RESUMO
Objective: To assess and compare the inter-rater agreement of the CDC criteria and the ASEPSIS score in identifying surgical site infections after cesarean section. Methods: Prospective observational study including 110 patients subjected to a cesarean section at our institution. Surgical wounds were managed according to standard care and were photographed on the third, seventh, and thirtieth postoperative day or during any evaluation in case of complications. Three expert surgeons reviewed the prospectively gathered data and photographs and classified each wound using CDC criteria and the ASEPSIS score. The inter-rater agreements of CDC criteria and ASEPSIS score were determined with Krippendorff's Alpha with linear weights and compared with a confidence interval approach. Results: The weighted α coefficient for CDC criteria was 0.587 (95%CI, 0.411-0.763, p < 0.001, "moderate" agreement according to Altman's interpretation of weighted agreement coefficient), while the weighted α coefficient for the ASEPSIS score was 0.856 (95%CI, 0.733-0.980, p < 0.001, "very good" agreement). Conclusion: ASEPSIS score presents a "very good" inter-rater agreement for surgical site infections identification after cesarean, resulting in a more objective method than CDC criteria ("moderate" inter-rater agreement). ASEPSIS score could represent an objective tool for managing and monitoring surgical site infections after cesarean section, also by photographic evaluation.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of endometriosis recurrence according to the mode of delivery (cesarean section vs. vaginal birth) in patients who had become pregnant with a live birth after surgery for endometriosis. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. A Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for endometriosis recurrence at 36 months of follow-up after the last pregnancy. SETTING: Academic hospital. PATIENT(S): Patients who have had ≥1 pregnancy with a live birth following conservative surgery for ovarian endometriosis performed from January 2009 to December 2016 at our institution. INTERVENTION(S): Patients who underwent ≥1 cesarean section after surgery for endometriosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The recurrence rate of endometriosis after live-birth pregnancies obtained after the first surgery for endometriosis. RESULTS: Patients with a history of ≥1 cesarean section after surgery for endometriosis have a higher risk of endometriosis recurrence than the patients who have had a vaginal birth, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.25 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-3.96). CONCLUSION: A cesarean section after surgery for endometriosis is associated with a twofold high risk of endometriosis recurrence with respect to vaginal birth. A different follow-up approach may be needed in those patients, and avoiding inappropriate indications for cesarean sections in pregnant patients with a history of surgery for endometriosis is necessary.
