RESUMO
The current economic situation is the reason for this conference that will be split in two main areas: first, we will focus on general concepts on rationalizing versus rationing in health care, and secondly, on rationing in the practice of clinical nutrition. According to the Spanish Royal Academy of the Language, to rationalize is to organize the production or the work in a manner such the yields are increased or the costs are reduced with the least effort. However, to ration is the action and effect of rationing or limiting the consumption of something to prevent negative consequences. In Europe, the percentage of the Gross National Product dedicated to health care progressively decreases whereas the costs of health care are ever increasing. From the economic viewpoint, this would be the main reason why the health care authorities have no other option but rationing. Until what extent the ethical principle of justice is compatible with rationing? Ethically, it seems that in order to accept rationing, not only a fair distribution of the limited resources should be achieved, but also a rational use of them. If we accept that limiting the health care allowances is necessary, we should then answer some questions: is it ethical not to limit? Who decides what is medically necessary? How is it decided? With no coherent answers to these questions it is ethically difficult to accept rationing from a healthcare viewpoint. When dealing with rationing in the practice of clinical nutrition, we should focus on how rationing impacts on hyponutrition, and more particularly on disease-related hyponutrition, since this is the focus of Clinical Nutrition. Given its importance and its implications, in several countries, including Spain, actions integrated in the European Union strategy "Together for health: a Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013", are being performed aimed at taking decisions for preventing and managing hyponutrition. However, restrictions persist with the imperative necessity of using all the tools available to prevent hyponutrition in patients at risk, to early detect malnourished patients or patients at risk for hyponutrition, and to establish the most appropriate actions.
Assuntos
Terapia Nutricional/tendências , Europa (Continente) , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Desnutrição/terapia , EspanhaRESUMO
La situación económica actual ha dado pie al tema de esta conferencia que se desarrollará en dos grandes apartados: primero, trataremos de ideas generales sobre la racionalización versus el racionamiento en la sanidad, y, posteriormente, del racionamiento en la práctica de la nutrición clínica. Racionalizar, según la Real Academia Española de la Lengua, es organizar la producción o el trabajo de manera que aumente los rendimientos o reduzca los costos con el mínimo esfuerzo. Mientras que por racionamiento se entiende la acción y efecto de racionar o limitar el consumo de algo para evitar consecuencias negativas. En Europa, el porcentaje del Producto Interior Bruto destinado a Sanidad cae progresivamente mientras el coste de la Sanidad no para de aumentar. Desde el punto de vista económico, éste sería el principal motivo por el que las autoridades sanitarias parece que no tienen más alternativa que racionar. ¿Hasta qué punto el principio ético de justicia es compatible con el racionamiento? Éticamente, parece que para aceptar el racionamiento debería cumplirse no sólo una distribución justa de los recursos limitados sino también el uso racional de los mismos. Si se acepta que el recorte en prestaciones sanitarias es necesario, deberíamos responder a diversas preguntas: ¿qué es lo ético no recortar?, ¿quién decide lo que es médicamente necesario?, ¿cómo se decide? Sin respuestas coherentes a estas preguntas resulta difícil, éticamente, aceptar el racionamiento a nivel sanitario. Al tratar el racionamiento en la práctica de la nutrición clínica, debemos centrarnos en cómo el racionamiento afecta a la desnutrición, y más concretamente de la desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad, ya que ello centra el origen de la Nutrición Clínica. Por su importancia e implicaciones se están llevando a cabo, en diversos países entre ellos en España, acciones integradas en la estrategia de la Unión Europea: "Together for health: a Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013" encaminadas a tomar medidas dirigidas a prevenir y tratar la desnutrición. Pero a pesar de ello, las restricciones persisten, situándonos en la necesidad imperativa de utilizar todas las herramientas a nuestro alcance para prevenir el desarrollo de la desnutrición en los pacientes en riesgo, para detectar precozmente los pacientes con desnutrición o riesgo de desarrollarla y para establecer las medidas de actuación más adecuadas (AU)
The current economic situation is the reason for this conference that will be split in two main areas: first, we will focus on general concepts on rationalizing versus rationing in health care, and secondly, on rationing in the practice of clinical nutrition. According to the Spanish Royal Academy of the Language, to rationalize is to organize the production or the work in a manner such the yields are increased or the costs are reduced with the least effort. However, to ration is the action and effect of rationing or limiting the consumption of something to prevent negative consequences. In Europe, the percentage of the Gross National Product dedicated to health care progressively decreases whereas the costs of health care are ever increasing. From the economic viewpoint, this would be the main reason why the health care authorities have no other option but rationing. Until what extent the ethical principle of justice is compatible with rationing? Ethically, it seems that in order to accept rationing, not only a fair distribution of the limited resources should be achieved, but also a rational use of them. If we accept that limiting the health care allowances is necessary, we should then answer some questions: is it ethical not to limit? Who decides what is medically necessary? How is it decided? With no coherent answers to these questions it is ethically difficult to accept rationing from a healthcare viewpoint. When dealing with rationing in the practice of clinical nutrition, we should focus on how rationing impacts on hyponutrition, and more particularly on disease-related hyponutrition, since this is the focus of Clinical Nutrition. Given its importance and its implications, in several countries, including Spain, actions integrated in the European Union strategy "Together for health: a Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013", are being performed aimed at taking decisions for preventing and managing hyponutrition. However, restrictions persist with the imperative necessity of using all the tools available to prevent hyponutrition in patients at risk, to early detect malnourished patients or patients at risk for hyponutrition, and to establish the most appropriate actions (AU)
