The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the course of miscarriages.

OBJECTIVES: Miscarriage is the most common complication of pregnancy. Infections are well-known causes of pregnancy loss. It has been suggested that infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus may also have an adverse effect on the course of early pregnancy, causing miscarriage. AIM: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnancy loss during the first half of pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical records of patients hospitalized at the Department of Fetal Medicine and Gynecology; Medical University of Lodz were retrospectively reviewed. The study was done during the pandemic (March 2020 to the end of March 2022) and the previous 2 years due to missed abortion, indicated by no fetal heartbeat and spontaneous (complete or incomplete) abortion with vaginal bleeding. RESULTS: While 682 women were hospitalized due to miscarriage in the first half of pregnancy in the period 2018-2020, there were 516 hospitalized during the pandemic. No differences in the proportion of missed and spontaneous abortions with bleeding were found between the group of patients before and during the epidemic SARS CoV-2. COVID-19 exposure appears to have an impact on earlier pregnancy loss. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic predisposes to the abnormal course of pregnancy in its first half. OBJECTIVES: Miscarriage is the most common complication of pregnancy. Infections are well-known causes of pregnancy loss. It has been suggested that infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus may also have an adverse effect on the course of early pregnancy, causing miscarriage. AIM: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnancy loss during the first half of pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical records of patients hospitalized at the Department of Fetal Medicine and Gynecology; Medical University of Lodz were retrospectively reviewed. The study was done during the pandemic (March 2020 to the end of March 2022) and the previous 2 years due to missed abortion, indicated by no fetal heartbeat and spontaneous (complete or incomplete) abortion with vaginal bleeding. RESULTS: While 682 women were hospitalized due to miscarriage in the first half of pregnancy in the period 2018-2020, there were 516 hospitalized during the pandemic. No differences in the proportion of missed and spontaneous abortions with bleeding were found between the group of patients before and during the epidemic SARS CoV-2. COVID-19 exposure appears to have an impact on earlier pregnancy loss. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic predisposes to the abnormal course of pregnancy in its first half.

Metanalyses on metformin's role in pancreatic cancer suffer from severe bias and low data quality - An umbrella review.

AIMS: Discrepancies in the preclinical evidence, retrospective studies, and randomized trials evaluating metformin's role in pancreatic cancer are difficult to disentangle. We aimed to critically and systematically examine the quality and sources of heterogeneity between meta-analyses investigating the association between metformin intake and the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on October 31, 2021 to identify meta-analyses investigating the impact of metformin treatment on the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. Meta-analyses quality was assessed using according to the AMSTAR 2 criteria. We assessed bias in individual studies included in the meta-analyses, with particular attention to immortal time bias and quality of reporting. RESULTS: Eleven meta-analyses describing 24 individual studies were included. All meta-analyses were rated low (n = 5) or critically low (n = 6) quality. Only 4 followed PRISMA reporting guidelines and only in 5 presented data were sufficient to replicate the analyses. Most meta-analyses combined results from clinical trials and retrospective studies (n = 6); patients with different cancer stages (resectable vs advanced) and from studies with different control group definitions. Immortal time bias was present and not accounted for in most (65.2%) of the individual retrospective studies; almost all (n = 9) meta-analyses failed to identify and correct for this source of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analyses describing the association of metformin use in patients with pancreatic cancer are plagued by various types of bias inherent in retrospective studies. The quality of evidence linking metformin to decreased pancreatic cancer mortality is generally low.

Impact of Multiple Factors on the Incidence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Risk Assessment Tool.

Background and Objectives: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions in children. If not treated, it leads to disability, gait abnormalities, limb shortening, and chronic pain. Our study aims to determine the impact of multiple risk factors on the incidence of DDH and to develop an interactive risk assessment tool. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Outpatient Clinic for Children of the Medical University of Warsaw Hospital. The Graf classification system was used for universal ultrasonographic screening. In total, 3102 infants met the eligibility criteria. Results: The incidence of DDH in the study group was 4.45%. The incidence of DDH in the Warsaw population, Poland, during the study period was 3.73 to 5.17 (95% CI). According to the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for DDH were birth weight (OR = 2.17 (1.41−3.32)), week of delivery (OR = 1.18 (1.00−1.37)), female sex (OR = 8.16 (4.86−13.71)), breech presentation (OR = 5.92 (3.37−10.40)), physical signs of DDH (25.28 (8.77−72.83)) and positive family history in siblings (5.74 (2.68−12.31)). Our results support the recent hypothesis that preterm infants (<37 weeks) have a lower rate of DDH. Conclusions: A multivariate logistic regression predictive model was used to build the risk calculator. The DDH risk calculator will be evaluated in a prospective validation study.

A Retrospective Study Assessing the Outcomes of Immediate Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant and Mesh-Based Breast Reconstruction.

(1) Introduction: In response to patient concerns about breast cancer recurrence, increased use of breast magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing, and advancements in breast reconstruction techniques, mastectomy rates have been observed to rise over the last decade. The aim of the study is to compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral implants and long-term, dual-stage resorbable mesh-based breast reconstructions in mutation carriers (prophylactic surgery) and breast cancer patients. (2) Patients and methods: This retrospective, two-center study included 170 consecutive patients after 232 procedures: Prepectoral surgery was performed in 156 cases and subpectoral was performed in 76. (3) Results: Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with more frequent minor late complications (p < 0.001), but not major ones (p = 0.101), while postoperative chemotherapy was related to more frequent serious (p = 0.005) postoperative complications. Postoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of minor complications (31.03%) than no-radiotherapy (12.21%; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression found complications to be significantly associated with an expander (OR = 4.43), skin-reducing mastectomy (OR = 9.97), therapeutic mastectomy vs. risk-reducing mastectomy (OR = 4.08), and postoperative chemotherapy (OR = 12.89). Patients in whom prepectoral surgeries were performed demonstrated significantly shorter median hospitalization time (p < 0.001) and lower minor complication rates (5.77% vs. 26.32% p < 0.001), but similar major late complication rates (p = 0.915). (4) Conclusions: Implant-based breast reconstruction with the use of long-term, dual-stage resorbable, synthetic mesh is a safe and effective method of breast restoration, associated with low morbidity and good cosmesis. Nevertheless, prospective, multicenter, and long-term outcome data studies are needed to further evaluate the benefits of such treatments.

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics and metastasis-free survival in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost and androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics has been linked to prognosis in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Our goal was to analyze the association between PSA kinetics and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with localized PCa treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) boost combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed multiple PSA kinetics related to PSA nadir (nPSA), PSA bouncing, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in 186 PCa patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), followed by EBRT combined with HDR-BT boost. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression models were calculated to assess the value of PSA-related parameters for the prediction of MFS. RESULTS: 5- and 10-year MFS were 95% and 84%, respectively. Median nPSA was 0.011 (IQR, 0.007-0.057) ng/ml and predicted MFS in multivariable analysis. Implementation of nPSA improved c-index of baseline model from 0.8 to 0.68. nPSA of 0.2 ng/ml offered the most optimal discriminatory ability for identifying patients with better prognoses. Time to nPSA (median, 11 months; IQR, 8-18 months) and PSA bounce, which occurred in 12.4% of patients, were not significantly associated with MFS. CONCLUSIONS: Lower values of nPSA are significantly associated with decreased risk of developing metastases in patients treated with EBRT combined with HDR-BT boost and ADT, and improve the accuracy of a clinical model for MFS.