Locked Plating versus Nailing for Proximal Tibia Fractures: A Multicenter RCT.

OBJECTIVES: The main 2 forms of treatment for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locked lateral plating (LLP). The goal of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: 16 academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 108 patients were enrolled. 99 patients were followed for 12 months. 52 patients were randomized to IMN, and 47 patients were randomized to LLP. INTERVENTION: IMN or lateral locked plating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, Bother Index, EQ-5Dindex and EQ-5DVAS. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory aid and number, and complications. RESULTS: Functional testing demonstrated no difference between the groups, but both groups were still significantly affected 12 months postinjury. Similarly, there was no difference in time of surgery, alignment, nonunion, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory support, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both IMN and LLP provide for similar outcomes after these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired even 1 year later. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Professional Society Opportunities and Involvement for Early-Career Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Professional societies can provide orthopaedic surgeons opportunities to build strong fellowship among colleagues within a specialty, to gain leadership positions and responsibilities, and to contribute to the latest research and practice management guidelines. However, early-career surgeons often receive little to no guidance about how membership can benefit them in the long term. The primary purpose of this review article was to provide an overview of orthopaedic professional societies, why early-career orthopaedic surgeons should consider membership, and how they can get involved. Topics discussed in this article include the missions of various societies, value in career advancement both in academic and private practice settings, benefits to patient care, and tips for budding surgeons on how to rise up the ranks within a given professional society. We also provide a comprehensive list of leadership development, fellowship, mentorship, and research opportunities that are designed for orthopaedic surgeons within their first 10 years of practice.

Are Pelvic Binders an Effective Prehospital Intervention?

OBJECTIVE: Widespread adoption of prehospital pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCDs) by emergency medical services (EMS) systems has been slow and variable across the United States. We sought to determine the frequency of prehospital PCCD use by EMS providers. Secondarily, we hypothesized that prehospital PCCD use would improve early hemorrhagic shock outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 162 unstable pelvic ring injuries transported directly to our center by EMS from 2011 to 2020. Included patients received a PCCD during their resuscitation (prehospital or emergency department). Prehospital treatment details were obtained from the EMS medical record. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received a PCCD by EMS before hospital arrival. Secondarily, we explored factors associated with receiving a prehospital PCCD, and its association with changes in vital signs, blood transfusion, and mortality. RESULTS: EMS providers documented suspicion of a pelvic ring fracture in 85 (52.8%) patients and 52 patients in the cohort (32.2%) received a prehospital PCCD. Wide variation in prehospital PCCD use was observed based on patient characteristics, geographic location, and EMS provider level. Helicopter flight paramedics applied a prehospital PCCD in 46% of the patients they transported (38/83); in contrast, the EMS organizations geographically closest to our hospital applied a PCCD in ≤5% of cases (2/47). Other predictors associated with receiving a prehospital PCCD included lower body mass index (p = 0.005), longer prehospital duration (p = 0.001) and lower Injury Severity Score (p < 0.05). We were unable to identify any improvements in clinical outcomes associated with prehospital PCCD, including early vital signs, number of blood transfusions within 24 hours, or mortality during admission (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate wide practice variation in the application of prehospital PCCDs. Although disparate PCCD application across the state is likely explained by differences across EMS organizations and provider levels, our study was unable to identify any clinical benefits to the prehospital use of PCCDs. It is possible that the benefits of a prehospital PCCD can only be observed in the most displaced fracture patterns with the greatest early hemodynamic instability.

Telemedicine and Socioeconomics in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic factors may introduce barriers to telemedicine care access. This study examines changes in clinic absenteeism for orthopaedic trauma patients after the introduction of a telemedicine postoperative follow-up option during the COVID-19 pandemic with attention to patient socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: Patients (n = 1,060) undergoing surgical treatment of pelvic and extremity trauma were retrospectively assigned to preintervention and postintervention cohorts using a quasi-experimental design. The intervention is the April 2020 introduction of a telemedicine follow-up option for postoperative trauma care. The primary outcome was the missed visit rate (MVR) for postoperative appointments. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the relative change in MVR adjusting for patient age and sex. SES-based subgroup analysis was based on the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) according to home address. RESULTS: The pre-telemedicine group included 635 patients; the post-telemedicine group included 425 patients. The median MVR in the pre-telemedicine group was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 45%) and 24% (95% CI, 6% to 43%) in the post-telemedicine group. Low SES was associated with a 40% relative increase in MVR (95% CI, 17% to 67%, P < 0.001) compared with patients with high SES. Relative MVR changes between pre-telemedicine and post-telemedicine groups did not reach statistical significance in any socioeconomic strata (low ADI, -6%; 95% CI, -25% to 17%; P = 0.56; medium ADI, -18%; 95% CI, -35% to 2%; P = 0.07; high ADI, -12%; 95% CI, -28% to 7%; P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Low SES was associated with a higher MVR both before and after the introduction of a telemedicine option. However, no evidence in this cohort demonstrated a change in absenteeism based on SES after the introduction of the telemedicine option. Clinicians should be reassured that there is no evidence that telemedicine introduces additional socioeconomic bias in postoperative orthopaedic trauma care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The 1-Year Economic Impact of Work Productivity Loss Following Severe Lower Extremity Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Severe lower extremity trauma among working-age adults is highly consequential for returning to work; however, the economic impact attributed to injury has not been fully quantified. The purpose of this study was to examine work and productivity loss during the year following lower extremity trauma and to calculate the economic losses associated with lost employment, lost work time (absenteeism), and productivity loss while at work (presenteeism). METHODS: This is an analysis of data collected prospectively across 3 multicenter studies of lower extremity trauma outcomes in the United States. Data were used to construct a Markov model that accumulated hours lost over time due to lost employment, absenteeism, and presenteeism among patients from 18 to 64 years old who were working prior to their injury. Average U.S. wages were used to calculate economic loss overall and by sociodemographic and injury subgroups. RESULTS: Of 857 patients working prior to injury, 47.2% had returned to work at 1 year. The average number of productive hours of work lost was 1,758.8/person, representing 84.6% of expected annual productive hours. Of the hours lost, 1,542.3 (87.7%) were due to working no hours or lost employment, 71.1 (4.0%) were due to missed hours after having returned, and 145.4 (8.3%) were due to decreased productivity while working. The 1-year economic loss due to injury totaled $64,427/patient (95% confidence interval [CI], $63,183 to $65,680). Of the 1,758.8 lost hours, approximately 88% were due to not being employed (working zero hours), 4% were due to absenteeism, and 8% were due to presenteeism. Total productivity loss was higher among older adults (≥40 years), men, those with a physically demanding job, and the most severe injuries (i.e., those leading to amputation as well as Gustilo type-IIIB tibial fractures and type-III pilon/ankle fractures). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe lower extremity trauma carry a substantial economic burden. The costs of lost productivity should be considered when evaluating outcomes.

Open reduction and internal fixation alone versus open reduction and internal fixation plus total hip arthroplasty for displaced acetabular fractures in patients older than 60 years: A prospective clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment of elderly patients with an acetabular fracture is unknown. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to compare functional outcomes and reoperation rates in patients older than 60 years with acetabular fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone versus ORIF plus concomitant total hip arthroplasty (ORIF + THA). Our hypothesis was that patients who had ORIF + THA would have better patient reported outcomes and lower reoperation rates postoperatively. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients older than 60 years with acetabular fracture plus at least one of three fracture characteristics: dome impaction, femoral head fracture, or posterior wall component. Eligible patients were operative candidates based on fracture displacement, ambulatory status, and physiological appropriateness. Patients received either ORIF alone or ORIF + THA (accomplished at same surgery through same incision). Outcome measurements included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index hip score, Short Form 36, Harris Hip Score, and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form scores. Additionally, patients were monitored for any unplanned reoperation within 2 years. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 165 eligible patients with an average age of 70.7 years were included. The mean Harris Hip Score difference favored ORIF + THA (mean difference, 12.3, [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.3 to 24.9, p = 0.07]). No clinically important differences were detected in any other validated outcome score or patient satisfaction score 1 year after surgery. ORIF + THA decreased the absolute risk of reoperation by 28% (95% CI, 13% to 44%, p < 0.01). No postoperative hip dislocation occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients older than 60 years with an operative displaced acetabular fracture with specific fracture features (dome impaction, femoral head fracture, or posterior wall component), treatment with ORIF + THA resulted in fewer reoperations than treatment with ORIF alone. No differences in patient satisfaction and other validated outcome measures were detected.

Access to Total Knee Arthroplasty Among Patients With Low Incomes Has Not Increased Under Global Budget Revenue.

In 2014, Maryland implemented an experimental reimbursement model, Global Budget Revenue (GBR). This model provided hospitals with a capitated annual budget each fiscal year to use toward all services, regardless of payer. Goals of GBR include reductions in cost, improvements in care quality, and increased access for patients to high-volume procedures, such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed demographics and outcomes among patients with low incomes and patients of racial minority groups in Maryland who underwent TKA before and after GBR implementation. Patients undergoing TKAs from 2011 to 2016 were queried from the Maryland State Inpatient Database, resulting in 71,066 patients. There were 13,722 patients with low incomes and 19,846 patients of racial minority groups. The chi-square test was used for sex, income, insurance, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and morbid obesity, with the Student's t test being reserved for age before and after GBR. The proportion of patients with low incomes decreased the year before GBR but increased with GBR and maintained (P<.001). The proportion of patients of racial minority groups increased the year before GBR implementation, decreased slightly, and then maintained (P<.001). Mean cost decreased for both cohorts of patients (both P<.001). Discharges to home increased for both cohorts (P<.001), while length of stay decreased (both P<.001). Global Budget Revenue decreased cost while improving outcomes for TKA patients post-GBR. Patients with low incomes have not increased their use of TKA, contrary to patients of racial minority groups. This suggests that barriers remain. Further follow-up of GBR performance in subsequent years will increase understanding of the sustainability of this trend and the degree to which any increase in access is dependent on the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(1):e11-e16.].

Population Decline in COPD Admissions During the COVID-19 Pandemic Associated with Lower Burden of Community Respiratory Viral Infections.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to widespread implementation of public health measures, such as stay-at-home orders, social distancing, and masking mandates. In addition to decreasing spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, these measures also impact the transmission of seasonal viral pathogens, which are common triggers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Whether reduced viral prevalence mediates reduction in COPD exacerbation rates is unknown. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of data from a large, multicenter health care system to assess admission trends associated with community viral prevalence and with initiation of COVID-19 pandemic control measures. We applied difference-in-differences analysis to compare season-matched weekly frequency of hospital admissions for COPD prior to and after implementation of public health measures for COVID-19. Community viral prevalence was estimated using regional Centers for Disease Control and Prevention test positivity data and correlated to COPD admissions. RESULTS: Data involving 4422 COPD admissions demonstrated a season-matched 53% decline in COPD admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic, which correlated to community viral burden (r = 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.78) and represented a 36% greater decline over admission frequencies observed in other medical conditions less affected by respiratory viral infections (incidence rate ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.71, P < .001). The post-COVID-19 decline in COPD admissions was most pronounced in patients with fewer comorbidities and without recurrent admissions. CONCLUSION: The implementation of public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased COPD admissions. These changes are plausibly explained by reduced prevalence of seasonal respiratory viruses.

Patient Satisfaction After Discharge Is Discordant With Reported Inpatient Experience.

Patient satisfaction measures are commonly used to evaluate clinical performance. However, research on the correlation between patient satisfaction scores and actual patient experience is limited. This study aimed to determine the concordance between patient satisfaction reported as an inpatient and patient satisfaction reported after discharge. The study enrolled 231 adult orthopedic patients at least 48 hours after admission to an academic hospital. Study participants rated their overall inpatient experience on a scale of 0 to 10, followed by open-ended questions on their hospital experience. Participants were then randomized to a second survey by either phone or mail at 4 to 6 weeks after discharge. Statistical and qualitative techniques were used to assess concordance in satisfaction scores and the agreement and association between patient experiences and patient satisfaction scores. The median overall patient satisfaction scores were 9.5 as inpatients (interquartile range [IQR], 8-10) and 10 at follow-up (IQR, 8-10), with a poor concordance between the inpatient and follow-up satisfaction scores (ρc=0.28). This study raises concerns regarding the validity of patient satisfaction measures to accurately quantify inpatient experience and the limitations related to its modes of administration. The authors observed poor agreement between the reported experience as an inpatient and the recollection of the inpatient experience after discharge. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):e427-e433.].

What Is the Long-Term Impact of an Implant Stewardship Program on Orthopaedic Trauma Implant Pricing?

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effectiveness of an implant stewardship program on implant cost containment and to estimate surgeons' responsiveness to implant price changes. DESIGN: Interrupted time series. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Monitored usage of 5 trauma constructs by 10 surgeons over a 5-year period. INTERVENTION: Red-Yellow-Green (RYG) implant pricing comparison chart. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were changes in the mean price, minimum price, and the number of price changes. The secondary outcome was surgeons' responsiveness to RYG/cost changes. RESULTS: The study consisted of 2468 procedures. A mean construct price decrease of $66 per year [95% confidence interval (CI), $-170 to $-151], with distal femoral plates demonstrating the largest mean annual price decline ($486; 95% CI, $-540 to $-432). The minimum construct price decreased by $131 per year (95% CI, $-155 to $-111), with the largest reductions observed for distal femoral plates (-$436 per year; 95% CI, $-516 to $-354) and external fixators (-$122 per year; 95% CI, $-258 to $-136). The median price decrease was $407 (range: $6 to $2491) or 12.5% of the previous price. Positive changes in RYG levels increased surgeons' usage of tibial nails by 115%, femoral nails by 106%, and external fixators by 104%. Surgeons' implant selection was insensitive to RYG changes for distal femoral plates [RYG elasticity (ERYG): -0.74] and proximal tibia plates (ERYG: -0.21). CONCLUSIONS: The implant stewardship program was associated with substantial implant price reductions. Surgeons' implant selection was especially sensitive to price changes for intramedullary nails and external fixators.

Maryland's Global Budget Revenue Model: How Do Costs and Readmission Rates Fare for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty?

In 2014, Maryland implemented the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) model for cost reduction and quality improvement. This study evaluated GBR's effect on demographics and outcomes for patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing Maryland to the United States (U.S.). We identified primary TKA patients in Maryland's State Inpatient Database (n = 71,022) and the National Inpatient Sample (n = 4,045,245) between 2011 and 2016 utilizing International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Multiple regression was used for difference-in-difference (DID) analyses to compare the intervention cohort (Maryland) to the nonintervention cohort (U.S.) between the pre-GBR (2011-2013) and post-GBR (2014-2016) periods. After GBR implementation, there were proportionally less white, obese, morbidly obese, Medicare, and Medicaid patients with proportionally more routine discharge patients in Maryland and the U.S. (all p < 0.001). There were proportionally less home health care (HHC) patients in Maryland, but more in the U.S. (both p < 0.001). The mean lengths of stay (LOS), costs, and complications decreased for both cohorts, while charges increased for the U.S. (all p < 0.001). The DID analysis suggested Maryland saw more Asian and Medicaid patients and less obese and morbidly obese patients under GBR. The DID assessments also found decreased LOS, costs, and charges (p < 0.001 for all) for patients under GBR. As other states such as Pennsylvania and Vermont explore hospital budgets, Maryland may provide a more viable model for future health care policies that incorporate global budgets.

Quantitative Evaluation of Embolic Load in Femoral and Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated With Reamed Intramedullary Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the volume of embolic load during intramedullary fixation of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. Our hypothesis was that tibial intramedullary nails (IMNs) would be associated with less volume of intravasation of marrow than IM nailing of femur fractures. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Urban Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three patients consented for the study: 14 with femoral shaft fractures and 9 with tibial shaft fractures. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent continuous transesophageal echocardiography, and volume of embolic load was evaluated during 5 distinct stages: postinduction, initial guide wire, reaming (REAM), nail insertion, and postoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Volume of embolic load was measured based on previously described luminosity scores. The embolic load based on fracture location and procedure stage was evaluated using a mixed effects model. RESULTS: The IMN procedure increased the embolic load by 215% (-12% to 442%, P = 0.07) in femur patients relative to tibia patients after adjusting for baseline levels. Of the 5 steps measured, REAM was associated with the greatest increase in embolic load relative to the guide wire placement and controlling for fracture location (421%, 95% confidence interval: 169%-673%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral shaft IMN fixation was associated with a 215% increase in embolic load in comparison with tibial shaft IMN fixation, with the greatest quantitative load during the REAM stage; however, both procedures produce embolic load. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tourniquet use for extremity fractures has no adverse effect on number of ventilator days for patients who are treated with reamed femoral or tibial shaft nails.

INTRODUCTION: Concern exists regarding the pulmonary effects of using tourniquets for secondary extremity fractures in patients also undergoing intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of femoral or tibial shaft fractures. Our hypothesis was that tourniquet use would be associated with increased ventilator days. METHODS: At a Level I trauma center, we conducted a retrospective review of 1966 patients with 2018 fractures (1070 femoral shaft and 948 tibial shaft) treated with IMN from December 2006 to September 2014. Medical record review and bivariate and multiple variable regression analyses were conducted, and the main outcome measurement was number of ventilator days. RESULTS: No statistically significant negative association was found between use of a tourniquet and number of ventilator days in the femoral or tibial fracture group. Use of tourniquets in the upper extremities showed a statistically significant decrease in amount of ventilator days in the femoral group (-2.2 days, p = 0.003) but no association in the tibial group (1.1 days, p = 0.36). Use of tourniquets concurrently in both upper and lower extremities of both femoral and tibial groups also had a protective effect (-6.8 days, p < 0.001 and -2.3 days, p = 0.009, respectively). Stratified and sensitivity analyses (to account for effects of mortality and missing data) showed consistently similar results. CONCLUSION: Tourniquet use for secondary extremity fractures, in patients also undergoing IMN fixation for femoral or tibial shaft fractures, was not associated with an increased number of ventilator days. A potential protective effect of tourniquet use was shown in patients with upper extremity fractures and in those with both upper and lower extremity fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III (Retrospective cohort study).

The Affordable Care Act and Global Budget Revenue: The Impact on Total Hip Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: Maryland possesses a unique, population-based alternative payment model named Global Budget Revenue (GBR). This study evaluated the effects of GBR on demographics and outcomes for patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) by comparing Maryland to the United States (U.S.). METHODS: We identified primary THA patients in the Maryland State Inpatient Database (n = 35,925) and the National Inpatient Sample (n = 2,155,703) between 2011 and 2016 utilizing International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 diagnosis codes. Qualitative analysis was used to report trends. Multiple regressions were used for difference-in-difference (DID) analyses to compare Maryland to the U.S. between pre-GBR (2011-2013) and post-GBR (2014-2016) periods. RESULTS: After GBR implementation, there were proportionally more patients who were obese (Maryland: +5.1% vs U.S.: +3.0%), used Medicare (+1.6% vs +0.7%), used Medicaid (+2.4% vs +1.3%) while less used private insurance (-4.2% vs -1.8%) (all P < .001). There were proportionally less home health care patients in Maryland, but more in the U.S. (-3.5% vs +1.6%; both P < .001). The mean costs decreased for both cohorts (-$1780.80 vs -$209.40; both P < .001). The DID found Maryland saw more Medicaid and less private insurance patients under GBR (both P ≤ .001). Maryland saw more obese patients than would be expected (P = .001). The DID also found decreased costs for patients under GBR (P < .001 for both). CONCLUSION: Maryland has benefitted from GBR with decreased cost and an increase in Medicaid patients. Maryland may provide a viable model for future healthcare policies that incorporate global budgets.

Quantitative Lesser Trochanter Profile Versus Cortical Step Sign in Assessing Femoral Malrotation After Femoral Nailing.

We describe the novel quantitative lesser trochanter profile (QLTP) technique to determine the magnitude and direction of femoral malrotation and to compare its performance with the cortical step sign technique. For this assessment, 9 orthopaedic surgeons estimated the magnitude and direction of femoral malrotation with each technique in 198 anteroposterior view images of the proximal cadaveric femur and osteotomy sites. Based on the results, the main benefit of the QLTP technique over the cortical step sign technique is the ability to determine the direction of femoral malrotation. The QLTP technique was also more accurate in measuring malrotation and had less error. However, the QLTP technique requires additional imaging, and the mean difference in error between the 2 techniques might not be clinically meaningful.

Maryland's Global Budget Revenue model associated with lower inpatient costs and 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Maryland implemented the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) to reduce hospital costs, improve quality, and decrease readmissions. Studies assessing its impact on inpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures are lacking. This study compared before and after GBR changes in 1) patient characteristics; 2) discharge dispositions and lengths of stay (LOS); 3) costs and charges of inpatient stays; and 4) 30-day readmission rates (RR) for THA recipients. METHODS: The Maryland State Inpatient Database was queried for patients who underwent THA between 2010 and 2016 utilizing the ICD-9 and ICD-10 procedure codes (n = 43,251). Pre- and post-GBR periods were grouped as 2010 to 2013 and 2014 to 2016, respectively. Chi-square analyses were used to analyze patient characteristics. Student's t-tests were utilized to compare ages, LOS, costs, charges, and RR. RESULTS: There were no differences in the proportion of minorities undergoing THA between the pre- and post-GBR periods (18.3% vs 19.4% African American, 1.2% vs 1.3% Hispanic; P = .056). The number of THA patients with Medicaid insurances increased during post-GBR (4.0% vs 6.7%; P < .001). There was an increased rate of home discharges during post-GBR (33.1% vs 40.9%; P < .001). We found lower LOS (-0.50 days; 95% CI: -0.458 to -0.533; P < .001), mean inpatient costs (-$1417.44; 95% CI -$1143.76 to -$1150.32; P < .001), and mean inpatient charges (-$2196.50; 95% CI: -$1980.10 to -$2412.90; P < .001) during the post-GBR period. There were lower 30-day RR during the post-GBR period (-0.9%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest favorable preliminary results for patients undergoing THA under the GBR model.

Advanced Prehospital Trauma Resuscitation With a Physician and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist: The Shock Trauma "Go-Team".

OBJECTIVE: The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center (STC) is Maryland's primary adult resource center for trauma care. The Shock Trauma "Go-Team" is a specialized component of Maryland's emergency medical system and is composed of a physician and certified registered nurse anesthetist. They are dispatched when advanced prehospital resuscitation is required. The purpose of this study is to describe the capabilities and historic epidemiology outcomes of the Go-Team. METHODS: A retrospective case series review of recoverable Go-Team records was performed from 2011 to 2018. Go-Team call logs/records were identified from multiple sources. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, and treatments in the field. There was a total of 61 activations, with 22 deployments to the scene of injury. RESULTS: The majority of deployments were via helicopter (73%) and lasted 2 hours. The most common indications for deployment were motor vehicle entrapment (41%), trench collapse (14%), and building collapse (9%). Of the 22 patients treated by the Go-Team, 50% received at least 1 blood transfusion in the field, and 23% required an advanced airway. No field amputations were required. CONCLUSION: The STC Go-Team is a unique multidisciplinary specialized component of a statewide emergency medical system.

Variability in Discharge Disposition Across US Trauma Centers After Treatment for High-Energy Lower Extremity Injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between patient- and center-level characteristics and discharge to an inpatient facility versus home after treatment for lower extremity trauma, as well as examine the variability in discharge disposition across clinical centers after controlling for these factors. DESIGN: This is an analysis of data collected prospectively across 5 multicenter studies of extremity trauma. SETTING: US Trauma Centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 18-80 years with lower extremity trauma treated at 1 of 55 participating centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Discharge disposition. RESULTS: Among 2365 patients treated at 1 of 55 centers across 13 states, 673 (28.5%) were discharged to an inpatient facility, and 1692 (71.5%) were discharged home. Individuals who were older, female, unmarried, insured, higher body mass index, history of severe alcohol abuse, Gustilo type IIIB or IIIC open injuries, bilateral, spine and upper extremity injuries, higher injury severity score scores, or intensive care unit stay were more likely to be discharged to an inpatient facility. Even after accounting for patient- and center-level characteristics, there was substantial variation in discharge disposition across centers (likelihood ratio test: P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Variation in discharge disposition may represent a potential for improvement in resource utilization and cost savings. Further studies are needed to examine the relationship between utilization of postdischarge inpatient facility after trauma and outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Valuing the Recovery Priorities of Orthopaedic Trauma Patients After Injury: Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment Within 6 Weeks of Injury.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the recovery priorities of extremity fracture patients during the subacute phase and the patient factors associated with variation in recovery priorities. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Academic trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients with a fracture to the appendicular skeleton. Patients with severe traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, and non-English-speaking patients were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The relative importance of clinical recovery, work-related recovery, and obtaining disability benefits after injury. RESULTS: In the subacute period, clinical recovery was the main priority for fracture patients (mean: 62%, SD: 5.3). Work-related recovery (mean: 27%, SD: 3.9) and the receipt of other disability benefits (mean: 11%, SD: 6.4) were each of significantly less importance. Heterogeneity was observed across these estimates based on the physical demands of preinjury employment, preinjury physical health, preinjury work status, health insurance type, and the severity of the fracture. CONCLUSION: Clinical recovery was of paramount importance for fracture patients during the subacute recovery phase. However, patients also valued resuming work and access to disability benefits. Understanding a patient's recovery priorities early in the clinical care pathway will enable the development of multidisciplinary care plans that are responsive to these priorities and, hence, deliver value-based health care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does an Implant Usage Report Card Impact Orthopaedic Trauma Implant Stewardship?

OBJECTIVES: As hospitals seek to control variable expenses, orthopaedic surgeons have come under scrutiny because of relatively high implant costs. We aimed to determine whether feedback to surgeons regarding implant costs results in changes in implant selection. METHODS: This study was undertaken at a statewide trauma referral center and included 6 fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. A previously implemented implant stewardship program at our institution using a "red-yellow-green" (RYG) implant selection tool classifies 7 commonly used trauma implant constructs based on cost and categorizes each implant as red (used for patient-specific requirements, most expensive), yellow (midrange), and green (preferred vendor, least expensive). The constructs included were femoral intramedullary nail, tibial intramedullary nail, long and short cephalomedullary nails, distal femoral plate, proximal tibial plate, and lower-limb external fixator. Baseline implant usage from the previous year was obtained and provided to each surgeon. Each surgeon received a monthly feedback report containing individual implant utilization and overall ranking. RESULTS: The overall RYG score increased from 68.7 to 79.1 of 100 (P < 0.001). Three of the 7 implants (tibial and femoral nails and lower-limb external fixation) had significant increases in their RYG scores; implant selections for the other 4 implants were not significantly altered. A decrease of 1.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.4-3.2, P = 0.01) was noted in overall implant costs over the study period. CONCLUSION: Our intervention resulted in changes in surgeons' implant selections and cost savings. However, surgeons were unwilling to change certain implants despite their being more expensive.