Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) to brachial systolic blood pressure (brachSBP) ratio reproducibility during antihypertensive therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Higher CSBP than brachial SBP in individual patient increases cardiovascular (CV) risk. For follow-up it is important to assess the reproducibility of such measurements. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of these differences, expressed as a CSBP/BrachSBP ratios. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-three patients on antihypertensive therapy were analysed for the reproducibility of such ratios after time interval of several month up to several years. For CSBP estimation, we used the Arteriograph (Tensiomed Ltd.), based on blood pressure measurements by cuff on oscillometric principle, using pulse wave analysis (PWA) for assessment of CSBP. RESULTS: The proportion of patients retained the same characteristics (either higher central or higher peripheral SBP) between the first and second measurement was 71.1 %. The association between 1st and 2nd measurement, was statistically significant, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: In our study, a high proportion (60 %) of treated hypertensive patients had CSBP higher than brachial SBP, which may adversely influence their prognosis. This characteristic is highly reproducible. Taking into the account these differences may increase the exactness of CV risk estimation and may contribute to explanation of residual risk of individual patient (Tab. 3, Fig. 1, Ref. 28).

Central systolic blood pressure increases with aortic stiffness.

OBJECTIVES: Central systolic blood pressure (CSBP) is the pressure in the root of aorta, which directly influences organs such as brain, heart and kidneys and is related to organ damage. Its value increases with the aortic stiffness. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationships of CSBP to aortic stiffness parameters. METHODS: Central blood pressure (BP) and related parameters were measured by Arteriograph, working based on oscillometric principle, using pulse wave analysis (PWA) approach. We examined 123 patients (69 females, 54 males) with a primary hypertension. RESULTS: Using a linear correlation analysis, we found that CSBP was correlated to aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), aortic and brachial pulse pressure (PP), aortic augmentation index, return time of reflected pressure wave (RT) and aortic and brachial augmentation indexes. Multivariate analysis defines the aortic pulse pressure (PPao) as the most powerful parameter influencing CSBP. By an individual analysis of BP in each patient separately, we defined two different types of central hemodynamics; those with a higher CSBP than brachial SBP occur in stiffer aorta. CONCLUSION: The CSBP increases with aortic PP, the most powerful stiffness parameter of aorta. Higher CSBP than brachial SBP usually accompanies a stiffer aorta (Tab. 5, Ref. 19).

[Impact of aortic stiffness on central hemodynamics and cardiovascular system]. / Vplyv tuhosti aorty na centrálnu hemodynamiku a na kardiovaskulárny systém.

Arterial stiffness increases as a result of degenerative processes accelerated by aging and many risk factors, namely arterial hypertension. Basic clinical examination reveals increased pulse pressure as its hemodynamic manifestation. The most serious consequence of increased vascular stiffness, which cannot be revealed by clinical examination, is a change of central hemodynamics leading to increased load of left ventricle, left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction and to overall increase of cardiovascular risk. This review aimed to point at some patophysiological mechanisms taking part in the development of vascular stiffness, vascular remodeling and hemodynamic consequences of these changes. This work also gives an overview of noninvasive examination methods and their characteristics enabling to evaluate the local, regional and systemic arterial stiffness and central pulse wave analysis and their meaning for central hemodynamics and heart workload.