Clinical and Technical Outcomes of Intracranial-Intracranial Bypass for Treating Complex Intracranial Aneurysms: An Analysis of 255 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent increase in publications centered on intracranial-intracranial (IC-IC) bypasses for complex aneurysms, there is no systematic evidence regarding their outcomes. The purpose was to assess the outcomes of patients subjected to IC-IC bypass for aneurysms. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, a systematic review was conducted. Criteria for inclusion entailed studies with a cohort of at least 4 patients having undergone IC-IC bypass for aneurysms, detailing at least one outcome, such as patency, clinical outcomes, complications, and procedure-related mortality. When the study included patients who had undergone extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass, the authors extracted the patency and clinical data to juxtapose them with the results of IC-IC. RESULTS: Of the 2509 shortlisted studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 255 patients and 263 IC-IC bypass procedures. The IC-IC bypass procedure exhibited a patency rate of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%-95%). The patency rate of IC-IC and EC-IC bypasses did not significantly differ (odds ratio=0.60 [95% CI: 0.18-1.96]). Concerning clinical outcomes, 91% of the IC-IC patients had positive results (95% CI: 85%-97%), with no significant disparity between the IC-IC and EC-IC groups (odds ratio=1.29 [95% CI: 0.43-3.88]). After analysis, the complication rate was 11% (95% CI: 5%-18%). Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%). CONCLUSIONS: IC-IC bypass is valuable for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, boasting high patency and positive clinical outcomes. Complications are unusual, and procedure-related mortality is minimal. Comparing IC-IC and EC-IC led to no significant differences.

Stellate Ganglion Block in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Promising Protective Measure Against Vasospasm?

BACKGROUND: Stellate ganglion block (SGB) may have protective effects in patients at risk of vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to reduced sympathetic activity. However, the safety and clinical outcomes of SGB in this scenario are not definitively known. The objective was to evaluate the safety, clinical outcomes, and cerebral blood flow velocity in patients submitted to SGB or cervical sympathectomy with SAH. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating SGB or cervical sympathectomy use in SAH were conducted. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were evaluated. Patients with mRS from 0 to 2, GOS from 4 to 5, or symptom resolution were considered favorable clinical outcomes. Related mortality was defined as death by vasospasm or delayed cerebral ischemia. RESULTS: The analysis included 8 studies comprising 182 patients. Only 2 studies employed SGB prophylactically. The results revealed favorable outcomes in 52% of patients (95% CI: 37%-65%). The overall incidence of complications was 2% (95% CI: 0% -26%). The mortality rate was 13% (95% CI: 7%-21%), with a vasospasm-related mortality rate of 11% (95% CI: 2%-20%). A decrease of cerebral blood flow velocity was reported in 4 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The notable reduction in cerebral blood flow velocity following SGB, alongside positive outcomes and a low occurrence of mortality and complications, highlights its significance as a therapeutic intervention for vasospasm following SAH. While the number of studies evaluating SGB as a preventive measure is limited, the promising results emphasize the importance of future research.