Composite Echocardiographic Score to Predict Long-Term Survival Following Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Whilst the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains the primary echocardiographic measure widely utilised for risk stratification following myocardial infarction (MI), it has a number of well recognised limitations. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic utility of a composite echocardiographic score (EchoScore) composed of prognostically validated measures of left-ventricular (LV) size, geometry and function, to the utility of LVEF alone, for predicting survival following MI. METHODS: Retrospective data on 394 consecutive patients with a first-ever MI were included. Comprehensive echocardiography was performed within 24 hours of admission for all patients. EchoScore consisted of LVEF<50%, left atrial volume index>34 mL/m2, average E/e >14, E/A ratio>2, abnormal LV mass index, and abnormal LV end-systolic volume index. A single point was allocated for each measure to derive a score out of 6. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 24 months there were 33 deaths. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, a high EchoScore (>3) displayed significant association with all-cause mortality (log-rank χ2=74.48 p<0.001), and was a better predictor than LVEF<35% (log-rank χ2=17.01 p<0.001). On Cox proportional-hazards multivariate analysis incorporating significant clinical and echocardiographic predictors, a high EchoScore was the strongest independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 6.44 95%CI 2.94-14.01 p<0.001), and the addition of EchoScore resulted in greater increment in model power compared to addition of LVEF (model χ2 56.29 vs 44.71 p<0.001, Harrell's C values 0.83 vs 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: A composite echocardiographic score composed of prognostically validated measures of LV size, geometry, and function is superior to LVEF alone for predicting survival following MI.

Determinants of Diastolic Dysfunction Following Myocardial Infarction: Evidence for Causation Beyond Infarct Size.

BACKGROUND: The determinants of severe diastolic dysfunction (DD) following myocardial infarction (MI) are not well defined. This study sought to define the determinants of severe DD (restrictive mitral inflow pattern on Doppler echocardiography [RFP]) in patients with a first-ever MI, with particular emphasis on the impact of infarct size. METHODS: Retrospective single-centre study including consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary referral centre with a first-ever non-ST-elevation-MI (NSTEMI) or ST-elevation-MI (STEMI) (n=477). Peak troponin-I (Peak-TnI) was used as the principal measure of infarct size, whilst left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion score index (WMSI) were regarded as surrogate measures. Echocardiography was performed within 24 hours of admission for all patients. RFP was defined as E/A ratio >2.0 or E/A ratio >1.5 and E-wave deceleration time <140 ms. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients (14.5%) had RFP. Peak-TnI levels were higher in the RFP group (32.6±32.7 versus 16.9±25.2 µg/L, p<0.001). In sequential multivariable models incorporating significant clinical, angiographic and left ventricular (LV) size-related variables, Peak-TnI (OR 1.98, p=0.001), WMSI (OR 2.34, p=0.048) and LVEF (OR 0.97, p=0.044) were independent predictors of RFP. Presence of diabetes was also an independent predictor in all the models constructed. When patients were stratified according to an LVEF of 50%, 39% of RFP patients had a preserved LVEF (RFP/preserved EF group), and these patients had lower Peak-TnI levels compared to the RFP/reduced EF group (14.4±18.7 vs 44.5±35.5 µg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst infarct size is a major determinant of severe diastolic dysfunction after MI, a significant subset of patients develop severe diastolic dysfunction despite a small infarct size and preserved LVEF, highlighting that other factors such as pre-existing diastolic dysfunction due to risk factors such as diabetes have an important role in causation.

Accuracy of Cardiac Nurse Acquired and Measured Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Comparison to Echosonographer.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional echocardiography (3D-Echo) performed by novice health care staff to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) could allow cost-effective screening and monitoring for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) prior to the development of heart failure. The aim of this study was to determine feasibility and accuracy of cardiac nurses (after completing focussed training) independently acquiring 3D-Echo images, and measuring LVEF using semi-automated software when compared to an echosonographer. METHODS: One echosonographer and three cardiac nurses acquired 3D-Echo images on 73 patients (62 ± 16 years, 62% male) with good image quality, and subsequently measured LVEF using a semi-automated algorithm. RESULTS: Overall feasibility was 89% with the three nurses successfully acquiring 3D-Echo images suitable for LVEF assessment in 65 of the 73 patients. High accuracy (r = 0.82; p < 0.0001) with minimal bias (+0.1, -10.6 to +10.8 limits of agreement; p = 0.91) was observed comparing the nurses to the echosonographer for measuring LVEF. Individual nurses demonstrated high feasibility (86%-92%), accuracy (r = 0.83-0.87; all p < 0.0001) and intra-observer reproducibility (r = 0.96-0.97; all p < 0.0001), with good inter-observer consistency in accuracy compared to the echosonographer (one-way analysis of variance p = 0.559). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that, following a focussed training protocol, it was feasible for cardiac nurses to acquire 3D-Echo images of sufficient image quality to allow measurement of LVEF using a semi-automated algorithm, with comparable accuracy and intra-observer variability to an expert echosonographer. This could potentially allow the broader application of echocardiography to screen for LVSD in high-risk cohorts.

Hemodynamic Validation of the E/e' Ratio as a Measure of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Patients With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

The E/e' ratio has an established role in the assessment of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) in stable patients, but its accuracy in acute myocardial ischemia is less well established. The aim of this study was to validate the relation between the E/e' ratio and invasively measured LVFP in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A total of 120 unselected patients with NSTEMI underwent cardiac catheterization with measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP; elevated ≥15 mm Hg) and Doppler echocardiography with either simultaneous (n = 30) or same-day (n = 90) measurement of E/e'. Patients were aged 64.1 ± 11.8 years, 72% were male and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 48.0 ± 20.9%. Septal, lateral, and average E/e' ratios all showed a significant correlation with LVEDP (Pearson's r: 0.42, 0.43, 0.48, respectively [all p <0.001]). Receiver operating characteristics curves showed an area under the curve of 0.72, 0.72, and 0.75 (all p <0.001) for septal, lateral, and average E/e', respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values for the guideline-recommended threshold of average E/e' >14 for elevated LVEDP was 27%, 93%, 79%, and 44%, respectively. Utilizing lower E/e' boundaries of 6, 7, and 8 for lateral, average, and medial E/e', respectively, improved the NPV to ≥80% for each parameter. In conclusion, the E/e' ratio is a robust measure of LVFP during acute NSTEMI using upper and lower thresholds to achieve a high PPV and NPV, respectively, with the use of adjunctive guideline-recommend measures required in patients with nonconclusive E/e'.

Echocardiographic predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >35%: Value of guideline based assessment of diastolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggests that the majority of cardiac deaths in patients with heart failure occur in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35%. This study sought to determine the value of guideline based assessment of diastolic dysfunction in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with a first-ever myocardial infarction (MI) with an LVEF >35%. METHODS: A retrospective single centre study involving 383 patients with a first-ever MI (STEMI or NSTEMI) with LVEF >35% was performed. Clinical, angiographic and echocardiographic data were obtained from prospectively maintained institutional databases. Outcomes data were obtained from national death registry. Echocardiography was performed early post-admission for all patients. Significant diastolic dysfunction (DD) was defined was grade 2/3 diastolic dysfunction according to current American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines. RESULTS: At a median follow up of 2 years, there were 32 deaths. On Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis incorporating significant clinical variables (age, chronic kidney disease and extent of coronary artery disease), significant DD (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.16-5.68, p = 0.020) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (HR 1.03, 1.04-1.07, p = 0.021) were the only independent echocardiographic predictors of all-cause mortality. Intermodel comparisons using model χ2 and Harrel's-C confirmed incremental value of DD. In the subgroup with LVEF 36-55% (n = 176), significant DD was the only independent echocardiographic predictor (HR 3.56, 95%CI 2.46-9.09, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of significant DD identifies patients with LVEF >35% following MI who are at a higher risk of all-cause mortality, and who may benefit from further risk stratification and treatment.

Relation of Left Atrial Volumes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction to Left Ventricular Filling Pressures and Outcomes.

The inter-relationships between minimal and maximal left atrial volume index (LAVI), left ventricular filling pressures and survival have not been well studied. This study aimed to compare LAVImin with LAVImax with respect to (1) relative prognostic value, and (2) correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic pressures (LVEDP), in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). A retrospective study involving consecutive patients with a first-ever MI (n = 419) was undertaken. LAVIs were determined using Simpson's biplane method from 2D echocardiography performed the day after admission. LAVmin ≥ 18 mls/m2 and LAVImax ≥ 34 mls/m2 were considered enlarged. The primary end point was composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (death/MI/heart failure). Correlation between LVEDP and LAVI was assessed in 120 patients who underwent echocardiography and cardiac catheterization either simultaneously (n = 30) or same-day (n = 90). At a median follow-up of 24 months, there were 61 MACE events. On Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis incorporating significant clinical predictors and LVEF, whereas both LAVImin ≥ 18 mls/m2 (hazard ratio 3.15 [95% confidence interval 1.70 to 5.54], p <0.001) and LAVImax ≥ 34 mls/m2 (hazard ratio 1.79 [95% confidence interval 1.02 to 3.14], p = 0.041) were independent predictors of MACE, LAVImin showed a stronger association. Intermodel comparisons of the model chi-square and Harrell's C-statistic confirmed better prognostication with LAVImin. In the invasive cohort, because LAVImin and LAVImax had a similar correlation with LVEDP ≥ 15 mm Hg (r = 0.41 [p <0.001] vs r = 0.42 [p <0.001]), LAVmin ≥ 18 mls/m2 had a greater sensitivity for LVEDP ≥ 15 mm Hg than LAVImax ≥ 34 mls/m2 (sensitivity 59.4% vs 34.4%). In conclusion, utilizing thresholds of ≥18 and ≥34 mls/m2, respectively, LAVImin was a better predictor of survival than LAVImax, the pathophysiologic basis of which relates to a better sensitivity for elevated left ventricular filling pressures with LAVImin at these thresholds. There may be incremental clinical value in measuring LAVImin alongside LAVImax.

New Diastology Guidelines: Evolution, Validation and Impact on Clinical Practice.

The 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Echocardiography (ASE/EACVI) guidelines on the assessment of diastolic function sought to simplify the assessment of diastolic function by recommending a streamlined, stepped approach with a focus on four key variables. Haemodynamic validation using simultaneous cardiac catheterisation and echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function have shown robust prediction of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) using the streamlined 2016 algorithms, with favourable comparisons to the 2009 guidelines. Similarly, prognostic validation data demonstrates that the 2016 algorithms are easier to implement in clinical practice, have superior inter-observer reliability across a broad range of observer experience, and are better at predicting clinical outcomes. Furthermore, published data show improved classification of clinical heart failure patients. However, increased specificity of the updated 2016 guidelines results in a lower prevalence of diastolic dysfunction compared to the 2009 recommendations. Further refinement of guidelines for the identification and diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction is possible through incorporation of new diastolic parameters.

Diastolic Dysfunction Assessed Using Contemporary Guidelines and Prognosis Following Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Recent American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines for the assessment of diastolic dysfunction (DD) recommend a simplified approach with four key variables incorporated into a novel diagnostic algorithm. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of significant DD assessed using the algorithm recommended in the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines (DD2016) in comparison with the prognostic value of significant DD assessed using the 2009 guidelines (DD2009) as well as the individual parameters incorporated in the 2016 algorithm. METHODS: Retrospective data on 419 consecutive patients with first ever myocardial infarction were included. Doppler echocardiography was performed within 24 hours of admission in all patients. Significant DD was defined as grade 2 or 3 DD. The primary outcome measure was composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), comprising death, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 24 months, there were 61 MACEs. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, DD2016 showed a better association with MACEs than DD2009 (log-rank χ2 = 21.01 [P < .001] vs 13.13 [P = .001]). On Cox proportional-hazards multivariate analysis incorporating significant clinical predictors and left ventricular ejection fraction, DD2016 (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.25-3.98; P = .007) was the strongest independent predictor of MACEs, whereas DD2009 (hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.95-2.80; P = .074) was not a significant predictor. Of the four key diastolic parameters, only left atrial volume index was independently associated with MACEs (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.02-3.14; P = .041) when included in a Cox proportional-hazards multivariate model incorporating significant clinical predictors and left ventricular ejection fraction, although the association was weaker than DD2016. Intermodel comparisons with model χ2 and Harrell's C statistic were satisfactory for DD2016. CONCLUSIONS: Significant DD assessed using the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines is a robust independent predictor of clinical outcomes following myocardial infarction and compares favorably with DD2009 as well as the individual parameters incorporated in the novel 2016 algorithm.

Diastolic stress echocardiography: from basic principles to clinical applications.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) looms as a major public heart challenge with increasing prevalence due to an ageing population. Diagnosis can be challenging due to non-specific symptomatology, low natriuretic peptide levels and equivocal diastology on resting echocardiography. Diastolic stress echocardiography represents a non-invasive option to refining the diagnosis in this subset of patients. Diastolic responses to exercise are most commonly measured with a non-invasive measure of left ventricular filling pressures (LVFP) estimated by the ratio of the early mitral inflow wave to early diastolic tissue velocity (E/e' ratio). This is measured pre- and post-exercise , and is highly feasible. An elevation of exercise E/e' >15 is classified as an abnormal response as per current guidelines. An alternative measure of exercise-related diastolic performance, the Diastolic Functional Reserve Index has also been proposed, but has not been as well studied as exercise E/e'. A number of studies have validated exercise E/e' as a measure of LVFP against invasively measured LVFP using simultaneous echocardiography-catheterisation studies. The independent prognostic value of exercise E/e' has also been well delineated in a number of studies. While diastolic stress echocardiography can be considered for all patients with suspected HFpEF, it is of particular value in patients with normal or equivocal diastolic indices on resting echocardiography.

Eustachian valve endocarditis: Case report and literature review.

In the intravenous drug user (IVDU) population, infected right-sided valvular lesions are common, and this has been well described in the literature. The Eustachian valve (also known as the valve of the inferior vena cava) is another valve in close proximity to the tricuspid valve, which can, in rare cases, be the focus of infection. Eustachian valve endocarditis may be an under-recognised complication of Staphylococcus bacteraemia in IVDU population, often only identified by transesophageal imaging. We present a case of tricuspid valve endocarditis in an IVDU with secondary seeding on the Eustachian valve, and an accompanying literature review on this rare topic.

Negative predictive value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for perioperative risk stratification in patients with cardiac risk factors and reduced exercise capacity undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend functional testing for myocardial ischaemia in the perioperative setting in patients with greater than one recognised cardiac risk factor and self-reported reduced exercise capacity. AIM: To determine the clinical utility of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for perioperative risk stratification in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: Data on 79 consecutive patients undergoing DSE for perioperative risk stratification at a single centre were retrospectively reviewed to determine rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the index hospitalisation and 30 days post-discharge. Echocardiography and outcome data were obtained through a folder audit and echolab database. RESULTS: Out of the 79 DSE performed for perioperative risk stratification, 11 (14%) were positive (DSE +ve) and 68 (86%) were negative (DSE -ve). Management in the DSE +ve group included medical optimisation without invasive intervention (n = 7(64%)), diagnostic coronary angiography (n = 3(27%)) and coronary artery bypass graft (n = 1(9%)). None of the patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention preoperatively. Perioperative MACE in the DSE +ve group was 36% compared to 4% in the DSE-ve group (P = 0.006). DSE +ve was a powerful predictor of perioperative inpatient MACE (OR 12.4, 95% CI 2.3-67, P = 0.003). The positive predictive value of DSE +ve status was 36%, whereas the negative predictive value of DSE-ve status for perioperative MACE was 96%. CONCLUSION: DSE for perioperative risk stratification had a high clinical utility in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. In particular, a normal DSE had a high negative predictive value for perioperative MACE.

A rare case of a pericardial mass: Myelosarcoma from relapsed acute monoblastic leukaemia without bone marrow involvement.

INTRODUCTION: A 67-year-old male presented with progressive exertional dyspnoea, night sweats and 25 kg of weight loss over 2 years. He was febrile, 38.0°C, hypotensive and tachycardiac. Pulsus paradoxus was present. His electrocardiogram showed electrical alternans. He had previously had acute myeloid leukaemia treated with three cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The patient was found to have a 3.6 cm pericardial effusion with features consistent with tamponade and three cardiac masses (largest 10 × 9 × 5 cm) and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. He had 825 mL of pericardial fluid drained from which cytology was consistent with extramedullary leukaemia. A bone marrow aspirate and trephine was normal. CONCLUSION: The findings suggested extramedullary recurrence of leukaemia in the pericardium, without bone marrow involvement.

Myofibrillar Cardiomyopathy due to a Novel Desmin Gene Mutation: Complementary Role of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Genetic Testing in Delineating Diagnosis.

The investigators present a rare case of myofibrillar cardiomyopathy in an 18-year-old male patient in which echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and genetic testing played complementary roles. At the top, the parasternal long- and short-axis views of the heart document increased wall thickness and normal systolic function. Significant diastolic dysfunction was present. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (bottom) showed delayed enhancement in thickened segments and was not suggestive of cardiac amyloid or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Quadriceps muscle biopsy showed histopathology compatible with myofibrillar myopathy. Subsequent genetic testing confirmed a novel desmin gene mutation as the cause.

Evaluation of training nurses to perform semi-automated three-dimensional left ventricular ejection fraction using a customised workstation-based training protocol.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the feasibility of training cardiac nurses to evaluate left ventricular function utilising a semi-automated, workstation-based protocol on three dimensional echocardiography images. BACKGROUND: Assessment of left ventricular function by nurses is an attractive concept. Recent developments in three dimensional echocardiography coupled with border detection assistance have reduced inter- and intra-observer variability and analysis time. This could allow abbreviated training of nurses to assess cardiac function. DESIGN: A comparative, diagnostic accuracy study evaluating left ventricular ejection fraction assessment utilising a semi-automated, workstation-based protocol performed by echocardiography-naïve nurses on previously acquired three dimensional echocardiography images. METHODS: Nine cardiac nurses underwent two brief lectures about cardiac anatomy, physiology and three dimensional left ventricular ejection fraction assessment, before a hands-on demonstration in 20 cases. We then selected 50 cases from our three dimensional echocardiography library based on optimal image quality with a broad range of left ventricular ejection fractions, which was quantified by two experienced sonographers and the average used as the comparator for the nurses. Nurses independently measured three dimensional left ventricular ejection fraction using the Auto lvq package with semi-automated border detection. RESULTS: The left ventricular ejection fraction range was 25-72% (70% with a left ventricular ejection fraction <55%). All nurses showed excellent agreement with the sonographers. Minimal intra-observer variability was noted on both short-term (same day) and long-term (>2 weeks later) retest. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to train nurses to measure left ventricular ejection fraction utilising a semi-automated, workstation-based protocol on previously acquired three dimensional echocardiography images. Further study is needed to determine the feasibility of training nurses to acquire three dimensional echocardiography images on real-world patients to measure left ventricular ejection fraction. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurse-performed evaluation of left ventricular function could facilitate the broader application of echocardiography to allow cost-effective screening and monitoring for left ventricular dysfunction in high-risk populations.

Serial Doppler echocardiographic assessment of diastolic dysfunction during acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We performed serial Doppler echocardiography in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to describe the temporal changes in Doppler parameters following STEMI. BACKGROUND: Data on comprehensive Doppler assessment of diastolic dysfunction following STEMI, incorporating tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), are lacking. Severe diastolic dysfunction in stable patients usually manifests as a restrictive mitral filling pattern (RFP), reduced TDI-derived annular velocities (E'), and elevated E/E' ratios >15. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (19 males, mean age 60 ± 10 years) with a first-ever STEMI who underwent PCI were prospectively assessed with echocardiography and invasive left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) measurements prior to PCI. Repeat echocardiograms were performed at day 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: During STEMI: (i) LVEDP was significantly elevated but decreased post revascularization (26.1 ± 6.2 vs. 20.8 ± 5.2 mmHg, P = 0.002); (ii) the predominant mitral inflow pattern was an abnormal relaxation pattern (n = 14 [50%]), whereas restrictive filling pattern was only observed in seven (25%) patients; (iii) E' velocities were only modestly reduced (septal E' 7.4 ± 2.2 cm/sec, lateral E' 9.6 ± 2.2 cm/sec), and (iv) a septal E/E'ratio >15 seen in only one patient, whereas all other patients had an E/E' ratio of 8-15. Serial TDI showed that E'velocity decreased at day 3 (septal E' 7.4 ± 2.1 cm/sec vs. 5.9 ± 1.6 cm/sec, P = 0.002) and remained reduced at 1 year follow-up, suggesting persistence of diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: During STEMI, contrary to findings in stable patients, the predominant Doppler manifestation of the severe diastolic dysfunction and elevated LVEDP was an abnormal relaxation mitral inflow pattern accompanied by E/E' ratios of 8-15. Serial Doppler assessment suggests incomplete diastolic recovery following STEMI.