Proof-of-concept study exploring the effect of spesolimab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a considerable disease burden. Existing treatment options are limited and often suboptimal; a high unmet need exists for effective targeted therapies. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of spesolimab treatment in patients with HS. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-clinical-concept study was conducted at 25 centers across 12 countries from May 3, 2021, to April 21, 2022. Patients had moderate-to-severe HS for ≥1 year before enrollment. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive a loading dose of 3600 mg intravenous spesolimab (1200 mg at Weeks 0, 1, and 2) or matching placebo, followed by maintenance with either 1200 mg subcutaneous spesolimab every 2 weeks from Week 4-10 or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at Week 12. Secondary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), percentage change from baseline in draining tunnel (dT) count, the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of zero, absolute change from baseline in revised Hidradenitis Suppurativa Area and Severity Index (HASI-R), the proportion of patients achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50), the proportion of patients with ≥1 flare (all at Week 12), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: In this completed trial, randomized patients (N=52) received spesolimab (n=35) or placebo (n=17). The difference (95% confidence interval) versus placebo in least squares mean are reported. At Week 12, the percentage change in total AN count was similar between treatment arms: -4.1% (-31.7, 23.4). There was greater numerical improvement in the spesolimab arm, as measured by IHS4: -13.9 (-25.6, -2.3); percentage change from baseline in dT count: -96.6% (-154.5, -38.8); and the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of zero: 18.3% (-7.9, 37.5). Spesolimab treatment also improved HASI-R and HiSCR50 versus placebo. Spesolimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, similar to that observed in trials in other diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory proof-of-clinical-concept study supports the development of spesolimab as a new therapeutic option in HS. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04762277.

Quantifying the Effect of Methotrexate on Adalimumab Response in Psoriasis by Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling.

Previously, we showed that the combination of methotrexate and adalimumab treatment leads to less antidrug antibody development. In this study, we quantify the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of adalimumab and evaluate the influence of methotrexate cotreatment. A population PK-PD model was developed using prospective data from 59 patients with psoriasis (baseline PASI = 12.6) receiving adalimumab over 49 weeks. Typical PK and PD parameters and their corresponding interpatient variability were estimated. We performed a covariate analysis to assess whether interpatient variability could be explained by addition of methotrexate and other covariates. In total, 330 PASIs, 252 adalimumab serum concentrations, and 247 antidrug antibody titers were available. Presence of antidrug antibodies (adalimumab group = 46.7%, adalimumab + methotrexate group = 38.7%; P = .031) was correlated with increased adalimumab apparent clearance (P < .001). In the PD model, the use of concomitant methotrexate was borderline to significantly correlated with a decreased half-maximal inhibitory concentration (adalimumab concentration for which clinical response score is reduced by half; P < .10). On the basis of our PK-PD model, concomitant use of methotrexate indirectly increases adalimumab concentration, partially through less antidrug antibodies formation, which may result in better efficacy.

Needle-Free Jet Injector-Assisted Triamcinolone Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars is Effective and Well Tolerated in Children.

BACKGROUND: Keloids and hypertrophic scars can cause severe pain, pruritus, and psychological distress. Conventional intralesional corticosteroid treatment with needle injections remains challenging, especially in children with needle phobia. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and patient satisfaction of intralesional treatment with triamcinolone acetonide using a needle-free electronic pneumatic jet injector in children with keloids and hypertrophic scars. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in children with keloids and hypertrophic scars who received intralesional triamcinolone acetonide treatments using an electronic pneumatic jet injector. Effectiveness was evaluated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Global Aesthetic Improvement Score at follow-up versus baseline. Tolerability was assessed with reported adverse effects and injection-related pain using a visual analog scale. Satisfaction questionnaires were used to evaluate treatment-related patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Six female patients and five male patients aged 5-17 years, with a total of >118 keloids or hypertrophic scars were included. Electronic pneumatic jet injector treatment led to a significant reduction in the total Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale observer and patient scores compared with baseline, with a median reduction of 28.9% and 23.8%, respectively (p = 0.005; p = 0.009). Median visual analog scale pain scores for electronic pneumatic jet injector treatment were significantly lower compared with needle injections, 3.0 versus 7.0, respectively (p = 0.027). No severe adverse effects were reported. Overall, 6 patients were 'satisfied' and five patients were 'very satisfied' with the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic pneumatic jet injector-assisted intralesional triamcinolone acetonide is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars in children. It should be considered as an alternative non-traumatic delivery method, especially in children with needle phobia or severe pain during previous needle injections.

Global consensus process to establish a core dataset for hidradenitis suppurativa registries.

BACKGROUND: Several registries for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) already exist in Europe and the USA. There is currently no global consensus on a core dataset (CDS) for these registries. Creating a global HS registry is challenging, owing to logistical and regulatory constraints, which could limit opportunities for global collaboration as a result of differences in the dataset collected. The solution is to encourage all HS registries to collect the same CDS of information, allowing registries to collaborate. OBJECTIVES: To establish a core set of items to be collected by all HS registries globally. The core set will cover demographic details, comorbidities, clinical examination findings, patient-reported outcome measures and treatments. METHODS: Beginning in September 2022, 20 participants - including both clinicians with expertise in HS and patient advocates - from eight countries across three continents participated in a Delphi process consisting of four rounds of voting, with all participants completing each round. A list of potential items for inclusion in the core set was generated from the relevant published literature, including systematic reviews of comorbidities in HS, clinical and examination findings, and epidemiology. For disease severity and progression items, the Hidradenitis SuppuraTiva Core outcome set International Collaboration (HiSTORIC) core set and other relevant instruments were considered for inclusion. This resulted in 47 initial items. Participants were invited to suggest additional items to include during the first round. Anonymous feedback was provided to inform each subsequent round of voting to encourage consensus. RESULTS: The eDelphi process established a CDS of 48 items recommended for inclusion in all HS registries globally. CONCLUSIONS: The routine adoption of this CDS in current and future HS registries should allow registries in different parts of the world to collaborate, enabling research requiring large numbers of participants.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: new insights into disease mechanisms and an evolving treatment landscape.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa, is a chronic disabling and debilitating inflammatory disease with a high unmet medical need. The prevalence of HS reported in most studies is 1-2%, although it is likely to be under-reported and estimates vary globally owing to variance in data collection methods, ethnicity, geographical location and under-diagnosis. HS is characterized by persistent, painful cutaneous nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels commonly affecting the axillary, anogenital, inguinal and perianal/gluteal areas. Over time, chronic uncontrolled inflammation results in irreversible tissue destruction and scarring. Although the pathophysiology of HS has not been fully elucidated, the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-17 pathways have an important role, involving multiple cytokines. Currently, treatment options include topical medications; systemic therapies, including repeated and/or rotational courses of systemic antibiotics, retinoids and hormonal therapies; and various surgical procedures. The anti-TNF-α antibody adalimumab is currently the only biologic approved by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for HS; however, its efficacy varies, with a clinical response reported in approximately 50% of patients in phase III trials. HS is a rapidly evolving field of discovery, with a diverse range of agents with distinct mechanisms of action currently being explored in clinical trials. Several other promising therapeutic targets have recently emerged, and agents targeting the IL-17 and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways are the most advanced in ongoing or completed phase III clinical trials. Alongside limited therapeutic options, significant challenges remain in terms of diagnosis and disease management, with a need for better treatment outcomes. Other unmet needs include significant diagnostic delays, thus missing the therapeutic 'window of opportunity'; the lack of standardized outcome measures in clinical trials; and the lack of established, well-defined disease phenotypes and biomarkers.

Needle-free electronically-controlled jet injector treatment with bleomycin and lidocaine is effective and well-tolerated in patients with recalcitrant keloids.

OBJECTIVES: The treatment of recalcitrant keloids is challenging. Although intralesional bleomycin using conventional needle injectors (CNI) is effective, it has important drawbacks, such as the need for repetitive and painful injections. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability and patient satisfaction of intralesional bleomycin with lidocaine administered with a needle-free electronically-controlled pneumatic jet-injector (EPI) in recalcitrant keloids. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with recalcitrant keloids who had received three intralesional EPI-assisted treatments with bleomycin and lidocaine. Effectiveness was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at baseline and four to six weeks after the third treatment. Additionally, treatment related pain scores numeric rating scale, adverse effects, patient satisfaction and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) were assessed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a total of >148 recalcitrant keloids were included. The median total POSAS physician- and patient-scores were respectively 40 and 41 at baseline, and reduced with respectively 7 and 6-points at follow-up ( p < 0.001; p < 0.001). The median pain scores during EPI-assisted injections were significantly lower compared to CNI-assistant injections, (2.5 vs. 7.0, respectively ( p < 0.001)). Adverse effects were mild. Overall, patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the treatments (14/15, 93.3%). The GAIS was "very improved" in one patient, "improved" in nine patients and "unaltered" in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: EPI-assisted treatment with bleomycin and lidocaine is an effective, well tolerated, patient-friendly alternative for CNI in patients with recalcitrant keloid scars. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our findings and improve the clinical management of recalcitrant keloids.

Viewpoint on the evaluation of severity and treatment effects in mild hidradenitis suppurativa: the cumulative IHS4 (IHS4-C).

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent and debilitating inflammatory skin disease, characterized by painful inflamed nodules, abscesses and tunnels in the skin folds. Up to 66% of HS patients can be classified as having mild disease. However, currently, most clinical trials are focusing on patients with moderate to severe disease, resulting in more available treatment options for this smaller group of patients. This difference in treatment options and lack of clinical trials for patients with mild HS has been noticed and additional focus on milder HS cases is requested. However, an important hurdle to overcome studying treatment efficacy in mild HS is an adequate treatment outcome. Patients with mild HS sometimes have no lesions due to waxing and waning of the disease. Furthermore, the difference in aim of a clinical trial for patients with mild disease should be taken into consideration. Where treatment of moderate to severe patients focusses on lowering the number of draining tunnels, abscesses and inflammatory nodules, in patient with mild disease, we focus on prevention of new lesions and progression to moderate and severe disease. This clinical characteristic of mild HS and difference in aim of clinical trials are the key challenges for efficacy measurement in mild HS. To overcome these challenges, we propose to measure the continuous international hidradenitis suppurativa severity score (IHS4) monthly and use the cumulative IHS4 score (IHS4-C) over all these visits as a primary outcome in clinical trials in patients with mild HS, to increase the probability to detect the inflammatory lesions with a temporary nature. We argue that this novel application of the IHS4, has the potential to better facilitate assessment of treatments or interventions in patients with mild HS and should be tested in future studies.

Large-scale functional inference for skin-expressing lncRNAs using expression and sequence information.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate the expression of protein-coding genes and have been shown to play important roles in inflammatory skin diseases. However, we still have limited understanding of the functional impact of lncRNAs in skin, partly due to their tissue specificity and lower expression levels compared with protein-coding genes. We compiled a comprehensive list of 18,517 lncRNAs from different sources and studied their expression profiles in 834 RNA-Seq samples from multiple inflammatory skin conditions and cytokine-stimulated keratinocytes. Applying a balanced random forest to predict involvement in biological functions, we achieved a median AUROC of 0.79 in 10-fold cross-validation, identifying significant DNA binding domains (DBDs) for 39 lncRNAs. G18244, a skin-expressing lncRNA predicted for IL-4/IL-13 signaling in keratinocytes, was highly correlated in expression with F13A1, a protein-coding gene involved in macrophage regulation, and we further identified a significant DBD in F13A1 for G18244. Reflecting clinical implications, AC090198.1 (predicted for IL-17 pathway) and AC005332.6 (predicted for IFN-γ pathway) had significant negative correlation with the SCORAD metric for atopic dermatitis. We also utilized single-cell RNA and spatial sequencing data to validate cell type specificity. Our research demonstrates lncRNAs have important immunological roles and can help prioritize their impact on inflammatory skin diseases.

Needle-free electronically controlled jet injection with corticosteroids in recalcitrant keloid scars: a retrospective study and patient survey.

First-line treatment of keloids consists of intralesional needle injections with corticosteroids, but generally entails multiple painful sessions, resulting in variable clinical outcomes. Novel needle-free jet injectors may facilitate more effective and patient-friendly dermal drug delivery. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability and patient satisfaction of intralesional triamcinolone-acetonide (TCA) treatment in recalcitrant keloids using an electronically controlled pneumatic injector (EPI). A retrospective study was conducted in recalcitrant keloid patients with a history of severe pain during needle injections who received three sessions of EPI + TCA. Outcome measures included Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), treatment-related pain (NRS), adverse effects, and patient satisfaction (survey). Ten patients with in total 283 keloids were included. The POSAS score significantly improved at follow-up and GAIS was reported as '(very) improved' for all patients. EPI + TCA was well-tolerated with a significantly lower NRS pain score compared to needle + TCA (pilot treatment). Only minor adverse effects occurred, and 90% of patients preferred EPI over needle treatment. EPI + TCA is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with recalcitrant keloids. The minimal treatment-related pain and high patient satisfaction makes it a promising treatment for patients with needle-phobia and/or severe pain during needle injections.

Oral prednisolone suppresses skin inflammation in a healthy volunteer imiquimod challenge model.

Imiquimod (IMQ) is a topical agent that induces local inflammation via the Toll-like receptor 7 pathway. Recently, an IMQ-driven skin inflammation model was developed in healthy volunteers for proof-of-pharmacology trials. The aim of this study was to profile the cellular, biochemical, and clinical effects of the marketed anti-inflammatory compound prednisolone in an IMQ model. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 24 healthy volunteers. Oral prednisolone (0.25 mg/kg/dose) or placebo (1:1) was administered twice daily for 6 consecutive days. Two days after treatment initiation with prednisolone or placebo, 5 mg imiquimod (IMQ) once daily for two following days was applied under occlusion on the tape-stripped skin of the back for 48 h in healthy volunteers. Non-invasive (imaging and biophysical) and invasive (skin punch biopsies and blister induction) assessments were performed, as well as IMQ ex vivo stimulation of whole blood. Prednisolone reduced blood perfusion and skin erythema following 48 h of IMQ application (95% CI [-26.4%, -4.3%], p = 0.0111 and 95% CI [-7.96, -2.13], p = 0.0016). Oral prednisolone suppressed the IMQ-elevated total cell count (95% CI [-79.7%, -16.3%], p = 0.0165), NK and dendritic cells (95% CI [-68.7%, -5.2%], p = 0.0333, 95% CI [-76.9%, -13.9%], p = 0.0184), and classical monocytes (95% CI [-76.7%, -26.6%], p = 0.0043) in blister fluid. Notably, TNF, IL-6, IL-8, and Mx-A responses in blister exudate were also reduced by prednisolone compared to placebo. Oral prednisolone suppresses IMQ-induced skin inflammation, which underlines the value of this cutaneous challenge model in clinical pharmacology studies of novel anti-inflammatory compounds. In these studies, prednisolone can be used as a benchmark.

Adalimumab combined with methotrexate versus adalimumab monotherapy in psoriasis: Three-year follow-up data of a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are formed in patients treated with adalimumab (ADL). This might increase clearance of ADL, potentially causing a (secondary) non-response. Combination therapy of ADL and methotrexate (MTX) reduces ADA levels and has a clinical benefit in rheumatologic diseases. In psoriasis however, the long-term effectiveness and safety have not been studied. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the three-year follow-up data of ADL combined with MTX compared to ADL monotherapy in ADL-naive patients with moderate to severe plaque type psoriasis. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre RCT in the Netherlands and Belgium. Randomization was performed by a centralized online randomization service. Patients were seen every 12 weeks until week 145. Outcome assessors were blinded. We collected data on drug survival, effectiveness, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of patients that started ADL combined with MTX compared to ADL monotherapy. We present descriptive analysis and patients were analysed according to the group initially randomized to. Patients becoming non-adherent to the biologic were excluded from analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included and 37 patients (ADL group n = 17, ADL + MTX group n = 20) continued in the follow-up study after 1 year. After 109 weeks and 145 weeks, there was a trend towards longer drug survival in the ADL + MTX group compared to the ADL group (week 109: 54.8% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.326, week 145: 51.6% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.464). At week 145, 7/13 patients were treated with MTX. In the ADL group, 4/12 patients that completed the study developed ADA, and 3/13 in the ADL + MTX group. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, there was no significant difference in ADL overall drug survival when it was initially combined with MTX, compared to ADL alone. Discontinuation due to adverse events was common in the combination group. To secure accessible healthcare, combination treatment of ADL and MTX can be considered in individual patients.

Adalimumab in conjunction with surgery compared with adalimumab monotherapy for hidradenitis suppurativa: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab, the only biologic registered for hidradenitis suppurativa, shows clinical response in up to 60% of patients, leaving many patients in need for other treatment options such as surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab combined with surgery vs adalimumab monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. METHODS: A pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial was performed from August 2018 to July 2022. Primary outcome was the difference in mean International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System reduction after 12 months of treatment with the difference in mean Dermatology Life Quality Index reduction as a key secondary outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included per arm. The mean International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System at baseline was 23.9 ± 10.7 in the surgery group and 20.9 ± 16.4, in the monotherapy group. After 12 months of treatment the surgery group had a significantly greater reduction in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System compared with the monotherapy group (-19.1 ± 11.3 vs -7.8 ± 11.8, P < .001). Moreover, the surgery group showed a greater reduction in Dermatology Life Quality Index after treatment compared with the monotherapy group (-8.2 ± 6.2 vs -4 ± 7.7, P = .02). LIMITATIONS: The study follow-up was too short to assess surgical recurrence rates. DISCUSSION: Combining adalimumab with surgery resulted in greater clinical effectiveness and improved quality of life after 12 months in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa.

A multimodal, comprehensive characterization of a cutaneous wound model in healthy volunteers.

Development of pharmacological interventions for wound treatment is challenging due to both poorly understood wound healing mechanisms and heterogeneous patient populations. A standardized and well-characterized wound healing model in healthy volunteers is needed to aid in-depth pharmacodynamic and efficacy assessments of novel compounds. The current study aims to objectively and comprehensively characterize skin punch biopsy-induced wounds in healthy volunteers with an integrated, multimodal test battery. Eighteen (18) healthy male and female volunteers received three biopsies on the lower back, which were left to heal without intervention. The wound healing process was characterized using a battery of multimodal, non-invasive methods as well as histology and qPCR analysis in re-excised skin punch biopsies. Biophysical and clinical imaging read-outs returned to baseline values in 28 days. Optical coherence tomography detected cutaneous differences throughout the wound healing progression. qPCR analysis showed involvement of proteins, quantified as mRNA fold increase, in one or more healing phases. All modalities used in the study were able to detect differences over time. Using multidimensional data visualization, we were able to create a distinction between wound healing phases. Clinical and histopathological scoring were concordant with non-invasive imaging read-outs. This well-characterized wound healing model in healthy volunteers will be a valuable tool for the standardized testing of novel wound healing treatments.

Clindamycin-Benzoyl Peroxide Gel Compared with Clindamycin Lotion for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Randomized Controlled Assessor-Blinded Intra-Patient Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a major concern, especially in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, antibiotics form a cornerstone in its treatment. Topical clindamycin is known to cause bacterial resistance but is still advised as monotherapy for the treatment of mild to moderate HS. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, intra-patient pilot trial to compare the clinical efficacy of clindamycin-benzoyl peroxide gel with clindamycin lotion in patients with mild to moderate HS. Two contralateral body sites were randomized for treatment in each patient. The primary outcome was the difference in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) between the two groups after 12 weeks. Secondary objectives were feasibility of the intra-patient design, efficacy within treatment groups, effect on HS pain, HS itch, patient satisfaction, antibiotic resistance, and the prolonged efficacy after 16 weeks. RESULTS: Ten patients were included, resulting in two groups of 10 treated body sites. No significant differences were found between the two groups for all measurements after 12 or 16 weeks, while both therapies led to an improvement in the IHS4, pain, and itch scores. A significant decrease was observed in the IHS4 for both the clindamycin lotion (-1.5; p < 0.05) and the clindamycin-benzoyl peroxide gel (-2; p < 0.01) after 16 weeks, and the pain scores were reduced from 7 to 2.5, p < 0.01 and 6.5 to 3, p = 0.03, respectively. Using the IHS4-55, we identified 50% of patients as responders in both groups after 12 weeks. The intra-patient design, however, unexpectedly appeared to hinder the inclusion of patients. CONCLUSION: Clindamycin-benzoyl peroxide gel showed favorable clinical efficacy results, similar to clindamycin lotion, suggesting that it could replace clindamycin lotion in the treatment of mild to moderate HS and to prevent antibiotic resistance. A larger controlled trial is needed to validate these results.

Efficacy and safety of needle-free jet injector-assisted intralesional treatments in dermatology-a systematic review.

Needle-free jet injectors are used for the intralesional treatment of various dermatological indications. However, a systematic review that evaluates the efficacy and safety of these treatments has not been published. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of needle-free jet injections for dermatological indications and to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations. An electronic literature search was conducted in April 2022. Two reviewers independently selected studies based on predefined criteria and performed a methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaborations risk-of-bias 2.0 assessment tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Thirty-seven articles were included, involving 1911 participants. Dermatological indications included scars, alopecia areata, hyperhidrosis, nail diseases, non-melanoma skin cancer, common warts, local anesthesia, and aesthetic indications. Keloids and other types of scars (hypertrophic, atrophic, and burn scars) were investigated most frequently (n = 7). The included studies reported favorable efficacy and safety outcomes for intralesional jet injector-assisted treatment with triamcinolone acetonide/hexacetonide, 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, or hyaluronic acid. Two high-quality studies showed good efficacy and tolerability of intralesional jet injections with a combination of 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone acetonide in hypertrophic scars and with saline in boxcar and rolling acne scars. No serious adverse reactions and good tolerability were reported in the included studies. Overall, the methodological quality of the included studies was low. Limited evidence suggests that needle-free jet injector-assisted intralesional treatment is efficacious and safe for hypertrophic and atrophic acne scars. More well-powered RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of jet injector treatment in dermatology are warranted to make further evidence-based recommendations.

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, immune-mediated skin condition characterized by inflammatory lesions that can cause pain, impaired physical activity, and reduced quality of life. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits interleukin 23 by binding to its p19 subunit, for the treatment of HS. METHODS: This phase II multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg; risankizumab 360 mg; or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, and 12. Patients initially randomized to placebo received blinded risankizumab 360 mg at weeks 16, 17, and 18; patients initially randomized to risankizumab received blinded matching placebo at the same time points. From weeks 20-60, all patients received open-label risankizumab 360 mg every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the achievement of HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 16. Safety was assessed by monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were randomized (risankizumab 180 mg, n = 80; risankizumab 360 mg, n = 81; placebo, n = 82). HiSCR was achieved by 46.8% of patients with risankizumab 180 mg, 43.4% with risankizumab 360 mg, and 41.5% with placebo at week 16. The primary endpoint was not met, and the study was terminated early. Incidence of TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs considered possibly related to study drug, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were generally low and comparable across treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Risankizumab does not appear to be an efficacious treatment for moderate-to-severe HS. Future studies to understand the complex molecular mechanisms underlying HS pathogenesis and develop improved therapies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03926169.

Guselkumab for hidradenitis suppurativa: a phase II, open-label, mode-of-action study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of available biologics for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is limited. Additional therapeutic options are needed. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and mode of action of guselkumab [an anti-interleukin (IL)-23p19 monoclonal antibody] 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 16 weeks in patients with HS. METHODS: An open-label, multicentre, phase IIa trial in patients with moderate-to-severe HS was carried out (NCT04061395). The pharmacodynamic response in skin and blood was measured after 16 weeks of treatment. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), and the abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the local institutional review board (METC 2018/694), and the study was conducted in accordance with good clinical practice guidelines and applicable regulatory requirements. RESULTS: Thirteen of 20 patients (65%) achieved HiSCR with a statistically significant decrease in median IHS4 score (from 8.5 to 5.0; P = 0.002) and median AN count (from 6.5 to 4.0; P = 0.002). The overall patient-reported outcomes did not show a similar trend. One serious adverse event, likely to be unrelated to guselkumab treatment, was observed. In lesional skin, transcriptomic analysis revealed the upregulation of various genes associated with inflammation, including immunoglobulins, S100, matrix metalloproteinases, keratin, B-cell and complement genes, which decreased in clinical responders after treatment. Immunohistochemistry revealed a marked decrease in inflammatory markers in clinical responders at week 16. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-five per cent of patients with moderate-to-severe HS achieved HiSCR after 16 weeks of treatment with guselkumab. We could not demonstrate a consistent correlation between gene and protein expression and clinical responses. The main limitations of this study were the small sample size and absence of a placebo arm. The large placebo-controlled phase IIb NOVA trial for guselkumab in patients with HS reported a lower HiSCR response of 45.0-50.8% in the treatment group and 38.7% in the placebo group. Guselkumab seems only to be of benefit in a subgroup of patients with HS, indicating that the IL-23/T helper 17 axis is not central to the pathophysiology of HS.