Reduced wound leakage in arthroplasty with modified wound closure: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Wound leakage has been shown to increase the risk of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) in primary total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (unicondylar and total knee arthroplasty; KA). The aim of this study is to determine whether the addition of a continuous subcuticular bonding stitch to a conventional three-layer closure method reduces the incidence of prolonged wound leakage and PJIs after THA and KA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients receiving a THA or KA. Patients in the control group with a three-layer closure method had surgery between November 1st 2015 and October 31st 2016, and were compared to the study group with a four-layer closure method that had surgery between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2018. The primary outcome was incidence of prolonged wound leakage longer than 72 h. Differences were evaluated using logistic regression. Incidence of PJIs was the secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 439 THA and 339 KA in the control group and 460 THA and 350 KA in the study group were included. In the control group, 11.7% of the patients had a prolonged leaking wound compared to 1.9% in the study group (p < 0.001). The modified wound closure method showed a protective effect for obtaining prolonged wound leakage; odds ratios were 0.09 (95% CI 0.04-0.22; p < 0.001) for THA and 0.21 (95% CI 0.10-0.43; p < 0.001) for KA. PJIs decreased from 1.54 to 0.37% (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a continuous subcuticular bonding stitch reduces the incidence of prolonged wound leakage and PJIs after THA and KA compared to a conventional three-layer wound closure method. The large reduction of incidence in wound leakage and PJIs in this study, combined with relatively negligible cost and effort of the modified wound closure method, would advocate for implementing this wound closure method in arthroplasty.

The contribution of six polymorphisms to cardiovascular risk in a Dutch high-risk primary care population: the HIPPOCRATES project.

This study was designed to examine the contribution of six polymorphisms to the occurrence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a Dutch primary care population with a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. In this cross-sectional case-control study, 232 patients with CVD and 571 event-free controls were studied. Patients were genotyped for the AGTR1 (A1166C), AGT (M235T), ACE (4656rpt), NOS3 (E298D), GNB3 (C825T) and ADD1 (G460W) polymorphisms. Univariate and multivariate odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess the relationship between genotypes and CVD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to quantify the contribution of the polymorphisms to the prediction of CVD. No differences in either genotype or allele frequencies were found between CVD cases and controls. Multivariate analyses, corrected for multiple testing according to Bonferroni, showed significant protective associations for the T-allele of AGT (OR=0.55 (0.34-0.84)) and for the T-allele of ADD1 (OR=0.52 (0.31-0.82)). ROC analysis showed only a very small improvement of CVD risk prediction by adding the six polymorphisms to a model with traditional risk factors. Our data suggest that a major attribution of the six polymorphisms to the cardiovascular risk prediction in a primary care population such as HIPPOCRATES is unlikely.

Regional differences in cardiovascular risk factor profile cannot fully explain differences in cardiovascular morbidity in the Netherlands: a comparison of two urban areas.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to investigate whether a region in the south of the Netherlands (Heerlen/Kerkrade) had a high burden of cardiovascular disease in comparison with a nearby region (Maastricht) and the average Dutch population, respectively. We also wanted to determine if there are interregional differences in cardiovascular risk factor profile. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data from a nationwide registry (CBS) were used to analyse cardiovascular mortality in the two regions and the average in the Netherlands. Data from a primary care morbidity registration network (RNH) were used to compare cardiovascular morbidity and cardiovascular risk factors in both regions. A standardisation procedure was carried out for age and sex. Data were analysed using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The overall cardiovascular mortality rate was higher in the Heerlen/Kerkrade region (7.8 per thousand) compared with Maastricht (6.1 per thousand, OR=1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5) and the average in the Netherlands (5.7 per thousand). Similarly, most cardiovascular morbidity rates for Heerlen/Kerkrade were more elevated compared with the RNH overall and with Maastricht. Prevalence rates of risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (7.2%, OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.7) and overweight (10.8%, OR= 2.0, 95% CI 1.8-2.2) were significantly higher in the Heerlen/Kerkrade region compared with Maastricht. There were no differences with regard to hypertension (15.2%, OR=1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.1). CONCLUSION: Heerlen/Kerkrade is indeed a region with a high burden of cardiovascular disease. Differences in morbidity between Heerlen/Kerkrade and Maastricht cannot be fully explained by differences in cardiovascular risk factor profile.