Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38596560

RESUMO

We present here a 66-year-old Caucasian male whose persistent abdominal pain thought to be due to appendicitis and associated acute splanchnic thrombosis. He was initially managed with antibiotics and anticoagulation. But further work up revealed a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm causing the splanchnic vein thrombosis. Additionally, diagnosis and management of this rare tumor and appropriate work up for splanchnic thrombosis will be briefly reviewed here.

2.
J Am Soc Cytopathol ; 9(5): 422-428, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32616449

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Core needle biopsy (CNB) of renal masses has not been commonly performed because of the perceived low sensitivity until recent years. Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) using touch preparations (TPs) has the potential to improve the yield of CNB, although it can be challenging because of the diverse morphology of various types of renal tumors and native cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed percutaneous CNBs of renal masses with ROSE using TPs. ROSE findings were correlated with diagnoses on CNBs. RESULTS: Among the 165 cases identified between August 2016 and August 2019, CNB led to definitive diagnoses in 82.4% (136 of 165) cases. These included renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (n = 113, 68.5%), benign neoplasms (n = 14, 8.5%), urothelial carcinomas (n = 6, 3.6%), metastatic carcinomas (n = 2, 1.2%) and 1 case of lymphoma (0.6%). Eight cases were indeterminate, including 2 cases positive for oncocytic neoplasm, 2 cases suspicious for RCC, and 4 cases with atypical features. Twenty-one (12.7%) CNBs were negative for tumor. ROSE interpretations for these cases were: malignant (n = 18, 10.8%); positive for neoplasm (n = 6, 3.6%); atypical/lesional/adequate not otherwise specified (n = 113, 68.5%); negative (n = 19, 11.5.0%); and unsatisfactory (n = 9, 5.5%). The overall concordance rate between ROSE and the final CNB diagnoses was 87.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Renal mass CNBs revealed a subset of non-surgical conditions in addition to RCCs. ROSE using TPs showed a high concordance rate with CNB results. Proximal tubular cells, macrophages, and angiomyolipomas are common pitfalls, whereas vacuolated cytoplasm and background are helpful features to confirm low-grade RCCs.


Assuntos
Angiomiolipoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Tato , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angiomiolipoma/patologia , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Linfoma/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Urotélio/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...