Effectiveness of interventions on early neurodevelopment of preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: As preterm infants' neurodevelopment is shaped by NICU-related factors during their hospitalization, it is essential to evaluate which interventions are more beneficial for their neurodevelopment at this specific time. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions initiated during NICU hospitalization on preterm infants' early neurodevelopment during their hospitalization and up to two weeks corrected age (CA). METHODS: This systematic review referred to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017047072). We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, and Web of Science from 2002 to February 2020 and included randomized controlled/clinical trials conducted with preterm infants born between 24 and 366/7 weeks of gestation. All types of interventions instigated during NICU hospitalization were included. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, data extraction, assessment of risks of bias and quality of evidence. RESULTS: Findings of 12 studies involving 901 preterm infants were synthesized. We combined three studies in a meta-analysis showing that compared to standard care, the NIDCAP intervention is effective in improving preterm infants' neurobehavioral and neurological development at two weeks CA. We also combined two other studies in a meta-analysis indicating that parental participation did not significantly improve preterm infants' neurobehavioral development during NICU hospitalization. For all other interventions (i.e., developmental care, sensory stimulation, music and physical therapy), the synthesis of results shows that compared to standard care or other types of comparators, the effectiveness was either controversial or partially effective. CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of evidence was rated low to very low. Future studies are needed to identify interventions that are the most effective in promoting preterm infants' early neurodevelopment during NICU hospitalization or close to term age. Interventions should be appropriately designed to allow comparison with previous studies and a combination of different instruments could provide a more global assessment of preterm infants' neurodevelopment and thus allow for comparisons across studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42017047072 .

Derivation and validation of the Montreal prehospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction activation rule.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital ECGs (phECGs) are the main screening tool used by paramedics to identify ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In the absence of telemetry or personnel trained in ECG interpretation, paramedics must rely on computerized interpretation of phECGs, which suffer from an elevated false-positive (FP) rate, impairing reliable early activation of reperfusion centers by Emergency Medical Services. OBJECTIVE: Develop a clinical prediction rule to reduce the frequency of FPs for STEMI in prehospital patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prehospital patients with a computer interpretation of '***ACUTE MI***' on phECG. We used logistic regression analysis to identify the independent variables for derivation of the rule. Once derived, we validated the rule on a distinct cohort of consecutive phECGs. RESULTS: Among the 654 cases in the derivation cohort, 46.2% were FP STEMIs. Four elements emerged as independent FP predictors: HR ≥ 120, no ongoing chest pain, no interpretable ST-segments in a lead, and presence of baseline wander or pacemaker spikes. In the derivation cohort this rule decreased FPs to 15.1% of the total cohort, while labelling 13.8% of STEMI cases as false-negatives (FNs). In the validation cohort (386 phECGs, 41.7% FPs), the rule decreased FPs down to 8.0%, while 25.9% were FN. CONCLUSION: Use of computer interpretation alone leads to a high STEMI FP rate. A clinical prediction rule based upon four elements available to paramedics can substantially lower the proportion of FPs. This clinical prediction rule should be incorporated into the decision for prehospital activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Prehospital Nitroglycerin in Tachycardic Chest Pain Patients: A Risk for Hypotension or Not?

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association guidelines (AHA) guidelines list tachycardia as a contraindication for the administration of nitroglycerin (NTG), despite limited evidence of adverse events. We sought to determine whether NTG administered for chest pain was a predictor of hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) in patients with tachycardia, compared to patients without tachycardia (50≥ heart rate ≤100). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using patient care reports completed by basic life support (BLS) providers in a large urban Canadian EMS system for the period 2010-2012. We used logistic regression to test the association between post-NTG hypotension and tachycardia, independent of pre-NTG blood pressure, age, sex, and comorbidities. Using identical models, we tested four secondary outcomes (drop in blood pressure, reduced consciousness, bradycardia, and cardiac arrest). RESULTS: The cohort included 10,308 patients who were administered NTG by BLS in the prehospital setting; 2,057 (20%) of patients were tachycardic before NTG administration. Hypotension occurred in 320 of all patients (3.1%): 239 without tachycardia (2.9%) and 81 with tachycardia (3.9%). Compared to non-tachycardic patients, tachycardic patients showed increased adjusted odds of hypotension (AOR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.23-2.08) or of a drop in blood pressure of 30mm Hg or greater (AOR: 1.11; CI: 1.00-1.24). Tachycardia was associated with decreased odds of bradycardia (OR: 0.33; CI: 0.17-0.64). We did not find a significant association between tachycardia and either post-NTG reduced level of consciousness or cardiac arrest. We did find a strong, significant association between pre-NTG blood pressure and post-NTG hypotension (AOR for units of 10mmHg: 0.64; CI: 0.61-0.69). CONCLUSION: Hypotension following prehospital administration of NTG was infrequent in patients with chest pain. However, while the absolute risk of NTG-induced hypotension was low, patients with pre-NTG tachycardia had a significant increase in the relative risk of hypotension. In addition, hypotension occurred most frequently in patients presenting with a lower pre-NTG blood pressure, which may prove to be a more discriminating basis for future guidelines. EMS medical directors should review BLS chest pain protocols to weigh the benefits of NTG administration against its risks.

Prehospital Nitroglycerin Safety in Inferior ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Patients with inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), associated with right ventricular infarction, are thought to be at higher risk of developing hypotension when administered nitroglycerin (NTG). However, current basic life support (BLS) protocols do not differentiate location of STEMI prior to NTG administration. We sought to determine if NTG administration is more likely to be associated with hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) in inferior STEMI compared to non-inferior STEMI. We conducted a retrospective chart review of prehospital patients with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin and computer-interpreted prehospital ECGs indicating "ACUTE MI." We included all local STEMI cases identified as part of our STEMI registry. Univariate analysis was used to compare differences in proportions of hypotension and drop in systolic blood pressure ≥ 30 mmHg after nitroglycerin administration between patients with inferior wall STEMI and those with STEMI in another region (non-inferior). Multiple variable logistic regression analysis was also used to assess the study outcomes while controlling for various factors. Over a 29-month period, we identified 1,466 STEMI cases. Of those, 821 (56.0%) received NTG. We excluded 16 cases because of missing data. Hypotension occurred post NTG in 38/466 inferior STEMIs and 30/339 non-inferior STEMIs, 8.2% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.73. A drop in systolic blood pressure ≥ 30 mmHg post NTG occurred in 23.4% of inferior STEMIs and 23.9% of non-inferior STEMIs, p = 0.87. Interrater agreement for chart review of the primary outcome was excellent (κ = 0.94). NTG administration to patients with chest pain and inferior STEMI on their computer-interpreted electrocardiogram is not associated with a higher rate of hypotension compared to patients with STEMI in other territories. Computer interpretation of inferior STEMI cannot be used as the sole predictor for patients who may be at higher risk for hypotension following NTG administration.