Plant regeneration in the new era: from molecular mechanisms to biotechnology applications.

Plants or tissues can be regenerated through various pathways. Like animal regeneration, cell totipotency and pluripotency are the molecular basis of plant regeneration. Detailed systematic studies on Arabidopsis thaliana gradually unravel the fundamental mechanisms and principles underlying plant regeneration. Specifically, plant hormones, cell division, epigenetic remodeling, and transcription factors play crucial roles in reprogramming somatic cells and reestablishing meristematic cells. Recent research on basal non-vascular plants and monocot crops has revealed that plant regeneration differs among species, with various plant species using distinct mechanisms and displaying significant differences in regenerative capacity. Conducting multi-omics studies at the single-cell level, tracking plant regeneration processes in real-time, and deciphering the natural variation in regenerative capacity will ultimately help understand the essence of plant regeneration, improve crop regeneration efficiency, and contribute to future crop design.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms of development and regeneration.

Regeneration involves a highly coordinated interplay of intricate cellular processes, enabling living organisms to renew and repair themselves, from individual cells to entire ecosystems. Further, regeneration offers profound insights into developmental biology, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Development and Regeneration (CMMDR) 2024 conference, which took place at the Shiv Nadar Institute of Eminence and University (India), gathered together an international array of researchers studying a wide variety of organisms across both plant and animal kingdoms. In this short Meeting Review, we highlight some of the outstanding research presented at this conference and draw together some of the common themes that emerged.

Gametophytic epigenetic regulators, MEDEA and DEMETER, synergistically suppress ectopic shoot formation in Arabidopsis.

KEY MESSAGE: The gametophytic epigenetic regulators, MEA and DME, extend their synergistic role to the sporophytic development by regulating the meristematic activity via restricting the gene expression in the shoot apex. The gametophyte-to-sporophyte transition facilitates the alternation of generations in a plant life cycle. The epigenetic regulators DEMETER (DME) and MEDEA (MEA) synergistically control central cell proliferation and differentiation, ensuring proper gametophyte-to-sporophyte transition in Arabidopsis. Mutant alleles of DME and MEA are female gametophyte lethal, eluding the recovery of recessive homozygotes to examine their role in the sporophyte. Here, we exploited the paternal transmission of these mutant alleles coupled with CENH3-haploid inducer to generate mea-1;dme-2 sporophytes. Strikingly, the simultaneous loss of function of MEA and DME leads to the emergence of ectopic shoot meristems at the apical pole of the plant body axis. DME and MEA are expressed in the developing shoot apex and regulate the expression of various shoot-promoting factors. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), DNA methylation, and gene expression analysis revealed several shoot regulators as potential targets of MEA and DME. RNA interference-mediated transcriptional downregulation of shoot-promoting factors STM, CUC2, and PLT5 rescued the twin-plant phenotype to WT in 9-23% of mea-1-/-;dme-2-/- plants. Our findings reveal a previously unrecognized synergistic role of MEA and DME in restricting the meristematic activity at the shoot apex during sporophytic development.

Multiple feedbacks on self-organized morphogenesis during plant regeneration.

Decades of research have primarily emphasized genetic blueprint as the driving force behind plant regeneration. The flow of information from genetics, which manifests as biochemical properties, including hormones, has been extensively implicated in plant regeneration. However, recent advancements have unveiled additional intrinsic modules within this information flow. Here, we explore the three core modules of plant regeneration: biochemical properties, mechanical forces acting on cells, and cell geometry. We debate their roles and interactions during morphogenesis, emphasizing the potential for multiple feedbacks between these core modules to drive pattern formation during regeneration. We propose that de novo organ regeneration is a self-organized event driven by multidirectional information flow between these core modules.

Protocol for real-time imaging, polar protein quantification, and targeted laser ablation of regenerating shoot progenitors in Arabidopsis.

Here, we provide a protocol for real-time tracking of regenerating shoot progenitors, combined with polar protein quantification and targeted laser ablation of callus cells in Arabidopsis. Using Arabidopsis strains expressing GFP-labeled polar auxin efflux carrier, PINFORMED 1 (PIN1) protein, we detail steps to prepare the callus for time-lapse confocal imaging and track the progenitors expressing PIN1-GFP, followed by mapping and quantifying PIN1 polarity using Fiji/ImageJ. We then describe targeted laser ablation of cells and subsequent time-lapse imaging to study regeneration. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Varapparambath et al. (2022).1.

Mechanical conflict caused by a cell-wall-loosening enzyme activates de novo shoot regeneration.

Cellular heterogeneity is a hallmark of multicellular organisms. During shoot regeneration from undifferentiated callus, only a select few cells, called progenitors, develop into shoot. How these cells are selected and what governs their subsequent progression to a patterned organ system is unknown. Using Arabidopsis thaliana, we show that it is not just the abundance of stem cell regulators but rather the localization pattern of polarity proteins that predicts the progenitor's fate. A shoot-promoting factor, CUC2, activated the expression of the cell-wall-loosening enzyme, XTH9, solely in a shell of cells surrounding the progenitor, causing different mechanical stresses in these cells. This mechanical conflict then activates cell polarity in progenitors to promote meristem formation. Interestingly, genetic or physical perturbations to cells surrounding the progenitor impaired the progenitor and vice versa. These suggest a feedback loop between progenitors and their neighbors for shoot regeneration in the absence of tissue-patterning cues.

Species-specific function of conserved regulators in orchestrating rice root architecture.

Shoot-borne adventitious/crown roots form a highly derived fibrous root system in grasses. The molecular mechanisms controlling their development remain largely unknown. Here, we provide a genome-wide landscape of transcriptional signatures - tightly regulated auxin response and in-depth spatio-temporal expression patterns of potential epigenetic modifiers - and transcription factors during priming and outgrowth of rice (Oryza sativa) crown root primordia. Functional analyses of rice transcription factors from WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX and PLETHORA gene families reveal their non-redundant and species-specific roles in determining the root architecture. WOX10 and PLT1 regulate both shoot-borne crown roots and root-borne lateral roots, but PLT2 specifically controls lateral root development. PLT1 activates local auxin biosynthesis genes to promote crown root development. Interestingly, O. sativa PLT genes rescue lateral root primordia outgrowth defects of Arabidopsis plt mutants, demonstrating their conserved role in root primordia outgrowth irrespective of their developmental origin. Together, our findings unveil a molecular framework of tissue transdifferentiation during root primordia establishment, leading to the culmination of robust fibrous root architecture. This also suggests that conserved factors have evolved their transcription regulation to acquire species-specific function.

Age, Wound Size, and Position of Injury - Dependent Vascular Regeneration Assay in Growing Leaves.

Recurring damage to the aerial organs of plants necessitates their prompt repair, particularly their vasculature. While vascular regeneration assays for aerial plant parts such as the stem and inflorescence stalk are well established, those for leaf vasculature remain unexplored. Recently, we established a new vascular regeneration assay in growing leaves and discovered the underlying molecular mechanism. Here, we describe the detailed stepwise method for the incision and regeneration assay used to study leaf vascular regeneration. By using a combination of micro-surgical perturbations, brightfield microscopy, and other experimental approaches, we further show that the age of the leaf as well as the position and size of the injury determine the overall success rate of regeneration. This easy-to-master vascular regeneration assay is an efficient and rapid method to study the mechanism of vascular regeneration in growing leaves. The assay can be readily combined with cellular and molecular biology techniques.

Model systems for regeneration: Arabidopsis.

Plants encompass unparalleled multi-scale regenerative potential. Despite lacking specialized cells that are recruited to injured sites, and despite their cells being encased in rigid cell walls, plants exhibit a variety of regenerative responses ranging from the regeneration of specific cell types, tissues and organs, to the rebuilding of an entire organism. Over the years, extensive studies on embryo, shoot and root development in the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana have provided insights into the mechanisms underlying plant regeneration. These studies highlight how Arabidopsis, with its wide array of refined molecular, genetic and cell biological tools, provides a perfect model to interrogate the cellular and molecular mechanisms of reprogramming during regeneration.

A coherent feed-forward loop drives vascular regeneration in damaged aerial organs of plants growing in a normal developmental context.

Aerial organs of plants, being highly prone to local injuries, require tissue restoration to ensure their survival. However, knowledge of the underlying mechanism is sparse. In this study, we mimicked natural injuries in growing leaves and stems to study the reunion between mechanically disconnected tissues. We show that PLETHORA (PLT) and AINTEGUMENTA (ANT) genes, which encode stem cell-promoting factors, are activated and contribute to vascular regeneration in response to these injuries. PLT proteins bind to and activate the CUC2 promoter. PLT proteins and CUC2 regulate the transcription of the local auxin biosynthesis gene YUC4 in a coherent feed-forward loop, and this process is necessary to drive vascular regeneration. In the absence of this PLT-mediated regeneration response, leaf ground tissue cells can neither acquire the early vascular identity marker ATHB8, nor properly polarise auxin transporters to specify new venation paths. The PLT-CUC2 module is required for vascular regeneration, but is dispensable for midvein formation in leaves. We reveal the mechanisms of vascular regeneration in plants and distinguish between the wound-repair ability of the tissue and its formation during normal development.

Regrowing the damaged or lost body parts.

Plants display extraordinary ability to revive tissues and organs lost or damaged in injury. This is evident from the root tip restoration and classical experiments in stem demonstrating re-establishment of vascular continuity. While recent studies have begun to unravel the mechanistic understanding of tissue restoration in response to injury in underground plant organs, the molecular mechanisms of the same in aerial organs remain to be ventured deeper. Here, we discuss the possibility of unearthing the regulatory mechanism that can confer universal regeneration potential to plant body and further provide a comprehensive understanding of how tissue and organ regeneration gets triggered in response to mechanical injury and later gets terminated after re-patterning and regaining the appropriate size.

Gradient Expression of Transcription Factor Imposes a Boundary on Organ Regeneration Potential in Plants.

A wide variety of multicellular organisms across the kingdoms display remarkable ability to restore their tissues or organs when they suffer damage. However, the ability to repair damage is not uniformly distributed throughout body parts. Here, we unravel the elusive mechanistic basis of boundaries on organ regeneration potential using root tip resection as a model and show that the dosage of gradient-expressed PLT2 transcription factor is the underlying cause. While transient downregulation of PLT2 in distinct set of plt mutant backgrounds renders meristematic cells incapable of regeneration, forced expression of PLT2 acts through auto-activation to confer regeneration potential to the cells undergoing differentiation. Surprisingly, sustained exposure to nuclear PLT2, beyond a threshold, leads to reduction of regeneration potential despite giving rise to longer meristem. Our studies reveal dosage-dependent role of gradient-expressed PLT2 in root tip regeneration and uncouple the size of an organ from its regeneration potential.

Genome-Wide Transcript Profiling Reveals an Auxin-Responsive Transcription Factor, OsAP2/ERF-40, Promoting Rice Adventitious Root Development.

Unlike dicots, the robust root system in grass species largely originates from stem base during postembryonic development. The mechanisms by which plant hormone signaling pathways control the architecture of adventitious root remain largely unknown. Here, we studied the modulations in global genes activity in developing rice adventitious root by genome-wide RNA sequencing in response to external auxin and cytokinin signaling cues. We further analyzed spatiotemporal regulations of key developmental regulators emerged from our global transcriptome analysis. Interestingly, some of the key cell fate determinants such as homeodomain transcription factor (TF), OsHOX12, no apical meristem protein, OsNAC39, APETALA2/ethylene response factor, OsAP2/ERF-40 and WUSCHEL-related homeobox, OsWOX6.1 and OsWOX6.2, specifically expressed in adventitious root primordia. Functional analysis of one of these regulators, an auxin-induced TF containing AP2/ERF domain, OsAP2/ERF-40, demonstrates its sufficiency to confer the adventitious root fate. The ability to trigger the root developmental program is largely attributed to OsAP2/ERF-40-mediated dose-dependent transcriptional activation of genes that can facilitate generating effective auxin response, and OsERF3-OsWOX11-OsRR2 pathway. Our studies reveal gene regulatory network operating in response to hormone signaling pathways and identify a novel TF regulating adventitious root developmental program, a key agronomically important quantitative trait, upstream of OsERF3-OsWOX11-OsRR2 pathway.

PtWOX11 acts as master regulator conducting the expression of key transcription factors to induce de novo shoot organogenesis in poplar.

KEY MESSAGE: WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX 11 establishes the acquisition of pluripotency during callus formation and accomplishes de novo shoot formation by regulating key transcription factors in poplar. De novo shoot regeneration is a prerequisite for propagation and genetic engineering of elite cultivars in forestry. However, the regulatory mechanism of de novo organogenesis is poorly understood in tree species. We previously showed that WUSCHEL (WUS)-RELATED HOMEOBOX 11 (PtWOX11) of the hybrid poplar clone 84K (Populus alba × P. glandulosa) promotes de novo root formation. In this study, we found that PtWOX11 also regulates de novo shoot regeneration in poplar. The overexpression of PtWOX11 enhanced de novo shoot formation, whereas overexpression of PtWOX11 fused with the transcriptional repressor domain (PtWOX11-SRDX) or reduced expression of PtWOX11 inhibited this process, indicating that PtWOX11 promotes de novo shoot organogenesis. Although PtWOX11 promotes callus formation, overexpression of PtWOX11 and PtWOX11-SRDX also produced increased and decreased numbers of de novo shoots per unit weight, respectively, implying that PtWOX11 promotes de novo shoot organogenesis partially by regulating the intrinsic mechanism of shoot development. RNA-seq and qPCR analysis further revealed that PtWOX11 activates the expression of PLETHORA1 (PtPLT1) and PtPLT2, whose Arabidopsis paralogs establish the acquisition of pluripotency, during incubation on callus-inducing medium. Moreover, PtWOX11 activates the expression of shoot-promoting factors and meristem regulators such as CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON2 (PtCUC2), PtCUC3, WUS and SHOOT MERISTEMLESS to fulfill shoot regeneration during incubation on shoot-inducing medium. These results suggest that PtWOX11 acts as a central regulator of the expression of key genes to cause de novo shoot formation. Our studies further provide a possible means to genetically engineer economically important tree species for their micropropagation.

The WOX11-LBD16 Pathway Promotes Pluripotency Acquisition in Callus Cells During De Novo Shoot Regeneration in Tissue Culture.

De novo shoot regeneration in tissue culture undergoes at least two phases. Explants are first cultured on auxin-rich callus-inducing medium (CIM) to produce a group of pluripotent cells termed callus; the callus is then transferred to cytokinin rich shoot-inducing medium (SIM) to promote the formation of shoot progenitor cells, from which adventitious shoots may differentiate. Here, we show that the Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factor gene LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN16 (LBD16) is involved in pluripotency acquisition in callus cells. LBD16, which is activated by WUSCHEL RELATED HOMEOBOX11 (WOX11), is specifically expressed in the newly formed callus on CIM and its expression decreases quickly when callus is moved to SIM. Blocking the WOX11-LBD16 pathway results in the loss of pluripotency in callus cultured on CIM, leading to shooting defects on SIM. Further analysis showed that LBD16 may function in the establishment of the root primordium-like identity in the newly formed callus, indicating that the root primordium-like identity is the cellular nature of pluripotency in callus cells. Additionally, LBD16 promotes cell division during callus initiation. Our study clarified that the WOX11-LBD16 pathway promotes pluripotency acquisition in callus cells.

Intermediate Developmental Phases During Regeneration.

The initial view that regeneration can be a continuum in terms of regulatory mechanisms is gradually changing, and recent evidence points towards the presence of discrete regulatory steps and intermediate phases. Furthermore, regeneration presents an excellent example of a process generating order and pattern, i.e. a self-organization process. It is likely that the process traverses a set of intermediate phases before reaching an endpoint. Although some progress has been made in deciphering the identity of these intermediate phases, a lot more work is needed to derive a comprehensive and complete picture. Here, we discuss the intermediate developmental phases in plant regeneration and compare them with the possible intermediate developmental phases in animal regeneration.

Fungal Production and Manipulation of Plant Hormones.

Living organisms are part of a highly interconnected web of interactions, characterised by species nurturing, competing, parasitizing and preying on one another. Plants have evolved cooperative as well as defensive strategies to interact with neighbour organisms. Among these, the plant-fungus associations are very diverse, ranging from pathogenic to mutualistic. Our current knowledge of plant-fungus interactions suggests a sophisticated coevolution to ensure dynamic plant responses to evolving fungal mutualistic/pathogenic strategies. The plant-fungus communication relies on a rich chemical language. To manipulate the plant defence mechanisms, fungi produce and secrete several classes of biomolecules, whose modeof- action is largely unknown. Upon perception of the fungi, plants produce phytohormones and a battery of secondary metabolites that serve as defence mechanism against invaders or to promote mutualistic associations. These mutualistic chemical signals can be co-opted by pathogenic fungi for their own benefit. Among the plant molecules regulating plant-fungus interaction, phytohormones play a critical role since they modulate various aspects of plant development, defences and stress responses. Intriguingly, fungi can also produce phytohormones, although the actual role of fungalproduced phytohormones in plant-fungus interactions is poorly understood. Here, we discuss the recent advances in fungal production of phytohormone, their putative role as endogenous fungal signals and how fungi manipulate plant hormone balance to their benefits.