Development and clinical validation of Knowledge-based planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of cervical cancer including pelvic and para aortic fields.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is based on a model to estimate dose-volume histograms, configured using a library of historical treatment plans to efficiently create high quality plans. The aim was to report configuration and validation of KBP for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A KBP model was configured from the institutional database (n = 125), including lymph node positive (n = 60) and negative (n = 65) patients. KBP Predicted plans were compared with Clinical Plans (CP) and Re-plans (Predicted plan as a base-plan) to validate the model. Model quality was quantified using coefficient of determination R2, mean square error (MSE), standard two-tailed paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Estimation capability of the model was good for the bowel bag (MSE = 0.001, R2 = 0.84), modest for the bladder (MSE = 0.008) and poor for the rectum (MSE = 0.02 R2 = 0.78). KBP resulted in comparable target coverage, superior organ sparing as compared to CP. Re-plans outperformed CP for the bladder, V30 (66 ± 11% vs 74 ± 11%, p < .001), V40 (48 ± 14% vs 52 ± 14%, p < .001), however sparing was modest for the bowel bag V30 (413 ± 191cm3 vs 445 ± 208cm3, p = .037) V40 (199 ± 105cm3 vs 218 ± 127cm3, p = .031). All plans were comparable for rectum, while KBP resulted in significant sparing for spinal cord, kidneys and femoral heads. CONCLUSION: KBP yielded comparable and for some organs superior performance compared to CP resulting in conformal and homogeneous target coverage. Improved organ sparing was observed when individual patient geometry was considered.

Improving accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET computed tomography to diagnose nodal involvement in non-small cell lung cancer: utility of using various predictive models.

PURPOSE: To determine predictive models (PM) that could improve the accuracy for identifying metastatic regional nodes in non-small cell lung cancer based on both PET and CT findings seen on 18F-FDG PET CT. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-nine biopsy-proven NSCLC patients who underwent surgical resection and had a staging 18F-FDG PET CT were enrolled. PET parameters obtained were (1) presence of visual PET positive nodes, (2) SUVmax of nodes (NSUV), (3) ratio of node to aorta SUVmax (N/A ratio) and (4) ratio of node to primary tumour SUVmax (N/T ratio). CT parameters obtained were (1) short-axis diameter and (2) Hounsfield units (HU) of PET-positive nodes. PET and CT parameters were correlated with nodal histopathology to find out the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy. Different PM combining these parameters were devised and the incremental improvement in accuracy was determined. RESULTS: Visual PET positivity showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 72.4, 76.1, 30.1, 95.1 and 75.6, respectively. PM2 which combined visual PET positivity, NSUV and HU appears more clinically relevant and showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 53.5, 96.5, 68.9, 93.6 and 91.2, respectively. PM6 which combined visual PET positivity, NSUV, N/A ratio and HU showed the maximum PPV (80.0%), specificity (98.3%) and accuracy of (91.9%). CONCLUSION: PM combining parameters like nodal SUVmax, N/A ratio, N/T ratio and HU values have shown to improve the PPV, specificity and overall accuracy of 18FDG PET CT in the preoperative diagnosis of nodal metastases.

Is palatal vault height a determinant for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A hypothesis?

Although environmental and genetic factors are known for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the present study is an attempt to provide a hypothesis behind the development of NPC with regards to the anatomical factor, the hypothesis being that patients with a deeper palatal vault tend to have a higher risk of developing nasopharyngeal cancers. The objective of this study was to find out the palatal vault height in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and compare it with the palatal vault height in patients with oral carcinomas. The heights of the palatal vault of 20 consecutive patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and 20 patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity (except hard palate) as control were recorded. In addition, in patients with carcinoma of the nasopharynx the height of the palate on the CT scans was measured and correlation between these recordings were calculated. The palatal heights of the nasopharyngeal and oral cancer cohorts were compared using independent sample T test. A strong correlation was observed in the nasopharyngeal cancer cohort between the palatal height measured manually and the radiologically measured height on the CT scans (Pearson Correlation Coefficient - 0.633; p=0.003). The difference in the mean heights of the nasopharyngeal and oral cancer cohorts was statistically significant (p<0.001). Nasopharyngeal cancer patients tend to have a higher palatal vault height compared to those with carcinoma of oral cavity other than hard palate. In such palates with a deep vault, there is increased turbulent air flow leading to increased deposition of air-borne virus/carcinogens. Lingering of these agents may ultimately cause carcinoma of the nasopharynx.

Radiotherapy with or without mitomycin c in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: results of the IAEA multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Single agent mitomycin c (MMC) has been shown to improve the outcome of radiotherapy in single institution trials. In order to confirm these findings in a broader worldwide setting, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) initiated a multicentre trial randomising between radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy plus MMC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with primary curative radiotherapy (66 Gy in 33 fractions with five fractions per week) +/-a single injection (15 mg/m(2)) of MMC at the end of the first week of radiotherapy. Stratification parameters were tumour localization, T-stage, N-stage, and institution. A total of 558 patients were recruited in the trial from February 1996 to December 1999. Insufficient accrual and reporting led to the exclusion of three centres. The final study population consisted of 478 patients from seven centres. Patients had stage III (n=223) or stage IV (n=255) squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (n=230), oropharynx (n=140), hypopharynx (n=65) or larynx (n=43). Prognostic factors like age, gender, site, size, differentiation and stage were well balanced between the two arms. RESULTS: The haematological side effects of MMC were very modest (<5% grade 3-4) and did not require any specific interventions. Furthermore, MMC did not enhance the incidence or severity of acute and late radiation side effects. Confluent mucositis and dry skin desquamation was common, occurring in 56% and 62% of patients, respectively. The overall 3-year primary locoregional tumour control, disease-specific and overall survival rates were 19, 36 and 30%, respectively. Gender, haemoglobin drop, tumour site, tumour and nodal stage were significant parameters for loco-regional tumour control. There was no significant effect of MMC on locoregional control or survival, except for the 161 N0 patients, where MMC resulted in a better loco-regional control (3-year estimate 16% vs. 29%, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study did not show any major influence of MMC on loco-regional tumour control, survival or morbidity after primary radiotherapy in stage III-IV head and neck cancer except in N0 patients where loco-regional control was significantly improved.