RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Infections are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). They primarily occur during the first course of induction chemotherapy and may increase the risk of leukaemia relapse, due to a significant delay in consolidation therapy. The intensification of induction chemotherapy and the use of non-conventional drugs such as fludarabine are considered responsible for the increased risk of infections. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analysed the infections occurred in 224 newly diagnosed AML patients =65 yr, consecutively treated between 1997 and 2002 with an induction regimen including fludarabine, arabinosyl cytosine and idarubicin, with or without etoposide (FLAI/FLAIE), in the context of three multicentric prospective trials (AML97, AML99, AML02). RESULTS: During the induction phase, 146 (65%) patients experienced fever of undetermined origin (FUO), 30 (13%) and 47 (21%) patients had Gram-negative and positive bacteremias, respectively, and 10 (4%) patients developed a probable/proven invasive fungal infection (IFI). The fatality rate for Gram-negative, Gram-positive bacteremias and probable/proven IFI was 10%, 8% and 60% respectively. During consolidation, 75 (35%) patients had FUO, 43 (20%) and 40 (19%) patients had Gram-negative and positive bacteremias, respectively, and 5 (2%) patients developed a probable/proven IFI. The fatality rate for Gram-negative, Gram-positive bacteremias and probable/proven IFI was 14%, 5% and 80% respectively. Interestingly, the overall incidence of microbiologically documented infections during induction was 38% and the incidence of probable/proven IFIs during the induction/consolidation programme was 7%. No infections caused by viruses or opportunistic pathogens were observed neither during induction, nor during consolidation. CONCLUSIONS: These data, although retrospectively collected, suggest that fludarabine-based chemotherapy is not associated with an increased incidence of infections, in particular IFIs, compared to conventional regimens commonly used for AML induction.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/mortalidade , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Micoses/mortalidade , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Bacteriemia/induzido quimicamente , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Feminino , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Febre/mortalidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/induzido quimicamente , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Incidência , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Micoses/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem , Vidarabina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
One hundred and six patients aged =60 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treated with fludarabine-based regimens (cases) were matched with 106 AML patients treated with conventional non-fludarabine-based regimens (controls). The cases and controls were matched by expression of the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein (MDR-Pgp), measured by flow cytometry as mean fluorescence index (MFI), cytogenetics, and age. The complete remission (CR) rate of the cases was 61% among the MDR-Pgp-positive (pos(ve)) patients (MFI >/= 6) vs. 75% among the MDR-Pgp-negative (neg(ve)) ones (MFI < 6) (P = 0.16). Conversely, in the controls, the CR rate was 44% among the MDR-Pgp-pos(ve) patients vs. 67% among the MDR-Pgp-neg(ve) ones (P = 0.02). The 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of MDR-Pgp-pos(ve) cases were significantly longer than those of MDR-Pgp-pos(ve) controls (DFS, 28.1% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.004; OS, 33.5% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.01). This difference was not found among the MDR-Pgp-neg(ve) patients. By univariate (P = 0.007) and multivariate (P = 0.007) analysis, the MDR-Pgp-pos(ve) phenotype was negatively correlated with CR and it emerged as the most important independent negative prognostic factor, after cytogenetics. Our study confirms the prognostic impact of the MDR phenotype in AML and strongly suggests fludarabine-based induction treatments as a promising strategy for MDR-Pgp-pos(ve) AML patients. In this setting of patients, large prospective randomised studies should be planned.