Procoagulant microparticles are associated with arterial disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Microparticles (MPs) have been associated with inflammatory and thrombotic disease. High levels of MPs have been identified in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and associated with cardiovascular disease. We analyzed the procoagulant activity of MPs and its correlation with arteriosclerosis and arterial thrombosis in SLE patients. Eighty-seven patients with SLE were included: 22 (25.3%) with associated antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 32 (36.8%) without antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and 33 (37.9%) with aPL but without APS. Subclinical arteriosclerosis, defined as the presence and number of plaques, was evaluated by ultrasonography of carotid arteries. Thrombotic events were confirmed by objective methods. The procoagulant activity of MPs was determined by a functional assay with annexin V. Subclinical arteriosclerosis was found in 19 (21.8%) patients. Thirteen episodes of arterial thrombosis and eight of venous thrombosis were recorded. The procoagulant activity of MPs was greater in patients with arterial thrombosis (17.28 ± 8.29 nM vs 12.96 ± 7.90 nM, p < 0.05). In patients without arterial thrombosis, greater procoagulant activity of MPs was identified in patients with multiple (≥ 2) carotid plaques (17.26 ± 10.63 nM vs 12.78 ± 7.15 nM, p = 0.04). In the multivariate analysis, the procoagulant activity of MPs was independently associated with multiple (≥ 2) carotid plaques and arterial thrombosis [OR = 1.094 (95%CI 1.010-1.185), p = 0.027 and OR = 1.101 (95%CI 1.025-1.182), p = 0.008; respectively]. In conclusion, the procoagulant activity of MPs is associated with arteriosclerosis burden and arterial thrombosis in patients with SLE.

The H1 haplotype of the endothelial protein C receptor protects against arterial thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Genetic variants in the endothelial protein C receptor gene (PROCR) may contribute to the thrombosis risk by regulating levels of the soluble form of this protein (sEPCR). We evaluated whether PROCR polymorphisms and sEPCR levels play a role in the thrombotic manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-five patients (62 with primary antiphospholipid syndrome, 30 with antiphospholipid syndrome associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, 40 with systemic lupus erythematosus without antiphospholipid antibodies and 43 with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibodies) and 66 healthy controls were included. PROCR H1 and H3 haplotypes were determined by genotyping 7014G/C and 1651C/G tag-polymorphisms, respectively. sEPCR levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: PROCR haplotype distribution was similar among groups of patients and controls. PROCR H1 and H3 haplotypes were less prevalent in antiphospholipid syndrome patients with arterial thrombosis than those without arterial thrombosis, but statistical significance was only reached for the H1 haplotype (58.0% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.003; odds ratio: 0.23 [95% CI 0.08-0.65]). No relationship between the PROCR H1 and H3 haplotypes and venous thrombosis was found. sEPCR levels were higher in H3 than in H1 carriers (175.5 [95% CI 60.9-290.1] ng/ml vs. 69.1 [95% CI 61.5-76.9] ng/ml, p < 0.01). No relationship of sEPCR with arterial or venous thrombosis was found. CONCLUSION: The PROCR H1 haplotype was less frequently found in APS patients with arterial thrombosis, suggesting a protective effect of PROCR H1 against arterial thrombosis in these patients. No relationship between sEPCR and thrombosis was found.