Predictive value of Bispectral Index (BIS) in emergency neurosurgical patients: Loss of BIS reactivity to propofol predicts poor functional outcomes.

AIM: In emergency neurosurgical patients, evaluation with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone immediately after stopping sedation post-operatively might not differentiate those with good recovery from those with poor outcomes at 3 months. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of measuring the Bispectral Index (BIS) and the correlation to propofol dosage during the use of sedation in the early post-operative period. METHODS: This is a prospective study on consecutive post-operative neurosurgical patients admitted to the neurosurgical ICU on propofol sedation. The primary outcome was the correlation between early post-operative BIS and the Propofol dosage with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the post-operative propofol requirement in patients with good functional outcomes (mRS 0-3) versus poor functional outcomes (mRS 4-6) at 3 months. RESULTS: In total, 728 BIS readings were collected from twenty-four patients for analysis. The BIS readings were significantly correlated to the propofol dosage in patients with good function outcomes at 3 months (p < 0.0001). BIS readings in patients with no associations to changes in propofol dosage during their ICU stay had poor outcomes (mRS 4-6) at 3 months (r = -0.0407). For patients with good functional outcomes at 3 months, a significantly higher propofol dosage was used for deep sedation (BIS 40 - 60) during the post-operative period (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For emergency neurosurgical patients whose BIS readings had lost correlation to the propofol dosage upon recovery, their functional outcomes at 3 months were poor. For those with good functional outcomes at 3 months, a significantly higher propofol dosage was required for deep sedation during their ICU stay. Patients with preserved correlation of BIS readings to changes in propofol dosages during the early post-operative period were associated with good functional outcomes at 3 months.

Tracheostomy during COVID-19 pandemic-Novel approach.

BACKGROUND: This study describes a novel approach in reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during tracheostomy. METHODS: Five patients underwent tracheostomy between April 1, 2020 and April 17, 2020. A clear and sterile plastic drape was used as an additional physical barrier against droplets and aerosols. Operative diagnosis; droplet count and distribution on plastic sheet and face shields were documented. RESULTS: Tracheostomy was performed for patients with carcinoma of tonsil (n = 2) and nasopharynx (n = 1), and aspiration pneumonia (n = 2). Droplet contamination was noted on all plastic sheets (n = 5). Droplet contamination was most severe over the central surface at 91.5% (86.7%-100.0%) followed by the left and right lateral surfaces at 5.2% (6.7%-10.0%) and 3.3% (6.7%-10.0%), respectively. No droplet contamination was noted on all face shields. CONCLUSION: Plastic drapes can help reduce viral transmission to health care providers during tracheostomy. Face shields may be spared which in turn helps to conserve resources during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.