Economic evaluation of encorafenib with cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in France: a cost-effectiveness analysis using data from the BEACON CRC randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The BEACON CRC randomised controlled trial (NCT02928224) in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients showed improved overall survival for the combination treatment of encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) with cetuximab (EGFR inhibitor) compared with cetuximab with chemotherapy (FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) or irinotecan). We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of encorafenib with cetuximab in adult patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC after prior systemic therapy, from the perspective of the French healthcare system. DESIGN: A partitioned survival analysis model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of encorafenib with cetuximab using data from BEACON CRC (encorafenib with cetuximab and cetuximab with FOLFIRI or irinotecan). For two further comparator treatments (FOLFIRI alone and bevacizumab with FOLFIRI), a systemic literature review identified appropriate clinical trial data for indirect comparison. Piecewise modelling extrapolation was used to fulfil a lifetime horizon in the model. A discount rate of 2.5% was used. Treatment-emergent adverse events ≥grade 3 with an incidence of ≥2% were included, as well as relative dose intensity and utility values. OUTCOME MEASURES: The effectiveness outcomes of the model were expressed in terms of incremental life years gained and incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. The cost-effectiveness of encorafenib with cetuximab was assessed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results were presented probabilistically to account for parametric uncertainty. Deterministic and scenario analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The ICER for encorafenib with cetuximab versus cetuximab with FOLFIRI or irinotecan, FOLFIRI alone and bevacizumab with FOLFIRI was €69 823/QALY, €70 421/QALY and €72 336/QALY, respectively. Encorafenib with cetuximab was considered cost-effective compared with the three comparators at a willingness to pay threshold of €90 000/QALY, with probabilities of being cost-effective of 89.8%, 98.2% and 86.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed encorafenib with cetuximab to be a cost-effective treatment in mCRC patients with a BRAF V600E mutation.

Dysnatremia and 6-Month Functional Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between plasma sodium concentrations and 6-month neurologic outcome in critically ill patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Eleven ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Three-hundred fifty-six aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients admitted to ICU between March 2016 and June 2018. The exposure variable was daily measured plasma sodium. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Six-month neurologic outcome as measured by the modified Rankin Scale. A poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale greater than or equal to 4. The mean age was 57 years (± 12.6 yr), 68% were female, and 32% (n = 113) had a poor outcome. In multivariable analysis, including age, illness severity, and process of care measures as covariates, higher mean sodium concentrations (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.29), and greater overall variability-as measured by the sd (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.17-1.99)-were associated with a greater likelihood of a poor outcome. Multivariable generalized additive modeling demonstrated, specifically, that a high initial sodium concentration, followed by a gradual decline from day 3 onwards, was also associated with a poor outcome. Finally, greater variability in sodium concentrations was associated with a longer ICU and hospital length of stay: mean ICU length of stay ratio (1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20) and mean hospital length of stay ratio (1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients, higher mean sodium concentrations and greater variability were associated with worse neurologic outcomes at 6 months, despite adjustment for known confounders. Interventional studies would be required to demonstrate a causal relationship.

Critical care management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in Australia and New Zealand: what are we doing, and where to from here?

Patients with an aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) frequently require admission to the intensive care unit. There, a variety of therapeutic strategies are initiated, in addition to definitive procedures aimed at securing the aneurysm. Despite a substantial investment in caring for these patients, outcomes for this group remain poor. Although the severity of the initial bleed is crucial in this context, many patients undergo further deterioration in the ICU. Delayed cerebral ischaemia is a significant cause of longterm morbidity and mortality after SAH. There are limited data supporting much of the critical care provided to patients with SAH in the ICU, leading to substantial institutional and practitioner variation in treatment. Whether this influences patient outcomes is unknown, although it represents a major knowledge gap in neurocritical practice in Australia and New Zealand.