Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Blood Press Monit ; 27(2): 135-138, 2022 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34636810

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the InBody BPBIO210 manual auscultatory mercury-free hybrid blood pressure (BP) measuring device for professional office use in a general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018). METHODS: Subjects were recruited to fulfil the age, sex, BP and cuff distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard in a general population using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. Two cuffs of the test device were used for arm circumference 22-32 (medium) and 32-42 cm (large). RESULTS: A total of 94 subjects were recruited and 86 were analysed (mean age 53.7 ± 18.4 [SD] years, 50 men, arm circumference 32.5 ± 4.8 cm, range 22-42 cm). For the validation Criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference BP readings was -1.0 ± 4.1/-0.7 ± 2.5 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). For Criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences between the test device and reference BP per subject was 2.65/1.59 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). CONCLUSIONS: The InBody BPBIO210 manual auscultatory hybrid device for professional office BP measurement fulfilled all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in a general population and can be recommended for clinical use.


Assuntos
Monitores de Pressão Arterial , Hipertensão , Adulto , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Referência
2.
Blood Press Monit ; 26(2): 146-148, 2021 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33323723

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the single upper-arm cuff oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor InBody BPBIO750 developed for self-measurement by adults in public spaces (kiosk) according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018). METHODS: Subjects were recruited to fulfil the age, gender, BP and cuff distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard in general population using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. RESULTS: A total of 102 subjects were recruited and 85 were analyzed [mean age 56.7 ± 15.4 (SD) years, 40 men, arm circumference 32.3 ± 5.3 cm, range 22-42 cm]. For validation criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference BP readings was 2.2 ± 6.1/-2.2 ± 5.2 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). For criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences between the test device and reference BP per subject was 5.00/4.63 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). CONCLUSION: The InBody BPBIO750 device fulfilled all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in general population and can be recommended for clinical use in adults.


Assuntos
Monitores de Pressão Arterial , Hipertensão , Adulto , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Referência , Sístole
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 293(4): 721-9, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26695642

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We sought to study the effect of propranolol co-administration with oxytocin during the latent and active phases of labor on labor outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched Medline, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register databases. The meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan 5.1 software. Six studies were included in the present meta-analysis which enrolled 609 parturient. RESULTS: According to the findings of our study, propranolol administration during the latent phase effectively reduces the cesarean section rates (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.27, 0.89). However, this beneficial effect is not observed during the active phase of labor. The 5 min neonatal Apgar scores are not influenced by its administration (MD -0.07, 95 % CI -0.017, 0.02). Respectively, the neonatal admissions to a NICU are similar to those of neonates exposed only to oxytocin (OR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.36, 2.53). CONCLUSION: Propranolol's effect on the duration of the various stages of labor was underreported, however, evidence seem to support that it shortens the latent phase and possibly the total duration of labor. Firm results are, however, precluded due to the low number enrolled parturient and due to the significant methodological heterogeneity of included studies.


Assuntos
Trabalho de Parto/efeitos dos fármacos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/tratamento farmacológico , Ocitócicos/administração & dosagem , Ocitocina/administração & dosagem , Propranolol/administração & dosagem , Cesárea , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Ocitócicos/efeitos adversos , Ocitocina/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...