Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 20(2): 177-184, 2019 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29608669

RESUMO

Aims: Primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) can be considered as a heterogeneous clinical disease. The optimal timing of valve surgery for severe PMR remains unknown. To determine whether unbiased clustering analysis using dense phenotypic data (phenomapping) could identify phenotypically distinct PMR categories of patients. Methods and results: One hundred and twenty-two patients who underwent surgery were analysed, excluding patients with pre-operative permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), were prospectively included before surgery. They were given an extensive echocardiographic evaluation before surgery, and clinical data were collected. These phenotypic variables were grouped in clusters using hierarchical clustering analysis. Then, different groups were created using a dedicated phenomapping algorithm. Post-operative outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary endpoint was post-operative cardiovascular events (PCE), defined as a composite of: deaths, AF, stroke, and rehospitalization. The secondary endpoint was post-operative AF. Data from three phenogroups with different characteristics and prognoses were identified. Phenogroup-1 (67 patients) was the reference group. Phenogroup-2 (33 patients) included intermediate-risk male and smoker patients with heart remodelling. Phenogroup-3 (22 patients) included older female patients with comorbidities (chronic renal failure, paroxysmal AF) and diastolic dysfunction. They had a higher risk of developing both PCE [(hazard ratio) HR = 3.57(1.72-7.44), P < 0.001] and post-operative AF [HR = 4.75(2.03-11.10), P < 0.001]. Pre-operative paroxysmal AF was identified as an independent risk factor for PCE. Conclusion: Classification of PMR can be improved using statistical learning algorithms to define therapeutically homogeneous patient subclasses. High-risk patients can be identified, and these patients should be carefully monitored and may even be treated earlier.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Algoritmos , Análise por Conglomerados , Comorbidade , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fenótipo , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 111(11): 656-665, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29229216

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated the superiority of complete revascularization (CR) in patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). AIM: To evaluate whether immediate CR improves in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI with multivessel disease. METHODS: Data from a prospective multicentre registry including 9365 patients with STEMI were analysed. Patients with multivessel disease and treated with pPCI (n=3412) were included and separated into two groups according to whether immediate CR was performed during the index procedure. The primary endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and definite stent thrombosis. Secondary endpoints were individual components of MACE and major bleeding. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity-score adjustment were performed to account for confounders. RESULTS: Immediate CR was performed in 98 patients (2.9%), whereas 3314 patients (97.1%) were incompletely revascularized. The prevalence of severe heart failure (Killip class III or IV) and significant lesions of the left main coronary artery were higher in the immediate CR group (21.6% vs. 13.5% and 24.5% vs. 6.7%, respectively; P<0.001 for both). After adjustment, immediate CR was not associated with reduced rates of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-1.35; P=0.24) or all-cause death (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.23-1.16; P=0.11), but with increased risks of definite stent thrombosis (HR: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.12-13.75; P=0.03) and major bleeding (HR: 17.46, 95% CI: 2.29-133.17; P=0.006). CONCLUSION: Immediate CR did not improve in-hospital outcomes of patients with STEMI with multivessel disease in this analysis. Randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the optimal timing of CR in patients with STEMI.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Idoso , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Trombose Coronária/etiologia , Feminino , França , Hemorragia/etiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA