Relation of Baseline Renal Dysfunction With Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Popliteal and Infrapopliteal Percutaneous Peripheral Arterial Interventions.

Renal dysfunction is a major risk factor for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Infrapopliteal PAD is associated with more co-morbid conditions and worse prognosis than suprapopliteal PAD. Long-term outcomes of patients with renal dysfunction and popliteal or infrapopliteal PAD undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) are not well described. We retrospectively evaluated long-term outcomes in 726 patients undergoing infrapopliteal PVI categorized into 3 glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-based groups: GFR (≥60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), GFR (<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), and those on dialysis. At mean follow-up of 36 ± 20 months, amputation rates were 3%, 5%, and 11% with mortality rates of 23%, 36%, and 56% in normal renal function, chronic kidney disease (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for amputation 1.75, 95% CI 0.73 to 4.21; adjusted OR for mortality 1.53, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.23, p = 0.028), and dialysis (adjusted OR for amputation 2.43, 95% CI 0.84 to 7.02, p = 0.100; adjusted OR for mortality 4.51, 95% CI 2.46 to 8.26, p <0.0001) groups, respectively. Repeat revascularization was similar in all 3 groups at roughly 25%. In conclusion, chronic kidney disease and dialysis were associated with increased major amputations and mortality in patients who received PVI for popliteal and infrapopliteal PAD.

Laser in infrapopliteal and popliteal stenosis 2 study (LIPS2): Long-term outcomes of laser-assisted balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty for below knee peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Laser-assisted balloon angioplasty (LABA) has been shown to be more effective in achieving angiographic success for treatment for below knee peripheral artery disease (PAD) compared with balloon angioplasty alone(BA). However, long-term outcomes of LABA compared with BA for popliteal and infrapopliteal PAD are unknown. METHODS: We evaluated data on 726 patients undergoing LABA (n = 395) and BA (n = 331) for popliteal and infrapopliteal PAD retrospectively at a single center (2007-2012). Outcomes included long-term ipsilateral major limb amputation, revascularization and mortality (median follow-up = 36 months). RESULTS: Baseline features were similar in two groups with the exception of more TASC-D lesions (92.4 vs. 66.5%; P < 0.0001) and chronic total occlusions (86.4 vs. 49.5%; P < 0.0001) in LABA group. Angiographic success was higher in LABA compared with BA (97.7 vs. 89.2%; P < 0.0001). Ipsilateral major limb amputation (4.1 vs. 5.1%, P = 0.48) and repeat revascularization (25.1 vs. 23.3%, P = 0.47) were similar in LABA and BA patients despite unfavorable baseline angiographic characteristics in the former. Compared with BA, death was more frequently in LABA group (35.2 and 26.3%, P = 0.01), a reflection of higher comorbid conditions in this group (adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.39). CONCLUSION: Despite worse baseline angiographic characteristics compared with BA, LABA was associated with higher angiographic success and similar ipsilateral major amputation, repeat revascularization, and long-term mortality. Future randomized clinical trial should evaluate the efficacy of LABA compared with BA (particularly drug-eluting) in improving limb salvage and reducing repeat revascularization in these high-risk PAD patients.

CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc versus CHADS(2) for stroke risk assessment in low-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: a pilot study from a single center of the NCDR-PINNACLE registry.

The CHADS(2) score is widely used to assess the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with score of 0 and 1 are considered 'low risk' and are often treated with aspirin. In a Danish Study, the CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc score was shown to identify low and high-risk subgroups among patients with CHADS(2) score of 0 and 1, with annual risk ranging from 0.84 to 8.18%. This study seeks to assess whether using CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc score will identify high-risk subset of patients with low CHADS(2) scores in an American population. This pilot study examined data from our cardiology fellowship ambulatory clinics from January 2009 to May 2012 using the NCDR-PINNACLE registry. Each cardiology fellow entered patients' data using on-line software developed by the American College of Cardiology. Among 2,048 patients followed at our clinics, 478 had AF. Of those, 161 patients had CHADS(2) score of 0 (44 patients) or 1 (117 patients). Calculating the CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc score in these patients, 12 (7.4%) had score of 0, 50 (31.1%) had score of 1, 66(41%) had score of 2, 31 (19.3%) had score of 3 and 2 (1.2%) had score of 4. Using original CHADS(2) recommendation, warfarin would not be strongly recommended in any of these patients. Utilizing the CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc score, 61.5% of the 161 patients would have a score of 2 or more signifying increased risk where anticoagulation may be indicated. Compared to CHADS(2), CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc may more precisely predict the risk of stroke and anticoagulation strategy in low-risk patients with non-valvular AF.

Laser in infra-popliteal and popliteal stenosis (LIPS): retrospective review of laser-assisted balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty alone for below knee peripheral arterial disease.

Despite the use of laser technology over the last decade, there are limited data to show its procedural and clinical success in infra-popliteal disease. We hypothesized that laser-assisted balloon angioplasty (LABA) is at least similar or better in procedural and peri-procedural outcomes compared to balloon angioplasty (BA) alone, despite adverse lesion characteristics prior to intervention. Retrospective chart and angiogram review of consecutive critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients who underwent endovascular revascularization in the popliteal or infra-popliteal vessels between 2007 and 2012 with LABA or BA alone. Data from 731 patients revealed that baseline demographics were similar in the LABA (n = 398) and BA group (n = 333) with minor exceptions. More patients in the LABA group had TASC-D lesions (92.5 vs. 66.7 %; P < 0.0001) and chronic total occlusions (CTOs) in both vessel 1 (86.4 vs. 49.5 %; P < 0.0001) and vessel 2 (78.6 vs. 47.8 %; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis performed using logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors showed use of LABA was associated with a 7 times greater likelihood of achieving <50 % residual disease compared to BA alone (OR 7.59, P < 0.0001), and a 5 times greater likelihood of improvement in the infra-popliteal lesion severity score than balloon angioplasty alone (OR 4.77, p < 0.0001). LABA is significantly better at achieving angiographic success and improving lesion severity score in spite of adverse lesion characteristics (more TASC-D lesions and CTOs) compared with BA alone. Our findings suggest that the use of LABA is an endovascular approach that is at least as effective and safe or better compared to BA for the treatment of CLI from complex popliteal and infra-popliteal vascular disease.