Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Pediatr ; 2024 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102225

RESUMO

Importance: The effects of probiotic interventions on colonization with resistant bacteria and early microbiome development in preterm infants remain to be clarified. Objective: To examine the efficacy of Bifidobacterium longum subsp infantis, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis (BB-12), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (La-5) probiotics to prevent colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms or highly epidemic bacteria (MDRO+) and to shape the microbiome of preterm infants toward the eubiotic state of healthy full-term infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: The multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, group sequential, phase 3 Priming Immunity at the Beginning of Life (PRIMAL) randomized clinical trial, conducted from April 2018 to June 2020, included infants with gestational age of 28 to 32 weeks at 18 German neonatal units. Data analyses were conducted from March 2020 to August 2023. Intervention: A total of 28 days of multistrain probiotics diluted in human milk/formula starting within the first 72 hours of life. Main Outcomes and Measures: Colonization with MDRO+ at day 30 of life (primary end point), late-onset sepsis and severe gastrointestinal complication (safety end points), and gut dysbiosis, ie, deviations from the microbiome of healthy, term infants (eubiosis score) based on 16-subunit ribosomal RNA and metagenomic sequencing. Results: Among the 643 infants randomized until the stop of recruitment based on interim results, 618 (median [IQR] gestational age, 31.0 [29.7-32.1] weeks; 333 male [53.9%]; mean [SD] birth weight, 1502 [369] g) had follow-up at day 30. The interim analysis with all available data from 219 infants revealed MDRO+ colonization in 43 of 115 infants (37.4%) in the probiotics group and in 39 of 104 infants (37.5%) in the control group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.54-1.81; P = .97). Safety outcomes were similar in both groups, ie, late-onset sepsis (probiotics group: 8 of 316 infants [2.5%]; control group: 12 of 322 infants [3.7%]) and severe gastrointestinal complications (probiotics group: 6 of 316 infants [1.9%]; control group: 7 of 322 infants [2.2%]). The probiotics group had higher eubiosis scores than the control group at the genus level (254 vs 258 infants; median scores, 0.47 vs 0.41; odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13) and species level (96 vs 83 infants; median scores, 0.87 vs 0.59; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19-1.38). Environmental uptake of the B infantis probiotic strain in the control group was common (41 of 84 [49%]), which was highly variable across sites and particularly occurred in infants with a sibling who was treated with probiotics. Conclusions and Relevance: Multistrain probiotics did not reduce the incidence of MDRO+ colonization at day 30 of life in preterm infants but modulated their microbiome toward eubiosis. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00013197.

2.
Front Pediatr ; 12: 1377982, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39026938

RESUMO

Background: Preterm birth and fetal growth restriction are the main determinants of perinatal mortality. In the absence of therapeutic interventions, management is restricted to the observation of fetal growth and fetoplacental perfusion to determine the timing of delivery. Fetal circulatory redistribution, known as "brain sparing," represents a sign of fetal hypoxia and has been implemented in algorithms for when to deliver. In the absence of any other option, the nitric oxide donor pentaerythrityl tetranitrate (PETN), which has been shown to improve fetoplacental flow and reduce preterm birth in high-risk patients, is offered to patients as a personal therapy attempt. The aim of this study was to evaluate determinants related to pregnancy, including PETN intake during pregnancy, on immediate neonatal outcomes in a cohort of growth-restricted infants born before 32 completed weeks of gestation. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 98 infants born with a birth weight below the 10th percentile before 32 completed weeks of gestation at our tertiary care center between 2010 and 2019. PETN was offered to all mothers with a history of severe adverse pregnancy outcomes who were at high risk of developing fetal growth restriction as an individual therapy attempt. Results: The mean gestational age at birth was 188.5 days, and the mean birth weight was 549 g, corresponding to a median percentile of three. In 73 (79.3%) cases, brain sparing occurred during pregnancy. A total of 22 (22.4%) neonates were stillborn, 20 died postnatally, and 37.3% developed a severe complication. Multivariable analysis revealed birth weight percentile, gestational age at birth, and gestational age when brain sparing first occurred to be robust predictors of mortality or severe neonatal morbidity. In 39 neonates of mothers taking PETN, this impact of brain sparing was not observed. Conclusion: Our study is the first to demonstrate a significant association between the early occurrence of brain-sparing and severe neonatal outcomes in a cohort of very early preterm, growth-restricted newborns. The data suggest that PETN intake may ameliorate the effect of brain sparing in the affected neonates.

3.
Front Pediatr ; 12: 1383120, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681773

RESUMO

Introduction: In neonatology, the accurate determination of vital parameters plays a pivotal role in monitoring critically ill newborns and premature infants, as well as aiding in disease diagnosis. In response to the limitations associated with contact-based measurement methods, substantial efforts have been directed toward developing contactless measurement techniques, particularly over the past decade. Methods: Building upon the insights gained from our pilot study, we realized a new investigation to assess the precision of our imaging photoplethysmography-based system within a clinical environment of the neonatal intermediate care unit. We conducted measurements in 20 preterm infants or newborns requiring therapeutic interventions. As a point of reference, we employed a conventional pulse oximeter. To analytically predict measurement artifacts, we analyzed the potential influence of confounding factors, such as motion artifacts, illumination fluctuations (under- and overexposure), and loss of region of interest prior to heart rate evaluation. This reduced the amount of data we evaluated for heart rate to 56.1% of its original volume. Results: In artifact-free time segments, the mean difference between the pulse oximetry and the imaging photoplethysmography-based system for 1 s sampling intervals resulted in -0.2 bpm (95% CI -0.8 to 0.4, LOA ±â€…12.2). For the clinical standard of 8 s averaging time, the mean difference resulted in -0.09 bpm (95% CI -0.7 to 0.6, LOA ±â€…10.1). These results match the medical standards. Discussion: While further research is needed to increase the range of measurable vital parameters and more diverse patient collectives need to be considered in the future, we could demonstrate very high accuracy for non-contact heart rate measurement in newborn infants in the clinical setting, provided artifacts are excluded. In particular, performing a priori signal assessment helps make clinical measurements safer by identifying unreliable readings.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA