Topotecan in the treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) affects about 1 in 20 individuals with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and has been associated with poor survival. This report describes the results of a phase II clinical trial using the drug topotecan, a semisynthetic analogue of camptothecan, administered to a cohort of subjects with AIDS-related PML. Data were evaluated on 11 of 12 subjects enrolled in the study. Three responded to therapy. Additionally, one patient was treated off-protocol and showed a response to treatment. Progression occurred after the first course; however, a partial response was noted after five courses. One study patient died from accidental overdose of topotecan. Overall, responders had higher pretreatment Karnofsky and lower Kurtzke expanded disability status scale scores than nonresponders. The most frequent toxicities were hematologic (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia). Five patients had dose delays; all delays were due to hematologic adverse events. This study demonstrates that topotecan treatment may be associated with decreased lesion size and prolonged survival from the infection. Because of the small number of subjects in the study, further studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of topotecan in treating this disease.

Lipopeptides induce cell-mediated anti-HIV immune responses in seronegative volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Test the efficacy of a mixture of six NEF (N1, N2, N3), GAG (G1, G2) and ENV (E) lipopeptides in the induction of B- and T-cell anti-HIV responses. DESIGN: A randomized phase I open-label dose-finding trial. Twenty-eight healthy seronegative volunteers received the lipopeptides, with or without the adjuvant QS21. METHODS: Anti-HIV-peptide antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting. Induction of cellulary responses was assessed by proliferative test and (51)Cr-release assay. RESULTS: Local and systemic adverse reactions were always mild or moderate. After three injections an antibody response was detected in 25 out of 28 volunteers (89%). T cells from 19 (79%) of the 24 volunteers proliferated in response to at least one peptide. The majority of the volunteers had induced a multispecific proliferative response; that is, cells from volunteers proliferated to two (five of 19), three (five of 19), four (three of 19) or five peptides (one of 19). Cytotoxic responses by anti-HIV CD8+ lymphocytes could be tested in 24 volunteers, 13 (54%) of whom had clear and reproducible responses, with strong activity in the remaining 12 (> 20% of specific lysis), and polyepitopic responses were detected in at least seven of the 13 responders. Cytotoxic responses were found against the whole NEF protein (clade B LAI) in three of four tested volunteers and cross-reactions with the proteins of clade B (MN) and clade A (Bangui) HIV-1 strains, and also HIV-2 ROD, were detected in one of two tested volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Lipopeptides are promising immunogens for an AIDS vaccine.

Multiepitopic B- and T-cell responses induced in humans by a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 lipopeptide vaccine.

We have attempted to develop an anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) lipopeptide vaccine with several HIV-specific long peptides modified by C-terminal addition of a single palmitoyl chain. A mixture of six lipopeptides derived from regulatory or structural HIV-1 proteins (Nef, Gag, and Env) was prepared. A phase I study was conducted to evaluate immunogenicity and tolerance in lipopeptide vaccination of HIV-1-seronegative volunteers given three injections of either 100, 250, or 500 microg of each lipopeptide, with or without immunoadjuvant (QS21). This report analyzes in detail B- and T-cell responses induced by vaccination. The lipopeptide vaccine elicited strong and multiepitopic B- and T-cell responses. Vaccinated subjects produced specific immunoglobulin G antibodies that recognized the Nef and Gag proteins. After the third injection, helper CD4(+)-T-cell responses as well as specific cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells were also obtained. These CD8(+) T cells were able to recognize naturally processed viral proteins. Finally, specific gamma interferon-secreting CD8(+) T cells were also detected ex vivo.

Distinctive effects of CCR5, CCR2, and SDF1 genetic polymorphisms in AIDS progression.

The Genetics of Resistance to Infection by HIV-1 (GRIV) cohort represents 200 nonprogressor/slow-progressor (Slowprog) and 90 fast-progressor (Fastprog) HIV-1-infected patients. Using this unique assembly, we performed genetic studies on three recently discovered polymorphisms of CCR5, CCR2, and SDF1, which have been shown to slow the rate of disease progression. The increased prevalence of mutant alleles among Slowprogs from the GRIV cohort was significant for CCR5 (p < .0001) but not for CCR2 (p = .09) or SDF1 (p = . 12), emphasizing the predominant role of CCR5 as the major HIV-1 coreceptor. However, the prevalence of the CCR2 mutant allele (64I) was significantly increased among Slowprogs homozygous for wild-type CCR5 compared with Fastprogs (p = .04). The prevalence of double mutants SDF1-3'A/3'A genotypes was also increased among Slowprogs homozygous for wild-type CCR5 compared with Fastprogs (p = .05). The effects of the CCR2 and SDF1 mutations are overshadowed by the protective effects of the CCR5 deletion. Predictive biologic markers such as CD4 cell counts or viral load in the Slowprog population did not show significant differences between Slowprog groups with wild-type or mutant alleles for the three genes. Thus, our data suggest that the effects of these genes are exerted earlier in infection and no longer evident in the Slowprog of the GRIV cohort whose average duration of HIV infection is 12 years. We conclude that these genes, whose products serve as viral coreceptors or their ligands, may play a role early in infection and delay the onset of disease. However, among Slowprogs, whose duration of infection is >8 years, they are no longer influential for maintenance of their longterm nonprogression status. Other genetic determinants may be responsible for late protective effects.