In vitro activity of eravacycline and comparator agents against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with cancer.

Background: Bacterial infections are common in patients with cancer, and many bacteria have developed resistance to currently used antibiotics. Objectives: We evaluated the in vitro activity of eravacycline (a recently developed fluorocycline) and comparators against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with cancer. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI-approved methodology and interpretive criteria for 255 Gram-positive and 310 Gram-negative bacteria. MIC and susceptibility percentage were calculated according to CLSI and FDA breakpoints when available. Results: Eravacycline had potent activity against most Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA. Of 80 Gram-positive isolates with available breakpoints, 74 (92.5%) were susceptible to eravacycline. Eravacycline had potent activity against most Enterobacterales, including ESBL-producing organisms. Of 230 Gram-negative isolates with available breakpoints, 201 (87.4%) were susceptible to eravacycline. Eravacycline had the best activity among comparators against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with 83% susceptibility. Eravacycline was also active against many non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria, with the lowest MIC90 value among comparators. Conclusions: Eravacycline was active against many clinically significant bacteria isolated from patients with cancer, including MRSA, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli. Eravacycline might play an important role in the treatment of bacterial infections in patients with cancer, and additional clinical evaluation is warranted.

The in vitro activity of delafloxacin and comparator agents against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with cancer.

Background: Fluoroquinolones are used for infection prevention in high-risk patients with haematological malignancies. Fluoroquinolones are active against many Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) but are less active against Gram-positive organisms. We evaluated the in vitro activity of delafloxacin and selected comparators against 560 bacterial pathogens isolated exclusively from patients with cancer. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and time-kill studies were performed using CLSI-approved methodology and interpretive criteria for 350 Gram-positive organisms and 210 GNB that had been recently isolated from patients with cancer. Results: Delafloxacin was more active than ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS. Overall, 63% of staphylococcal isolates were susceptible to delafloxacin, 37% to ciprofloxacin and 39% to levofloxacin. Activity of delafloxacin against most Enterobacterales was similar to that of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Escherichia coli and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates had low susceptibility rates to the three tested fluoroquinolones. In time-kill studies delafloxacin and levofloxacin decreased the bacterial load to 3.0 log10 in 8 and 13 h, respectively, using 8 × MIC. Conclusions: Delafloxacin is more active than ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against S. aureus but has substantial gaps in coverage against GNB. Resistance to all three fluoroquinolones could be high among leading GNB such as E. coli and P. aeruginosa, particularly in cancer centres where these agents are widely used as prophylactic agents.

In vitro activity of imipenem/releactam and comparator agents against clinical bacterial isolates from patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) are currently the predominant bacterial pathogens in patients with cancer. Many GNB have become problematic due to the widespread emergence of resistance. Imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) is a combination of the carbapenem imipenem with relebactam, a non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor. It is active against most pathogenic GNB including many that are resistant to other agents. We compared its in vitro activity to six other agents against 490 GNB recovered exclusively from patients with cancer because such data are scarce. METHODS: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microbroth dilution methods were used for susceptibility testing. Whole genome sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) was performed on 30 selected isolates. RESULTS: IMI/REL was active against 98% of Enterobacterales and 87% of non-Enterobacterales isolates (excluding Stenotrophomonas maltophilia). It had potent activity against extended spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and other Enterobacterales (Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter Spp., and Serratia Spp.) and moderate activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. IMI/REL had potent activity against Achromobacter Spp., non-multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Sphingomonas paucimobilis and moderate activity against multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa. Overall, IMI/REL was associated with the lowest number of nonsusceptible isolates compared with six other agents (imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, and tigecycline) commonly used in patients with cancer. Whole genome sequencing performed on 30 resistant isolates (10 each of E. coli, K. pneumonia, and P. aeruginosa) did not reveal any predominant mechanism of resistance to IMI/REL. CONCLUSION: Its in vitro activity indicates that IMI/REL might have a role to play in the treatment of Gram-negative infections in patients with cancer.

Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Isolates from Cancer Patients.

Cefiderocol inhibited 97.5% of 478 Gram-negative isolates from cancer patients at ≤4 mg/liter. It had potent activity against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-positive Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Acinetobacter species isolates. Amikacin, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem had appreciable activity against non-CRE Enterobacteriaceae No comparators were active against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Only trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had appreciable activity against S. maltophilia isolates. Overall, cefiderocol was associated with the lowest level of resistance.

In vitro activity of tedizolid and comparator agents against clinical Gram-positive isolates recovered from patients with cancer.

A total of 248 Gram-positive isolates from cancer patients were tested for in-vitro susceptibility to tedizolid and 3 comparator agents using CLSI broth microdilution methodology. Tedizolid inhibited 97% of isolates at ≤0.5µg/ml. It was active against all Gram-positive species and consistently had 8 fold lower MICs than linezolid, although based on % susceptibility using CLSI breakpoints, most isolates were also susceptible to the comparators. Tedizolid was active against MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of ≥1.0µg/ml.

In vitro activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents against Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates from cancer patients.

Bacterial infections are common in cancer patients. Ceftaroline (CFT) is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against most Gram-positive organisms (GPOs) and many Gram-negative organisms. In this study, the in vitro activity of CFT was compared with vancomycin (VAN), daptomycin (DAP), linezolid (LZD), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (SXT) and tigecycline (TIG) against bacteria (predominantly blood culture isolates) isolated from cancer patients in 2014 and 2015. CFT was active against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (MS-CoNS) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) with MIC90 values (minimum inhibitory concentration that inhibited 90% of the isolates) of 0.25, 2.0, 0.12 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. MIC90 values for other GPOs were: Bacillus spp., >8.0 mg/L; Corynebacterium spp., 2.0 mg/L; Micrococcus spp., <0.06 mg/L; viridans group streptococci, 0.5 mg/L; Streptococcus pneumoniae, 0.25 mg/L; and Streptococcus spp., <0.06 mg/L. Among the comparator agents, VAN, DAP, TIG and LZD were active against the majority of GPOs tested. CFT also had moderate activity against common extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-negative Gram-negative bacilli such as Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus mirabilis and Serratia spp.

Time-kill determination of the bactericidal activity of telavancin and vancomycin against clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cancer patients.

The bactericidal activity of vancomycin and telavancin was compared against 4 clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates recently recovered from cancer patients, using minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC):MIC ratios and time-kill studies. All 4 isolates were susceptible to both agents based on individual MIC values. The 2 methodologies for assessing bactericidal activity produced variable results. Telavancin appeared to have somewhat better bactericidal activity than vancomycin based on narrower MBC:MIC ratios. However, based on the results of the time-kill studies, neither agent demonstrated reliable bactericidal activity (defined as a ≥3 log10 reduction of the starting inoculum at the end of 24hours) against these organisms. These findings might be of some therapeutic importance in certain clinical settings and/or specific patient populations (such as febrile neutropenic patients) in whom potent bactericidal activity is either desired or preferred.

High Rates of Nonsusceptibility to Ceftazidime-avibactam and Identification of New Delhi Metallo-ß-lactamase Production in Enterobacteriaceae Bloodstream Infections at a Major Cancer Center.

Resistance to the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has infrequently been reported in the United States. We report unexpectedly high rates of resistance to CAZ-AVI in CRE bloodstream isolates at our institution associated with the nonoutbreak spread of New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase in diverse Enterobacteriaceae species.

In vitro activity of dalbavancin and five comparator agents against common and uncommon Gram-positive organisms isolated from cancer patients.

Dalbavancin is a long acting, bactericidal lipoglycopeptide. Its in vitro activity was compared with that of vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and levofloxacin against 241 Gram-positive organisms isolated from cancer patients. The rank order of potency for the glycopeptides based on MIC90 (µg ml(-1)), that is, the concentration of antimicrobial agent required to inhibit 90% of isolates tested was dalbavancin (0.12 µg ml(-1))>daptomycin (1.0 µg ml(-1))>vancomycin (2.0 µg ml(-1)) for coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus isolates (including methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains). Dalbavancin had potent activity against staphylococcal isolates with vancomycin MICs⩾1.0 µg ml(-1). TMP/SMX also had potent activity against staphylococci including methicillin-resistant strains, whereas levofloxacin had moderate to poor anti-staphylococcal activity. Dalbavancin also exhibited more potent activity than vancomycin and daptomycin against Bacillus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Micrococcus spp. and various streptococci (including Streptococcus pneumoniae, viridans group streptococci (VGS), beta-hemolytic streptococci and gamma-hemolytic streptococci). MBC determinations showed that dalbavancin had potent bactericidal activity against MRSA with no tolerance being detected. These data suggest that dalbavancin may be considered as an alternative to vancomycin, especially in institutions wherein a substantial proportion of infections are caused by organisms with vancomycin MICs⩾1.0 µg ml(-1).

Microbiological Assessment of Polymyxin B Components Tested Alone and in Combination.

We investigated the antimicrobial activity of four polymyxin B components, B1, B2, B3, and isoleucine (Ile)-B1, individually and in combination. B3 was the most active agent against all organisms tested except Acinetobacter baumannii, for which Ile-B1 was most active. One combination met the criteria for synergy, B3 plus Ile-B1. No combinations exhibited antagonism. The dominant components of polymyxin B products (B1 and B2) were associated with the lowest probability of improved antibacterial activity when combined.

In vitro activity of telavancin compared with vancomycin and linezolid against Gram-positive organisms isolated from cancer patients.

Telavancin is a dual action, bactericidal lipoglycopeptide. Its in vitro activity was compared with vancomycin and linezolid against 392 Gram-positive isolates from cancer patients. MIC90 values (µg ml(-1)) for telavancin, vancomycin and linezolid were determined for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible (MS), methicillin-resistant (MR), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), viridans group streptococci (VGS), Streptococcus pneumoniae, Bacillus species, Corynebacterium species and Micrococcus species. Telavancin had potent activity against ß-hemolytic streptococci and Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Whereas 100% of MRSA and 98% of MSSA had vancomycin MICs ⩾ 1.0 µg ml(-1) (minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) at which poor clinical responses have been reported), the highest telavancin MIC was 0.38 µg ml(-1). For CoNS, 95% of MS and 100% of MR isolates had vancomycin MICs ⩾ 1.0 µg ml(-1), whereas the highest telavancin MIC was 0.38 µg ml(-1). Furthermore, 48% of VGS had vancomycin MICs ⩾ 1.0 µg ml(-1), whereas the highest telavancin MIC was 0.064 µg ml(-1). A similar pattern was noticed for S. lugdunensis, Bacillus species, Corynebacterium species and ß-hemolytic streptococci. These data suggest that telavancin and linezolid have potent activity against most Gram-positive organisms that cause infections in cancer patients. Consequently, they may be considered as alternatives to vancomycin, especially in institutions wherein a substantial proportion of infections are caused by organisms with vancomycin MICs ⩾ 1.0 µg ml(-1).

Polymyxins: wisdom does not always come with age.

We currently face a lack of new antimicrobial therapies in an era of increasingly common multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The polymyxins have become last-line treatments for patients with MDR bacterial infections. An increasing body of published literature has attempted to answer questions about dosing, pharmacology, and susceptibility testing of these drugs, yet each takes for granted purity and potency of the 2 available polymyxin products. In the case of polymyxin B, true potency may vary by as much as 40% from the content reported in prescribing information. This poor accuracy is related to quality assurance assays established in the 1940s and currently in use, which have been shown to be significantly flawed in recent investigations. This review discusses the limitations of pharmacological knowledge about polymyxin antimicrobials, the clinical impact of these limitations, and suggestions for further study of these drugs in order to optimize their use clinically.

Spectrum of gram-positive bacteraemia and in vitro activities of daptomycin, linezolid and vancomycin against organisms isolated from cancer patients.

Gram-positive organisms are the predominant bacterial pathogens in cancer patients. A survey indicated that coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (29.5%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.0%), Enterococcus spp. (12.1%) and viridans group streptococci (VGS) (9.1%) are isolated most often. The rate of reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (minimum inhibitory concentration ≥1.0 µg/mL) was 100% for meticillin-susceptible S. aureus and 99% for meticillin-resistant S. aureus, and 100% for meticillin-susceptible CoNS and 98% for meticillin-resistant CoNS. More than 98% of these isolates were susceptible to daptomycin and linezolid. Daptomycin and linezolid had comparable in vitro activity to vancomycin against Bacillus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Rhodococcus spp., Micrococcus spp., Stomatococcus mucilaginosus and VGS. Both agents were active against the majority (95%) of vancomycin-resistant organisms, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Pediococcus spp. and Leuconostoc spp. These data suggest that daptomycin and linezolid have an adequate antimicrobial spectrum and potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive isolates from cancer patients and may be considered as alternatives to vancomycin for empirical or targeted therapy in this setting.

High-dose induction liposomal amphotericin B followed by de-escalation is effective in experimental Aspergillus terreus pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: Aspergillus terreus is considered to be resistant to amphotericin B (AMB). However, it is unknown whether higher daily doses of liposomal AMB (L-AMB) can overcome this resistance in vivo. We evaluated the efficacy and total lung homogenate AMB concentrations of escalating intravenous doses of L-AMB (3-20 mg/kg daily) versus an induction-de-escalation dosing strategy (10 mg/kg/day ×3 days, then 3 mg/kg/day) in an experimental neutropenic murine model of A. terreus pneumonia. METHODS: BALB/c mice were rendered neutropenic with cyclophosphamide and administered cortisone acetate prior to intranasal inoculation (3.5 × 10(6) conidia) with A. terreus (Etest MIC 8 mg/L). Mice were then treated with L-AMB regimens for 5-7 days. The efficacy was assessed by animal survival and quantitative PCR lung fungal burden. Total AMB lung homogenate concentrations were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Compared with untreated controls, 10 mg/kg/day L-AMB prolonged survival (mean >7 versus 3-4 days, P < 0.003) and reduced A. terreus lung fungal burden (median log10 conidial DNA 5.0 versus 6.7, P < 0.05). Daily L-AMB regimens >10 mg/kg/day were associated with poorer survival and higher lung fungal burden. The induction-de-escalation strategy of 10 mg/kg/day ×3 days followed by 3 mg/kg/day was as effective as 10 mg/kg daily dosing, and resulted in higher mean AMB lung homogenate concentrations compared with a continuous 10 mg/kg regimen (23.2 ±â€Š6.7 versus 16.4 ±â€Š4.4 µg/g, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: A high-dose induction-de-escalation L-AMB dosing strategy was an effective treatment for experimental A. terreus pneumonia in neutropenic mice.

Comparison of posaconazole versus weekly amphotericin B lipid complex for the prevention of invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Antifungal prophylaxis is shown to decrease the risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI) after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Posaconazole has been approved for prophylaxis in HSCT. However, it is only available orally given three times per day. We evaluated once weekly intravenous amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), given its broad-spectrum antifungal activity and prolonged half-life (172 hr), as an alternative prophylaxis in HSCT. METHODS: We prospectively randomized allogeneic HSCT patients to receive 7.5 mg/kg of intravenous ABLC weekly or 200 mg of posaconazole orally three times per day as prophylaxis for up to 6 weeks. Endpoints were the incidence of IFI and drug-related toxicities. ABLC was discontinued if creatinine level increased to two times the baseline or greater. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were randomized; 40 received at least one dose of the drug and were included in the analysis: 19 received ABLC and 21 received posaconazole. All patients received tacrolimus. Apache II score, neutropenia, and creatinine, bilirubin, and alanine aminotransferase levels were similar in both groups at baseline. One patient in the ABLC arm and none in posaconazole arm developed IFI (5% vs. 0%, P=0.48). More patients in the ABLC arm doubled their serum creatinine (53% vs. 5%, P=0.001) necessitating discontinuation of the study drug. CONCLUSION: High-dose prophylactic ABLC in HSCT was associated with nephrotoxicity that could be aggravated by the concomitant use of other nephrotoxic agents. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of weekly high-dose ABLC as antifungal prophylaxis in patients at lower risk for nephrotoxicity.

Voriconazole pre-exposure selects for breakthrough mucormycosis in a mixed model of Aspergillus fumigatus-Rhizopus oryzae pulmonary infection.

Mucormycosis is an uncommon fungal infection that has been increasingly reported in severely immunocompromised patients receiving Aspergillus-active antifungals. Although clinical studies and pre-clinical animal models have suggested a unique predisposition for breakthrough mucormycoses in patients receiving voriconazole, no study has specifically evaluated the selection dynamics of various Aspergillus -active antifungal classes in vivo. We utilized an Aspergillus fumigatus:Rhizopus oryzae (10:1) model of mixed fungal pneumonia in corticosteroid-immunosuppressed mice to compare the selection dynamics of daily liposomal-amphotericin B (L-AMB), micafungin (MCFG) and voriconazole (VRC) therapy. A. fumigatus and R. oryzae lung fungal burden were serially monitored in parallel using non-cross-amplifying quantitative real-time PCR assays for each fungal genus. Additionally, experiments were performed where the R. oryzae component of the mixed inoculum was serially-passed on VRC-containing agar before animal infection. We found prior exposure to voriconazole in vitro, consistently resulted in a 1.5-2 log 10 increase in R. oryzae fungal burden by day +5 in vivo relative to animals infected with the non-VRC preexposed inoculum, irrespective of the antifungal-treatment administered in mice (P ≤ 0.02 all treatment groups). Mice infected with the VRC-preexposed inoculum and subsequently treated with saline or VRC had the highest mortality rates (82-86%), followed by MCFG (55%) then L-AMB (39%, P = 0.04 vs. control). However, in vivo treatment alone with voriconazole alone did not consistently increase the virulence of non- voriconazole preexposed R. oryzae versus controls. We conclude that exposure of R. oryzae sporangiospores to voriconazole in vitro modulates the subsequent growth rate and/or virulence of the fungus in vivo, which reduces effectiveness of Mucorales-active antifungals. The mechanisms underlying this phenotypic change are unknown.

Comparative in vivo dose-dependent activity of caspofungin and anidulafungin against echinocandin-susceptible and -resistant Aspergillus fumigatus.

BACKGROUND: Echinocandin resistance in Aspergillus species is rare. We examined if mutations in FKS1 would result in a complete loss of echinocandin activity in vivo in an experimental model of aspergillosis. METHODS: Neutropenic mice were infected with either an echinocandin-susceptible Aspergillus fumigatus (AF 293) or an echinocandin-resistant A. fumigatus laboratory strain harbouring 'hot-spot' substitution in Fks1p (AF Ser678Pro). Mice then received daily treatment with either anidulafungin or caspofungin at varying dosages (0.25-16 mg/kg/day) for 5 days and Aspergillus lung fungal burden was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: Both strains produced histological evidence of progressive invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, but AF Ser678Pro was less virulent than AF 293, as evidenced by lower lung fungal burden and longer median survival time. At > 0.5 mg/kg/day, both anidulafungin and caspofungin reduced the lung fungal burden in neutropenic animals infected with AF 293, but had mixed efficacy against the resistant AF Ser678Pro strain. For caspofungin, the fungal burden was reduced only at doses <1 mg/kg/day. Anidulafungin also modestly reduced AF Ser678Pro lung fungal burden, but only at > 4 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lack of appreciable antifungal activity in vitro, both anidulafungin and caspofungin were still modestly effective in vivo against a laboratory-generated A. fumigatus mutant harbouring the Ser678Pro mutation in Fks1p. This persistent activity, combined with impaired fitness of the isolate in vivo, could partially explain why microbiologically documented echinocandin-resistance in Aspergillus species remains a rare clinical occurrence.

Escherichia coli resistance to quinolones at a comprehensive cancer center.

As part of Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection/USA Surveillance Programme, we monitored the occurrence of quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli over a 10-year period. A total of 271 E. coli isolates from our institution were tested over a 10-year period. Screening for quinolone resistance (qnr) gene was performed. A decline in susceptibility of E. coli isolates to quinolones and aminoglycosides was noted over the 10-year span (P < 0.0001), which was significantly reduced compared with the average susceptibility of all sites. Introduction of quinolone prophylaxis has led to a significant decline in susceptibility of E. coli to all quinolones. The organisms remain susceptible to carbapenems, cefepime, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Periodic surveillance allows for detection of resistance patterns and adjustment of empiric antibiotic choice in patients at high risk for infection.