RESUMO
Deliberate open burning of crop residues emits greenhouse gases and toxic pollutants into the atmosphere. This study investigates the environmental impacts (global warming potential, GWP) and economic impacts (net cash flow) of nine agricultural residue management schemes, including open burning, fertilizer production, and biochar production for corn residue, rice straw, and sugarcane leaves. The environmental assessment shows that, except the open burning schemes, fossil fuel consumption is the main contributor of the GWP impact. The fertilizer and biochar schemes reduce the GWP impact including black carbon by 1.88-1.96 and 2.46-3.22 times compared to open burning. The biochar schemes have the lowest GWP (- 1833.19 to - 1473.21 kg CO2-eq/ton). The economic assessment outcomes reveal that the biochar schemes have the highest net cash flow (222.72-889.31 US$2022/ton or 1258.15-13409.16 US$2022/ha). The expenditures of open burning are practically zero, while the biochar schemes are the most costly to operate. The most preferable agricultural residue management type is the biochar production, given the lowest GWP impact and the highest net cash flow. To discourage open burning, the government should tailor the government assistance programs to the needs of the farmers and make the financial assistance more accessible.
Assuntos
Agricultura , Produtos Agrícolas , Produtos Agrícolas/economia , Produtos Agrícolas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Agricultura/economia , Agricultura/métodos , Carvão Vegetal/economia , Aquecimento Global/prevenção & controle , Aquecimento Global/economia , Fertilizantes/análise , Zea mays , Oryza/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Queima de Resíduos a Céu AbertoRESUMO
This research analyzes data on the microplastic (MP) contamination in the environmental systems (atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere) and the levels of MPs in freshwater of cities with different levels of national income. This study investigates the influencing factors of MP generation, i.e., mismanaged plastic waste, untreated wastewater, number of registered motor vehicles, and stormwater runoff. The statistical correlations between the MP contamination in urban freshwater and the four influencing factors of MP generation are determined by linear regression. The results indicate that MPs are most abundant in aquatic systems (i.e., hydrosphere) and pose a serious threat to the human food chain. The regression analysis shows a strong correlation between mismanaged plastic waste and microfragment smaller than 300 µm in particle size in urban freshwater with high goodness-of-fit (R2 = 0.8091). A strong relationship with high goodness-of-fit also exists between untreated wastewater and microfragment of 1000-5000 µm in particle size (R2 = 0.9522). The key to mitigate the MP contamination in urban freshwater is to replace improper plastic waste management and wastewater treatment with proper management practices.
RESUMO
This research investigates the cost-effectiveness of four sludge treatment scenarios for centralized (C) and decentralized (D) wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) using life cycle cost assessment (LCCA). The environmental impacts and costs are quantified by Stepwise2006. The most environmentally and financially viable WWTP construction option for Bangkok, Thailand (2022-2031) is determined in terms of LCCA and net present value (NPV). The environmental costs of D-treatment scenarios are lower than those of C-treatment scenarios. The total environmental costs of C- and D-fertilizer scenarios are lower than those of C- and D-dewatering scenarios. The net cash flow per functional unit of C-WWTPs is higher than that of D-WWTPs. The C-fertilizer scenario is the most environmentally and economically viable treatment scenario due to the lowest LCCA deficit (-5.58 THB2020 per m3 treated effluent). Composting should thus be adopted for treating sludge. The most environmentally and financially viable WWTP construction option is option I (building four C-WWTPs within 10 years) due to the lowest LCCA deficit (-19925 million THB2020) and smallest financial loss (NPV = -6309.96 million THB2020). Essentially, the local administration of the capital should adopt option I as a guideline in formulating the wastewater treatment management policy of 2022-2031.