Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 132, 2022 Feb 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35172775

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rates of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months in Spain are far from recommended by the World Health Organization, which is 50% by 2025. Evidence of the effectiveness of group interventions in late postpartum is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the PROLACT group educational intervention for increasing the proportion of mother-child dyads with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months compared to the usual practice in primary care. METHOD: Multicentre cluster randomized clinical trial. A total of 434 mother-child dyads who breastfed exclusively in the first 4 weeks of the children's life and agreed to participate were included. The main outcome was exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months. Secondary variables were type of breastfeeding, reasons for abandonment, degree of adherence and satisfaction with the intervention. To study the effectiveness, the difference in the proportions of dyads with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months was calculated, and the relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated with their 95% CIs. To study the factors associated with the maintenance of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months, a multilevel logistic regression model was fitted. All analyses were performed to intention to treat. RESULTS: The percentage of dyads with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months was 22.4% in the intervention group and 8.8% in the control group. PROLACT intervention obtained an RR =2.53 (95% CI: 1.54-4.15) and an NNT = 7 (95%CI: 5-14). The factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months were the PROLACT intervention, OR = 3.51 (95%CI: 1.55-7.93); age > 39 years, OR = 2.79 (95%CI: 1.02-7.6); previous breastfeeding experience, OR = 2.61 (95%CI: 1.29-5.29); income between 500 and 833.33 €, OR = 3.52 (95%CI 1.47-8.47).); planning to start work before the infant was 6 months old, OR = 0.35 (0.19-0.63) . CONCLUSIONS: The PROLACT intervention in primary care is more effective than the usual practice for maintaining exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months, and can therefore be considered evidence-based practice for implementation in standard practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under code number NCT01869920 (03/06/2013).


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Mães/educação , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Adulto , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Espanha
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(38): e12238, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30235668

RESUMO

We assessed the effect of co-infection by hepatitis C virus (HCV) on immunological and virological response at 48 weeks from initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART).We included patients from the Cohort of Spanish HIV Research Network (CoRIS) starting ART between January 2004 and November 2014, had at least 1 CD4 T-cell count and viral load measurements both in the previous 6 months and at 48 (±12) weeks from ART initiation, and HCV serology before ART initiation. We used linear regression for mean differences in CD4 T-cell count increase from ART initiation and logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for virological response.Of 12,239 patients by November 30, 2015, 5070 met inclusion criteria: 4382 (86.4%) HIV mono-infected and 688 (13.6%) HIV/HCV co-infected. Co-infected patients were more likely to have acquired HIV through injecting drugs use (57.4% vs. 1.1%), to be women, older, and Spanish, have a lower educational level, and having started ART with lower CD4 counts and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. CD4 T-cell count increase at 48 weeks was 229.7 cell/µL in HIV-monoinfected and 161.9 cell/µL in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The percentages of patients achieving a virological response at 48 weeks were 87.0% and 78.3% in mono and coinfected patients, respectively. Multivariable analyses showed that at 48 weeks, coinfected patients increased 44.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.8-64.3) cells/µL less than monoinfected and had lower probability of virological response (odds ratio: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44-0.88).HIV/HCV-coinfected patients have lower immunological and virological responses at 48 weeks from ART initiation than monoinfected patients.


Assuntos
Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Coinfecção/imunologia , Feminino , Hepatite C/imunologia , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Viral , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/epidemiologia , Carga Viral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA