Outcomes for Women Denied Postpartum Tubal Ligation During the Initial COVID-19 Surge.

Objective: To evaluate the utilization and outcomes of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (PPLARC) following unmet postpartum bilateral tubal ligation (PPBTL) requests during a time in which elective surgeries were canceled due to the initial COVID-19 surge. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using an embedded design. Using a retrospective cohort design, we collected data from patients seeking PPBTL following vaginal delivery between March 15, 2020, and June 20, 2020; this reflects a time period during which elective surgery was canceled thus making PPBTL unavailable. We recorded demographic data, method of contraception at time of discharge and 18 months postpartum, and incidence of interval pregnancy at 18 months postpartum. Additionally, we conducted five semistructured interviews to gain deeper insights into patient experiences with PPLARC as a bridge method. Results: Forty-five patients had unfilled PPBTL requests with follow-up data available for 35. The median age was 34 years. Ten (22%) accepted PPLARC as a bridge to interval bilateral tubal ligation (BTL). At the 18-month mark, only 1 out of 7 (14.3%) PPLARC users had undergone an interval BTL procedure, compared to 11 out of 28 (39.3%) nonusers. None of the PPLARC users experienced pregnancies, while 6 out of 28 (21.6%) nonusers became pregnant. Qualitative interviews underscored themes such as inadequate counseling preparation for unmet PPBTL requests and persistent barriers to BTL access. Conclusions: Raising awareness of unmet PPBTL risks may drive greater adoption of PPLARC as a bridge method. While not a substitution for PPTBL, PPLARC provides a reliable form of interval contraception for patients seeking to delay pregnancy. It is essential to recognize that patient security with PPLARC's contraceptive efficacy may introduce delays in achieving the desired interval sterilization. Enhancing antenatal counseling on contraception options and providing transparency regarding barriers to sterilization could mitigate the challenges associated with unmet PPBTL requests.

The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on women presenting with pelvic organ prolapse.

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a difference in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage at time of presentation after lifting coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown restrictions, as compared to before the lockdown. Enhancing our understanding of how healthcare utilization for pelvic floor disorders may be affected by limited accessibility, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, could prove invaluable for similar future circumstances. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of women with POP at their initial visit. Patients were grouped into two cohorts based on their initial presentation time: pre-COVID-19 lockdown (before March 2020) and post-COVID-19 lockdown (after December 2020). The cohorts were compared using demographic, clinical, and surgical variables. A logistic regression controlling for confounders was used to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 lockdown on prolapse stage. RESULTS: There were 656 (50.3%) patients in the pre-COVID-19 lockdown cohort and 648 (49.7%) in the post-COVID-19 lockdown cohort. All baseline characteristics were similar between both cohorts except for race (p = 0.015). Treatment choices differed with the post-COVID-19 lockdown cohort having a lower proportion (26.5%) opting for surgery and a higher proportion (50.5%) of patients opting for nonsurgical interventions compared to the pre-COVID-19 lockdown cohort (p = 0.0005). A higher proportion of women presented with stages I and II prolapse in the post-COVID-19 lockdown (70.4%) cohort as compared to the pre-COVID-19 lockdown (62.5%) cohort (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Women in the post-COVID-19 lockdown cohort presented with early stage prolapse with preference for more conservative treatment options.

Black Women's Lived Experiences of Abortion.

In this study, we aim to understand abortion in the context of structural racism and reproductive injustice. We designed this study using Reproductive Justice and Public Health Critical Race Praxis frameworks. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with self-identified Black women over the age of 18 who have had an abortion. The primary identified theme is that "choice" around abortion is a privilege that is not always available to Black women. Participants discussed domains of experience around abortion. The domains were (1) community experience and intergenerational wisdom, (2) personal experience and beliefs, (3) the process of accessing abortion, and (4) reflecting on abortion experience and recovery. Understanding the ways in which reproductive injustices and structural racism constrict choices is critical to providing abortion care. Abortion care should seek to honor the experiences of Black women, trust in the expertise that Black women have in our own bodies, and work to provide Reproductive-Justice-informed care.

Opioid prescribing practices and medication use following urogynecological surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioid abuse is a growing epidemic in the United States, with opioid overdose becoming a leading cause of death. There is wide variation in prescription practices for post-operative opioids due to absence of guidelines. The purpose of this study is to examine postoperative opioid prescribing patterns after urogynecologic surgery and determine usage and management of opioid pills by patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational, prospective study of female patients (N = 143) who underwent urogynecologic (prolapse or incontinence) surgery from June to December 2017 at a single academic center. Patients were surveyed regarding their pain medication use 30 days postoperatively. Survey questions included preoperative pain medication use, quantity of opioid pills consumed, need for additional opioid prescription, and management of remaining pills. T-test and one-way Anova were used for comparison of continuous variables and chi-squared test used for comparison of categorical variables. RESULTS: Of 143 eligible patients, 99 (69%) responded; 62% of respondent patients underwent vaginal surgery, 22% abdominal surgery with or without vaginal surgery, and 15% underwent other procedures. Postoperatively, 81.8% of patients were prescribed opioids. The average number of tablets prescribed ranged from 12.4 to 17.4 depending on the procedure. 54.3% of patients reported using less than half of their prescribed opioid prescription. Of the patients who had excess opioid tablets, only 8.6% reported discarding their opioids. CONCLUSION: To date, no guidelines exist on prescribing opioids postoperatively. Opioids are overprescribed post-operatively with over half of patients using less than half of the opioids prescribed to them.