Comparing advanced hybrid closed loop therapy and standard insulin therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CRISTAL): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) therapy can improve glycaemic control in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. However, data are needed on the efficacy and safety of AHCL systems as these systems, such as the MiniMed 780G, are not currently approved for use in pregnant women. We aimed to investigate whether the MiniMed 780G can improve glycaemic control with less hypoglycaemia in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: CRISTAL was a double-arm, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted in secondary and tertiary care specialist endocrinology centres at 12 hospitals (11 in Belgium and one in the Netherlands). Pregnant women aged 18-45 years with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned (1:1) to AHCL therapy (MiniMed 780G) or standard insulin therapy (standard of care) at a median of 10·1 (IQR 8·6-11·6) weeks of gestation. Randomisation was done centrally with minimisation dependent on baseline HbA1c, insulin administration method, and centre. Participants and study teams were not masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was proportion of time spent in the pregnancy-specific target glucose range (3·5-7·8 mmol/L), measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) at 14-17 weeks, 20-23 weeks, 26-29 weeks, and 33-36 weeks. Key secondary outcomes were overnight time in target range, and time below glucose range (<3·5 mmol/L) overall and overnight. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04520971). FINDINGS: Between Jan 15, 2021 and Sept 30, 2022, 101 participants were screened, and 95 were randomly assigned to AHCL therapy (n=46) or standard insulin therapy (n=49). 43 patients assigned to AHCL therapy and 46 assigned to standard insulin therapy completed the study. At baseline, 91 (95·8%) participants used insulin pumps, and the mean HbA1c was 6·5% (SD 0·6). The mean proportion of time spent in the target range (averaged over four time periods) was 66·5% (SD 10·0) in the AHCL therapy group compared with 63·2% (12·4) in the standard insulin therapy group (adjusted mean difference 1·88 percentage points [95% CI -0·82 to 4·58], p=0·17). Overnight time in the target range was higher (adjusted mean difference 6·58 percentage points [95% CI 2·31 to 10·85], p=0·0026), and time below range overall (adjusted mean difference -1·34 percentage points [95% CI, -2·19 to -0·49], p=0·0020) and overnight (adjusted mean difference -1·86 percentage points [95% CI -2·90 to -0·81], p=0·0005) were lower with AHCL therapy than with standard insulin therapy. Participants assigned to AHCL therapy reported higher treatment satisfaction. No unanticipated safety events occurred with AHCL therapy. INTERPRETATION: In pregnant women starting with tighter glycaemic control, AHCL therapy did not improve overall time in target range but improved overnight time in target range, reduced time below range, and improved treatment satisfaction. These data suggest that the MiniMed 780G can be safely used in pregnancy and provides some additional benefits compared with standard insulin therapy; however, it will be important to refine the algorithm to better align with pregnancy requirements. FUNDING: Diabetes Liga Research Fund and Medtronic.

Novel time-saving OGTT sparing HbA1c-HOMA2 based algorithm for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.

AIMS: The diagnosis of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) faces several challenges. We propose a novel screening algorithm to alleviate the burden of cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: Through a retrospective cross-sectional single-centre study, HbA1c and HOMA2 indices were assessed in multiple models as alternative diagnostic tools from OGTT data. We sought to establish specific thresholds for CFRD screening with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as gold standard. We evaluated various straightforward or sequential approaches, in terms of diagnostic accuracy while also quantify the potential reduction in OGTTs through these different methods. RESULTS: HOMA indices were recovered in 72 patients. We devised a composite index that combines HbA1c and HOMA-B: Diabetes Predicting Index in cystic fibrosis (DIPIc) = (HbA1c(%) × 3.455) - (HOMA-B(%) ×  0.020) - 19.294. This index yields the highest screening accuracy according to receiver-operating characteristics curves. Using a stepwise algorithm that incorporates DIPIc decreases the requirement for annual OGTTs. A CFRD exclusion cutoff less than -1.7445 (sensitivity 98 %), in conjunction with a CFRD diagnostic threshold greater than 0.4543 (specificity 98 %) allows for 71 % OGTT sparing. CONCLUSION: The composite index DIPIc is a suitable, less invasive screening method for CFRD, which enables to avoid many OGTTs.

Combined CFTR modulator therapies are linked with anabolic benefits and insulin-sparing in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.

Aims: Combined CFTR modulator therapies have dramatically altered pulmonary outcomes in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Their impact on glucose metabolism requires further investigations. This study aims to evaluate insulin requirements after initiation of combined CFTR modulator therapy in patients with CF-related diabetes (CFRD) and HOMA indices changes in CF patients without diabetes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed: 1) the effects of tezacaftor + ivacaftor and elexacaftor + tezacaftor + ivacaftor on FEV1, weight, BMI, HbA1c, and daily insulin dose, in 17 CFRD patients and 2) the impact of tezacaftor + ivacaftor on HOMA indices in 15 CF patients without diabetes. Results: Age was 37±12y in the CFRD group (70% men), 88% of whom were homozygous for F508del mutation. Diabetes duration was 15±10y. Median duration of combined CFTR modulator therapy was 16 months (IQR: 4) Thirteen patients received tezacaftor + ivacaftor, of whom 9 were switched to elexacaftor + tezacaftor + ivacaftor. Four patients received elexacaftor + tezacaftor + ivacaftor up front. A decrease in insulin needs was noticed in 88% of patients (0.85±0.3 vs 0.71±0.3U/kg/day; p = 0001). Total daily insulin dose decreased from 50±16 to 44±20U/day (p = 0.017). BMI improved (20.9 (IQR: 1.90) vs 22.1 kg/m2 (IQR: 3.70); p = 0.014). HbA1c went from 7.3±1.1 to 7.7±1.6% (p = 0.072). Median age was 22y (IQR: 11) in the CF group without diabetes (67% men), 93% of whom were homozygous for F508del mutation. Duration of combined CFTR modulator therapy was 10±5 months. HOMA-B changes were not significant (129.2 (IQR: 84.8) vs 103.5% (IQR: 66.3) nor were HOMA-S changes (from 94±64 to 95±49%). HOMA-BxS decreased from 112±45 to 104±29% (NS). BMI rose from 21.9±3 to 23.1±3.5 kg/m2 (p = 0.047). HbA1c was unchanged (5.0±0.5%). FEV1 improved in both groups (+11% and + 7% of predicted value; p < 0.001; p = 0.013). Conclusion: Combined CFTR modulator therapies are correlated with a decrease in insulin doses and positive effects on BMI and FEV1. HOMA indices did not change on tezacaftor + ivacaftor among CF patients without diabetes.

Closed-loop insulin delivery in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CRISTAL): a multicentre randomized controlled trial - study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII, insulin pumps) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) in pregnancy, achieving recommended pregnancy glycaemic targets (3.5-7.8 mmol/L or 63-140 mg/dL) remains challenging. Consequently, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes remains high. Outside pregnancy, hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems have led to a paradigm shift in the management of T1D, with 12% higher time in glucose target range (TIR) compared to conventional CSII. However, most commercially available HCL systems are currently not approved for use in pregnancy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of the MiniMed™ 780G HCL system (Medtronic) in T1D in pregnancy. METHODS: In this international, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT), we will compare the MiniMed™ 780G HCL system to standard of care (SoC) in T1D in pregnancy. Women aged 18-45 years with T1D diagnosis of at least one year, HbA1c ≤ 86 mmol/mol (≤ 10%), and confirmed singleton pregnancy up to 11 weeks 6 days will be eligible. After providing written informed consent, all participants will wear a similar CGM system (Guardian™ 3 or Guardian™ 4 CGM) during a 10-day run-in phase. After the run-in phase, participants will be randomised 1:1 to 780G HCL (intervention) or SoC [control, continuation of current T1D treatment with multiple daily injections (MDI) or CSII and any type of CGM] stratified according to centre, baseline HbA1c (< 53 vs. ≥ 53 mmol/mol or < 7 vs. ≥ 7%), and method of insulin delivery (MDI or CSII). The primary outcome will be the time spent within the pregnancy glucose target range, as measured by the CGM at four time points in pregnancy: 14-17, 20-23, 26-29, and 33-36 weeks. Prespecified secondary outcomes will be overnight TIR, time below range (TBR: <3.5 mmol/L or < 63 mg/dL), and overnight TBR. Other outcomes will be exploratory. The planned sample size is 92 participants. The study will end after postpartum discharge from hospital. Analyses will be performed according to intention-to-treat as well as per protocol. DISCUSSION: This large RCT will evaluate a widely used commercially available HCL system in T1D in pregnancy. Recruitment began in January 2021 and was completed in October 2022. Study completion is expected in May 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04520971. Registration date: August 20, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04520971.

Contraception and diabetes: Which modalities should we consider in 2021?

Diabetes affects many women of reproductive age. Choice of contraceptive method is essential in order to combine efficacy and the patient's wishes, while taking into account the potential side effects. In this review, we will discuss the different methods available for women with diabetes, focusing the discussion on their metabolic and general effects. We will not discuss the side effects and contraindications common to all women, whether they have diabetes or not. The objective is to try to identify an algorithm to help in the decision to choose the most suitable contraceptive method for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

An elevated 1-h post- load glucose level during the oral glucose tolerance test detects prediabetes.

AIM: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnosis of dysglycemic states by conventional oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) criteria (fasting and 2-h plasma glucose) with the 1-h post-load plasma glucose level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 34 individuals (mean age: 55±13years; BMI: 27.7±6.3kg/m2) at risk for prediabetes were administered a 75g OGTT. Individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or prediabetes were identified according to fasting and/or 2-h plasma glucose (PG) concentrations. Subsequently, subjects were divided in 2 groups: group 1 (n=21) with a 1-h PG<155mg/dl and group 2 (n=13) with a 1-h PG≥155mg/dl. HOMA was performed to assess ß-cell function and insulin sensitivity. RESULTS: NGT or prediabetes based on conventional criteria correlated with the 1-h PG

ROOTS: A multicenter study in Belgium to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of liraglutide (Victoza®) in type 2 diabetic patients.

AIMS: The ROOTS study was an observational study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of liraglutide (Victoza(®)), a GLP-1 receptor analog, in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control despite conventional antihyperglycaemic dual therapy. The primary objective was to assess glycaemic control while using liraglutide under normal clinical practice conditions. The primary endpoint was to estimate the proportion of patients achieving improved glycaemic control defined as a HbA1c<7% or with a decrease of ≥1% after 12 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 245 subjects. They received liraglutide in addition to their usual dual therapy (metformin and sulfonylureas or pioglitazone). Age and duration (mean±SD) of diabetes were 58±10 and 9±5 years respectively. Body mass index was 33.9±6.2 kg/m(2). RESULTS: HbA1c decreased from 9.12%±1.28 at baseline to 7.54%±1.12 after one year follow-up (p<0.001). The primary endpoint was achieved in 66.5% of patients. In parallel, we observed a reduction of BMI from baseline 33.9±6.2 to 32.8±6.3 kg/m(2) (p<0.001). At 12 months, 64.6% of the patients received liraglutide at a dosage of 1.2 mg/day, 32.7% received 1.8 mg and 2.7% 0.6 mg. Adverse drug reactions were present in 24% of subjects, most frequently gastrointestinal disorders (11.4%), mainly nausea (6.9%) and no pancreatic events. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with liraglutide was associated with a marked improvement in glycaemic control in daily routine practice as well as with a reduction of weight, without major side effects.

Glucose homeostasis and genotype-phenotype interplay in cystic fibrosis patients with CFTR gene deltaF508 mutation.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the clinical phenotype of adolescent/adult patients with cystic fibrosis, according to heterozygosity or homozygosity for cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) deltaF508 mutation, and to analyze their characteristics according to glucose tolerance status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 76 cystic fibrosis patients with CFTR deltaF508 mutation (33 heterozygous and 43 homozygous) stratified according to normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 51) or abnormal glucose homeostasis (AGH) (impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or diabetes; n = 25) had their homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) of beta-cell function and of insulin sensitivity and hyperbolic product (beta-cell function x insulin sensitivity [B x S]) measured. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency was inferred from pancreatine requirements. Clinical effects of insulin therapy on weight and lung function were recorded. RESULTS: AGH was observed in 24 and 40% of heterozygous and homozygous subjects, respectively. AGH patients were older than NGT patients (mean +/- SD age 29 +/- 10 vs. 23 +/- 8 years, P = 0.006), and their beta-cell function was lower (93 +/- 49 vs. 125 +/- 51%, P = 0.011). Insulin sensitivity values were comparable in NGT and AGH patients. A lower B x S product was observed in AGH, although it was nonsignificant when adjusted for error propagation. Pancreatic insufficiency was observed in 52 and 100% of heterozygous and homozygous patients (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-diabetes and diabetes represent frequent comorbidities in CFTR deltaF508 mutation in the homozygous or heterozygous states. Impairment of insulin secretion, as shown by HOMA, is an important determinant when compared with the magnitude of compensation from insulin sensitivity. Given the high prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance, screening for (pre-)diabetes is mandatory. Insulin supplementation in diabetic subjects with CFTR deltaF508 mutation seems a rational therapy for consideration, although this does not preclude that therapy directed toward insulin resistance could also interact.