The learning curve in robotic assisted knee arthroplasty is flattened by the presence of a surgeon experienced with robotic assisted surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning curve associated with robotic assisted knee arthroplasty (RAS KA). Therefore, the evaluation of the influence of an experienced surgeon on the overall team performance of three surgeons regarding the learning curve in RAS KA was investigated. It was hypothesized that the presence of an experienced surgeon flattens the learning curve and that there was no inflection point for the learning curve of the surgical team. METHODS: Fifty-five cases consisting of 31 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) and 24 unicompartmental arthroplasties (UKA) performed by three surgeons during 2021 were prospectively investigated. Single surgeon and team performance for operation time learning curve and inflection points were investigated using cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM). RESULTS: A downward trend line for individual surgeons and the team performance regarding the operation time learning curve was observed. No inflexion point was observed for the overall team performance regarding TKA and UKA. The surgeon that performed all cases with the assistance of the experienced surgeon had significantly shorter surgical times than the surgeon that only occasionally received assistance from the experienced surgeon (p = 0.004 TKA; p = 0.002 UKA). CONCLUSION: The presence of an experienced surgeon in robotically assisted knee arthroplasty can flatten the learning curve of the surgical team formerly unexperienced in robotic assisted systems. Manufacturers should provide expanded support during initial cases in centres without previous experience to robotic assisted knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Rehabilitation, clinical outcome and return to sporting activities after posterolateral elbow instability: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for rehabilitation concepts, clinical outcome and sporting performance after surgical or non-surgical treatment of Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the elbow (PLRI). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In order to identify any published clinical study reporting on rehabilitation concepts and sporting performance following surgical or non-surgical treatment of PLRI a systematic search in literature was conducted. Rehabilitation protocols were reviewed according to main rehabilitation protocol categories (bracing, range of motion [ROM], strengthening and return to sport [RTS]). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seven articles, including 148 patients met the inclusion criteria. Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) repair with sutures or suture anchors was reported in two studies. In four studies, treatment was an isolated graft reconstruction and in one study a repair or graft reconstruction was performed. No study reporting on conservative treatment was found. Bracing with initially limiting ROM was declared in all studies. Duration of immobilization varied from one day to six weeks postoperative. Limitation of ROM to 30° of elbow extension was reported in the majority of studies. Strengthening was allowed from six to eight weeks postoperative. Postoperative improvement in elbow range of motion was noted in all studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is agreement concerning bracing and limiting ROM following PLRI surgery there is currently no consensus in the rehabilitative- and conservative treatment modalities for patients with symptomatic PLRI. The majority of surgically treated patients with PLRI regain high acceptable results but further research is needed to determine the postoperative level of performance of these athletes.

Reattachment of the flexor and extensor tendons at the epicondyle in elbow instability: a biomechanical comparison of techniques.

BACKGROUND: Elbow dislocation represents a common injury, especially in the younger population. If treated surgically, the reattached tendons require a high amount of primary stability to allow for an early rehabilitation to avoid postoperative stiffness. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical properties of a single and a double row technique for reattachment of the common extensor and common flexor muscles origin. We hypothesized that the double row technique would provide greater stability in terms of pullout forces than the single row technique. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric specimens were randomized into two groups of fixation methods for the common extensor tendon or the common flexor tendon at the elbow (1): a single row technique using two knotted 3.0 mm suture anchors, and (2) a double row technique using an additional knotless 3.5 mm anchor. The repairs were cyclically loaded over 500 cycles at 1 Hz from 10 N to a maximum of 100 N (extensors) or 150 N (flexors), and then pulled to failure. Stiffness and maximum load at failure and mode of failure were recorded and calculated. RESULTS: No significant differences in stiffness were observed between the two techniques for both the extensor and flexor reattachment (P = 0.701 and P = 0.306, respectively). The mean maximum load at failure indicated that the double row construct was significantly stronger than the single row construct. This was found to be true for both the extensor and flexor reattachment (213.6; SD 78.7 N versus 384.1; SD 105.6 N, P = 0.010 and 203.7; SD 65.8 N versus 318.0; SD 64.6 N, P = 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The double row technique provides significant greater stability to the reattached common flexor or extensor origin to the medial or lateral epicondyle. Thus, it should be considered in the development of improved repair techniques for stabilizers of the elbow. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.