Use of kidney failure risk equation as a tool to evaluate referrals from primary care to specialist nephrology care.

BACKGROUND: With rising costs and burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD), timely referral of patients to a kidney specialist is crucial. Currently, Kidney Health Australia (KHA) uses a 'heat map' based on severity and not future risk of kidney failure, whereas the kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) score predicts future risk of progression. AIMS: Evaluate whether a KFRE score assists with timing of CKD referrals. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of 2137 adult patients, referred to tertiary hospital outpatient nephrologist between 2012 and 2020, were analysed. Referrals were analysed for concordance with the KHA referral guidelines and, with the KFRE score, a recommended practice. RESULTS: Of 2137 patients, 626 (29%) did not have urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) measurement at referral. For those who had a UACR, the number who met KFRE preferred referral criteria was 36% less than KHA criteria. If the recommended KFRE score was used, then fewer older patients (≥40 years) needed referral. Positively, many diabetes patients were referred, even if their risk of kidney failure was low, and 29% had a KFRE over 3%. For patients evaluated meeting KFRE criteria, a larger proportion (76%) remained in follow-up, with only 8% being discharged. CONCLUSIONS: KFRE could reduce referrals and be a useful tool to assist timely referrals. Using KFRE for triage may allow those patients with very low risk of future kidney failure not be referred, remaining longer in primary care, saving health resources and reducing patients' stress and wait times. Using KFRE encourages albuminuria measurement.

Integrated virtual medical consultations versus traditional clinic care in a public and a private outpatient service.

Objectives: The iConnect Care programme provided integrated 'virtual care' (VC) for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District. VC is an alternative to outpatient care which expedites time to specialists' opinions and is safe. Comparing different outpatient care models is important to understand the role of telehealth and integrated care, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to compare a VC model with existing CKD outpatient care. Design participants and setting: A multisite, comparative, retrospective cohort study with parallel groups. 374 patients with mild CKD were recruited (July 2013 and August 2015) from public and private outpatients and followed for 12 months (n=304) or via VC (n=70). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) were compared at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Results: At 12 months, no significant differences existed among groups in eGFR or ACR or haemoglobin, but serum creatinine was lower in the VC cohort. A significant difference existed in time to see a patient from time of referral; 7 days for VC clinic and 35-42 days for outpatient clinic. Patients interviewed felt VC was efficient and they were well managed. Conclusion: VC can be a faster mechanism to access a nephrologist and other specialists. It provided similar outcomes to outpatient care. VC represents an additional assessment and follow-up pathway supported in the community. Time to deliver is similar, but specific resources are needed. It has the potential to evolve into a standard component of chronic disease care.

iConnect CKD - virtual medical consulting: A web-based chronic kidney disease, hypertension and diabetes integrated care program.

AIMS: Chronic kidney disease patients overwhelm specialist services and can potentially be managed in the primary care (PC). Opportunistic screening of high risk (HR) patients and follow-up in PC is the most sustainable model of care. A 'virtual consultation' (VC) model instead of traditional face to face (F2F) consultations was used, aiming to assess efficacy and safety of the model. METHODS: Seventy patients were recruited from PC sites and hospital clinics and followed for 1 year. The HR patients (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2 +/- albuminuria >30 mg/mmol/L) were randomized to either VC or F2F. Patients were monitored in 6 monthly follow-up cycles by a Clinical Nurse Specialist. The specialist team provided virtual or clinical support and included a Nephrologist, Endocrinologist, Cardiologist and Renal 'Palliative' Supportive Care. RESULTS: Sixty one (87%) patients were virtually tracked or consulted with 14 (23%) being HR. At 12 months, there was no difference in outcomes between VC and F2F patients. All patients were successfully monitored. General practitioners reported a high level of satisfaction and supported the model, but found software integration challenging. Patients found the system attractive and felt well managed. Specialist consults occurred within a week, and if a second specialist opinion was required, it took another 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The programme demonstrated safe, expedited and efficient follow up with a clinical and web based programme. Support from the general practitioners and patients was encouraging, despite logistical issues. Ongoing evaluation of VC services will continue and feasibility to larger networks and more chronic diseases remains the long term goal.

Improving nephrology service delivery - Accessing the specialist.

BACKGROUND: The increased prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is straining the medical workforce and healthcare budget. To improve efficiency, patients require streamlined access to renal and general practice specialist advice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to profile general practitioner (GP) referrals for patients with CKD and compare these referrals to national guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 randomly selected outpatient referrals to the renal service at St George Hospital, Sydney, between 2008 and 2011. These referrals were compared against national referral guidelines. RESULTS: Declining renal function accounted for the majority (44%; n = 78) of referrals, while advice regarding hypertension management contributed to a further 21% (n = 38) of referrals. Fifteen per cent (n = 27) of patients were referred back to their GP after one visit, while 40% (n = 72) required follow-up beyond 12 months. When compared with the National nephrology referral guidelines, 25% (n = 42) of referrals did not meet the criteria. DISCUSSION: Access to renal specialists may be difficult because of bottlenecks in the public clinic, frustrating all parties concerned. If an alternative, more integrated, possibly web-based CKD support service existed, some formal reviews could be bypassed. This study provides preliminary data supporting the development of such a service, and simultaneously providing streamlined sup-port to the GP and relieving pressure on hospital clinics.

Markers of cardiovascular disease risk after hypertension in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: Women with a history of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Underlying cardiovascular risk factors, persistent endothelial dysfunction or sympathetic overactivity may contribute to this risk. We studied markers of cardiovascular disease risk in nonpregnant women with a history of hypertension in pregnancy. METHODS: Women with a history of preeclampsia (n = 39), gestational hypertension (n = 27) and normal pregnancies (n = 35) were studied 2-12 years after delivery. Laboratory measures included plasma fasting lipids, glucose, insulin, creatinine and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Blood pressure was measured by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, endothelial function by flow-mediated dilatation and sympathetic activity by both head-up tilt test and cold pressor test, including the response of the circulating renin-angiotensin system to tilt testing. RESULTS: Compared with women who had previous normal pregnancies, women with a history of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension have higher ambulatory blood pressure, BMI and relative insulin resistance. Glomerular filtration rate, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, endothelial function and sympathetic activity was similar among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Women with a history of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension have features of the metabolic syndrome which are presumably present already before pregnancy, predisposing them to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and later cardiovascular risk. In this study, we found no evidence for early renal damage, endothelial dysfunction or sympathetic overactivity in the postpartum state.

Inaccuracies in estimated glomerular filtration rate in one Australian renal centre.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of true renal disease (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min) results in better patient outcomes. There is now routine reporting in Australia of estimated GFR (eGFR) in all patients over age 18 who have serum creatinine measured, calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, which was validated in an American Caucasian cohort. Significant clinical decisions and prognosis are often made on the basis of this calculation. AIM: To assess the accuracy of three estimates of GFR in an Australian population by comparing eGFR obtained by the abbreviated MDRD (aMDRD), Cockcroft-Gault corrected for body surface area (BSA) (CG) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-Epi) formulae with a gold standard, isotopic (51) Cr-ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid ((51) Cr-EDTA) GFR. METHODS: Patients referred with an eGFR of <60 mL/min reported by the aMDRD formula underwent isotopic measurement of GFR (over 4 h) and had eGFR calculated using CG corrected for BSA, aMDRD and CKD-Epi formulae. Data were analysed using Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis to compare methods; bias, precision and the proportion of patients correctly stratified by stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) were also compared according to the three estimates of GFR, using (51) Cr-EDTA GFR as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were recruited (female 45%), mean age 64 years and mean serum creatinine 212 µmol/L. The mean GFR (SD) (mL/min per m(2) ) for isotopic, CG, aMDRD and CKD-Epi were 47 (28), 37 (20), 32 (17) and 33 (18) (P = 0.001). CG (57%) was more likely to correctly stage CKD than aMDRD (37%) or CKD-Epi (37%), and absolute bias was significantly lower using CG than either other method (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this small Australian population the CG formula corrected for BSA agreed more closely with isotopic GFR and correctly staged patients with CKD more often than the aMDRD or CKD-Epi formulae. It is important that each renal Unit considers the accuracy of estimates of GFR according to their population demographics.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly NV06 (Phenoxodiol), a novel isoflav-3-ene, in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: We wished to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of the novel isoflav-3-ene, NV06 (Phenoxodioltrade mark), a compound with a diphenolic structure related chemically and biologically to genistein and flavopiridol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with advanced cancers were treated with weekly intravenous administration of NV06 at escalating dose levels with 1-4 patients at each dose cohort. Plasma sampling was undertaken to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the compound. RESULTS: Toxicity was minimal, with asymptomatic Grade 3 lymphocytopenia occurring in nine patients. Nine patients developed Grade 1 nausea, six patients developed Grade 1 increases in alkaline phosphatase, and six patients developed Grade 1 increases in transaminases. Two patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions. The MTD was not reached. Most patients had progressive disease on treatment but eight completed 12 weeks and two completed 24 weeks of treatment. The best response was stable disease of 6 months duration. The plasma half-life (T1/2), clearance (Cl), and volume of distribution (VD) were 304 (+/-91) min, 82 (+/-19) ml/min and 32,663 (+/-7,199) ml, respectively, for total NV06. CONCLUSIONS: NV06 is well tolerated and can be given safely as an intravenous infusion over 1-2 h at a dose of at least 30 mg/kg.