RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Investigation of expression profile of well-established microRNAs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and its correlation with clinicopathological factors. METHODS: Eighty-eight samples of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 98 control samples were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction for miR-21, miR-31, miR-122, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-155, miR-210, and miR-222 expressions. The results were normalized and then statistically analyzed using nonparametric statistical tests. RESULTS: According to our results, miR-21, miR-155, miR-210, miR-221, and miR-222, were overexpressed in diseased tissues than in the control samples, whereas miR-31, miR-122, miR-145, and miR-146a were underexpressed. Additionally, the expressions of miR-21 and miR-155 were associated with tumor stage and poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The tumorigenic role of miR-21 and miR-155 was confirmed, whereas down-regulation of miR-31, miR-145, and miR-146a, in dispute with current literature, renders necessary the revision of use of microRNAs as biological markers.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , MicroRNAs/análise , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Idoso , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo RealRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: MicroRNAs are molecules implicated in RNA-RNA interaction, playing a role in cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as in carcinogenesis. Knowledge on their biological features is necessary to understand their role in phenotypic characteristics of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Review of current literature concerning mechanisms of action, studying methods, implementations, and preclinical trials on pancreatic adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: More than 20 microRNAs have been identified, being involved in pancreatic adenocarcinoma biology, affecting tumor growth, metastatic potential, and chemosensitivity. Combinations of microRNAs can be used to differentiate between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and other pancreatic pathologies, as well as to assess prognosis. Manipulations of microRNAs can decrease the rate of growth or reinstall chemosensitivity to certain chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: The field of microRNAs promises novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/genética , MicroRNAs/genética , Pâncreas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Adenocarcinoma/induzido quimicamente , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/genética , Humanos , Modelos Genéticos , Metástase Neoplásica , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Prognóstico , Carga Tumoral/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Echinococcal disease is still a serious problem in certain parts of the world. The liver is the organ affected most frequently. Over recent decades, various reports have been published comparing standard surgical and more conservative modalities for the treatment of the disease. Proper selection among the strategies reported so far could be the most appropriate part of successful patient management. METHODS: A thorough review of the most recent reports on the treatment of liver Echinococcus infection, including percutaneous drainage, medical management, and laparoscopic, endoscopic and open surgical approaches has been conducted, focusing on patient outcomes. RESULTS: The standard surgical approach, namely partial capsectomy, drainage, and epiploplasty, remains the most frequent operative method. Previous problems such as disease recurrence and a residual cavity seem to be managed optimally with more radical operations such as total pericystectomy. Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy) appear to have a crucial role, especially when the location of the cyst or the patient's status does not permit more radical approaches. Percutaneous computed tomography- or ultrasound-guided drainage appears to be of great value in certain cases. Chemotherapeutic agents remain useful as an adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate patient selection and proper use of the various available treatments are of great importance. A tailor-made approach should be employed for each patient. The surgeon's experience constitutes a principal criterion. To achieve the best possible results, an interdisciplinary approach should be used in the majority of patients.