Impact of simultaneous heart procurement on outcomes of donation after circulatory death lung transplantation.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart procurement is done using either direct procurement (DP) or thoracoabdominal normothermic machine perfusion (TA-NRP). Both approaches could impact lung transplant outcomes with combined heart and lung procurements from the same donor. The impact of such practice on DCD lung transplant remains unstudied. We performed a retrospective analysis using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) dataset, identifying DCD lung transplants where the donor also donated the heart (cardia lung donor [CD]). A cohort of noncardiac DCD lung donors (noncardiac lung donor [NCD]) from the same era, matched for donor and recipient characteristics, was used as a comparison group. Both immediate and long-term outcomes were examined. A subanalysis was performed comparing the distinct impact of DP or TA-NRP on DCD lung transplant outcomes. Overall graft survival did not significantly differ between CD and NCD. However, recipients in the CD group trended toward a lower P/F ratio at 72 hours (CD vs NCD: 284 vs 3190; P = .054). In the subanalysis, we identified 40 DP donors and 22 TA-NRP donors. We found the both cohorts had lower P/F ratio at 72 hours than the NCD control (P = .04). Overall, 1-year graft survival was equivalent among the TA-NRP, DP, and NCD cohorts.

Short-term outcomes after third-time lung transplantation: A single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Reoperative lung transplantation (LTx) survival has improved over time such that a growing number of patients may present for third-time LTx (L3Tx). To understand the safety of L3Tx, we evaluated perioperative outcomes and 3-year survival after L3Tx at a high-volume US LTx center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent bilateral L3Tx at our institution. Using an optimal matching technique, a primary LTx (L1Tx) cohort was matched 1:2 and a second-time LTx (L2Tx) cohort 1:1. Recipient, operative, and donor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and 3-year survival were compared among L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx groups. RESULTS: Eleven L3Tx, 11 L2Tx, and 22 L1Tx recipients were included. Among L3Tx recipients, median age at transplant was 37 years and most (73%) had cystic fibrosis. L3Tx was performed median 6.0 and 10.6 years after L2Tx and L1Tx, respectively. Compared to L1Tx and L2Tx recipients, L3Tx recipients had greater intraoperative transfusion requirements, a higher incidence of postoperative complications, and a higher rate of unplanned reoperation. Rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, reintubation, and in-hospital mortality were similar among groups. There were no differences in 3-year patient (log-rank p = 0.61) or rejection-free survival (log-rank p = 0.34) after L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, L3Tx was associated with similar perioperative outcomes and 3-year patient survival compared to L1Tx and L2Tx. L3Tx represents the only safe treatment option for patients with allograft failure after L2Tx; however, further investigation is needed to understand the long-term survival and durability of L3Tx.

With Comparable Outcomes, Should Early-Stage Lung Cancer Be a Contraindication to Lung Transplant?

BACKGROUND: Active primary lung malignancy remains a strong contraindication to lung transplantation (LTx). However, outcomes are unclear for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo LTx. We hypothesize that patients with early-stage NSCLC incidentally discovered in the explanted lungs have survival comparable to LTx recipients without incidental cancer identified. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of all LTx recipients from May 2007 to September 2021 with incidental cancer identified in the explanted lungs by pathologist report. Survival statistics were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1586 LTx performed, 23 patients (1.5%) were found to have incidental lung cancer in the explanted lungs. The most common indications for LTx were interstitial lung disease (n = 13) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 7), and the most common histologic diagnosis was adenocarcinoma (n = 14). In the cohort with stage I disease (n = 9), the 1- and 5-year unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 88.9% and 51.9%, respectively. The 1- and 5-year survival rates for transplant recipients without incidental cancer findings at LTx during this period were 86.7% and 59.4%, respectively, and did not differ significantly between the 2 strata (P = .96). CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates at 1 and 5 years were comparable between LTx recipients with incidentally noted pathologic stage I NSCLC and contemporary recipients without cancer. All cancer-related deaths occurred in recipients with incidentally noted advanced NSCLC. These results suggest that patients with pathologic stage I lung cancer at the time of transplant have outcomes comparable to those without cancer findings at the time of transplant.

Two Compartment Evaluation of Liver Grafts During Acellular Room Temperature Machine Perfusion (acRTMP) in a Rat Liver Transplant Model.

Background: Subnormothermic machine perfusion (SNMP) of liver grafts is currently less clinically developed than normothermic and hypothermic approaches, but may have logistical advantages. At intermediate temperatures, the oxygen demand of the graft is low enough to be satisfied with an acellular perfusate, obviating the need for oxygen carrying molecules. This intermediate metabolic rate, however, is sufficient to support the production of bile, which is emerging as an important indicator of graft injury and viability. In this study, we hypothesized that the biliary compartment would be more sensitive than perfusate in detecting graft injury during SNMP. Methods: To test this hypothesis in a rat model, we performed liver transplants with DCD and control liver grafts after 1 h of acellular room temperature machine perfusion (acRTMP) or static cold storage (SCS). Point of care liver function tests were measured in biliary and perfusate samples after 1 h of machine perfusion. Following transplantation, rats were sacrificed at 24 h for assessment of post-transplant graft function and histology. Results: All point-of-care liver function tests were significantly more concentrated in the biliary compartment than the perfusate compartment during acRTMP. DCD liver grafts could be distinguished from control liver grafts by significantly higher markers of hepatocyte injury (AST, ALT) in the biliary compartment, but not in the perfusate compartment. Classical markers of cholangiocyte injury, such as gammy-glut amyl transferase (GGT), amylase (AML), and alkaline phosphatase were detectable in the biliary compartment, but not in the perfusate compartment. In comparison to SCS, graft preservation by acRTMP produced a significant survival benefit in DCD liver transplantation (75 vs. 0%, p < 0.0030). Conclusion: Together, these findings demonstrate that during acRTMP, the biliary compartment may be a more sensitive indicator of graft injury than the perfusate compartment. Moreover, acRTMP provides superior graft preservation to SCS in rat DCD liver transplantation.

Women's Risk Perceptions and Willingness to Engage in Risk-Reducing Interventions for the Prevention of Obesity-Related Endometrial Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial cancer rates are rising in parallel with the global obesity epidemic. Our aim was to assess the willingness of women at greatest risk of obesity-related endometrial cancer to engage with risk-reducing strategies and establish perceived barriers that may preclude their participation in a randomized controlled trial of primary endometrial cancer prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women attending gynecology, obesity and sleep apnea clinics in Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre-affiliated hospitals with obesity classes II (BMI 35-39.9kg/m2) and III (BMI ≥40kg/m2) were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey. We asked women about their perceived risk, knowledge of risk factors and willingness to engage with endometrial cancer risk-reducing interventions. RESULTS: Seventy-four women with a median age of 51 years (range 22-73) and BMI of 47kg/m2 (range 34-81) took part in the study. Two-thirds (65.6%) knew that obesity was a risk factor for endometrial cancer but few were able to recall other major risk factors. Just over half (53.5%) perceived their risk of developing endometrial cancer to be higher than average. Women were prepared to lose weight (94%), eat healthily (91%), exercise more (87%), take a pill every day (74%) or receive an intra-uterine device (49%) for primary endometrial cancer prevention. Perceived barriers included cost, forgetting, willpower, finding time, physical fitness, social anxiety, possible side effects and previous bad experiences. CONCLUSION: Women at highest risk of obesity-related endometrial cancer may not always appreciate their susceptibility. However, willingness to engage in risk-reducing strategies suggests recruitment to a randomized controlled trial for primary endometrial cancer prevention could be feasible.