Correction to: Introducing Students of Color to Health Sciences Research: An Evaluation of the Health Disparities Summer Internship Program.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.

Introducing Students of Color to Health Sciences Research: An Evaluation of the Health Disparities Summer Internship Program.

The goal of this analysis is to assess the effectiveness of a summer program designed to introduce high school students of color to health disparities research. A total of 73 students (69.9% Black, 68.5% female and 80.6% either junior/senior) participated in the 4-week Health Disparities Summer Internship Program (HDSIP) during the years 2012-2015. Students attended lectures covering topics such as health disparities, community-based participatory research (CBPR), immigrant health, and policy and advocacy. While working with community-based organizations, students gained hands-on experience related to issues discussed in class. Students completed research projects and provided suggestions for health policy change. Pre/post surveys were completed to evaluate the program. After participating in the HDSIP, students demonstrated heightened awareness of the social determinants of health, especially in regards to racial discrimination (p = .023); borderline statistically significant increases were shown for income (p = .082), community safety (p = .058), and healthcare access (p = .076). Most students (82.1%) planned to advocate for changes in their community; an increase from the initial 65.2% (p = .052). About nine out of ten students (89.6%) reported being satisfied with the summer program; the majority reported improvement in analytical skills, CBPR methods, and oral/communication skills. Increasing diversity in the health workforce has widely been proposed as a means of addressing health disparities. Introducing minority students to health professions can serve as a catalyst for lasting changes in health outcomes. The HDSIP has increased students' awareness of social determinants of health and has fostered their interest in improving the health of minority populations.

Sleep health in a black community sample.

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep health is a major health disparity and public health concern. The primary goal of this study was to accurately obtain the rates of self-reported sleep disorders, sleep dysfunction, and daytime sleepiness in a true community sample of black adults. METHODS: We used a community-based participatory research design to identify a health priority to design a study that could (a) provide an accurate assessment of the problem, (b) help to better understand the barriers to treatment, and (c) provide the community with access to care. Subsequently, 470 black adults, approached at salons, barber shops, and churches throughout Brooklyn participated. They underwent anthropometric measurement and completed a self-reported sleep assessment. RESULTS: Sleep disorders (insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea) were found in 34% of the sample, and 75% of the population that had a sleep disorder was unaware of it. Fourteen percent of the sample self-identified as having obstructive sleep apnea, 38.0% reported having Insomnia, and 38% reported having excessive daytime somnolence. People with a sleep disorder described less satisfaction with their sleep quality and poorer health than did those without a sleep disorder. CONCLUSION: The variability in the reported rates of sleep disorders in black samples suggests that the true rates of these conditions are not well-known. However, the large number of black individuals who have sleep disturbances warrants increased scientific and public health attention. In addition, with increased community involvement in research, there can be increased buy-in and greater accuracy in the assessments and reduced barriers to treatment.

Lessons learned from building an infrastructure for community-engaged research.

Before community-based participatory research (CBPR) can commence an infrastructure needs to be established whereby both academic researchers and community members can participate in CBPR as equitable partners throughout the research process. OBJECTIVES: We describe the key principles of the Brooklyn Health Disparities Center (BHDC), a community-academic-government partnership, to guide the development for an infrastructure to support, increase, and sustain the capacity of academics and community members to engage in CBPR to address cardiovascular health disparities in Brooklyn, New York. METHODS: The guiding principles of the BHDC consist of 1) promoting equitable and collaborative partnerships 2) enhancing research capacity and 3) building/sustaining trust. Delphi survey, youth summer internship programs, and workshops were among the tools utilized in enhancing community capacity. RESULTS: Several lessons were gleaned: design programs that are capable of building trust, skills, capacity, and interest of community members concomitantly; be flexible in terms of the priorities and objectives that the partners seek to focus on as these may change over time; and build a groundswell of local advocates to embrace the research and policy agenda of the BHDC.

[Cocaine abuse in Vienna and European cities--a multi-center study]. / Kokainmissbrauch in Wien und in europäischen Metropolen--eine multizentrische Studie.

INTRODUCTION: As cocaine consumption seems to have increased over the last decades, the EU has funded this multi-center, cross-sectional survey to investigate cocaine consumption in three different target groups. The study was conducted by the Addiction Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University Vienna and other nine European cities. METHODS: Data were collected by structured face-to-face interviews. The sample was composed of 211 cocaine abusers out of three target groups: (1) treatment group undergoing opioid maintenance therapy, (2) marginalized scene group and (3) integrated party group. Sociodemographic data such as age, education, employment, monthly expenses on cocaine/crack, data on consumption patterns, physical and mental health and personal needs regarding cocaine consumption were evaluated. Urine toxicology results for cocaine in the treatment group completed the analysis. RESULTS: The marginalized scene group was the oldest with a mean age of 29.35 years, with the highest unemployment rate (mean 25.11 days) and the longest duration of cocaine consumption (mean 5.80 years). They had the highest cocaine consumption pattern with a mean of 22.32 days within the last month. On average 1969 Euros/months was spent for their addiction. The treatment group had the lowest school education with a mean of 10.36 years, but showed a sufficient insight in their cocaine problem. However, the party group (with the lowest mean age, 25.64 years) highly underestimated their drug problem, the mean amount of money they spent for their addiction was 588.99 Euro/months. Structured urine toxicology between 1996 and 2002 in patients undergoing opioid maintenance therapy ("treatment group") revealed a significant increase of concomitant cocaine consumption (1996: 33.1%; 2002: 40.2%; p = 0.044). DISCUSSION: The European trend of increased cocaine use could also be observed in Vienna. One of the greatest barriers for establishing adequate treatment settings for this target group is the difficulty to reach this population. In addition, multiple substance abuse seems to be one of the predominating patterns of cocaine consumption and this aspect should be integrated within treatment (in the treatment and scene groups additional heroin and benzodiapzepines abuse is observed, in the party group intensive alcohol consumption). The Viennese results are in line with those of the other European cities; however, it could not be confirmed that consumption of crack cocaine and binge play a similarly significant role as in cities such as Hamburg or London.