A psychosocial risk assessment model (PRAM) for use with pregnant and postpartum women in primary care settings.

Recognition of high rates of mental health morbidity and mortality that affect women during the perinatal period has prompted the development of psychosocial risk assessment programs. Designed to identify women, at risk, during routine health checks and delivered by primary care health service providers, these fit within a primary prevention and early intervention strategic approach to the reduction of perinatal mental illness and reflect an integrated approach to perinatal health services delivery. This paper describes the development and use of the psychosocial risk assessment model (PRAM) at the Royal Hospital for Women in Sydney, Australia. Data is presented on 2,142 women who attended the Antenatal Midwives Clinic between 2002 and 2005. The PRAM guides primary care staff to quickly identify women experiencing emotional distress and/or psychosocial problems during pregnancy or postnatal checks. Measures used in pregnancy are the symptom-based Edinburgh Depression Scale and the psychosocial risk-based Antenatal Risk Questionnaire. In postnatal setting the Postnatal Risk Questionnaire is used. Scores can be used to compute a Psychosocial Risk Index (PRI) to guide individualized care planning, define needs for referral and classify groups for clinical and research purposes. Based on the PRI, among 2,142 women assessed in pregnancy 70.6% were classified as low/no risk (no interventions indicated currently), 24.1% as medium risk (in need of monitoring), and 5.3% as high risk (complex). The PRAM offers a conceptual framework, methods and measures for brief psychosocial assessment with clinical and research applications. Postpartum follow up studies of women assessed during pregnancy have commenced. Randomized controlled trials and cross-cultural studies are now indicated to strengthen the evidence base for the model.

Clinical issues in perinatal mental health: new developments in the detection and treatment of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents evidence of new developments in the detection and treatment of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders that have relevance for clinicians. METHOD: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and The Cochrane Library Database for the interval 1995-2005 for papers published in English. RESULTS: New developments were identified as follows: i) Broadening frames of reference within perinatal mental health. ii) Impact of disorders upon offspring. iii) Identifying women at risk of mental health problems. iv) Prevention and early intervention strategies. v) Treatments. CONCLUSION: Perinatal mental health is a rapidly expanding field that impacts upon the health and wellbeing of all members of families with infants and young children. An evidence base for best practice is slowly emerging but considerable work is still needed in relation to the identification of women at risk, standardisation of diagnostic procedures, reduction of adverse outcomes for women and infants, prevention, early intervention, and treatment of clinical disorders.