Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(9): 2692-2706, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37204633

RESUMO

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous family of tumors of challenging diagnosis and clinical management. Their incidence and prevalence continue to rise mainly due to an improvement on diagnostic techniques and awareness. Earlier detection, along with steadfast improvements in therapy, has led to better prognosis over time for advanced gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this guideline is to update evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic and lung NENs. Diagnostic procedures, histological classification, and therapeutic options, including surgery, liver-directed therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and systemic hormonal, cytotoxic or targeted therapy, are reviewed and discussed, and treatment algorithms to guide therapeutic decisions are provided.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Brônquicas , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Humanos , Neoplasias Brônquicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Brônquicas/terapia , Algoritmos , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/terapia
2.
Gastric Cancer ; 20(3): 465-474, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27599830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab significantly improves overall survival (OS) when added to cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine as a treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancers (AGC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the gradual implementation of HER2 testing on patient prognosis in a national registry of AGC. METHODS: This Spanish National Cancer Registry includes cases who were consecutively recruited at 28 centers from January 2008 to January 2016. The effect of missing HER2 status was assessed using stratified Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression. RESULTS: The rate of HER2 testing increased steadily over time, from 58.3 % in 2008 to 92.9 % in 2016. HER2 was positive in 194 tumors (21.3 %). In the stratified Cox PH regression, each 1 % increase in patients who were not tested for HER2 at the institutions was associated with an approximately 0.3 % increase in the risk of death: hazard ratio, 1.0035 (CI 95 %, 1.001-1.005), P = 0.0019. Median OS was significantly lower at institutions with the highest proportions of patients who were not tested for HER2. CONCLUSION: Patients treated at centers that took longer to implement HER2 testing exhibited worse clinical outcomes. The speed of implementation behaves as a quality-of-care indicator. Reviewed guidelines on HER2 testing should be used to achieve this goal in a timely manner.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Espanha , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Trastuzumab/administração & dosagem
3.
Gastric Cancer ; 18(2): 360-7, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24792482

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Potentially myelosuppressive doublet and triplet chemotherapy combination regimens are considered the most active treatments in gastric cancer. This multicenter prospective observational study was designed to gain insight into the chemotherapy regimens being used in Europe and to evaluate neutropenia management in patients identified as at high risk for febrile neutropenia (FN). METHODS: Eligible patients had gastric cancer, were scheduled for ≥ 3 cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and had an investigator-assessed overall FN risk ≥ 20%. Data were collected for up to ten cycles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (defined as G-CSF initiated on days 1-7 of cycle 1). Secondary endpoints included FN incidence, chemotherapy administration, and G-CSF use. RESULTS: Of 199 patients who met the eligibility criteria and started at least one cycle of chemotherapy, mean age was 63 years, 76% were men, 83% had an ECOG score of 0 or 1, 54% had metastatic disease, and 24% had received prior chemotherapy. A total of 27 different backbone regimens were given; the most common regimen was modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). Despite all patients having been identified as having a ≥ 20% FN risk, only 70 (35%) received G-CSF primary prophylaxis. FN occurred in 14 patients overall (7%). Most FN events occurred in patients who received DCF/modified DCF (9/14 events, 64%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal a high use of myelotoxic treatment regimens in gastric cancer in Europe and low adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the use of primary and secondary G-CSF prophylaxis for FN.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia
4.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 7(11): 493-8, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16373060

RESUMO

AIM: A multi-centred, open-labelled, phase 11 study containing 46 patients was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of gemcitabine (1,400 mg/m(2)) combined with 5-FU (3 g/m(2)) in a 48 h continuous infusion (CI). METHODS: Both drugs were administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of every 4 week cycle in chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced unresectable metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Clinical benefit response was the primary endpoint and this was achieved by 24.4% of the patients. Quality of life (QoL) improved in 16.6% of patients. Objective response was observed in 7% of the patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.4 weeks and the median overall survival (OS) time was 22.7 weeks. One-year survival was 25%. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (45%), mucositis (7.5%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This schedule was not superior in terms of clinical benefit, response rate, PFS and OS than standard gemcitabine treatment


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hiperbilirrubinemia/induzido quimicamente , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosite/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Cooperação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Espanha , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Gencitabina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...