[Antiviral Activity of CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes on a Hepatitis B Virus Model In Vivo].

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This disease is a key issue for global health. Modern methods of therapy do not completely eliminate HBV from infected cells and do not cure chronic infection. The CRISPR/Cas9 systems of site-specific nucleases can effectively cleave do not target DNA including viral genomes. The cleavage of the major form of the HBV genome, i.e., covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), leads to a robust reduction in viral replication and degradation or mutational inactivation of cccDNA. CRISPR/Cas9-based approaches are one of the most promising ways to achieve a 'sterilizing' cure of CHB, i.e., complete elimination of the virus from the body. Here, the HBV mouse model in vivo has been used to analyze the antiviral activity of the high-specific Cas9 protein and sgRNA targeting HBV genome. We have found that a single injection of short-lived ribonucleoprotein complexes of CRISPR/Cas9 results in a ~10-fold reduction in HBV DNA levels in the serum and liver of mice as early as 48 h after the start of the experiment. The remaining HBV DNAs have been found to harbor rare indel mutations. Developing new antivirals for treating CHB based on CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes could substantially reduce the duration of CHB therapy and, potentially, achieve complete elimination of viral infection.

[HBx Protein Potentiates Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation].

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can cause chronic hepatitis B, one of the most prevalent infectious diseases in the world. Global estimates suggest that over 2 billion people are affected by HBV, with over 250 million people developing chronic infection. Upon treatment of comorbidities, patients with chronic infection may develop an abrupt increase of viral replication-HBV reactivation-leading to liver decompensation and, in some cases, death. HBV reactivation occurs mostly due to suppression of antiviral immune response and activation of intracellular pro-viral signaling. Defining the mechanisms of HBV reactivation is necessary for the rational use of drugs and reduction of mortality rates in patients with chronic infection. In this study, for the first time we analyzed the effects of HBx protein on HBV reactivation, described reactivation of HBV from the transcriptionally inactivated state at the methylated recombinant HBV genome model, and investigated HBV reactivation upon treatment with genotoxic agents (doxorubicin and hydrogen peroxide) and targeted drug therapies (sunitinib and bortezomib). We report that both wild-type HBx protein and, to a greater extent, the mutant form of HBx protein lacking the nuclear exportation signal, potentiate viral replication and promote HBV reactivation. For the first time, we demonstrate that HBV can reactivate from the transcriptionally inactive state. Doxorubicin and hydrogen peroxide induce HBV reactivation at models of both transcriptionally active and transcriptionally silenced viral genome. Sunitinib weakly reactivates HBV, while bortezomib does not affect HBV replication in vitro.

The role of nelarabine in the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: literature review and own experience.

AIM: The analysis of experience of nelarabine use in refractory/relapsed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) depending on the immunophenotype and the line of therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the patients with relapsed or refractory T-ALL aged from 0 to 18 years who received treatment with nelarabine as a part of the therapeutic element R6 were included in the study. For all patients a detailed immunological analysis of leukemia cells with discrimination of immunological variants TI, TII, TIII or TIV was performed. Patients administered with nelarabine as a first therapeutic element were referred to the first-line therapy group, other patients were referred to the second-line therapy group. Nelarabine was ad- ministered as intravenous infusion at a dose of 650 mg/m2, on days 1-5. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (allo-HSCT) was considered for all patients. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2017, 54 patients with refractory/relapsed T-ALL were treated with nelarabine. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was 28% for all patients, cumulative risk of relapse (CIR) was 27%. EFS was significantly higher in nelarabine first-line therapy group in comparison with second-line therapy group (34±8% vs 8±8%, p=0,05). In patients after allo-HSCT EFS, OS and CIR were 51±10%, 50±10% and 39,1±9,5% accordingly. The best results were achieved in patients with TI immunophenotype. No toxicity-related mortality as well as severe neurologic complications or discontinuation of therapy associated with use of nelarabine were reported. CONCLUSION: The use of nelarabine is an effective strategy for the treatment of relapsed and refractory T-ALL. The best treatment outcomes were obtained in patients with TI immunophenotype and in the first-line therapy group. Optimal dosage regimens can be established dur- ing controlled clinical trials.

[Age-related characteristics of the efficacy of different glucocorticosteroids in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

AIM: To determine predictors for decision-making on a differential approach to choosing glucocorticosteroids (GCS) for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The analysis covered 1064 primary patients aged to 1 to 18 years with ALL who had been registered at the clinics of Russia and Belorussia in April 2002 to November 2006. Before induction therapy, the patients were randomized into a dexamethasone (DEXA) 6 mg/m2 group (n=539) and a methylprednisolone (MePRED) 60 mg/m2 one (n=525). RESULTS: The entire group showed no statistically significant differences in survival rates between the patients receiving DEXA or MePRED. However, an analysis of age groups revealed the benefits of DEXA in children younger than 14 years (the event-free survival (EFS) was 76±2 and 71±2%, respectively (p=0.048); the overall survival (OS) was 81±2 and 77±2%, respectively (p=0.046); therapy-induced mortality was 6.4% (DEXA) andl 1.1% (MePRED) (p=0.01 4); the rate of isolated extramedullary relapses was 1.5% (DEXA) and 4.4% (MePRED) (p=0.009). At the same time, EFS and OS in 14-to-18-year-old adolescents were statistically significantly higher than in those who used MePRED (EFS, 65±6 and 52±6%, respectively (p=0.087); OS, 72±6 and 61±6%, respectively; (p=0.l 7). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that it is possible that the choice of a GCS for ALL therapy must be also based on a patient's age. There is a need for further studies of this matter in prospective randomized multicenter trials in children and adolescents.

[Efficiency of the ALL-MB-2002 protocol in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of the original ALL-MB-2002 protocol within the multicenter study of treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 1873 primary patients with ALL aged 1 to 18 years, of whom 1544 patients were enrolled in this study, were notified at 36 clinics of Russia and Belarus from April 15, 2002, to January 1, 2008. RESULTS: With the median observation of 4.12 years, 7-year event-free survival (EFS) was 73 +/- 13%; overall survival (OS) 78 +/- 2%; relapse-free survival 82 +/- 1%. The rates of EFS and OS were equal and amounted to 76 +/- 2 and 80 +/- 2% in the standard-risk group (SRG) and intermediate-risk group (ImRG), respectively. In the high-risk group (HRG) patients, EFS and OS were as high as 30 +/- 6 and 37 +/- 6%, respectively. The frequency of relapses with central nervous system lesion was as much as 4.7% in all the patients, 6-year cumulative risk for isolated neurorecurrences being 2.5% in the SRG patients. Adolescents, patients with the baseline leukocytosis (more than 100 x 10(9)/l), and those with a splenic size of over 4 cm or more from the costal arch margin had substantially worse survival rates. A poor early response to therapy (on induction days 8 and 15) was also associated with its lower efficiency. CONCLUSION: Despite a considerable rise in the number of centers and a slight increase in the intensity of therapy, the results of the new ALL-MB-2002 protocol are as minimum equivalents obtained in the use of the previous ALL-MB-91 protocol. A significant improvement in the overall results of therapy and a reduction in the cumulative risk for isolated neurorecurrences were noted in the ImRG patients.