Three-dimensional printing and virtual reconstruction in surgical planning of double-outlet right ventricle repair.

Objectives: For more than a decade, 3-dimensional (3D) printing has been identified as an innovative tool for the surgical planning of double-outlet right ventricle (DORV). Nevertheless, lack of evidence concerning its benefits encourages us to identify valuable criteria for future prospective trials. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 10 patients with DORV operated between 2015 and 2019 in our center. During a preoperative multidisciplinary heart team meeting, we harvested surgical decisions following a 3-increment step process: (1) multimodal imaging; (2) 3D virtual valvular reconstruction (3DVVR); and (3) 3D-printed heart model (3DPHM). The primary outcome was the proportion of predicted surgical strategy following each of the 3 steps, compared with the institutional retrospective surgical strategy. The secondary outcome was the change of surgical strategy through 3D modalities compared with multimodal imaging. The incremental benefit of the 3DVVR and 3DPHM over multimodal imaging was then assessed. Results: The operative strategy was predicted in 5 cases after multimodal imaging, in 9 cases after 3DVVR, and the 10 cases after 3DPHM. Compared with multimodal imaging, 3DVVR modified the strategy for 4 cases. One case was correctly predicted only after 3DPHM inspection. Conclusions: 3DVVR and 3DPHM improved multimodal imaging in the surgical planning of patients with DORV. 3DVVR allowed a better appreciation of the relationships between great vessels, valves, and ventricular septal defects. 3DPHM offers a realistic preoperative view at patient scale and enhances the evaluation of outflow tract obstruction. Our retrospective study demonstrates benefits of preoperative 3D modalities and supports future prospective trials to assess their impact on postoperative outcomes.

Treatment of HeartMate III-LVAD driveline infection by negative pressure wound therapy: Result of our case series.

Driveline infection is one of the most frequent complications following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) treatment and there is no consensus for its management. The standard approach to treat foreign-body infection is complete device ablation, which is not always feasible and therefore not an elected method for LVAD driveline infections. Here we share the results from a series of cases successfully treated for driveline infection by negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) therapy. Between 2016 and 2020, five male patients were hospitalized in our unit with a driveline infection of HeartMate III-LVAD®. Ultrasonography and/or thoraco-abdominal CT confirmed the diagnosis, infection localization, and abscess formation. Following an antibiotic treatment, an urgent surgical abscess drainage and debridement of the infected tissues were performed. At the end of the procedure, NPWT was applied. NPWT re-dressing and debridement of wound was performed every 3-4 days. The wound was closed surgically after obtaining negative culture results and good healing. The patients were discharged in good condition, without signs of infection. Two patients underwent successful heart transplantation after 1 and 13 months. Other patients did not show any residual or recurrent infection during the follow-up within 25 months. Driveline infection following LVAD implantation is a significant complication and a challenging in terms of management for both; the surgical team and the patient. These results from our case series report a successful and less invasive approach by using NPWT for the treatment of LVAD driveline infections.

Editor's Choice - The Prognostic Value of the WIfI Classification in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The Society for Vascular Surgery has proposed the Wound, Ischaemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system as a prognostic tool for the one year amputation risk and the added value of revascularisation in patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). This systematic review summarises the current evidence on the prognostic value of the WIfI classification system in clinical practice. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. MATERIALS: The Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched up to June 2018. METHODS: All studies using the WIfI classification for patients with CLTI were eligible. Outcomes of interest were major amputation, limb salvage, and amputation free survival in relation to WIfI clinical stage. The methodological quality of studies was appraised with the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. If possible, data were pooled and analysed using a random effects model. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were carried out by two authors independently. RESULTS: The search yielded 12 studies comprising 2669 patients, most of whom underwent endovascular or open revascularisation. Overall study quality was moderate. All but one were retrospective studies, including a variety of subpopulations of patients with CLTI, such as only haemodialysis dependent, diabetic or non-diabetic patients. The WIfI classification was derived from chart data or prospectively maintained databases, both documented before the WIfI classification was published. Estimated one year major amputation rates from four studies comprising 569 patients were 0%, 8% (95% CI 3-21%), 11% (95% CI 6-18%) and 38% (95% CI 21-58%), for WIfI stages I-IV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of an amputation after one year in patients with CLTI increases with higher WIfI stages, which is important prognostic information. Prospective evaluations are needed to determine its role in clinical practice.