Project to improve storage, access and incorporation of advance care plans in a regional Australian hospital.

PROBLEM: Despite acknowledged benefits, the impact of advance care planning on usual care is inconsistent. DESIGN: Quality improvement study. SETTING: A Western Australian regional hospital. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: This project aimed to create a system for storing, accessing and incorporating advance care planning documents in clinical care. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: Interventions over 18 months addressed four areas: medical records processes for receiving and processing advance care planning documents; information technology solutions for electronic storage and alerts; clerical staff duties in regards advance care planning documents; and clinician education. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: There was a 12-fold increase in advance care planning documents stored electronically and 100% of audited notes had correct filing of advance care planning documents with an alert in place at follow-up audit. Clinician recognition of the presence of an advance care planning document improved. Detailed examples of interventions are described. LESSONS LEARNT: Repeated exposure to different forms of advance care planning education, in conjunction with simple but effective system changes can make a difference in changing established hospital practice. Final impact of these changes on end-of-life care requires further audit.

Advance care planning uptake among patients with severe lung disease: a randomised patient preference trial of a nurse-led, facilitated advance care planning intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Advance care planning (ACP) clarifies goals for future care if a patient becomes unable to communicate their own preferences. However, ACP uptake is low, with discussions often occurring late. This study assessed whether a systematic nurse-led ACP intervention increases ACP in patients with advanced respiratory disease. DESIGN: A multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial with preference arm. SETTING: Metropolitan teaching hospital and a rural healthcare network. PARTICIPANTS: 149 participants with respiratory malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or interstitial lung disease. INTERVENTION: Nurse facilitators offered facilitated ACP discussions, prompted further discussions with doctors and loved ones, and assisted participants to appoint a substitute medical decision-maker (SDM) and complete an advance directive (AD). OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary measure was formal (AD or SDM) or informal (discussion with doctor) ACP uptake assessed by self-report (6 months) and medical notes audit. Secondary measures were the factors predicting baseline readiness to undertake ACP, and factors predicting postintervention ACP uptake in the intervention arm. RESULTS: At 6 months, formal ACP uptake was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the intervention arm (54/106, 51%), compared with usual care (6/43, 14%). ACP discussions with doctors were also significantly higher (p<0.005) in the intervention arm (76/106, 72%) compared with usual care (20/43, 47%). Those with a strong preference for the intervention were more likely to complete formal ACP documents than those randomly allocated. Increased symptom burden and preference for the intervention predicted later ACP uptake. Social support was positively associated with ACP discussion with loved ones, but negatively associated with discussion with doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led facilitated ACP is acceptable to patients with advanced respiratory disease and effective in increasing ACP discussions and completion of formal documents. Awareness of symptom burden, readiness to engage in ACP and relevant psychosocial factors may facilitate effective tailoring of ACP interventions and achieve greater uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000255684.