Rat bite fever due to Streptobacillus notomytis complicated by meningitis and spondylodiscitis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Only three other cases of rat bite fever caused by Streptobacillus notomytis in humans have been reported since this species was identified in 2015. Data specific to the differences in clinical features and geographic distribution between S. notomytis infection and S. moniliformis infection are scarce. All previous cases of human S. notomytis infection were reported from Japan. This is the first case of S. notomytis infection reported from outside of Japan. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old Thai woman was admitted to Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand)-Thailand's largest university-based national tertiary referral center-in August 2020 with fever, myalgia, and polyarthralgia for 3 days, and gradually decreased consciousness for the past 1 day. Physical examination and laboratory investigations revealed septic arthritis of both knee joints, meningitis, and hepatitis. She was initially misdiagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis in the elderly since the initial investigations were unable to detect a causative pathogen. However, S. notomytis infection was later confirmed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of a part of the 16S rRNA gene and sequencing from synovial fluid. Her clinical course was also complicated by spondylodiscitis and epidural abscess caused by S. notomytis, which was detected from tissue biopsy. Therefore, rat bite fever in this patient manifested as meningitis, septic polyarthritis, hepatitis, and spondylodiscitis. The patient was treated with intravenous ceftriaxone then switched to oral amoxicillin with complete recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations of S. notomytis infection are similar to those demonstrated in S. moniliformis infection. This case also showed that arthritis caused by S. notomytis mimics rheumatoid arthritis, and that meningitis and spondylodiscitis are potential coexisting complications that can be found in S. notomytis infection.

Implementation of global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) in patients with bacteriuria.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the practicality and advantage of Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) for surveillance of urine culture samples collected from patients with bacteriuria. METHODS: GLASS has been implemented at a tertiary care university hospital in Thailand by using the web application program to collect clinical data and urine culture data from patients with positive urine culture. RESULTS: There were 5085 urine samples from 3545 patients that were sent to our microbiology laboratory during June-December 2017. Bacteriuria was found in 1944 patients. Of those, 952 had urinary tract infection (UTI), and 1161 had colonization. Among UTI patients, hospital-acquired infection (HAI) was observed in 74.2 %, and community-acquired infection (CAI) was found in 28.7 %. E. coli and S. agalactiae were more frequently observed in CAI, but P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis, E. faecium, and A. baumannii were more prevalent in HAI. UTI isolates demonstrated less resistance to antibiotics than colonized isolates. Non-duplicate isolates of bacteria demonstrated less resistance than duplicate isolates. E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis, E. faecalis, and E. faecium causing HAI were more resistant to antibiotics than those causing CAI. CONCLUSION: GLASS is feasible to implement and more beneficial than laboratory-based surveillance. This study collects additional information beyond GLASS including causative bacteria and colonizing bacteria; types of UTI; and more specific criteria to distinguish HAI from CAI so that such data can be used for developing more valid local guidelines for selecting antibiotic therapy in UTI patients in addition to AMR surveillance in urine samples.