérnias lombares e para-ilíacas: uma alternativa técnica

ABSTRACT Lumbar and para-iliac hernias are rare and occur after removal of an iliac bone graft, nephrectomies, retroperitoneal aortic surgery, or after blunt trauma to the abdomen. The incidence of hernia after the removal of these grafts ranges from 0.5 to 10%. These hernias are a problem that surgeons will face, since bone grafts from the iliac crest are being used more routinely. The goal of this article was to report the technique to correct these complex hernias, using the technique of fixing the propylene mesh to the iliac bone and the result of this approach. In the period of 5 years, 165 patients were treated at the complex hernia service, 10 (6%) with hernia in the supra-iliac and lumbar region, managed with the technique of fixing the mesh to the iliac bone with correction of the failure. During the mean follow-up of 33 months (minimum of 2 and maximum of 48 months), there was no recurrence of the hernias.

RESUMO Hérnias lombares e para-ilíacas são raras e ocorrem após a retirada de enxerto ósseo ilíaco, nefrectomias, cirurgia aórtica retroperitoneal, ou ainda, após traumas contusos sobre o abdômen. A incidência de hérnia após a retirada destes enxertos varia de 0,5 a 10%. Essas hérnias constituem um problema com o qual os cirurgiões irão se defrontar, uma vez que os enxertos ósseos da crista ilíaca estão sendo usados mais rotineiramente. O objetivo desse artigo foi relatar a técnica para correção dessas hérnias, consideradas complexas, utilizando-se a técnica de fixação de tela de propileno ao osso ilíaco e o resultado dessa abordagem. No período de 5 anos, 165 pacientes foram atendidos no serviço de hérnias complexas, 10 (6%) com hérnia da região suprailíaca e lombar, manejados com a técnica de fixação de tela ao osso ilíaco corrigindo a falha. Durante o seguimento médio de 33 meses (mínimo de 2 e máximo de 48 meses), não houve recidiva das hérnias.

CT scanning in blunt chest trauma: validation of decision instruments.

OBJECTIVE: to perform an external validation of two clinical decision instruments (DIs) - Chest CT-All and Chest CT-Major - in a cohort of patients with blunt chest trauma undergoing chest CT scanning at a trauma referral center, and determine if these DIs are safe options for selective ordering of chest CT scans in patients with blunt chest trauma admitted to emergency units. METHODS: cross-sectional study of patients with blunt chest trauma undergoing chest CT scanning over a period of 11 months. Chest CT reports were cross-checked with the patients' electronic medical record data. The sensitivity and specificity of both instruments were calculated. RESULTS: the study included 764 patients. The Chest CT-All DI showed 100% sensitivity for all injuries and specificity values of 33.6% for injuries of major clinical significance and 40.4% for any lesion. The Chest CT-Major DI had sensitivity of 100% for injuries of major clinical significance, which decreased to 98.6% for any lesions, and specificity values of 37.4% for injuries of major clinical significance and 44.6% for all lesions. CONCLUSION: both clinical DIs validated in this study showed adequate sensitivity to detect chest injuries on CT and can be safely used to forego chest CT evaluation in patients without any of the criteria that define each DI. Had the Chest CT-All and Chest CT-Major DIs been applied in this cohort, the number of CT scans performed would have decreased by 23.1% and 24.6%, respectively, resulting in cost reduction and avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure.

CT scanning in blunt chest trauma: validation of decision instruments / Tomografia computadorizada em trauma torácico fechado: validação de instrumentos de decisão

ABSTRACT Objective: to perform an external validation of two clinical decision instruments (DIs) - Chest CT-All and Chest CT-Major - in a cohort of patients with blunt chest trauma undergoing chest CT scanning at a trauma referral center, and determine if these DIs are safe options for selective ordering of chest CT scans in patients with blunt chest trauma admitted to emergency units. Methods: cross-sectional study of patients with blunt chest trauma undergoing chest CT scanning over a period of 11 months. Chest CT reports were cross-checked with the patients' electronic medical record data. The sensitivity and specificity of both instruments were calculated. Results: the study included 764 patients. The Chest CT-All DI showed 100% sensitivity for all injuries and specificity values of 33.6% for injuries of major clinical significance and 40.4% for any lesion. The Chest CT-Major DI had sensitivity of 100% for injuries of major clinical significance, which decreased to 98.6% for any lesions, and specificity values of 37.4% for injuries of major clinical significance and 44.6% for all lesions. Conclusion: both clinical DIs validated in this study showed adequate sensitivity to detect chest injuries on CT and can be safely used to forego chest CT evaluation in patients without any of the criteria that define each DI. Had the Chest CT-All and Chest CT-Major DIs been applied in this cohort, the number of CT scans performed would have decreased by 23.1% and 24.6%, respectively, resulting in cost reduction and avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure.

RESUMO Objetivo: realizar validação externa de dois instrumentos de decisão clínica (IDCs) - TC de tórax-All e TC de tórax-Major - em uma coorte de pacientes com trauma torácico fechado submetidos a tomografia computadorizada de tórax em centro de referência para trauma, e determinar se esses IDCs são opções seguras para solicitação seletiva de tomografias computadorizadas de tórax em pacientes com trauma torácico fechado admitidos em unidades de emergência. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo transversal de pacientes com trauma torácico fechado submetidos a tomografia computadorizada de tórax, por período de 11 meses. Os laudos da TC de tórax foram cruzados com os dados do prontuário eletrônico dos pacientes. A sensibilidade e especificidade de ambos os instrumentos foram calculadas. Resultados: o estudo incluiu 764 pacientes. O IDC TC de tórax-All apresentou sensibilidade de 100% para todas as lesões e especificidades de 33,6% para lesões de maior significado clínico e 40,4% para qualquer lesão. O IDC TC de tórax Major teve sensibilidade de 100% para lesões de maior significado clínico, que diminuiu para 98,6% para quaisquer lesões, e especificidades de 37,4% para lesões de maior significado clínico e 44,6% para todas as lesões. Conclusão: ambos os instrumentos de decisão clínica validados neste estudo mostraram sensibilidade adequada para detectar lesões torácicas na TC e podem ser usados com segurança para dispensar a avaliação da TC de tórax em pacientes sem nenhum dos critérios que definem o IDC. Se os IDCs TC de tórax-All e TC de tórax Major de tórax tivessem sido aplicados nesta coorte, o número de tomografias realizadas teria diminuído em 23,1% e 24,6%, respectivamente, resultando em redução de custos e evitando exposição desnecessária à radiação.

Evaluation of traumatic brain injury patients with signs of alcohol intoxication. / Avaliação de pacientes vítimas de trauma cranioencefálico com sinais de intoxicação alcoólica.

OBJETIVE: to evaluate the influence of alcohol intoxication in the time to perform head computed tomography and tomographic findings in traumatic brain injury patients. METHODS: a retrospective study of 183 traumatic brain injury patients, divided into two groups: 90 alcoholics and 93 non-alcoholics. Time interval from patient's arrival at emergency room to tomography was calculated for comparison between the groups, and tomographic findings were analyzed. RESULTS: in the alcoholic group, the percentage of male patients was higher, the predominant age was between 31 and 40 years, aggression was the most frequent trauma mechanism, and these patients showed lower values on the Glasgow coma scale. It was observed that there was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding the time interval for tomography execution, as well as regarding the tomographic findings. In addition, in the alcoholic patients, when the Glasgow coma scale values were correlated with the time interval, there was no difference from scores 13 to 15 (mild traumatic brain injury) and those equal to or inferior than 12 (moderate and severe traumatic brain injury). CONCLUSION: signs of alcoholic intoxication did not influence the time interval for tomography execution. Patients under alcohol influence showed lower scores on the Glasgow coma scale due to the direct effect of alcohol and not due to a higher prevalence of tomographic findings.

OBJETIVO: avaliar, em vítimas de traumatismo cranioencefálico, a influência da intoxicação alcoólica no tempo para submissão destes pacientes à tomografia de crânio, comparando também os achados tomográficos nos pacientes alcoolizados e não alcoolizados. MÉTODOS: estudo retrospectivo de 183 pacientes com traumatismo cranioencefálico, divididos em dois grupos: 90 alcoolizados e 93 não alcoolizados. Foi calculado o intervalo de tempo desde a chegada do paciente ao pronto socorro até a realização da tomografia para comparação entre os grupos, e analisados os achados tomográficos. RESULTADOS: no grupo alcoolizado, o percentual de pacientes do sexo masculino foi maior, a idade predominante situava-se entre os 31 e os 40 anos, a agressão foi o mecanismo de trauma mais frequente e estes pacientes apresentaram valores mais baixos na escala de coma de Glasgow. Observou-se que não houve diferença estatística entre os dois grupos quanto ao intervalo de tempo para realização de tomografia, bem como, em relação aos achados tomográficos. Além disso, nos pacientes alcoolizados, quando correlacionados os valores da escala de coma de Glasgow com o intervalo de tempo, não houve diferença entre valores de 13 a 15 (traumatismo cranioencefálico leve) e os iguais ou menores do que 12 (traumatismo cranioencefálico moderado e grave). CONCLUSÃO: os sinais de intoxicação alcoólica não influenciaram no intervalo de tempo para realização da tomografia. Os pacientes alcoolizados apresentaram escores mais baixos na escala de coma de Glasgow por efeito direto do álcool e não por uma maior prevalência de achados tomográficos.

Computerized Axial Tomography in patients with severe abdominal trauma: is it a justifiable risk? / Tomografia no trauma abdominal grave: risco justificável?

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the evolution of severe abdominal trauma patients, for whom the massive transfusion protocol was triggered, and who were submitted to Computed Axial Tomography (CAT) in the emergency room (ER), in order to verify the patient's prognosis and the diagnostic efficiency of CAT in this scenario. METHODS: retrospective, longitudinal and observational study performed at a referral center for trauma care in Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. We selected 60 severe abdominal trauma patients who had massive transfusion protocol activation and divided them into two groups: patients who underwent CAT at ER and patients who did not. We verified the diagnostic accuracy of CAT-scan examination and compared the number of deaths, hospitalization time, and transfused blood components in both groups. RESULTS: considering the 60 patients, 66.67% received red blood cells at ER; 33.3% underwent CAT on admission due to hemodynamic improvement, and 66.7% did not perform the examination at the entrance. The percentage of deaths was 35% in both groups. Considering the two groups, the difference between the mean lengths of hospital stay was not statistically significant, as well as the difference between the mean numbers of transfused red blood cells. In the group that underwent CAT, 45% did not require exploratory laparotomy. CONCLUSION: CAT could be rapidly performed in patients with hemodynamic instability on arrival at ER, sparing some patients from an unnecessary exploratory laparotomy and not significantly influencing mortality.

OBJETIVO: avaliar a evolução de pacientes vítimas de trauma abdominal grave, nos quais o protocolo de transfusão maciça foi acionado, e que foram submetidos à Tomografia Axial Computadorizada (TAC) no Pronto Socorro (PS), com o intuito de verificar o prognóstico do paciente e a eficiência diagnóstica da TAC nesse cenário. MÉTODOS: estudo retrospectivo, longitudinal e observacional, feito em centro de referência para trauma. Foram selecionados 60 pacientes vítimas de trauma abdominal grave que ativaram o protocolo de transfusão maciça, divididos em dois grupos: os submetidos à TAC no PS e os que não foram. Verificou-se a acurácia da TAC, comparou-se o número de óbitos nos dois grupos, o tempo de internamento e os hemocomponentes transfundidos. RESULTADOS: dos 60 pacientes, 66,67% receberam concentrados de hemácias ainda no PS; 33,3% foram submetidos à TAC na admissão, pela melhora hemodinâmica, e 66,7% não realizaram o exame na entrada. O percentual de óbitos foi de 35% em ambos os grupos. A diferença entre as médias do tempo de internamento entre os grupos não foi estatisticamente significativa, assim como a média da quantidade de concentrado de hemácias transfundido. No grupo que fez TAC, 45% não necessitaram de laparotomia exploratória. CONCLUSÃO: a TAC pôde ser realizada de maneira rápida em pacientes com instabilidade hemodinâmica na chegada ao PS, não influenciou significativamente a mortalidade e poupou alguns doentes de uma laparotomia exploratória desnecessária.

Chest tube simulator: development of low-cost model for training of physicians and medical students. / Simulador de dreno de tórax: desenvolvimento de modelo de baixo custo para capacitação de médicos e estudantes de medicina.

OBJECTIVE: by using a 3D printer, to create a low-cost human chest cavity simulator that allows the reproduction of the closed chest drainage technique (CCD), comparing its effectiveness with that of the animal model. METHODS: it was made a 3D printing of the bony framework of a human thorax from a chest computerized tomography scan. After printing the ribs, we performed tests with several materials that contributed to form the simulation of the thoracic cavity and pleura. An experimental, randomized, and controlled study, comparing the efficacy of the simulator to the efficacy of the animal model, was then carried out in the teaching of CCD technique for medical students, who were divided into two groups: animal model group and simulator model group, that trained CCD technique in animals and in the simulator model, respectively. RESULTS: the chest reconstruction required anatomical knowledge for tomography analysis and for faithful 3D surface editing. There was no significant difference in the safety of performing the procedure in both groups (7.61 vs. 7.73; p=0.398). A higher score was observed in the simulator model group for "use as didactic material" and "learning of the chest drainage technique", when compared to the animal model group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: the final cost for producing the model was lower than that of a commercial simulator, what demonstrates the feasibility of using 3D printing for this purpose. In addition, the developed simulator was shown to be equivalent to the animal model in relation to the simulation of the drainage technique for practical learning, and there was preference for the simulator model as didactic material.

OBJETIVO: criar, em impressora 3D, um simulador de baixo custo de caixa torácica humana que permita a reprodução da técnica de drenagem fechada de tórax (DFT) comparando sua eficácia com a do modelo animal. MÉTODOS: foi realizada impressão 3D do arcabouço ósseo de um tórax humano a partir de uma tomografia de tórax. Após a impressão das costelas, foram realizados testes com diversos materiais que contribuíram para formar a simulação da caixa torácica e da pleura. Foi, então, realizado um estudo experimental, randomizado e controlado comparando sua eficácia ao modelo animal no ensino da DFT para estudantes de medicina, que foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo Modelo Animal e Grupo Modelo Simulador, que treinaram DFT em animais e no modelo simulador, respectivamente. RESULTADOS: a reconstrução do tórax exigiu o conhecimento anatômico para análise da tomografia e para edição fiel da superfície 3D. Não houve diferença significativa quanto à segurança de realizar o procedimento entre os grupos (7,61 vs. 7,73; p=0,398). Foi observada maior pontuação no grupo modelo simulador para uso como material didático e aprendizado da técnica de drenagem torácica quando comparado ao grupo modelo animal (p<0,05). CONCLUSÃO: o custo final para a confecção do modelo foi inferior ao de um simulador comercial, o que demonstra a viabilidade do uso da impressão 3D para esse fim. Além disso, o simulador desenvolvido se mostrou equivalente ao modelo animal quanto à simulação da técnica de drenagem para aprendizado prático e houve preferência pelo modelo simulador como material didático.

Avaliação de pacientes vítimas de trauma cranioencefálico com sinais de intoxicação alcoólica / Evaluation of traumatic brain injury patients with signs of alcohol intoxication

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar, em vítimas de traumatismo cranioencefálico, a influência da intoxicação alcoólica no tempo para submissão destes pacientes à tomografia de crânio, comparando também os achados tomográficos nos pacientes alcoolizados e não alcoolizados. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo de 183 pacientes com traumatismo cranioencefálico, divididos em dois grupos: 90 alcoolizados e 93 não alcoolizados. Foi calculado o intervalo de tempo desde a chegada do paciente ao pronto socorro até a realização da tomografia para comparação entre os grupos, e analisados os achados tomográficos. Resultados: no grupo alcoolizado, o percentual de pacientes do sexo masculino foi maior, a idade predominante situava-se entre os 31 e os 40 anos, a agressão foi o mecanismo de trauma mais frequente e estes pacientes apresentaram valores mais baixos na escala de coma de Glasgow. Observou-se que não houve diferença estatística entre os dois grupos quanto ao intervalo de tempo para realização de tomografia, bem como, em relação aos achados tomográficos. Além disso, nos pacientes alcoolizados, quando correlacionados os valores da escala de coma de Glasgow com o intervalo de tempo, não houve diferença entre valores de 13 a 15 (traumatismo cranioencefálico leve) e os iguais ou menores do que 12 (traumatismo cranioencefálico moderado e grave). Conclusão: os sinais de intoxicação alcoólica não influenciaram no intervalo de tempo para realização da tomografia. Os pacientes alcoolizados apresentaram escores mais baixos na escala de coma de Glasgow por efeito direto do álcool e não por uma maior prevalência de achados tomográficos.

ABSTRACT Objetive: to evaluate the influence of alcohol intoxication in the time to perform head computed tomography and tomographic findings in traumatic brain injury patients. Methods: a retrospective study of 183 traumatic brain injury patients, divided into two groups: 90 alcoholics and 93 non-alcoholics. Time interval from patient's arrival at emergency room to tomography was calculated for comparison between the groups, and tomographic findings were analyzed. Results: in the alcoholic group, the percentage of male patients was higher, the predominant age was between 31 and 40 years, aggression was the most frequent trauma mechanism, and these patients showed lower values on the Glasgow coma scale. It was observed that there was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding the time interval for tomography execution, as well as regarding the tomographic findings. In addition, in the alcoholic patients, when the Glasgow coma scale values were correlated with the time interval, there was no difference from scores 13 to 15 (mild traumatic brain injury) and those equal to or inferior than 12 (moderate and severe traumatic brain injury). Conclusion: signs of alcoholic intoxication did not influence the time interval for tomography execution. Patients under alcohol influence showed lower scores on the Glasgow coma scale due to the direct effect of alcohol and not due to a higher prevalence of tomographic findings.

Tomografia no trauma abdominal grave: risco justificável? / Computerized Axial Tomography in patients with severe abdominal trauma: is it a justifiable risk?

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a evolução de pacientes vítimas de trauma abdominal grave, nos quais o protocolo de transfusão maciça foi acionado, e que foram submetidos à Tomografia Axial Computadorizada (TAC) no Pronto Socorro (PS), com o intuito de verificar o prognóstico do paciente e a eficiência diagnóstica da TAC nesse cenário. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo, longitudinal e observacional, feito em centro de referência para trauma. Foram selecionados 60 pacientes vítimas de trauma abdominal grave que ativaram o protocolo de transfusão maciça, divididos em dois grupos: os submetidos à TAC no PS e os que não foram. Verificou-se a acurácia da TAC, comparou-se o número de óbitos nos dois grupos, o tempo de internamento e os hemocomponentes transfundidos. Resultados: dos 60 pacientes, 66,67% receberam concentrados de hemácias ainda no PS; 33,3% foram submetidos à TAC na admissão, pela melhora hemodinâmica, e 66,7% não realizaram o exame na entrada. O percentual de óbitos foi de 35% em ambos os grupos. A diferença entre as médias do tempo de internamento entre os grupos não foi estatisticamente significativa, assim como a média da quantidade de concentrado de hemácias transfundido. No grupo que fez TAC, 45% não necessitaram de laparotomia exploratória. Conclusão: a TAC pôde ser realizada de maneira rápida em pacientes com instabilidade hemodinâmica na chegada ao PS, não influenciou significativamente a mortalidade e poupou alguns doentes de uma laparotomia exploratória desnecessária.

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the evolution of severe abdominal trauma patients, for whom the massive transfusion protocol was triggered, and who were submitted to Computed Axial Tomography (CAT) in the emergency room (ER), in order to verify the patient's prognosis and the diagnostic efficiency of CAT in this scenario. Methods: retrospective, longitudinal and observational study performed at a referral center for trauma care in Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. We selected 60 severe abdominal trauma patients who had massive transfusion protocol activation and divided them into two groups: patients who underwent CAT at ER and patients who did not. We verified the diagnostic accuracy of CAT-scan examination and compared the number of deaths, hospitalization time, and transfused blood components in both groups. Results: considering the 60 patients, 66.67% received red blood cells at ER; 33.3% underwent CAT on admission due to hemodynamic improvement, and 66.7% did not perform the examination at the entrance. The percentage of deaths was 35% in both groups. Considering the two groups, the difference between the mean lengths of hospital stay was not statistically significant, as well as the difference between the mean numbers of transfused red blood cells. In the group that underwent CAT, 45% did not require exploratory laparotomy. Conclusion: CAT could be rapidly performed in patients with hemodynamic instability on arrival at ER, sparing some patients from an unnecessary exploratory laparotomy and not significantly influencing mortality.

Simulador de dreno de tórax: desenvolvimento de modelo de baixo custo para capacitação de médicos e estudantes de medicina / Chest tube simulator: development of low-cost model for training of physicians and medical students

RESUMO Objetivo: criar, em impressora 3D, um simulador de baixo custo de caixa torácica humana que permita a reprodução da técnica de drenagem fechada de tórax (DFT) comparando sua eficácia com a do modelo animal. Métodos: foi realizada impressão 3D do arcabouço ósseo de um tórax humano a partir de uma tomografia de tórax. Após a impressão das costelas, foram realizados testes com diversos materiais que contribuíram para formar a simulação da caixa torácica e da pleura. Foi, então, realizado um estudo experimental, randomizado e controlado comparando sua eficácia ao modelo animal no ensino da DFT para estudantes de medicina, que foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo Modelo Animal e Grupo Modelo Simulador, que treinaram DFT em animais e no modelo simulador, respectivamente. Resultados: a reconstrução do tórax exigiu o conhecimento anatômico para análise da tomografia e para edição fiel da superfície 3D. Não houve diferença significativa quanto à segurança de realizar o procedimento entre os grupos (7,61 vs. 7,73; p=0,398). Foi observada maior pontuação no grupo modelo simulador para uso como material didático e aprendizado da técnica de drenagem torácica quando comparado ao grupo modelo animal (p<0,05). Conclusão: o custo final para a confecção do modelo foi inferior ao de um simulador comercial, o que demonstra a viabilidade do uso da impressão 3D para esse fim. Além disso, o simulador desenvolvido se mostrou equivalente ao modelo animal quanto à simulação da técnica de drenagem para aprendizado prático e houve preferência pelo modelo simulador como material didático.

ABSTRACT Objective: by using a 3D printer, to create a low-cost human chest cavity simulator that allows the reproduction of the closed chest drainage technique (CCD), comparing its effectiveness with that of the animal model. Methods: it was made a 3D printing of the bony framework of a human thorax from a chest computerized tomography scan. After printing the ribs, we performed tests with several materials that contributed to form the simulation of the thoracic cavity and pleura. An experimental, randomized, and controlled study, comparing the efficacy of the simulator to the efficacy of the animal model, was then carried out in the teaching of CCD technique for medical students, who were divided into two groups: animal model group and simulator model group, that trained CCD technique in animals and in the simulator model, respectively. Results: the chest reconstruction required anatomical knowledge for tomography analysis and for faithful 3D surface editing. There was no significant difference in the safety of performing the procedure in both groups (7.61 vs. 7.73; p=0.398). A higher score was observed in the simulator model group for "use as didactic material" and "learning of the chest drainage technique", when compared to the animal model group (p<0.05). Conclusion: the final cost for producing the model was lower than that of a commercial simulator, what demonstrates the feasibility of using 3D printing for this purpose. In addition, the developed simulator was shown to be equivalent to the animal model in relation to the simulation of the drainage technique for practical learning, and there was preference for the simulator model as didactic material.

The role of computerized tomography in penetrating abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the role of abdominal computed tomography in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma. METHODS: we conducted a historical cohort study of patients treated for penetrating trauma in the anterior abdomen, dorsum or thoracoabdominal transition, that were submitted to a computed tomography carried out on admission. We evaluated the location of the wound and the presence of tomographic findings, and the management of these patients as for nonoperative treatment or laparotomy. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography according to the evolution of the nonoperative treatment or the surgical findings. RESULTS: we selected 61 patients, 31 with trauma to the anterior abdomen and 30 to the dorsum or thoracoabdominal transition. The mortality rate was 6.5% (n=4), all in the late postoperative period. Eleven patients with trauma to the anterior abdomen were submitted to nonoperative treatment, and 20, to laparotomy. Of the 30 patients with trauma to the dorsum or thoracoabdominal transition, 23 underwent nonoperative treatment and seven, laparotomy. There were three nonoperative treatment failures. In penetrating trauma of the anterior abdomen, the sensitivity of computed tomography was 94.1% and the negative predictive value was 93.3%. In dorsal or thoracoabdominal transition lesions, the sensitivity was 90% and the negative predictive value was 95.5%. In both groups, the specificity and the positive predictive value were 100%. CONCLUSION: the accuracy of computed tomography was adequate to guide the management of stable patients who could be treated conservatively, avoiding mandatory surgery in 34 patients and reducing the morbidity and mortality of non-therapeutic laparotomies.

Damage control surgery: are we losing control over indications?

OBJECTIVE: to analyze the surgeons' subjective indications for damage control surgery, correlating with objective data about the patients' physiological state at the time the surgery was chosen. METHODS: we carried out a prospective study between January 2016 and February 2017, with 46 trauma victims who were submitted to damage control surgery. After each surgery, we applied a questionnaire to the attending surgeon, addressing the motivations for choosing the procedure. We collected data in the medical records to assess hemodynamic conditions, systolic blood pressure and heart rate on arrival at the emergency room (grade III or IV shock on arrival at the emergency room would partially justify the choice). We considered elevation of serum lactate level, prolonged prothrombin time and blood pH below 7.2 as laboratory indicators of worse prognosis, objectively corroborating the subjective choice of the procedure. RESULTS: the main indications for damage control surgery were hemodynamic instability (47.8%) and high complexity lesions (30.4%). Hemodynamic and laboratory changes corroborated the choice in 65.2% of patients, regardless of the time; 23.9% presented hemodynamic changes compatible with degree III and IV shock, but without laboratory alterations; 4.3% had only laboratory abnormalities and 6.5% had no alterations at all. CONCLUSION: in the majority of cases, there was early indication for damage control surgery, based mainly on hemodynamic status and severity of lesions, and in 65.2%, the decision was compatible with alterations in objective hemodynamic and laboratory data.