Parental perceptions regarding mandatory mouthguard use in competitive youth soccer.

OBJECTIVE: To understand factors that influence parental perceptions regarding mandatory mouthguard use in competitive youth soccer. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A web based survey of parents whose 8-14 year old children participated in outdoor competitive youth soccer during the fall of 2002. Questions focused on: previous injury, education provided, dentist/physician recommendations, and parental perceptions of mouthguard use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcome variable was parental agreement with the statement "mouthguards should be mandatory for competitive youth soccer". Logistic regression and chi(2) were performed using STATA 8.0. RESULTS: Altogether 120 parents participated. The children had a mean (SD) age of 11.8 (1.5) years and 48% were female; 14% wore mouthguards and 11% suffered orofacial injuries. Nineteen percent of parents reported receiving educational material from the youth soccer organization. Although 92% of parents believed that mouthguards were effective in reducing orofacial injuries, only one half agreed that mouthguards should be mandatory. Thirty percent of respondents reported that their dentist/physician recommended mouthguards for competitive youth soccer. Logistic regression showed that dentist/physician recommendation and parental female gender were independently associated with parental agreement for mandatory mouthguard use (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 7.3; odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.5). CONCLUSIONS: Few athletes wear mouthguards during competitive youth soccer. Health care professionals in this study did not capitalize on the apparent influence they have on parental beliefs regarding mouthguard use. Efforts are needed by both health professionals and soccer organizations to educate parents about orofacial injuries and mouthguard use in competitive youth soccer.

ST segment elevation and the prediction of hospital life-threatening complications: the role of right ventricular and posterior leads.

UNLABELLED: Accurate prognosis in suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is essential for appropriate use of thrombolytic therapy and primary angioplasty. However, previous models may be limited because the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) does not examine the right ventricular (RV) and posterior myocardium. We evaluated ST segment elevation (STSE) in posterior (V7-V9) and RV (V4R-V6R) leads to determine their predictive value for hospital life-threatening complications (HLTCs). METHOD AND RESULTS: This prospective trial of seven Midwestern hospital emergency departments (EDs) had inclusion criteria of age 35 years, chest pain suggestive of ischemia, and coronary care unit (CCU) admission. ECG leads were test positive if STSE was > 0.1 mV. Patients were positive for HLTCs if ED or inpatient hospital course included: ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia, second- or third-degree block, shock, arrest, or death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test each lead's association with HLTCs. Of 533 patients, 64.7% (345/533) had AMI and 15.8% (85/533) had HLTCs. The sensitivity of 18 leads for HLTCS was increased by 5.8%, but specificity decreased by 8.2%. ECG subgroups by STSE were associated with the following HLTC rates: inferior/+RV (32.4%); anterior (29.5%), lateral (23.1%), inferior RV (17.9%), and posterior (16.2%). V1 (odds = 3.2) and V6R (odds = 3.1) were statistically significant independent predictors. CONCLUSION: Posterior and RV leads did not increase the ECG's overall prognostic value, but in the presence of inferior STSE, were associated with low and high complication rates, respectively. Right and left precordial leads were the best predictors of HTLCs.