Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 62(6): 1116-21, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23932821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimum timing of the initiation of dialysis therapy in acute kidney injury is not clear. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, open label, 2-arm, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 208 adults with acute kidney injury with progressively worsening azotemia at the artificial kidney dialysis unit of a tertiary-care referral center in western India. INTERVENTION: Earlier-start dialysis was initiated when serum urea nitrogen and/or creatinine levels increased to 70 and 7 mg/dL, respectively, whereas the usual-start dialysis patients (control group) received dialysis when clinically indicated as judged by treating nephrologists. OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and dialysis dependence at 3 months. Secondary outcome in patients receiving dialysis was time to recovery of kidney function, computed from time of enrollment to the last dialysis session. RESULTS: Of 585 screened patients, 102 were assigned to earlier-start dialysis, and 106 to usual-start dialysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between randomized groups. 93 (91.1%) and 88 (83.1%) participants received dialysis in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Mean serum urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels at dialysis therapy initiation were 71.7 ± 21.7 (SD) and 7.4 ± 5.3 mg/dL, respectively, in the intervention group versus 100.9 ± 32.6 and 10.41 ± 3.3 mg/dL in the control group. Data on primary outcome were available for all patients. In-hospital mortality was 20.5% and 12.2% in the intervention and control groups, respectively (relative risk, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.88-3.17; P = 0.2). 4.9% and 4.7% of patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, were dialysis dependent at 3 months (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.29-3.7; P = 0.9). LIMITATIONS: Study was not double blind, event rate (ie, mortality) was less than predicted, wide CIs preclude definitive findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the earlier initiation of dialysis therapy in community-acquired acute kidney injury.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Intervenção Médica Precoce , Diálise Renal , Injúria Renal Aguda/mortalidade , Adulto , Azotemia/terapia , Nitrogênio da Ureia Sanguínea , Creatinina/sangue , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Índia , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
Indian J Nephrol ; 22(4): 298-300, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23162276

RESUMO

We report here a case of 26-year-old male who presented with history of recurrent acute renal failure associated with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. ADAMTS 13 deficiency due to mutation in the gene encoding for ADAMTS 13 was identified as the cause. After eight episodes of acute kidney injury (AKI), patient started developing hypertension, proteinuria, and renal insufficiency. Treatment with regular monthly plasma infusions prevented further episodes of AKI and stabilized the renal function. Hypertension and proteinuria are controlled with angiotensin II receptor blockers.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...