Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bimagrumab (BYM338).

BACKGROUND: Bimagrumab is a human monoclonal antibody binding to the activin type II receptor with therapeutic potential in conditions of muscle wasting and obesity. This phase I study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of various dose regimens of bimagrumab and routes of administration in healthy older adults. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multiple-dose study in older adult men and women (aged ≥ 70 years, body mass index [BMI] 18-34 kg/m2) with stable health and diet. The study comprised seven treatment groups (Cohorts 1-7). Participants received bimagrumab or placebo treatment every 4 weeks for three doses (Cohorts 1 [700 mg] and 2 [210 mg] intravenous infusion; Cohorts 3 [1500 mg] and 4 [525 mg] subcutaneous infusion), or every week for 12 doses (Cohorts 5 [300 mg], 6 [150 mg], and 7 [52.5 mg] subcutaneous bolus injection) and were followed up until week 20. Blood samples were collected for bimagrumab PK analysis. PD were assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to quantify the change from baseline in lean body mass (LBM) and fat body mass (FBM) compared with placebo. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Eighty-four of 91 (92.3%) randomized participants (mean age 74.5 years; BMI 28.0 kg/m2) completed the study. Demographic characteristics were generally balanced across the groups. A target-mediated drug disposition profile was observed following both intravenous and subcutaneous administration. The absolute subcutaneous bioavailability was estimated at approximately 40%. LBM increased by 4-6% (1.5-2 kg) from baseline throughout the treatment period for intravenous and subcutaneous regimens, except for the 52.5 mg subcutaneous dose, which did not differ from placebo. Concurrently, there was a decrease in FBM (approximately 2-3 kg) for all intravenous and subcutaneous regimens. Bimagrumab was generally safe and well tolerated; adverse events were mostly mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Dose levels of bimagrumab administered weekly subcutaneously resulted in PK profiles and PD effects comparable with monthly intravenous dosing, which supports the feasibility of the subcutaneous route of administration for bimagrumab for future clinical development.

Test-retest reliability of wireless inertial-sensor derived measurements of knee joint kinematics.

Advances in sensor technology have provided an opportunity to measure gait characteristics using body-worn inertial measurement units (IMUs). Whilst research investigating the validity of IMUs in reporting gait characteristics is extensive, research investigating the reliability of IMUs is limited. This study aimed to investigate the inter-session reliability of wireless IMU derived measures of gait (i.e., knee angle, range of motion) taking multiple test administrators into account. Fifteen healthy volunteers (43 ± 15 years) completed two visits. Within each visit, participants were required to perform two sets of 6 gait trials (6-metre walk tests). IMUs were placed on the participant in 7 locations on the lower limbs and waist. A different test administrator (n = 3) applied the IMUs at each set. At visit 2, this procedure was repeated with the same test administrators as visit 1. Kinematic measures of maximum angle (Knee_Max), minimum angle (Knee_Min), and range of motion (RoM) are reported for the left and right knee. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) are reported to determine IMU reliability. The results confirmed moderate to good inter-session reliability across all features (0.73-0.87). SEM values ranged from 1.21-3.32° and MDC values ranged from 3.37 - 9.21°. Therefore, IMUs appear to be a reliable method to determine inter-session gait characteristics across multiple test administrators.

An Automatic Foot and Shank IMU Synchronization Algorithm: Proof-of-concept.

When using wearable sensors for measurement and analysis of human performance, it is often necessary to integrate and synchronise data from separate sensor systems. This paper describes a synchronization technique between IMUs attached to the shanks and insoles attached at the feet and aims to solve the need to compute the ankle joint angle, which relies on synchronized sensor data. This will additionally enable concurrent analysis using gait kinematic and kinetic features. A proof-of-concept of the algorithm, which relies on cross-correlation of gyroscope sensor data from the shank and foot, to align the sensor systems is demonstrated. The algorithm output is validated against those signals synchronized using manually annotated heel-strike and toe-off ground-truth signal landmarks, identified in both the shank and feet signals using previously published definitions. Results demonstrate that the developed algorithm is capable of synchronizing both sensor systems, based on IMU data from both healthy participants and participants suffering from knee osteoarthritis, with a mean lag time bias of 25.56ms when compared to the ground truth. A proof-of-concept of technique to synchronise IMUs attached to the shanks and insoles attached at the feet is demonstrated and offers an alternative approach to sensor system synchronisation.

Description of the Method for Evaluating Digital Endpoints in Alzheimer Disease Study: Protocol for an Exploratory, Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: More sensitive and less burdensome efficacy end points are urgently needed to improve the effectiveness of clinical drug development for Alzheimer disease (AD). Although conventional end points lack sensitivity, digital technologies hold promise for amplifying the detection of treatment signals and capturing cognitive anomalies at earlier disease stages. Using digital technologies and combining several test modalities allow for the collection of richer information about cognitive and functional status, which is not ascertainable via conventional paper-and-pencil tests. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties, operational feasibility, and patient acceptance of 10 promising technologies that are to be used as efficacy end points to measure cognition in future clinical drug trials. METHODS: The Method for Evaluating Digital Endpoints in Alzheimer Disease study is an exploratory, cross-sectional, noninterventional study that will evaluate 10 digital technologies' ability to accurately classify participants into 4 cohorts according to the severity of cognitive impairment and dementia. Moreover, this study will assess the psychometric properties of each of the tested digital technologies, including the acceptable range to assess ceiling and floor effects, concurrent validity to correlate digital outcome measures to traditional paper-and-pencil tests in AD, reliability to compare test and retest, and responsiveness to evaluate the sensitivity to change in a mild cognitive challenge model. This study included 50 eligible male and female participants (aged between 60 and 80 years), of whom 13 (26%) were amyloid-negative, cognitively healthy participants (controls); 12 (24%) were amyloid-positive, cognitively healthy participants (presymptomatic); 13 (26%) had mild cognitive impairment (predementia); and 12 (24%) had mild AD (mild dementia). This study involved 4 in-clinic visits. During the initial visit, all participants completed all conventional paper-and-pencil assessments. During the following 3 visits, the participants underwent a series of novel digital assessments. RESULTS: Participant recruitment and data collection began in June 2020 and continued until June 2021. Hence, the data collection occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic (SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic). Data were successfully collected from all digital technologies to evaluate statistical and operational performance and patient acceptance. This paper reports the baseline demographics and characteristics of the population studied as well as the study's progress during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: This study was designed to generate feasibility insights and validation data to help advance novel digital technologies in clinical drug development. The learnings from this study will help guide future methods for assessing novel digital technologies and inform clinical drug trials in early AD, aiming to enhance clinical end point strategies with digital technologies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/35442.

Digital endpoints for self-administered home-based functional assessment in pediatric Friedreich's ataxia.

BACKGROUND: Friedreich's ataxia is an inherited, progressive, neurodegenerative disease that typically begins in childhood. Disease severity is commonly assessed with rating scales, such as the modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale, which are usually administered in the clinic by a neurology specialist. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the utility of home-based, self-administered digital endpoints in children with Friedreich's ataxia and unaffected controls and their relationship to standard clinical rating scales. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study with 25 participants (13 with Friedreich's ataxia and 12 unaffected controls, aged 6-15 years), home-based digital endpoints that reflect activities of daily living were recorded over 1 week. Domains analyzed were hand motor function with a digitized drawing, automated analysis of speech with a recorded oral diadochokinesis test, and gait and balance with wearable sensors. RESULTS: Hand-drawing and speech tests were easy to conduct and generated high-quality data. The sensor-based gait and balance tests suffered from technical limitations in this study setup. Several parameters discriminated between groups or correlated strongly with modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale total score and activities of daily living total score in the Friedreich's ataxia group. Hand-drawing parameters also strongly correlated with standard 9-hole peg test scores. INTERPRETATION: Deploying digital endpoints in home settings is feasible in this population, results in meaningful and robust data collection, and may allow for frequent sampling over longer periods of time to track disease progression. Care must be taken when training participants, and investigators should consider the complexity of the tasks and equipment used.

A Study of Novel Exploratory Tools, Digital Technologies, and Central Nervous System Biomarkers to Characterize Unipolar Depression.

Background: Digital technologies have the potential to provide objective and precise tools to detect depression-related symptoms. Deployment of digital technologies in clinical research can enable collection of large volumes of clinically relevant data that may not be captured using conventional psychometric questionnaires and patient-reported outcomes. Rigorous methodology studies to develop novel digital endpoints in depression are warranted. Objective: We conducted an exploratory, cross-sectional study to evaluate several digital technologies in subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD) and persistent depressive disorder (PDD), and healthy controls. The study aimed at assessing utility and accuracy of the digital technologies as potential diagnostic tools for unipolar depression, as well as correlating digital biomarkers to clinically validated psychometric questionnaires in depression. Methods: A cross-sectional, non-interventional study of 20 participants with unipolar depression (MDD and PDD/dysthymia) and 20 healthy controls was conducted at the Centre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), the Netherlands. Eligible participants attended three in-clinic visits (days 1, 7, and 14), at which they underwent a series of assessments, including conventional clinical psychometric questionnaires and digital technologies. Between the visits, there was at-home collection of data through mobile applications. In all, seven digital technologies were evaluated in this study. Three technologies were administered via mobile applications: an interactive tool for the self-assessment of mood, and a cognitive test; a passive behavioral monitor to assess social interactions and global mobility; and a platform to perform voice recordings and obtain vocal biomarkers. Four technologies were evaluated in the clinic: a neuropsychological test battery; an eye motor tracking system; a standard high-density electroencephalogram (EEG)-based technology to analyze the brain network activity during cognitive testing; and a task quantifying bias in emotion perception. Results: Our data analysis was organized by technology - to better understand individual features of various technologies. In many cases, we obtained simple, parsimonious models that have reasonably high diagnostic accuracy and potential to predict standard clinical outcome in depression. Conclusion: This study generated many useful insights for future methodology studies of digital technologies and proof-of-concept clinical trials in depression and possibly other indications.

Effect of Bimagrumab vs Placebo on Body Fat Mass Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Antibody blockade of activin type II receptor (ActRII) signaling stimulates skeletal muscle growth. Previous clinical studies suggest that ActRII inhibition with the monoclonal antibody bimagrumab also promotes excess adipose tissue loss and improves insulin resistance. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimagrumab on body composition and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and overweight and obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-masked, placebo-controlled, 48-week, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted among adults with type 2 diabetes, body mass index between 28 and 40, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels between 6.5% and 10.0% at 9 US and UK sites. The trial was conducted from February 2017 to May 2019. Only participants who completed a full treatment regimen were included in analysis. Interventions: Patients were randomized to intravenous infusion of bimagrumab (10 mg/kg up to 1200 mg in 5% dextrose solution) or placebo (5% dextrose solution) treatment every 4 weeks for 48 weeks; both groups received diet and exercise counseling. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was least square mean change from baseline to week 48 in total body fat mass (FM); secondary and exploratory end points were lean mass (LM), waist circumference (WC), HbA1c level, and body weight (BW) changes from baseline to week 48. Results: A total of 75 patients were randomized to bimagrumab (n = 37; 23 [62.2%] women) or placebo (n = 38; 12 [31.6%] women); 58 (77.3%) completed the 48-week study. Patients at baseline had a mean (SD) age of 60.4 (7.7) years; mean (SD) BMI of 32.9 (3.4); mean (SD) BW of 93.6 (14.9) kg; mean (SD) FM of 35.4 (7.5) kg; and mean (SD) HbA1c level of 7.8% (1.0%). Changes at week 48 for bimagrumab vs placebo were as follows: FM, -20.5% (-7.5 kg [80% CI, -8.3 to -6.6 kg]) vs -0.5% (-0.18 kg [80% CI, -0.99 to 0.63 kg]) (P < .001); LM, 3.6% (1.70 kg [80% CI, 1.1 to 2.3 kg]) vs -0.8% (-0.4 kg [80% CI, -1.0 to 0.1 kg]) (P < .001); WC, -9.0 cm (80% CI, -10.3 to -7.7 cm) vs 0.5 cm (80% CI, -0.8 to 1.7 cm) (P < .001); HbA1c level, -0.76 percentage points (80% CI, -1.05 to -0.48 percentage points) vs -0.04 percentage points (80% CI, -0.23 to 0.31 percentage points) (P = .005); and BW, -6.5% (-5.9 kg [80% CI, -7.1 to -4.7 kg]) vs -0.8% (-0.8 kg [80% CI, -1.9 to 0.3 kg]) (P < .001). Bimagrumab's safety and tolerability profile was consistent with prior studies. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 2 randomized clinical trial, ActRII blockade with bimagrumab led to significant loss of FM, gain in LM, and metabolic improvements during 48 weeks in patients with overweight or obesity who had type 2 diabetes. ActRII pathway inhibition may provide a novel approach for the pharmacologic management of excess adiposity and accompanying metabolic disturbances. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03005288.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of bimagrumab in healthy older and obese adults with body composition changes in the older cohort.

BACKGROUND: Bimagrumab prevents activity of myostatin and other negative regulators of skeletal muscle mass. This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of bimagrumab in healthy older and obese adults. METHODS: A cohort of older adults (aged 70-85 years) received single intravenous infusions of bimagrumab 30 mg/kg (n = 6) or 3 mg/kg (n = 6) or placebo (n = 4) and was followed for 20 weeks. A second cohort of obese participants [body mass index (BMI) 30-45 kg/m2 , aged 18-65 years] received a single intravenous infusion of bimagrumab 30 mg/kg (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2) and was followed for 12 weeks. Outcomes included the safety, tolerability, and PK of bimagrumab, in both cohorts. Measures of pharmacodynamics were performed in the older adult cohort to evaluate the effects of bimagrumab on thigh muscle volume (TMV), total lean body mass (LBM), total fat body mass, and muscle strength. RESULTS: All 24 randomized participants completed the study. The older adults had a mean (±SD) age of 74.5 ± 3.4 years and BMI of 26.5 ± 3.5 kg/m2 . The obese participants had a mean (±SD) age of 40.4 ± 11.8 years, weight of 98.0 ± 11.3 kg, and BMI of 34.3 ± 3.9 kg/m2 . Adverse events in both cohorts were mostly mild. In older adults, most commonly reported adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection, rash, and diarrhoea (each 3/16, 19%). Obese participants reported muscle spasms and rash (both 5/8, 63%) most often. Non-linearity was observed in the PK concentration profiles of both cohorts due to target-mediated drug disposition. Bimagrumab 3 and 30 mg/kg increased mean (±SD) TMV (Week 4: 5.3 ± 1.8% and 6.1 ± 2.2%, vs. placebo: 0.5 ± 2.1%, both P ≤ 0.02) and LBM (Week 4: 6.0 ± 3.2%, P = 0.03 and 2.4 ± 2.2%, vs. placebo: 0.1 ± 2.4%), which were maintained longer with higher dose level, while total fat body mass (Week 4: -2.7 ± 2.9% and -1.6 ± 3.0%, vs. placebo: -2.3 ± 3.2%) decreased from baseline in older adults, with no change in muscle strength. CONCLUSIONS: Bimagrumab was safe and well tolerated and demonstrated similar PK in older and obese adults. A single dose of bimagrumab rapidly increased TMV and LBM and decreased body adiposity in older adults. Muscle hypertrophy and fat loss were sustained with extended drug exposure.

Bimagrumab vs Optimized Standard of Care for Treatment of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The potential benefit of novel skeletal muscle anabolic agents to improve physical function in people with sarcopenia and other muscle wasting diseases is unknown. Objective: To confirm the safety and efficacy of bimagrumab plus the new standard of care on skeletal muscle mass, strength, and physical function compared with standard of care alone in community-dwelling older adults with sarcopenia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 38 sites in 13 countries among community-dwelling men and women aged 70 years and older meeting gait speed and skeletal muscle criteria for sarcopenia. The study was conducted from December 2014 to June 2018, and analyses were conducted from August to November 2018. Interventions: Bimagrumab 700 mg or placebo monthly for 6 months with adequate diet and home-based exercise. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included 6-minute walk distance, usual gait speed, handgrip strength, lean body mass, fat body mass, and standard safety parameters. Results: A total of 180 participants were recruited, with 113 randomized to bimagrumab and 67 randomized to placebo. Among these, 159 participants (88.3%; mean [SD] age, 79.1 [5.3] years; 109 [60.6%] women) completed the study. The mean SPPB score increased by a mean of 1.34 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.77) with bimagrumab vs 1.03 (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.52) with placebo (P = .13); 6-minute walk distance increased by a mean of 24.60 (95% CI, 7.65 to 41.56) m with bimagrumab vs 14.30 (95% CI, -4.64 to 33.23) m with placebo (P = .16); and gait speed increased by a mean of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.18) m/s with bimagrumab vs 0.11 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.16) m/s with placebo (P = .16). Bimagrumab was safe and well-tolerated and increased lean body mass by 7% (95% CI, 6% to 8%) vs 1% (95% CI, 0% to 2%) with placebo, resulting in difference of 6% (95% CI, 4% to 7%) (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found no significant difference between participants treated with bimagrumab vs placebo among older adults with sarcopenia who had 6 months of adequate nutrition and light exercise, with physical function improving in both groups. Bimagrumab treatment was safe, well-tolerated, increased lean body mass, and decreased fat body mass. The effects of sarcopenia, an increasing cause of disability in older adults, can be reduced with proper diet and exercise. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02333331; EudraCT number: 2014-003482-25.

An Open-Label Study of the Impact of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single Oral and Intravenous Doses of Omadacycline.

Omadacycline is a once-daily oral or intravenous (i.v.) aminomethylcycline antibiotic approved in the United States for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) in adults. Omadacycline pharmacokinetics were characterized in 18 patients with hepatic impairment and 12 matched healthy subjects. Patients with hepatic impairment received i.v. omadacycline at 100 mg (mild hepatic impairment) or 50 mg (moderate and severe hepatic impairment) and oral omadacycline at 300 mg (mild hepatic impairment) or 150 mg (moderate hepatic impairment); oral omadacycline was not evaluated in those with severe hepatic impairment. Safety monitoring included the collection of adverse events (AEs), performance of laboratory tests, determination of vital signs, and performance of electrocardiograms. Omadacycline exposures were similar in patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects following i.v. or oral administration, with the geometric mean ratios for the area under the concentration-time curve and the maximum drug concentration ranging from 0.79 to 1.42. Omadacycline was safe and well tolerated. Overall, 13/30 (43.3%) participants experienced an AE; those occurring in more than 1 participant included headache (13.3%), nausea (6.7%), infusion-site pain (6.7%), contusion (6.7%), and dizziness (6.7%), with no differences based on the degree of hepatic impairment or the route of administration. Asymptomatic increases in heart rate were observed; none was considered an AE. These findings suggest that no omadacycline dose adjustment is warranted in patients with hepatic impairment.

Effects of Interleukin-1ß Inhibition on Incident Hip and Knee Replacement : Exploratory Analyses From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a common inflammatory disorder with no disease-modifying therapies. Whether inhibition of interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) can reduce the consequences of large joint osteoarthritis is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether IL-1ß inhibition with canakinumab reduces incident total hip or knee replacement (THR/TKR). DESIGN: Exploratory analysis of a randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01327846). SETTING: 1091 clinical sites in 39 countries. PARTICIPANTS: 10 061 CANTOS (Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study) participants. INTERVENTION: Random allocation to placebo or canakinumab (50, 150, or 300 mg) subcutaneously once every 3 months. MEASUREMENTS: The primary and secondary outcomes were time to first incident THR/TKR and time to first occurrence of an osteoarthritis-related adverse event (AE). Data were obtained through blinded ascertainment of trial clinical and safety databases. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.7 years. For the individual canakinumab dose groups, compared with placebo, hazard ratios (HRs) for incident THR/TKR during follow-up were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.95) for the 50-mg group, 0.53 (CI, 0.33 to 0.84) for the 150-mg group, and 0.60 (CI, 0.38 to 0.93) for the 300-mg group. Thus, in the pooled canakinumab groups, compared with the placebo group, incidence rates for THR/TKR were 0.31 and 0.54 events per 100 person-years (HR, 0.58 [CI, 0.42 to 0.80]; P = 0.001), respectively. The HR for the secondary end point of osteoarthritis-related AEs was 0.73 (CI, 0.61 to 0.87). Similar findings were observed in analyses restricted to participants with a history of osteoarthritis. LIMITATION: Because the parent trial was not designed to examine the efficacy of IL-1ß inhibitors in osteoarthritis, information on structural joint outcomes was not collected. CONCLUSION: Findings from this exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial support further investigation of IL-1ß inhibition for treatment of large joint osteoarthritis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Continuous Digital Monitoring of Walking Speed in Frail Elderly Patients: Noninterventional Validation Study and Longitudinal Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Digital technologies and advanced analytics have drastically improved our ability to capture and interpret health-relevant data from patients. However, only limited data and results have been published that demonstrate accuracy in target indications, real-world feasibility, or the validity and value of these novel approaches. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish accuracy, feasibility, and validity of continuous digital monitoring of walking speed in frail, elderly patients with sarcopenia and to create an open source repository of raw, derived, and reference data as a resource for the community. METHODS: Data described here were collected as a part of 2 clinical studies: an independent, noninterventional validation study and a phase 2b interventional clinical trial in older adults with sarcopenia. In both studies, participants were monitored by using a waist-worn inertial sensor. The cross-sectional, independent validation study collected data at a single site from 26 naturally slow-walking elderly subjects during a parcours course through the clinic, designed to simulate a real-world environment. In the phase 2b interventional clinical trial, 217 patients with sarcopenia were recruited across 32 sites globally, where patients were monitored over 25 weeks, both during and between visits. RESULTS: We have demonstrated that our approach can capture in-clinic gait speed in frail slow-walking adults with a residual standard error of 0.08 m per second in the independent validation study and 0.08, 0.09, and 0.07 m per second for the 4 m walk test (4mWT), 6-min walk test (6MWT), and 400 m walk test (400mWT) standard gait speed assessments, respectively, in the interventional clinical trial. We demonstrated the feasibility of our approach by capturing 9668 patient-days of real-world data from 192 patients and 32 sites, as part of the interventional clinical trial. We derived inferred contextual information describing the length of a given walking bout and uncovered positive associations between the short 4mWT gait speed assessment and gait speed in bouts between 5 and 20 steps (correlation of 0.23) and longer 6MWT and 400mWT assessments with bouts of 80 to 640 steps (correlations of 0.48 and 0.59, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed, for the first time, accurate capture of real-world gait speed in slow-walking older adults with sarcopenia. We demonstrated the feasibility of long-term digital monitoring of mobility in geriatric populations, establishing that sufficient data can be collected to allow robust monitoring of gait behaviors outside the clinic, even in the absence of feedback or incentives. Using inferred context, we demonstrated the ecological validity of in-clinic gait assessments, describing positive associations between in-clinic performance and real-world walking behavior. We make all data available as an open source resource for the community, providing a basis for further study of the relationship between standardized physical performance assessment and real-world behavior and independence.

Activin Type II Receptor Blockade for Treatment of Muscle Depletion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized Trial.

RATIONALE: Bimagrumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the activin type II receptors, preventing the activity of myostatin and other negative skeletal muscle regulators. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of bimagrumab on skeletal muscle mass and function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and reduced skeletal muscle mass. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with COPD (mean FEV1, 1.05 L [41.6% predicted]; aged 40-80 yr; body mass index < 20 kg/m2 or appendicular skeletal muscle mass index ≤ 7.25 [men] and ≤ 5.67 [women] kg/m2), received two doses of either bimagrumab 30 mg/kg intravenously (n = 33) or placebo (n = 34) (Weeks 0 and 8) over 24 weeks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed changes in thigh muscle volume (cubic centimeters) as the primary endpoint along with 6-minute-walk distance (meters), safety, and tolerability. Fifty-five (82.1%) patients completed the study. Thigh muscle volume increased by Week 4 and remained increased at Week 24 in bimagrumab-treated patients, whereas no changes were observed with placebo (Week 4: +5.9% [SD, 3.4%] vs. 0.0% [3.3%], P < 0.001; Week 8: +7.0% [3.7%] vs. -0.7% [2.8%], P < 0.001; Week 16: +7.8% [5.1%] vs. -0.9% [4.5%], P < 0.001; Week 24: +5.0% [4.9%] vs. -1.3% [4.3%], P < 0.001). Over 24 weeks, 6-minute-walk distance did not increase significantly in either group. Adverse events in the bimagrumab group included muscle-related symptoms, diarrhea, and acne, most of which were mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Blocking the action of negative muscle regulators through the activin type II receptors with bimagrumab treatment safely increased skeletal muscle mass but did not improve functional capacity in patients with COPD and low muscle mass. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01669174).

Effect of bimagrumab on thigh muscle volume and composition in men with casting-induced atrophy.

BACKGROUND: Patients experiencing disuse atrophy report acute loss of skeletal muscle mass which subsequently leads to loss of strength and physical capacity. In such patients, especially the elderly, complete recovery remains a challenge even with improved nutrition and resistance exercise. This study aimed to explore the clinical potential of bimagrumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the activin type II receptor, for the recovery of skeletal muscle volume from disuse atrophy using an experimental model of lower extremity immobilization. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, healthy young men (n = 24; mean age, 24.1 years) were placed in a full-length cast of one of the lower extremities for 2 weeks to induce disuse atrophy. After cast removal, subjects were randomized to receive a single intravenous (i.v.) dose of either bimagrumab 30 mg/kg (n = 15) or placebo (n = 9) and were followed for 12 weeks. Changes in thigh muscle volume (TMV) and inter-muscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) of the thigh, maximum voluntary knee extension strength, and safety were assessed throughout the 12 week study. RESULTS: Casting resulted in an average TMV loss of -4.8% and comparable increases in IMAT and SCAT volumes. Bimagrumab 30 mg/kg i.v. resulted in a rapid increase in TMV at 2 weeks following cast removal and a +5.1% increase above pre-cast levels at 12 weeks. In comparison, TMV returned to pre-cast level at 12 weeks (-0.1%) in the placebo group. The increased adiposity of the casted leg was sustained in the placebo group and decreased substantially in the bimagrumab group at Week 12 (IMAT: -6.6%, SCAT: -3.5%). Knee extension strength decreased by ~25% in the casted leg for all subjects and returned to pre-cast levels within 6 weeks after cast removal in both treatment arms. Bimagrumab was well tolerated with no serious or severe adverse events reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of bimagrumab 30 mg/kg i.v. safely accelerated the recovery of TMV and reversal of accumulated IMAT following 2 weeks in a joint-immobilizing cast.

Treatment of Sarcopenia with Bimagrumab: Results from a Phase II, Randomized, Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of bimagrumab on skeletal muscle mass and function in older adults with sarcopenia and mobility limitations. DESIGN: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, proof-of-concept study. SETTING: Five centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults (N = 40) aged 65 and older with gait speed between 0.4 and 1.0 m/s over 4 m and an appendicular skeletal muscle index of 7.25 kg/m2 or less for men and 5.67 kg/m2 or less for women. INTERVENTION: Intravenous bimagrumab 30 mg/kg (n = 19) or placebo (n = 21). MEASUREMENTS: Change from baseline in thigh muscle volume (TMV), subcutaneous and intermuscular fat, appendicular and total lean body mass, grip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). RESULTS: Thirty-two (80%) participants completed the study. TMV increased by Week 2, was sustained throughout the treatment period, and remained above baseline at the end of study in bimagrumab-treated participants, whereas there was no change with placebo treatment (Week 2: 5.15 ± 2.19% vs -0.34 ± 2.59%, P < .001; Week 4: 6.12 ± 2.56% vs 0.16 ± 3.42%, P < .001; Week 8: 8.01 ± 3.70% vs 0.35 ± 3.32%, P < .001; Week 16: 7.72 ± 5.31% vs 0.42 ± 5.14%, P < .001; Week 24: 4.80 ± 5.81% vs -1.01 ± 4.43%, P = .002). Participants with slower walking speed at baseline receiving bimagrumab had clinically meaningful and statistically significantly greater improvements in gait speed (mean 0.15 m/s, P = .009) and 6MWD (mean 82 m, P = .022) than those receiving placebo at Week 16. Adverse events in the bimagrumab group included muscle-related symptoms, acne, and diarrhea, most of which were mild in severity and resolved by the end of study. CONCLUSION: Treatment with bimagrumab over 16 weeks increased muscle mass and strength in older adults with sarcopenia and improved mobility in those with slow walking speed.

Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Oral and Intravenous Administration of Omadacycline to Healthy Subjects.

Omadacycline is a first-in-class aminomethylcycline antibiotic with microbiological activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes and atypical bacteria that is being developed for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The bioavailability of a phase 3 tablet formulation relative to that obtained via intravenous (i.v.) administration (and of other oral formulations relative to that of the phase 3 tablet) was investigated in an open-label, randomized, four-period, crossover study with healthy subjects age 18 to 50 years. Subjects received omadacycline at 100 mg i.v., 300 mg orally as two different tablet formulations with different dissolution profiles, and 300 mg as an oral solution. Plasma omadacycline concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Twenty of 24 subjects completed all treatment periods. The two tablet formulations produced equivalent total exposures. The phase 3 tablet produced an exposure equivalent to that of the 100-mg i.v. dose, with a geometric mean ratio (90% confidence intervals [CI]) for area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity [AUC∞]) of 1.00 (0.93, 1.07). The absolute bioavailability of the tablets was approximately 34.5%. Intersubject variability was consistent among the oral formulations (∼20 to 25%). Single oral and i.v. doses of omadacycline were well tolerated; three subjects experienced mild adverse events (dizziness, nausea, and vomiting) that resolved without intervention. A 300-mg dose of the tablet formulation of omadacycline intended for use in phase 3 studies produced a total exposure equivalent to that of a 100-mg i.v. dose.

Randomized, controlled pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of albinterferon in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Albinterferon is a fusion of albumin and interferon-α2b developed to improve the pharmacokinetics, convenience, and potential efficacy of interferon-α for the treatment of chronic hepatitis infections. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter study investigated the safety and efficacy of albinterferon in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who were e-antigen (HBeAg) positive. One hundred and forty-one patients received one of four albinterferon doses/regimens or pegylated-interferon-α2a. Primary efficacy outcomes were changes in serum HBeAg and antibody, HBV-DNA, and alanine aminotransferase. Principal safety outcomes were changes in laboratory values, pulmonary function, and adverse events. RESULTS: The study was prematurely terminated as phase III trials in hepatitis C infection indicated noninferior efficacy but inferior safety compared with pegylated-interferon-α2a. Here, all treatment groups had a significant reduction in HBV-DNA from baseline. Reductions in HBV-DNA were not significantly different, except the 1200 µg every 4 weeks albinterferon dose which was inferior compared with pegylated-interferon-α2a. The serum alanine aminotransferase levels decreased in all arms. The per-patient incidence of adverse events was not significantly different for albinterferon (96.4-100%) and pegylated-interferon-α2a (93.1%). Total adverse events, however, were higher for albinterferon and correlated to dose. Decreased lung function was found in all arms (∼93% of patients), and was more common in some albinterferon groups. CONCLUSIONS: Albinterferon doses with similar anti-HBV efficacy to pegylated-interferon-α2a had higher rates of certain adverse events, particularly changes in lung diffusion capacity (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov number NCT00964665).

Pharmacokinetics of LFF571 and vancomycin in patients with moderate Clostridium difficile infections.

Clostridium difficile infection causes diarrheal disease with potentially fatal complications. Although treatments are available, including vancomycin, metronidazole, and fidaxomicin, the recurrence of disease after therapy remains a problem. LFF571 is a novel thiopeptide antibacterial that shows in vitro potency against C. difficile that is comparable to or greater than that of other clinically used antibiotics. Here, we compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LFF571 and vancomycin in patients with C. difficile infection as part of an early efficacy study. This multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blind, and active-controlled study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of LFF571 in adults with primary episodes or first relapses of moderate C. difficile infections. Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of LFF571 or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily for 10 days. The PK parameters were calculated from drug concentrations measured in serum and fecal samples. The systemic exposure following oral administration of 200 mg of LFF571 four times per day for 10 days in patients with C. difficile infection was limited. The highest LFF571 serum concentration observed was 41.7 ng/ml, whereas the levels in feces at the end of treatment were between 107 and 12,900 µg/g. In comparison, the peak vancomycin level observed in serum was considerably higher, at 2.73 µg/ml; the levels of vancomycin in feces were not measured. Similar to healthy volunteers, patients with C. difficile infections exhibited high fecal concentrations and low serum levels of LFF571. These results are consistent with the retention of LFF571 in the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01232595.).

Multicenter, randomized clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of LFF571 and vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infections.

Clostridium difficile infection causes serious diarrheal disease. Although several drugs are available for treatment, including vancomycin, recurrences remain a problem. LFF571 is a semisynthetic thiopeptide with potency against C. difficile in vitro. In this phase 2 exploratory study, we compared the safety and efficacy (based on a noninferiority analysis) of LFF571 to those of vancomycin used in adults with primary episodes or first recurrences of moderate C. difficile infection. Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of LFF571 or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily for 10 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of clinical cures at the end of therapy in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included clinical cures at the end of therapy in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, the time to diarrhea resolution, and the recurrence rate. Seventy-two patients were randomized, with 46 assigned to receive LFF571. Based on the protocol-specified definition, the rate of clinical cure for LFF571 (90.6%) was noninferior to that of vancomycin (78.3%). The 30-day sustained cure rates for LFF571 and vancomycin were 56.7% and 65.0%, respectively, in the per-protocol population and 58.7% and 60.0%, respectively, in the modified intent-to-treat population. Using toxin-confirmed cases only, the recurrence rates were lower for LFF571 (19% versus 25% for vancomycin in the per-protocol population). LFF571 was generally safe and well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher for LFF571 (76.1% versus 69.2% for vancomycin), although more AEs in the vancomycin group were suspected to be related to the study drug (38.5% versus 32.6% for LFF571). One patient receiving LFF571 discontinued the study due to an AE. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01232595.).