Comparative efficacy of self-administered dentifrices for the management of dentine hypersensitivity - A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review with network meta-analysis synthesises available randomised controlled trials evidence concerning efficacy of self-administered dentifrices for management of dentine hypersensitivity (DH) pain. STUDY SELECTION: Following systematic review registration (CRD42019154064), three data bases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL) were searched to December 2022 for parallel randomised controlled trials conducted in adults diagnosed with DH, using at least two recognised stimuli, assessing the short-term efficacy of home-use dentifrice treatment in reducing pain. Thirty-two studies and 4,638 participants were included. A Network meta-analysis (NMA) approach was used to compare relative effectiveness between interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Twice daily application of self-applied dentifrice containing formulations of stannous, potassium +/- stannous, or arginine can be recommended for the reduction of dentine hypersensitivity pain. There is a need for standardised methodology guideline development to improve the conduct, analysis and reporting of DH clinical studies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This is the first comprehensive NMA to be performed, that follows guidelines for conduct of DH trials to determine the efficacy of self-applied dentifrices for the management of dentine hypersensitivity. Indirect comparisons can be made between formulations that have not been compared to one another in randomised controlled trials.

Post-treatment evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer patients after dental implant rehabilitation.

Objectives To assess oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) following oral rehabilitation using dental implants in patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC).Materials and methods Service evaluation: patients who had received dental implants during their oral rehabilitation were invited to take part (n = 81). In total, 37 patients completed questionnaires and underwent a structured interview regarding OHRQoL after rehabilitation. Analysis was by descriptive statistics for questionnaire and thematic analysis of interview.Results Rehabilitation types were 17 fixed implant prostheses, 12 removable implant prostheses and 8 combination. Functional problems relating to HNC treatment had a significant effect on OHRQoL and persisted after rehabilitation. Removable implant prostheses had more problems associated than fixed. At interview, patients described: functional and emotional benefits of oral rehabilitation involving implants; ease of keeping implants clean; variations in ability of primary care dentists to maintain rehabilitation; thankfulness to have received treatment; long duration of rehabilitation; and problems encountered while undergoing rehabilitation.Conclusions HNC treatment results in functional and emotional difficulties, which has a significant impact on OHRQoL. Use of dental implants in fixed or removable oral rehabilitation can result in good OHRQoL as assessed by patients at treatment completion, although some functional difficulties often remain.

Implementing the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases - how are we doing in the South West region of the UK?

Background A new world classification of periodontal diseases and conditions was developed in 2017 and implemented throughout the United Kingdom by the British Society of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry.Method A retrospective audit was undertaken at Bristol Dental Hospital (BDH) (December 2019 to March 2020) to assess uptake of the new classification in referral letters and its implementation by staff. In total, 75 consecutive new patient referrals seen at BDH were manually searched for diagnosis/classification. Additionally, the 75 most recent referrals where both the referring practitioner and BDH staff used the 2017 classification were analysed for agreeability.Results Within South West England, there was a positive uptake of the new classification in general practice, with 85% of referrals using the 2017 periodontal classification. Further, 98% of patients attending BDH for periodontology consultations were diagnosed using the 2017 classification. Results indicate 50.7% and 57.3% agreement for staging and grading, respectively, when comparing consultants to referring clinicians.Discussion The new classification has been widely conveyed to the profession and is being adopted quickly by specialists, general practitioners and dental health professionals. There is an underestimation of both stage and grade by referring practitioners, with 40% of referrals underestimating the stage and 38.7% underestimating the grade.

Effects of chlorhexidine mouthwash on the oral microbiome.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a commonly used mouthwash with potent anti-microbial effects useful for the management of oral disease. However, we are moving away from the view of simply 'killing' bacteria, towards managing oral microbial ecosystems (oral microbiome), as an integrated system, to promote oral and systemic health. Here, we aimed to review the effects of CHX mouthwash on the balance of microbial communities in the mouth in vivo in oral health and disease. SOURCES AND STUDY SECTION: The hierarchy of evidence was applied, with systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials consulted where available and case controlled studies being described thereafter. Search terms for each subject category were entered into MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane database. Focussing on metagenomics studies provides unique overview of the oral microbiome as an integrated system. DATA: Evidence was limited, but several next generation sequencing case-controlled studies suggested that in an integrated system, CHX may cause a shift towards lower bacterial diversity and abundance, in particular nitrate-reducing bacteria in vivo. CHX also appeared to alter salivary pH, lactate, nitrate and nitrite concentrations in saliva. Evidence regarding the effects of CHX on the oral microbiome during oral disease is still emerging. CONCLUSIONS: CHX alters the composition the oral microbiome. However, as CHX use remains widespread in dentistry to manage oral disease, urgent research using metagenomics studies of microbial communities in vivo are still needed to determine CHX mouthwash is 'good', 'bad' or otherwise for bacteria, in the context of oral and systemic health.

A study of physical activity comparing people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease to normal control subjects.

PURPOSE: Charcot Marie Tooth disease (CMT) describes a group of hereditary neuropathies that present with distal weakness, wasting and sensory loss. Small studies indicate that people with CMT have reduced daily activity levels. This raises concerns as physical inactivity increases the risk of a range of co- morbidities, an important consideration in the long-term management of this disease. This study aimed to compare physical activity, patterns of sedentary behavior and overall energy expenditure of people with CMT and healthy matched controls. METHODS: We compared 20 people with CMT and 20 matched controls in a comparison of physical activity measurement over seven days, using an activity monitor. Patterns of sedentary behavior were explored through a power law analysis. RESULTS: Results showed a decrease in daily steps taken in the CMT group, but somewhat paradoxically, they demonstrate shorter bouts of sedentary activity and more frequent transitions from sedentary to active behaviors. No differences were seen in energy expenditure or time spent in sedentary, moderate or vigorous activity. CONCLUSION: The discrepancy between energy expenditure and number of steps could be due to higher energy requirements for walking, but also may be due to an over-estimation of energy expenditure by the activity monitor in the presence of muscle wasting. Alternatively, this finding may indicate that people with CMT engage more in activities or movement not related to walking. Implications for Rehabilitation Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: • People with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease did not show a difference in energy expenditure over seven days compared to healthy controls, but this may be due to higher energy costs of walking, and/or an over estimation of energy expenditure by the activity monitor in a population where there is muscle wasting. This needs to be considered when interpreting activity monitor data in people with neuromuscular diseases. • Compared to healthy controls, people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease had a lower step count over seven days, but exhibited more frequent transitions from sedentary to active behaviors • High Body Mass Index and increased time spent sedentary were related factors that have implications for general health status. • Understanding the profile of physical activity and behavior can allow targeting of rehabilitation interventions to address mobility and fitness.

Comparing gait performance of people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease who do and do not wear ankle foot orthoses.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed for people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease. Scant evidence exists to guide the type and timing of orthotic prescription. This study explores the latter issue by investigating the differences in presentation and gait function of people with CMT disease who wore AFOs for daily mobility (n = 11) and a group who did not (n = 21). The aim was to see if there was a difference in the characteristics in people who regularly wear AFOs. METHODS: Primary measures of gait function were a 10-m timed walk (comfortable and maximum speed) and a 6-minute walk test. Means of the variables were compared using independent t-tests. Secondary measures included disease severity, lower limb muscle strength, sensory impairment, walking effort, fatigue severity and perceived walking ability. RESULTS: AFO wearers walked slower with higher effort. They also had greater disease severity, weaker leg muscles and perceived greater walking difficulty. Subjects not wearing AFOs showed significant relationships between gait variables and muscle strength, whereas AFO wearers showed significant relationships between gait variables and perceived walking ability, fatigue severity and effort. CONCLUSIONS: People who regularly wore AFOs were more severely affected, had a slower maximum walking speed, higher energy cost of walking and worse perceived walking ability. Walking ability in this group was related to fatigue, perceived exertion during walking and perceived walking ability. Gait function of people not using AFOs was determined by lower limb muscle function. People prescribed AFOs, those who do not wear them and those not prescribed AFOs were similar in presentation, suggesting that people choose to wear orthoses when their condition becomes sufficiently severe.