Thoracoabdominal asynchrony: Two methods in healthy, COPD, and interstitial lung disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Thoracoabdominal asynchrony is the nonparallel motion of the ribcage and abdomen. It is estimated by using respiratory inductive plethysmography and, recently, using optoelectronic plethysmography; however the agreement of measurements between these 2 techniques is unknown. Therefore, the present study compared respiratory inductive plethysmography with optoelectronic plethysmography for measuring thoracoabdominal asynchrony to see if the measurements were similar or different. METHODS: 27 individuals (9 healthy subjects, 9 patients with interstitial lung disease, and 9 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease performed 2 cycle ergometer tests with respiratory inductive plethysmography or optoelectronic plethysmography in a random order. Thoracoabdominal asynchrony was evaluated at rest, and at 50% and 75% of maximal workload between the superior ribcage and abdomen using a phase angle. RESULTS: Thoracoabdominal asynchrony values were very similar in both approaches not only at rest but also with exercise, with no statistical difference. There was a good correlation between the methods and the Phase angle values were within the limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis. CONCLUSION: Thoracoabdominal asynchrony measured by optoelectronic plethysmography and respiratory inductive plethysmography results in similar values and has a satisfactory agreement at rest and even for different exercise intensities in these groups.

Dynamic hyperinflation and exercise limitations in obese asthmatic women.

Obese individuals and patients with asthma can develop dynamic hyperinflation (DH) during exercise; however, no previous study has investigated DH as a factor associated with reduced exercise capacity in obese asthmatic women. The aim of the present study was to examine the occurrence of DH and exercise limitations in obese asthmatics. Obese grade II [obese group (Ob-G); BMI 35-39.9 kg/m2; n=36] and nonobese [nonobese group (NOb-G); BMI 18.5-29.9 kg/m2; n=18] asthmatic patients performed a cardiopulmonary test to quantify peak V̇o2 and a submaximal exercise test to assess DH. Anthropometric measurements, quadriceps endurance, and lung function were also evaluated. A forward stepwise regression was used to evaluate the association between exercise tolerance (wattage) and limiting exercise factors. Fifty-four patients completed the protocol. The Ob-G (n = 36) presented higher peak V̇o2 values but lower power-to-weight ratio values than the NOb-G (P <0 .05). DH was more common in the Ob-G (72.2%) than in the NOb-G (38.9%, P < 0.05). The Ob-G had a greater reduction in the inspiratory capacity (-18 vs. -4.6%, P < 0.05). Exercise tolerance was associated with quadriceps endurance (r = 0.65; p<0.001), oxygen pulse (r = 0.52; p=0.001), and DH (r = -0.46, P = 0.005). The multiple regression analysis showed that the exercise tolerance could be predicted from a linear association only for muscular endurance (r = 0.82 and r2 = 0.67). This study shows that dynamic hyperinflation is a common condition in obese asthmatics; they have reduced fitness for activities of daily living compared to nonobese asthmatics. However, peripheral limitation was the main factor associated with reduced capacity of exercise in these patients.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to investigate the occurrence of dynamic hyperinflation (DH) in obese asthmatics. Our results demonstrate that obese asthmatics present a higher frequency and intensity of DH than nonobese asthmatics. We also show that physical deconditioning in this population is linearly associated with cardiac (O2 pulse), respiratory (DH), and peripheral muscle (resistance) limitation. However, multiple linear regression demonstrated that peripheral muscle limitation may explain the exercise limitation in this population.

Effects of aerobic training combined with respiratory muscle stretching on the functional exercise capacity and thoracoabdominal kinematics in patients with COPD: a randomized and controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with COPD present a major recruitment of the inspiratory muscles, predisposing to chest incoordination, increasing the degree of dyspnea and impairing their exercise capacity. Stretching techniques could decrease the respiratory muscle activity and improve their contractile capacity; however, the systemic effects of stretching remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of aerobic training combined with respiratory muscle stretching on functional exercise capacity and thoracoabdominal kinematics in patients with COPD. DESIGN: This study was a randomized and controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 patients were allocated to a treatment group (TG) or a control group (CG; n=15, each group). INTERVENTION: The TG was engaged in respiratory muscle stretching and the CG in upper and lower limb muscle stretching. Both groups performed 24 sessions (twice a week, 12 weeks) of aerobic training. EVALUATIONS: Functional exercise capacity (6-minute walk test), thoracoabdominal kinematics (optoelectronic plethysmography), and respiratory muscle activity (surface electromyography) were evaluated during exercise. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the groups at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: After the intervention, the TG showed improved abdominal (ABD) contribution, compartmental volume, mobility, and functional exercise capacity with decreased dyspnea when compared with the CG (P<0.01). The TG also showed a decreased respiratory muscle effort required to obtain the same pulmonary volume compared to the CG (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that aerobic training combined with respiratory muscle stretching increases the functional exercise capacity with decreased dyspnea in patients with COPD. These effects are associated with an increased efficacy of the respiratory muscles and participation of the ABD compartment.

Volume rather than flow incentive spirometry is effective in improving chest wall expansion and abdominal displacement using optoelectronic plethysmography.

BACKGROUND: Incentive spirometers are widely used in clinical practice and classified as flow-oriented (FIS) and volume-oriented (VIS). Until recently the respiratory inductive plethysmography used to evaluate the effects of incentive spirometry on chest wall mechanics presented limitations, which may explain why the impact of VIS and FIS remains poorly known. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of VIS and FIS on thoracoabdominal mechanics and respiratory muscle activity in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This cross-sectional trial assessed 20 subjects (12 female, ages 20-40 years, body mass index 20-30 kg/m(2)). All subjects performed 8 quiet breaths and 8 deep breaths with FIS and VIS, in a randomized order. We measured thoracoabdominal chest wall, upper and lower rib-cage, and abdominal volumes with optoelectronic plethysmography, and the muscle activity of the sternocleidomastoid and superior and inferior intercostal muscles with electromyography. RESULTS: VIS increased chest wall volume more than did FIS (P = .007) and induced a larger increase in the upper and lower rib-cages and abdomen (156%, 91%, and 151%, respectively, P < .001). By contrast, FIS induced more activity in the accessory muscles of respiration than did VIS (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: VIS promotes a greater increase in chest wall volume, with a larger abdominal contribution and lower respiratory muscle activity, than does FIS in healthy adults.